The Idaho Research Activities Credit Start-Up Company Election: Statutory Compliance, Computational Nuance, and Strategic Implementation

I. Executive Summary: The Idaho Start-Up R&D Credit Defined

1.1 Simple Definition

The Start-Up Company Election allows a new Idaho business to adopt a statutorily defined, low Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) for calculating its Idaho Research Activities Credit (R&D credit). This election is designed to maximize the incremental research credit generated by reducing the baseline level of qualified research expenses (QREs) that must be exceeded to begin earning the 5% state tax credit.

1.2 Overview of Strategic Importance and Statutory Basis

The Idaho Research Activities Credit, codified under Idaho Code §63-3029G, provides a nonrefundable credit of five percent (5%) against taxes imposed by Idaho Code sections 63-3024, 63-3025, and 63-3025A for increasing research activities conducted within the state.1 Specifically, the credit is the sum of five percent (5%) of the excess of qualified research expenses (QREs) over the base amount, plus five percent (5%) of qualifying basic research payments.1

For nascent businesses—those without a long history of research expenditures or gross receipts—the calculation of the “base amount” under the standard method can be prohibitive. The standard calculation requires taxpayers to use a fixed-base percentage derived from historical QREs and gross receipts, a calculation often impossible or punitive for companies without adequate operational history. The strategic significance of the Start-Up Election lies in establishing an immediate, low Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP). This favorable FBP is applied to the company’s Average Annual Idaho Gross Receipts (AIGR) to determine the Base Amount.2 By minimizing the Base Amount, the election maximizes “Excess QREs,” thereby maximizing the potential 5% credit generation in the early years of operation.2 The election to use the start-up calculation methodology is made by checking the appropriate box on Idaho Form 67, Credit for Idaho Research Activities.2

The fundamental characteristics of the Idaho Research Activities Credit are summarized in the table below:

Idaho Research Activities Credit Key Features

1.3 Key Differences from Federal Treatment and High-Level Constraints

While Idaho’s credit structure relies heavily on Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, the state provides a unique, independent pathway for the Start-Up Company Election. A critical administrative provision permits a taxpayer to elect to be treated as a start-up company for Idaho purposes, even if they do not meet the criteria for the federal research credit start-up definition, or if they do not qualify as a federal Qualified Small Business (QSB).3

However, this flexibility is coupled with stringent state-specific calculation requirements. When making the election, the taxpayer must adhere to the federal formula structure derived from IRC Section 41 but must substitute Idaho-specific figures.3 This means the calculation must use only Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) incurred for research conducted in Idaho, and only Aggregate Gross Receipts (GR) attributable to Idaho sources.3

The profound reliance on federal tax law means that state credit eligibility is intrinsically linked to compliance with upstream federal requirements. For research expenses to be considered “qualified research” under IRC §41, the underlying expenditures must be eligible for treatment under IRC Section 174.7 Beginning with tax years starting on or after January 1, 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) requires domestic R&D expenditures covered by IRC §174 to be capitalized and amortized over five years.8 Therefore, correct federal adherence to the mandatory amortization of R&D costs is not merely a federal deduction issue, but a critical prerequisite for establishing the legitimacy of the QREs claimed for the state research credit computation. Failure to properly treat expenditures under federal IRC §174 could result in a determination that the expenses do not qualify as QREs for the state credit, thus invalidating the entire Idaho claim.

II. The Statutory and Regulatory Foundation (Idaho Code §63-3029G and IDAPA Rules)

2.1 Idaho’s Adoption of IRC §41: Conformity and Limitation

Idaho’s administrative rules, specifically IDAPA 35.01.01.720, solidify the state’s conformity with federal tax law by requiring the Idaho credit to be computed using the exact same definitions for qualified research expenses, qualified research, and basic research as those found in IRC Section 41.5 If an expense does not qualify for the federal credit, it cannot qualify for the Idaho credit.5

This conformity imposes the rigorous federal four-part test for qualified research activities 2:

1. Section 174 Test: The expenditures must be eligible for treatment as expenses under IRC §174 (research and experimental expenditures).7
2. Technological Information Test: The activity must seek to discover information that is technological in nature, relying fundamentally on principles of physical sciences, biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.2
3. Business Component Test: The discovered information must be intended for use in the development or improvement of a business component (e.g., a product, process, formula, or software).2
4. Process of Experimentation Test: The activity must involve a process of experimentation intended to eliminate uncertainty regarding the capability, method, or appropriate design of the new or improved component.7 The necessary uncertainty may exist even if technical feasibility is known, provided the method or design remains unclear.8

Taxpayers seeking the credit are advised by the Idaho State Tax Commission to ensure they identify the discrete business components that were the subject of the research and provide documentation supporting the elimination of technical uncertainty, as this is a key focus during examination.9

2.2 Sourcing Requirements: The “Conducted in Idaho” Mandate

Idaho law imposes a strict geographic limitation: the credit is calculated only based on research activities conducted in Idaho.5 This ensures the incentive directly targets and supports Idaho-based economic activity.

The sourcing requirement applies to all three primary categories of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) 2:

1. In-House Wages: Salaries and wages paid to employees must be allocated based on the time spent performing, supervising, or directly supporting qualified research activities within the geographical boundaries of Idaho.
2. Supplies: Costs for materials, tools, and prototypes must be consumed in Idaho during the research process.
3. Contract Research: Payments made to third-party contractors are generally included at a rate of 65% of the expense, but only if the contracted services were performed in Idaho.2

For taxpayers operating in multiple states, compliance necessitates robust record-keeping systems capable of tracking employee time and expense usage by physical location to accurately segregate Idaho QREs from non-Idaho QREs.11

2.3 Limitations, Ordering, and Carryforward

The credit for Idaho research activities is nonrefundable, meaning it can only offset a tax liability and cannot generate a cash refund.2

The amount of the credit that can be claimed in any taxable year is limited to the taxpayer’s Idaho tax liability after allowing for all other applicable credits.5 Idaho regulations specify a strict priority order for applying nonrefundable credits 13: the Idaho Research Credit must be applied after other credits, including:

1. Credit for tax paid to other states.
2. Credit for contributions to Idaho educational entities.
3. Investment tax credit.
4. Credit for contributions to Idaho youth and rehabilitation facilities.

Any unused credit resulting from the limitation may be carried forward for up to 14 tax years.2 When a taxpayer possesses credits earned in multiple years, the regulations require that the oldest credits be applied first (a First-In, First-Out, or FIFO, basis).4 Pass-through entities, such as S corporations and partnerships, are permitted to allocate the credit to their owners for broader utilization.2

III. Implementing the Start-Up Company Election (IDAPA 35.01.01.721)

3.1 Eligibility and Mechanics of the State-Specific Election

The Idaho State Tax Commission provides specific administrative rules regarding the Start-Up Company Election under IDAPA 35.01.01.721. This rule grants taxpayers strategic flexibility by decoupling the Idaho election from the federal definition of a start-up company.

A taxpayer who qualifies as a start-up company for the federal research credit must be treated as a start-up company for the Idaho credit.3 However, the rules explicitly permit a taxpayer to elect to be treated as a start-up company for the Idaho research credit even if they do not meet the qualification requirements for the federal credit under IRC §41(c)(3)(B).3 This independence allows a company that may have exceeded the federal gross receipts threshold but is still in the early years of generating Idaho-sourced research expenditures to take advantage of the favorable introductory Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP).

The election is simple to execute, requiring the taxpayer to check the appropriate box on Form 67, Credit for Idaho Research Activities, which must be filed with the taxpayer’s annual Idaho income tax return.3

3.2 The Irrevocability Mandate and Strategic Risk Assessment

A crucial compliance element associated with this election is its permanence. Idaho administrative guidance dictates that the election to be treated as a start-up company under Section 63-3029G, Idaho Code, is irrevocable once it has been made.2

This irrevocable nature necessitates meticulous long-term financial forecasting before the initial Form 67 is submitted. The election binds the taxpayer to the IRC §41 start-up FBP rules for all future credit years, particularly the transition rules beginning in Year 6. Taxpayers must project their future trajectory, specifically analyzing the relationship between anticipated Idaho QREs and projected Idaho Gross Receipts (GR). If the ratio of QREs to GR declines substantially after the initial five-year period, the historical blended FBP calculated in later years could potentially rise to an unfavorable level (up to the 16% cap).2 A higher FBP results in a larger Base Amount that must be exceeded before the 5% incremental credit can be earned, thereby diminishing the credit benefit in mature years. Taxpayers must ensure the long-term benefits of the low introductory FBP outweigh the potential computational disadvantages of the blended rate phase-in that begins in Year 6.

IV. Calculating the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) for Start-Ups

The purpose of the Start-Up Election is to simplify the calculation of the Base Amount, which is fundamentally determined by the product of the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) and the Average Annual Idaho Gross Receipts (AIGR) for the four preceding tax years.2

4.1 Required Data Substitution and Methodology

When a taxpayer elects start-up status for Idaho, the federal rules under IRC Section 41 must be utilized to determine the FBP, but with two mandatory substitutions that localize the calculation to Idaho 3:

1. Qualified Research Expenses (QREs): The calculation must include only QREs for research conducted in Idaho.
2. Aggregate Gross Receipts (GR): The calculation must include only gross receipts attributable to Idaho sources.

4.2 FBP Determination Timeline (Form 67 Instructions)

The applicable FBP is determined by referencing the number of tax years, beginning after 1993, that the taxpayer has incurred Idaho QREs. The Idaho State Tax Commission’s instructions for Form 67 govern the phase-in schedule:

Years 1 through 5: The 3% Introductory Rate

If the current year is the first through fifth tax year after 1993 in which the taxpayer incurred qualified research expenses conducted in Idaho, the taxpayer utilizes the simplified rate.3 In this period, the Fixed-Base Percentage is automatically set at 3.0%.3

For these initial years, the taxpayer enters the year number (e.g., “1st,” “2nd,” up to “5th”) on Form 67, Part B, Line 1, and then enters 3% on Line 5, bypassing the historical ratio computations that apply later.3

Years 6 and Later: Transition to Historical Blending

Beginning with the sixth tax year that the taxpayer has incurred Idaho QREs, the FBP must transition from the mandatory 3% rate to a blended rate based on the taxpayer’s actual historical activity.3

This calculation involves using the actual ratio of Idaho QREs to Idaho Gross Receipts incurred between the 5th preceding year and the immediately preceding year. The Form 67 instructions provide a table that dictates the phase-in percentage applied to this ratio, gradually moving toward a fully historical rate. For instance, if the current year is the 8th tax year, the instructions mandate entering 50% on Line 4 of Form 67, indicating that 50% of the historical average ratio is used in the blended rate calculation.3 Regardless of the calculated historical ratio, the FBP is statutorily capped at 16%.2

V. Definitional Guidance on Idaho-Sourced Inputs

5.1 Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) Sourcing Guidance

For the purposes of the Idaho research credit, QREs must meet both the technical qualification tests under IRC §41 and the physical sourcing test: the research activities must be physically performed within Idaho.3 This requirement emphasizes the need for robust internal systems to track employee labor and resource consumption by location. The QRE documentation must clearly demonstrate that the wages, supplies, and contracted services were all used for qualified research activities executed in Idaho.2

5.2 Aggregate Gross Receipts – Idaho Apportionment Rules

The Average Annual Idaho Gross Receipts (AIGR) figure, which is multiplied by the FBP, must adhere strictly to Idaho’s multistate apportionment rules. Idaho State Tax Commission rules dictate that gross receipts include only those receipts attributable to sources within Idaho, following Idaho Code §63-3027(q) and (r).4

Definition and Sourcing Methodology

Gross receipts are generally defined as receipts net of returns and allowances from the sale of real, tangible, or intangible property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.3 The attribution of these receipts to Idaho is based primarily on the location of the purchaser and the shipment destination:

• Receipts are attributable to Idaho if the property is delivered or shipped to a purchaser in Idaho.3
• For sales to the U.S. government, receipts are considered Idaho gross receipts if the property is shipped from an office, store, warehouse, factory, or other place of storage located in Idaho.3

AIGR Calculation and Historical Data Challenge

To calculate the AIGR required for the Base Amount formula, the taxpayer must total the Idaho Gross Receipts for the four preceding tax years and divide that amount by four.3 This figure is entered on Form 67, Part C, Line 2.3

The process of accurately determining the AIGR presents a significant compliance and logistical challenge, particularly for younger companies that may be electing start-up status. The taxpayer must retroactively apply Idaho’s specific apportionment rules to the sales data spanning the four preceding years.3 If the company was not historically tracking sales data based on Idaho destination or shipping origin with the precision required by the state’s apportionment statute, reconstructing this historical sales data accurately and defensively can be costly and time-consuming. The defensibility of the entire R&D credit claim ultimately rests on the ability of the taxpayer to verify that these historical gross receipts were correctly sourced and calculated according to Idaho law.

VI. Computational Analysis: Derivation of the Credit

6.1 Formulaic Breakdown and the Minimum 50% Floor

The Idaho research credit is determined by the Base Amount calculation, which itself is subject to a statutory minimum floor designed to ensure the credit is truly incremental and rewards increased research investment.2

The Base Amount used on Form 67 is determined as the greater of two results:

$$\text{Base Amount} = \text{MAX} \begin{cases} (\text{Fixed-Base Percentage}) \times (\text{Average Annual Idaho Gross Receipts}) \\ 50\% \times (\text{Current Year Idaho QREs}) \end{cases}$$

The 50% Floor is critical, as it dictates that the base amount must be at least 50% of the current year’s Idaho QREs.2 This prevents a company that has low or zero historical gross receipts (AIGR) from claiming the 5% credit on more than 50% of its current qualified research expenditures. This provision stabilizes the state’s tax base by ensuring that the credit incentivizes investment above a substantial baseline threshold, particularly for early-stage companies where the 3% FBP method would otherwise yield a negligible Base Amount.

Once the Final Base Amount is determined, it is subtracted from the Current Year Idaho QREs to calculate the Excess QREs. The final Idaho Research Credit is 5% of this resulting Excess QRE amount.2

6.2 Comprehensive Illustrative Example: Start-Up Company Election in Year 4

This example demonstrates the calculation of the Idaho Research Credit for an electing start-up company (Innovate ID Corp, AIC) in its fourth year of research activity, illustrating how the 50% minimum floor often governs the calculation in the initial growth phase.

Scenario Parameters: Innovate ID Corp (AIC) – Year 4 (2025)

AIC began qualified research in 2022 and irrevocably elected Start-Up status.

Calculation for Year 4 (2025):

Step 1: Determine Applicable Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP)

• Since 2025 is the 4th tax year after 1993 with Idaho QREs (2022-2025), the FBP under the Start-Up Election is the statutory minimum: 3.0%.3

Step 2: Calculate Average Annual Idaho Gross Receipts (AIGR)

• AIGR lookback years are the four preceding years (2021-2024).3
• Sum of IGR: $\$0 (2021) + \$500,000 (2022) + \$1,000,000 (2023) + \$2,500,000 (2024) = \$4,000,000$.
• AIGR: $\$4,000,000 / 4 = \mathbf{\$1,000,000}$.

Step 3: Calculate Potential Base Amounts

• Base Amount (FBP Method): $3.0\% \times \$1,000,000 = \mathbf{\$30,000}$.
• Base Amount (50% Floor): $50\% \times \text{Current Year QREs} (\$350,000) = \mathbf{\$175,000}$.2

Step 4: Determine Final Base Amount

• The Final Base Amount is the greater of the two potential amounts.2
• Final Base Amount = $\mathbf{\$175,000}$.

Step 5: Calculate Excess QREs

• Current Idaho QREs ($\$350,000$) – Final Base Amount ($\$175,000$) = $\mathbf{\$175,000}$.

Step 6: Calculate Idaho Research Credit

• $5\% \times \text{Excess QREs} (\$175,000) = \mathbf{\$8,750}$.

Step 7: Apply Limitation and Carryforward

• Credit earned is $\$8,750$.
• Available Tax Liability is $\$10,000$.5
• The full credit of $\$8,750$ is utilized to offset the income tax liability, and there is no carryforward.2

VII. Compliance and Strategic Recommendations

7.1 Administrative Filing Procedures (Form 67)

The Idaho research credit is claimed by completing and submitting Form 67, Credit for Idaho Research Activities, which must be included with the taxpayer’s annual Idaho income tax return.11

Form 67 provides explicit sections for indicating start-up status.3 Taxpayers must check the appropriate box confirming their status either as a federal start-up company (which automatically confers state status) or electing independent Idaho start-up status.3

For corporations included in a unitary group, the rules are specific: the corporation that earns the credit must first claim the credit against its own Idaho income tax liability to the extent permitted.6 Only the amount of the credit carryover and the credit earned that exceeds this limitation may be shared with other members of the unitary group.6 The taxpayer must provide a detailed calculation schedule identifying the credit earned, the amount used by each member, and the computation of any resulting credit carryovers.3

7.2 Strategic Considerations for Election Management

Because the Start-Up Company Election is irrevocable, strategic management must focus on optimizing the credit over the full lifespan of the company, not just the initial five years.

One critical planning aspect is modeling the interaction between the low 3% FBP and the 50% floor rule. As demonstrated in the example (Section 6.2), the 50% floor typically serves as the binding limitation for early-stage companies heavily investing in research prior to high revenue generation. Companies must project the crossover point—the year in which the Base Amount calculated using the 3% FBP multiplied by the AIGR finally exceeds the 50% floor of current QREs. Once that crossover occurs, the 3% FBP allows the company to generate the maximum incremental credit possible until Year 6, when the FBP starts blending into the higher historical rate.

For taxpayers operating within a unitary group, tax planning should prioritize centralizing Qualified Research Expenses in Idaho within the member entity that is projected to have sufficient Idaho income tax liability to absorb the credit immediately. This ensures efficient utilization of the nonrefundable credit before it enters the 14-year carryforward period or is shared with other members.16

7.3 Documentation and Audit Defense

Due to the state’s strict sourcing and conformity requirements, taxpayers must maintain comprehensive records to successfully defend their credit claim during an examination by the Idaho State Tax Commission.11

1. Technical Support: Maintain documentation for all projects that verifies the application of the four-part test, specifically establishing the technical uncertainty that the research sought to resolve and the rigorous process of experimentation used to eliminate that uncertainty.8
2. QRE Sourcing: Meticulous financial records are necessary to prove that wages, supplies, and contract research were incurred specifically for research activities physically conducted in Idaho. This is particularly vital for wages, requiring time tracking that links employee effort to qualified activities and physical location.2
3. Apportionment Records: The accuracy of the historical sales data used to compute the Average Annual Idaho Gross Receipts (AIGR) must be substantiated. This requires maintaining records that demonstrate the correct, retroactive application of Idaho’s apportionment rules (delivery destination or shipping origin for government sales) for the four tax years preceding the credit year.3 The defensibility of the Base Amount calculation hinges directly on the integrity of this historical apportionment data.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/