Analysis and Application of Wages for Qualified Services (WQS) for the Idaho Research and Development Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: Defining Wages for Qualified Services (WQS) and Strategic Context

Wages for Qualified Services (WQS) constitute the employee compensation directly attributable to activities that qualify as research under federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41. For the Idaho research credit, WQS are strictly limited to those amounts paid for qualified services physically performed by the employee within the geographical boundaries of the State of Idaho.1

WQS are the foundational element of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) for most technology and manufacturing taxpayers claiming the credit for increasing research activities in Idaho (Idaho Code §63-3029G). This credit provides a nonrefundable 5% credit on incremental QREs that exceed a predetermined historical base amount.3 The comprehensive inclusion of WQS is essential for maximizing the credit, which, due to its nonrefundable nature, offers significant long-term tax relief via a generous 14-year carryforward period.3 WQS are reported specifically on Line 4 of Idaho Form 67 (Credit for Idaho Research Activities).2

A. Report Overview and Strategic Context

The Idaho research credit is specifically designed to incentivize technological advancements and investment within the state.5 Since Idaho’s credit structure mirrors the federal IRC §41 framework, the primary definitional criteria for WQS and QREs are governed by federal regulations.2 However, the state imposes a critical jurisdictional limitation: only amounts related to research conducted in Idaho qualify for the state credit.2 The largest dollar value component of QREs is typically WQS, making the precise and defensible calculation of this figure paramount for generating substantial incremental credits.2

B. Summary of Key Compliance Risk Areas

The application of Idaho law presents specific compliance hurdles, particularly for multi-state taxpayers. The most significant area of risk centers on the dual requirements of qualification and sourcing.

First, the Sourcing Risk for WQS is defined by the strict geographical requirement. Idaho requires proof that the qualified services were physically performed within the state. Unlike general income tax nexus rules that might permit simplified apportionment methods for income sourcing, the Idaho R&D credit demands a specific, granular allocation of employee time based on where the qualified activity physically occurred.1 If an Idaho-based R&D employee works remotely or travels outside the state, the corresponding portion of wages must be excluded from WQS.

Second, the Documentation Risk arises from the need to substantiate the link between the employee’s compensation and the qualified activity. While federal guidance does not explicitly mandate time tracking documentation 8, Idaho State Tax Commission (ISTC) audit history indicates a high degree of scrutiny for retrospective estimates.9 Taxpayers must ensure their allocation methodologies are robust, justifiable, and demonstrate a clear nexus between the claimed wages and the qualifying research performed.

II. Statutory Nexus: WQS Under Idaho and Federal Law

A. The Foundational Federal Standard (IRC §41) and Idaho’s Conformity

Idaho Code §63-3029G aligns the state’s research credit provisions closely with the federal credit for increasing research activities outlined in IRC Section 41.3 Specifically, Idaho explicitly adopts the federal definitions of “basic research payments,” “basic research,” “qualified research expenses,” and “qualified research”.2 This means that for an expenditure to be considered a QRE, including WQS, it must first satisfy the comprehensive requirements of federal tax law, irrespective of the separate state sourcing rules.

The term “wages” for WQS purposes is defined by reference to IRC Section 3401(a).10 This scope includes all compensation subject to income tax withholding, such as regular salaries, commissions, and bonuses reported on an employee’s Form W-2. Critically, amounts that are generally excluded from withholding—such as certain fringe benefits or non-taxed income—are explicitly excluded from WQS, even if paid to employees engaged in qualified research activities.10

B. Defining “Qualified Services” (The Three Tiers of Engagement)

Qualified services represent the labor component of the QRE calculation. The definition of qualified services dictates that 100% of the employee’s time spent in these functions is includible as a QRE, provided the underlying research activity is deemed “qualified research”.1 These services are categorized into three distinct tiers:

1. Direct Performance: This refers to the actual, hands-on execution of the qualified research activities, such as a software engineer writing code for a new application feature or a technician running tests on a prototype.1
2. Direct Supervision: This category encompasses the immediate management and technical oversight of personnel directly performing qualified research. The supervision must be technical and directly related to the research process, not administrative or general business management oversight.1
3. Direct Support: These are services that are essential and proximate to the conduct of qualified research. Examples include a laboratory technician maintaining research equipment, or a data clerk compiling and inputting data derived from experiments directly into a research database.1

C. The Mandatory Qualified Research Test (IRC §41(d) Four-Part Criteria)

Wages compensated for services are only credit-eligible if the underlying research activity itself meets the stringent four-part test for “qualified research” adopted directly from IRC Section 41(d).2 The successful application of this test is the gateway requirement for claiming any WQS.

The four criteria are:

1. IRC Section 174 Requirement: The expenditures must be those that can be treated as expenses under IRC §174 (research and experimental expenditures).2
2. Technological in Nature: The activity must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information that is technological in nature, relying fundamentally on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.2 Research in non-technological fields—such as economics, business management, behavioral sciences, arts, or humanities—is expressly excluded from qualification.2
3. Business Component Test: The information discovered through the activity must be intended for use in the development of a new or improved business component of the taxpayer. A business component can be any product, process, computer software, technique, formula, or invention.2
4. Process of Experimentation: Substantially all (typically interpreted as 80% or more) of the research activities must constitute elements of a process of experimentation designed to eliminate technological uncertainty.2 Uncertainty exists if the information available to the taxpayer does not establish the capability, method, or appropriate design for developing or improving the product.11

D. Detailed Analysis of Statutory Nexus Implications

The reliance of Idaho law on the definitions within IRC Section 41 establishes a critical relationship between federal and state compliance. The audit defensibility of Idaho WQS begins with the successful documentation of the federal four-part test. If a taxpayer fails to prove that the underlying activity qualifies federally—for instance, if the process of experimentation did not effectively address technological uncertainty—the Idaho wages are automatically disallowed, regardless of where the services were performed. State and Local Tax (SALT) practitioners must therefore ensure adherence to the complex federal technical standards before attempting state-level wage sourcing.

Furthermore, the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) introduced a significant change requiring R&D expenditures to be capitalized and amortized over five years for domestic research, effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2022.11 This change impacts the federal taxable income calculation, converting what was previously an immediate deduction into a capitalized asset. However, this required amortization does not alter the core definition of WQS as a Qualified Research Expense for credit purposes.12 This necessitates compliance bifurcation: taxpayers must diligently track WQS for the nonrefundable credit computation while separately adhering to the capitalization and amortization rules for federal deduction purposes. Specialized bookkeeping and documentation are required to avoid conflating the deduction treatment with the credit eligibility.

III. Idaho State Tax Commission Guidance on Allocation and Sourcing

A. The Definitive State Limitation: Services “Performed in Idaho”

Idaho’s single most important modification to the federal standard is the strict sourcing requirement. The state credit is earned by increasing research activities in Idaho 2, and Form 67, Line 4, specifically requests “Wages for qualified services performed in Idaho“.2 This rule establishes that only the portion of WQS that corresponds to labor physically rendered within the state is eligible for the credit.

For multi-state businesses, this strict sourcing requirement means that general income apportionment factors used to determine overall Idaho income cannot be substituted for specific time tracking of R&D personnel. The physical location of the employee while conducting the qualified service is the sole determinant of eligibility. This mandates careful review of travel logs, remote work policies, and employee calendars to accurately allocate R&D time between Idaho and non-Idaho locations.

B. Reporting WQS on Idaho Form 67

The ISTC requires taxpayers to utilize Form 67 to calculate the Idaho research credit.2 The reporting structure on Form 67 differentiates between basic research payments (which only certain corporations complete on Lines 1 through 3) and general QREs.2

Wages for Qualified Services performed in Idaho are entered on Line 4.2 This is the starting point for calculating QREs for all entities other than qualifying corporations (e.g., individuals, S corporations, partnerships, trusts, estates, personal holding companies, and service organizations).2 WQS are then summed with:

• Cost of supplies used in Idaho (Line 5).1
• Rental or lease costs of qualifying off-premise computers used in research conducted in Idaho (Line 6).1
• 65% of contract research expenses paid or incurred for qualified research conducted in Idaho (Line 7).1

The summation of these amounts results in the Total Qualified Research Expenses for Research Conducted in Idaho (Line 8).2

C. Allocation Methodology and Audit Defensibility

The calculation of WQS requires determining the percentage of an employee’s total W-2 wages that correlates directly to their time spent performing qualified services in Idaho.

The Idaho Tax Commission has examined the documentation methodologies used for wage allocation in audits. In one administrative review, the taxpayer’s representative relied on estimated R&D percentages (e.g., 60% or 65%) based on extensive, conversational interviews (lasting 1-2 hours) with the business owner.9 The taxpayer did not utilize a formal questionnaire or a contemporaneous time tracking system. The representative argued that this retrospective estimation was reasonable based on their experience and cited precedents supporting the use of estimates.9

However, the ISTC Appeals division scrutinized this approach, demanding that the calculation methodology establish a “significant connection or nexus” between the allocated wages and the qualified research activities.9 The close examination of retrospective estimation signals that, while the ISTC may not mandate specific documentation like time sheets 8, reliance on post-year-end subjective interviews substantially increases the risk profile of the claim.9 To withstand an audit, taxpayers must generate verifiable documentation that justifies the percentage of time allocated, demonstrating both the qualified nature of the activity (passing the four-part test) and the physical location of its performance.

D. Detailed Analysis of Sourcing and Compliance

The State of Idaho applies an exceptionally strict geographic sourcing requirement. This strict approach is evidenced not only by the Form 67 language but also by administrative decisions regarding other QRE components. For instance, the Tax Commission has disallowed Contract Research Expenses paid to vendors located outside Idaho for design work, software development, or other services performed outside the state.15 This provides a strong indication of how rigorously the ISTC will enforce the “conducted in Idaho” limitation on the largest QRE component—WQS.

The practical implication for multi-state entities or those utilizing remote R&D talent is the need for highly specific documentation. If an R&D engineer is based in Utah but travels to the Idaho facility 50% of the time, only the wages attributable to the 50% of time physically spent in Idaho performing qualified services are includible in WQS. Reliance on generic apportionment factors or imprecise memory of time allocation, particularly in an audit scenario, will likely lead to partial or total disallowance of WQS. Therefore, for audit defensibility, investment in simplified, contemporaneous project time tracking or detailed calendar logs is highly advisable to clearly document both the type of service performed and the location of performance.16

IV. Practical Application and Example Calculation

A. Overview of Idaho Credit Generation

The Idaho Credit for Increasing Research Activities provides a 5% credit on the amount by which current-year Idaho QREs exceed a calculated base amount.3 The credit is earned by demonstrating an increase in qualifying research activities conducted within the state.2

The calculation process involves three critical stages:

1. Determine current-year total Idaho QREs (Lines 4-8 on Form 67).
2. Determine the Base Amount (Lines 9-11 on Form 67).
3. Calculate the incremental credit (Lines 12-13 on Form 67).

B. Example Scenario Setup: InnovateTech LLC

Consider InnovateTech LLC, a company developing specialized industrial software. The company is based in Boise, Idaho, but employs personnel who occasionally travel or work remotely. The company needs to calculate its WQS for the current tax year to include on Form 67, Line 4. The company utilizes a detailed system to track time spent on qualifying activities and the corresponding physical location. Total R&D-related salaries for the year amounted to $\$345,000$.

C. Step 1: Sourcing and Allocation of Wages to Idaho QREs (WQS)

The allocation of total wages to WQS requires a dual-filter approach: first, confirming the percentage of time spent on qualified services (Direct Performance, Direct Supervision, Direct Support), and second, confirming the physical location where those services were rendered.

Table 2: Hypothetical Calculation of Idaho Qualified Services Wages (WQS)

The Total Idaho Qualified Wages of $\$165,750$ would be entered on Idaho Form 67, Line 4.

For the Project Manager, the WQS calculation applies the Idaho physical location filter before the qualified service percentage:

$$\text{WQS} = \text{Total Wages} \times \text{Idaho Location Percentage} \times \text{Qualified Service Percentage}$$

$$\text{WQS} = \$120,000 \times 0.50 \times 0.20 = \$12,000$$

This demonstrates the critical nature of the state-specific sourcing rule, which applies regardless of the employee’s title or overall importance to the company’s research efforts.

D. Step 2: Integrating WQS into Total Idaho QREs

Assuming InnovateTech LLC also had other qualified research expenses that satisfy the Idaho sourcing rules:

• Wages for Qualified Services (WQS) (Line 4): $\$165,750$
• Cost of Supplies Used in Idaho (Line 5): $\$35,000$
• Rental/Lease Costs of Qualifying Computers Used in Idaho (Line 6): $\$0$
• Contract Research Expenses (65%) paid to Idaho Contractors (Line 7): $\$50,000$

The Total Idaho QREs (Form 67, Line 8) amount to:

$$\$165,750 + \$35,000 + \$0 + \$50,000 = \$250,750$$

E. Step 3: Base Amount Determination and Final Credit Calculation

The Base Amount is calculated by multiplying the taxpayer’s fixed-base percentage by the average annual Idaho gross receipts for the four tax years preceding the credit year.3 The gross receipts calculation must adhere strictly to Idaho’s multistate corporation apportionment rules, including only gross receipts attributable to Idaho.2

For the purposes of this example, assume that InnovateTech LLC’s historical fixed-base percentage calculation yields 10%. However, Idaho law mandates a crucial restriction: the Base Amount cannot be less than 50% of the current-year QREs.3

Table 3: Summary of Idaho R&D Credit Calculation Components

F. Strategic Considerations for Calculation

The Base Amount calculation involves key strategic decisions, particularly for new or rapidly growing businesses. Taxpayers treated as start-up companies for federal purposes may elect, on Form 67, to be treated as a start-up for Idaho purposes.2 This election uses a simplified federal formula applied with Idaho data, but it is irrevocable once made.2 Furthermore, the calculated fixed-base percentage under any method cannot exceed 16%.2 This ceiling, coupled with the 50% floor on the Base Amount, introduces complex long-term tax planning considerations. A company must weigh the immediate benefit of a lower starting base (often resulting from the start-up election) against the permanent lock-in of the methodology, which could constrain credit generation if the ratio of R&D expenses to gross receipts increases substantially in the future.

V. Conclusion and Strategic Compliance Recommendations

The Idaho Credit for Increasing Research Activities represents a vital financial incentive for companies investing in innovation within the state.6 The effectiveness of this incentive hinges significantly on the accurate identification and defensible allocation of Wages for Qualified Services (WQS). The credit’s 5% rate on incremental QREs, coupled with the 14-year carryforward period, underscores the importance of rigorous compliance to maximize the pool of qualifying expenses.3

A. Key Compliance Recommendations for WQS

1. Mandatory Dual Eligibility Screening: Taxpayers must implement a comprehensive two-step verification process for every dollar of WQS claimed. First, the underlying activity must satisfy the four-part Qualified Research Test (IRC §41).2 Second, the taxpayer must demonstrate that the services were physically rendered by the employee within Idaho.1
2. Robust Sourcing Methodology: Due to Idaho’s strict geographic sourcing rule, businesses with traveling or remote R&D personnel must maintain granular, auditable records establishing the physical location of services performed. General income apportionment factors are not sufficient to meet this specific R&D credit requirement. Relying on detailed, near-contemporaneous project logs or calendar entries for highly compensated R&D employees is the established best practice for mitigating sourcing risk during an ISTC examination.
3. Documentation of Nexus: While the ISTC may not mandate specific time tracking, audit precedents clearly indicate that retrospective allocation based solely on subjective interviews is highly vulnerable to challenge.9 Documentation must establish a clear nexus linking the compensated time, the employee’s role (Direct Performance, Supervision, or Support), and the specific technical uncertainty the qualified research activity was designed to eliminate.

B. Strategic Consideration: Maximizing the QRE Pool

The 5% credit is calculated only on incremental QREs, meaning the efficiency of the credit is realized only to the extent that current spending exceeds the calculated Base Amount. Given that WQS are typically the largest QRE component, ensuring every eligible dollar of Idaho-sourced labor is correctly captured and documented is critical for generating usable credit and securing the long-term tax benefit provided by the carryforward period.3 Failure to substantiate WQS reduces the total QREs (Form 67, Line 8), which, in turn, minimizes the Excess QREs (Line 12) and directly limits the resulting credit.

C. Advisory Note on Federal Tax Law Interplay (IRC §174)

The modification to federal law requiring the capitalization and amortization of domestic R&D costs beginning in 2022 introduces an additional compliance layer.11 Taxpayers must maintain meticulous records to clearly distinguish between R&D expenditures used for federal credit purposes (WQS and QREs, calculated via Form 67) and R&D expenditures capitalized for federal deduction purposes (amortization). Although the federal deduction treatment does not affect the Idaho credit calculation, conflating these two distinct tax treatments can lead to significant audit exposure and calculation errors at both the federal and state level.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/