Expert Report: Navigating the Exclusion for Customer Adaptation in the Illinois R&D Tax Credit (35 ILCS 5/201(k))

I. Executive Summary: Defining the Adaptation Exclusion

The Exclusion for Adaptation of Existing Components is a statutory limitation prohibiting the claim of the Research and Development (R&D) tax credit for routine customization efforts. This exclusion specifically applies to research related to tailoring a pre-existing product or process solely to meet a particular customer’s unique requirement or need.1

The Federal-State Link: IRC $\text{§}41(\text{d})(4)(\text{B})$ in the Illinois Context

The legal foundation for the Illinois R&D Tax Credit is intrinsically linked to Federal tax standards. The Illinois credit (35 ILCS 5/201(k)) explicitly mandates that “Qualifying expenses” must adhere to the definition of qualified research expenses (QREs) stipulated under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41.1 Consequently, all Federal exclusions defined within IRC $\text{§}41(\text{d})(4)$, including the exclusion for the Adaptation of Existing Business Components (IRC $\text{§}41(\text{d})(4)(\text{B})$), are fully adopted and enforced by the Illinois Department of Revenue (IDOR) for the state credit.3 This reliance on Federal definitions requires Illinois businesses to maintain robust compliance procedures that differentiate non-qualifying routine engineering adaptation from genuine qualified research—research that involves resolving a demonstrable technological uncertainty through a systematic process of experimentation.4

II. The Regulatory Foundation: Linking Illinois Law to Federal Standards

Compliance with the Illinois R&D credit hinges entirely on adherence to Federal definitions, meaning state qualification is determined by Federal regulatory and judicial interpretations.

2.1. Statutory Authority of the Illinois R&D Tax Credit

The Illinois R&D credit is authorized under the Illinois Income Tax Act (IITA) Section 201(k) and is available for tax years ending prior to January 1, 2027.1 The credit is nonrefundable but allows for unused portions to be carried forward.6

The credit is calculated as 6.5% of the increase in qualifying expenses for increasing research activities in Illinois over a base amount.2 This “base amount” is determined by calculating the average of qualifying expenses incurred during the three taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year.3 The central determinant of eligibility, however, is the state’s express requirement that all claimed expenditures must qualify under the Federal IRC Section 41.1

2.2. The Definitive Requirement: The IRC Section 41 Four-Part Test

For any activity in Illinois to generate qualifying expenses (QREs), it must satisfy the four-part test codified in IRC $\text{§}41(\text{d})$.7 The adaptation exclusion is often triggered when activities fail one or more of these fundamental criteria, particularly the element of uncertainty. The test requires:

1. Permitted Purpose: The research must seek to create or improve a business component’s function, performance, reliability, or quality.1
2. Elimination of Uncertainty: The activity must be intended to resolve a technical uncertainty regarding the product’s capability, the methodology for achieving the goal, or the appropriate design.7
3. Technological in Nature: The principles relied upon to resolve the uncertainty must be rooted in a physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.7
4. Process of Experimentation (POE): The research must employ a systematic method, such as testing, modeling, or rigorous design alternative evaluation, to resolve the technical uncertainty.4

Activities undertaken to satisfy a specific customer request that do not rise to the level of resolving a genuine technological uncertainty—i.e., they use known methods to fit an existing solution to a new parameter—are classified as excluded adaptation.

2.3. IDOR Guidance and Official Exclusions

The Illinois Department of Revenue (IDOR) incorporates the Federal exclusions directly into its administrative guidelines. The rules are detailed in the Illinois Administrative Code, specifically 86 Ill. Admin. Code 100.2160.5

Furthermore, the IDOR’s instructional material for Schedule 1299-I explicitly lists the activities that do not constitute qualified research.1 This list, mirroring IRC $\text{§}41(\text{d})(4)$, clearly bars the credit for: “research adapting an existing product or process to a particular customer’s need”.1 This reinforces that the IDOR accepts no exceptions for customer adaptation unless the activity transcends mere tailoring by resolving a technological uncertainty applicable to the general trade or business.

III. Deep Analysis of the Adaptation Exclusion (IRC $\text{§}41(\text{d})(4)(\text{B})$)

The purpose of the exclusion is to ensure that routine business functions, such as customization and order fulfillment, are not subsidized by the R&D credit, reserving the incentive solely for technological advancement.

3.1. Exclusion Defined: Research Related to the Adaptation of an Existing Component

The exclusion targets activities where the primary objective is fitting a pre-existing business component—which can be a product, process, or software—to the specific demands of a single buyer.8 The statutory language is focused on the term “particular customer’s requirement or need”.8

The key distinction is based on the intended outcome: if the work results in a general improvement to the underlying component that will benefit future customers or the taxpayer’s operations generally, it may qualify. If, however, the improvement is solely relevant to the customer’s unique installation or specifications, it is excluded adaptation. Research relating to style, taste, or cosmetic factors is also non-qualifying, reinforcing that only technical advancements are eligible.8

3.2. Treasury Regulation Interpretation: Irrelevance of Performance and Payment

Federal regulations provide definitive examples that guide the interpretation of this exclusion for all jurisdictions, including Illinois. Treasury Regulation $\text{§}1.41-4(\text{c})$ establishes that research undertaken to adapt a core program, such as general ledger accounting software, to the unique needs of a specific customer is excluded from the definition of qualified research.11

A critical clarification provided by the regulations is the irrelevance of the contractual arrangement. The exclusion applies regardless of who pays for the activity or who performs it.11 If a customer hires an external firm to perform the adaptation, the payments made by the customer are not for qualified research (Example 4). Likewise, if the customer uses its own employees to perform the adaptation, the wages paid are not considered in-house research expenses (Example 5).11 This analysis confirms that the IDOR will judge eligibility strictly based on the technical nature of the activity, divorced from the commercial context.

3.3. Differentiation Checklist: Routine Customization vs. Qualified Research

The determination of qualification hinges upon demonstrating that the activity moved beyond routine engineering. Routine design adaptations, even when complex or costly, are generally excluded because the required steps involve decisions or selections between known options, rather than the systematic resolution of a fundamental technological uncertainty.4

It is important to note that the sheer cost of an improvement activity does not validate it as R&D; cost alone does not qualify an improvement activity for the credit.12 However, activities that involved a systematic Process of Experimentation aimed at resolving uncertainty—even if they ultimately resulted in an unsuccessful product improvement—may still generate qualifying expenses.12 The focus must be on the process of discovery, not the successful commercial outcome.

IV. Strategic Compliance: The Pathway to Overcoming the Exclusion

Successfully claiming credits for research initiated by customer contracts requires demonstrating that the need surpassed a commercial or configuration requirement and became a technological imperative.

4.1. The Interplay Between Adaptation and Technical Uncertainty

A customer contract acts as a significant factor in audit defense; the taxpayer must successfully rebut the potential classification of the work as mere adaptation. This requires establishing that the customer’s requirement introduced a technical barrier that necessitated innovative solutions. If the challenge could be solved through the routine application of established engineering or scientific principles, the activity lacks the necessary element of technical uncertainty and is excluded.7

The taxpayer must ensure that documentation clearly links the customer requirement not just to the finished product, but to the specific technological uncertainties that had to be resolved to achieve a permanent or reusable advancement in the underlying business component, thereby benefiting the taxpayer’s broader trade or business.

4.2. The Indispensable Role of the “Shrink-Back” Rule

When a customer project involves both excluded adaptation and potentially qualifying technical work, the taxpayer must utilize the “shrink-back” rule to segment the expenditures. The complexity of many customer orders mandates this segregation.13

The shrink-back rule requires the taxpayer to analyze the overall business component and break it down to the smallest possible unit or sub-component that independently satisfies the four-part test for qualified research.13 By documenting the research activities at this lower level (e.g., development of a new material or algorithm), the costs related to the qualifying component can be isolated and claimed, while the costs related to the overarching custom assembly and configuration remain excluded adaptation. Failure to perform and document this granular analysis, or attempting to claim the project based on a “product as a whole” review, increases the risk of complete credit disallowance during an audit.13

4.3. Addressing Documentation and Legal Precedent

Detailed, contemporaneous project records are the foundation of a defensible R&D credit claim. Judicial and administrative decisions emphasize that the taxpayer must present evidence showing that technical uncertainties were clearly defined and systematically resolved through a Process of Experimentation (POE).4 Simply stating that a complex design or construction project involved issues that were resolved is insufficient. The records must detail the alternatives considered, the testing methodologies, and the results of those tests to substantiate that the activity was true research, not routine problem-solving or design adaptation.4

For Illinois taxpayers, the value of the credit, which includes a 20-year carryforward of unused amounts 6, necessitates a proactive, highly detailed compliance methodology. Deficiencies found in one year regarding the adaptation exclusion can cascade across the carryforward years, leading to significant tax liabilities upon examination.

V. Practical Case Studies and Illustrative Examples

To provide tangible guidance, the following examples demonstrate the application of the adaptation exclusion in commercial contexts.

5.1. Non-Qualifying Case: Software Configuration for a Single Client

Scenario: A Chicago-based software consulting firm (Company X) licenses enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. A new manufacturing client requires the ERP system to interface with its 15-year-old proprietary inventory database using a specific, non-standard data schema. Company X’s developers spend significant time writing custom scripts and middleware to map the ERP data fields to the client’s legacy database fields, ensuring smooth communication between the two distinct systems.

Analysis: This activity is clearly related to adapting an existing business component (the ERP software) to a particular customer’s requirement (interfacing with the legacy database).11 While the work is technically complex and crucial for the client, it primarily involves using known coding languages and standard database techniques to achieve compatibility. No new technological information is sought, and no fundamental uncertainty regarding the capability or design of the core ERP software is resolved. Therefore, the associated costs are excluded under the adaptation exclusion (IRC $\text{§}41(\text{d})(4)(\text{B})$).

5.2. Qualifying Case: Material Science Innovation for Customer Performance

Scenario: A heavy equipment manufacturer in Illinois (Company Y) receives an order from a major energy customer (Customer Z) for a specialized turbine housing. Customer Z requires the housing to operate reliably under extreme pressure and temperature variations that exceed the operational limits of all existing standard housings. Meeting this requirement necessitates the development and testing of entirely new welding techniques for novel alloys, as the integrity of the material structure cannot be guaranteed using known methods.

Analysis (Applying Shrink-Back): The fabrication of the overall turbine housing (the specific customer order) involves excluded adaptation. However, the forced development and systematic experimentation related to the new welding technique and its resulting material integrity—aimed at resolving the technical uncertainty of structural failure under extreme conditions—constitutes qualified research.7 The information gained about the welding technique (a process component) is intended for use in Company Y’s broader trade or business. Under the shrink-back rule, Company Y may claim the expenses related only to the systematic experimentation and testing involved in developing and proving the new welding technique, provided this effort involved the application of engineering principles and resolved a technological uncertainty.

VI. Conclusion: Compliance as a Strategic Asset

The Illinois R&D Tax Credit, codified in 35 ILCS 5/201(k), serves as a substantial state-level incentive for innovation. The definitive integration of IRC Section 41 means that the stringent Federal exclusions apply with full force at the state level.

The exclusion concerning the Adaptation of Existing Component to a Particular Customer’s Need presents a continual audit risk, particularly in high-volume contract-based industries. Successfully defending the R&D claim requires taxpayers to demonstrate that the customer’s demands acted as a catalyst for genuine technological advancement, forcing the resolution of a technical uncertainty through a structured Process of Experimentation. The mere complexity, high cost, or eventual failure of a project does not grant eligibility.

Ultimately, compliance is achieved through meticulous, contemporaneous documentation that isolates the qualifying research expenditures using the “shrink-back” rule, thereby proving that the activities generated new technological information that transcended the scope of routine customization or simple fulfillment of a specific client’s request. This disciplined approach ensures the long-term viability and maximization of the valuable state tax credit.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/