Navigating the Critical Boundary: The Exclusion of Research After Commercial Production in the Illinois R&D Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: The Exclusion Defined and Strategic Context

The Exclusion for Research After Commercial Production (RACP) is a fundamental statutory limitation on the scope of qualified research expenses (QREs) claimable under the Illinois Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit. This provision ensures that the Illinois tax incentive, aligned with federal law, only rewards technical activities focused on resolving core technological uncertainty prior to market readiness.

The RACP exclusion bars expenses incurred once a business component is ready for general release or repeatable production. This mandate ensures the credit subsidizes true innovation and experimentation, not routine manufacturing maintenance or post-release refinement.

1.1 The Illinois R&D Tax Credit Framework (35 ILCS 5/201(k))

The state of Illinois offers a significant non-refundable income tax credit designed to incentivize qualified research activities conducted within the state.1 This incentive, codified under the Illinois Income Tax Act (IITA) 35 ILCS 5/201(k), allows a credit equal to 6.5% of the taxpayer’s incremental QREs.1

The credit is administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue (IDOR) and claimed using specialized schedules, such as Schedule 1299-A, 1299-C, or 1299-D, depending on the taxpayer entity type.3 The focus of this credit is to encourage innovation in key sectors, including manufacturing and technology, which are central to Illinois’ economic growth strategy.5

The Illinois General Assembly has consistently supported this incentive, extending its sunset date multiple times. As of current statute, the credit is available for tax years ending on or before December 31, 2031, providing long-term certainty for businesses investing in research infrastructure.6 A crucial component of the state credit structure is the allowance for unused credits to be carried forward for a period of five years.1

This five-year carryforward period significantly impacts strategic planning. Since the federal R&D credit generally allows a 20-year carryforward, the limited Illinois window places substantial pressure on corporate tax teams to ensure that credits earned are clean, documented, and utilized rapidly. Any delay caused by an audit or adjustment resulting from misclassified expenses, such as the improper inclusion of Research After Commercial Production costs, risks the expiration of the credit balance before it can offset state tax liabilities. Therefore, compliance with exclusions is not merely a legal necessity but a critical component of maximizing the economic value of the credit.

II. The Legal Nexus: Federal Mandate and Illinois Adoption

The integrity of the Illinois R&D tax credit hinges entirely on its adherence to federal law. The Illinois statute explicitly incorporates the definitions and requirements set forth in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), particularly Section 41.

2.1 Illinois Statutory Basis and Compliance Schedules

The definition of “Qualifying expenses” for the Illinois credit are expenditures that qualify under IRC Section 41 and are specifically attributable to research activities performed within Illinois.1 This direct linkage means that any activity excluded from the federal definition of qualified research is automatically excluded from the Illinois definition.

The IDOR’s instructional documents for claiming the credit—including Schedule 1299-C (for Individuals) and Schedule 1299-D (for Corporations)—list the RACP exclusion as a non-qualifying activity.2 The uniformity between state and federal standards simplifies, yet simultaneously complicates, the compliance landscape. It simplifies the initial assessment of eligibility by requiring adherence to a single set of technical standards, but it complicates the process because IDOR auditors, while guided by state law, must interpret and apply dense federal Treasury Regulations and IRS guidance to determine state credit eligibility.

2.2 The Incorporation of Federal Exclusions

By mirroring IRC Section 41, Illinois upholds the eight primary exclusions that define the boundaries of qualified research.10 These exclusions serve to narrow the scope of the credit away from routine or non-technical business activities. The inclusion of RACP is central among these exclusions, specifically targeting activities that occur once a product or process is deemed viable and ready for general application.12

The state’s regulatory bodies, lacking their own extensive technical interpretation mechanisms comparable to the IRS, rely heavily on the established federal framework to enforce these exclusions. This means that a taxpayer undergoing an audit by IDOR regarding the RACP exclusion must be prepared to defend their position using complex federal precedents, including Treasury Regulations and IRS Audit Technique Guides (ATGs). The absence of a robust state-specific body of administrative code defining the commencement of commercial production means state compliance must be built on a deep understanding of federal regulatory minutiae.

2.3 Comprehensive List of Excluded Activities

The RACP exclusion must be understood within the context of the seven other activities explicitly barred from R&D credit claims under IRC Section 41, which are adopted wholesale by Illinois.2

III. Defining the Commencement of Commercial Production (CPC)

The single most contentious issue in applying the RACP exclusion is determining the precise moment the component or process transitions from a state of qualified research (seeking to eliminate technical uncertainty) to commercial production. This determination is not always aligned with an external event like the first sale but is tied to internal milestones.

3.1 The Functional Test for Readiness

Commercial production begins when the business component—which could be a product, process, technique, invention, or software 15—is developed to the point where it is considered ready for use or meets the basic functional and economic requirements of the taxpayer.14

This functional test is critical because it relies on internal metrics and engineering sign-offs, not external market metrics. For example, a new chemical process may be functionally ready and therefore past the point of commercial production commencement (CPC) even if the company chooses to delay full-scale marketing for financial reasons. Documentation demonstrating the point at which the final design specifications were met and approved for transfer to the production floor is paramount in establishing the CPC date.

3.2 The Per Se List: Activities Conclusively Deemed Post-Commercial

To ensure consistency and to prevent taxpayers from claiming routine production costs, the federal regulations—and consequently IDOR’s enforcement strategy—provide a definitive list of activities that are conclusively deemed to occur after the commencement of commercial production.11 If expenses are incurred for these activities, they must be excluded from Illinois QREs:

1. Preproduction planning for a finished business component: This involves the final logistical organization and scheduling of manufacturing resources after the technical design has been fixed.10
2. Tooling up for production: Activities related to preparing, installing, or modifying equipment specifically for the mass, repeatable manufacturing of the component.10
3. Trial production runs: Initial batches of the component produced primarily to verify the consistency and efficiency of the production line setup, rather than to resolve underlying technical design uncertainties.10
4. Troubleshooting involving detecting faults in production equipment or processes: Routine activity aimed at detecting and correcting operational flaws in the established production workflow.10
5. Accumulating data relating to production processes: Standard collection and analysis of metrics concerning throughput, yield, or general efficiency of the ongoing manufacturing process.10
6. Debugging flaws in a business component: The process of correcting anticipated or minor defects in the released component or software.10

The application of the exclusion for debugging flaws and troubleshooting presents the most complex compliance challenge, especially for companies engaged in continuous improvement, common in manufacturing and software development sectors.15 If a company releases software or a product, and subsequently dedicates engineering time to fix minor, anticipated bugs, those expenses are RACP and non-qualifying.

However, a situation may arise where a critical, previously unidentified technical flaw (e.g., a catastrophic system failure under specific usage conditions) requires the development team to return to the foundational scientific principles (chemistry, engineering, or computer science) and conduct a new process of experimentation to resolve a previously intractable technical uncertainty.11 In such a scenario, the debugging activities may initiate a new qualified research project, distinct from the initial development phase. The burden of proof rests entirely on the taxpayer to demonstrate, through meticulous documentation, that this activity was not merely routine troubleshooting but met the rigorous four-part test for qualified research—specifically, demonstrating the elimination of a new technical uncertainty through a systematic process of experimentation.15 Failing this technical distinction, the IDOR, following federal precedent, will default to applying the RACP exclusion.

IV. The Financial Impact of RACP Exclusion on the Illinois Credit

The consequence of misclassifying RACP expenses extends far beyond the current tax year due to the incremental nature of the Illinois credit calculation.

4.1 The Incremental Calculation Mechanism

The Illinois R&D tax credit is calculated based on the increase in QREs compared to a historical base amount. The credit rate is 6.5% of the excess QREs.1

The credit calculation follows this structure:

1. Determine Current Year QREs: Total qualified research expenses incurred in Illinois for the current tax year.3
2. Determine Base Period QREs: The average of the Illinois QREs incurred during the three immediately preceding tax years.1
3. Calculate Excess QREs: Current Year QREs minus Base Period QREs.
4. Apply Credit Rate: Credit = 6.5% $\times$ (Current QREs – Base Period QREs).

The IDOR provides detailed instructions for calculating both the current year and the base period QREs on the Research and Development Worksheet, which is integrated into Schedule 1299-C, 1299-A, or 1299-D.3 This worksheet requires line items for Illinois wages for qualified services, cost of supplies, rental/lease costs of computers, and 65% of contract research expenses.3 If a taxpayer was not doing business in Illinois during one or more base period years, the qualifying expenses for that year must be correctly annualized or set to zero.3

4.2 The Mechanism of Long-Term Credit Erosion

A compliance failure related to the RACP exclusion creates a unique and subtle long-term penalty mechanism known as Credit Erosion within this incremental system.

If a taxpayer mistakenly includes $\$100,000$ in routine post-commercial production costs (RACP) in the current year’s QRE calculation, they initially benefit from a $\$6,500$ credit (6.5% of $\$100,000$). However, that $\$100,000$ immediately inflates the base period calculation for the next three years. In the following three years, the base period average will be increased by approximately $\$33,333$ annually due to the inclusion of this non-qualifying cost.

The consequence is that for the next three years, the business must generate $\$33,333$ more in legitimate R&D spending just to reach the same baseline for credit calculation, effectively diminishing the credit yield from new, genuine R&D investment. The initial, small, improper credit benefit is paid for multiple times over through a permanently inflated base, leading to a reduction in the overall, sustainable credit amount.

For companies with long-term R&D investment strategies, preventing this form of base period inflation is strategically more important than maximizing the QRE amount in any single year. Rigorous cost segregation preventing recurring, post-commercial costs from entering the QRE calculation is essential to preserve the integrity of the base and maximize future incremental credit availability.

V. Practical Case Study: RACP in an Illinois Manufacturing Context

To illustrate the distinction between qualified pre-commercial research and excluded post-commercial activities, an analysis of a typical Illinois-based advanced manufacturing scenario is beneficial.5

5.1 Scenario: “Prairie Robotics Inc. (PRI)”

Prairie Robotics Inc. (PRI), an Aurora-based manufacturer of electronic and robotic components, is developing the “Apex 2.0,” a new generation of high-speed warehouse gripper.19 The project’s permitted purpose is to significantly increase the function and reliability of the gripper by using a new, custom-developed polymer alloy composite for the arm structure. The technical uncertainty lies in determining the optimum formulation of the composite and ensuring the manufacturing process can consistently produce the material without micro-fractures under high stress.

Phase 1: Qualified Research (Pre-CPC)

During the design phase, prior to its launch in Year 5, PRI’s Illinois-based engineers incurred the following expenses:

All associated costs (Illinois wages, supplies like chemical components, and computer rentals for simulation) incurred during this period are eligible QREs, provided they are accurately segregated and documented.3

5.2 Commencement of Commercial Production (CPC)

On January 1, Year 5, PRI’s leadership team holds a “Functional Readiness Review.” The lead engineer signs off, confirming that the polymer composite formulation has met all defined structural requirements and the arm unit operates at the target speed and reliability. The procurement team issues a large purchase order for bulk production materials, and the sales team begins accepting general orders. January 1, Year 5, marks the Commencement of Commercial Production.

The product is now considered “ready for use” and meets the company’s “basic functional and economic requirements”.14

5.3 Post-Commercial Activities (Year 5) and RACP Exclusion

Following the CPC date, PRI incurred further expenses related to the Apex 2.0. These activities illustrate the application of the RACP exclusion:

If PRI’s personnel, including engineers or developers, spent time on these excluded activities after January 1, Year 5, those hours and associated supplies must be meticulously tracked and filtered out of the Illinois QRE calculation.

The primary defense against an auditor’s challenge regarding post-CPC activities requires documenting that any expense incurred after the commercialization date was tied to a completely new R&D project (e.g., developing the “Apex 3.0” with a new power source, necessitating a new set of technical uncertainties), rather than merely improving or stabilizing the current Apex 2.0 model or process.20

VI. Strategic Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Effective utilization of the Illinois R&D tax credit requires rigorous compliance protocols specifically designed to isolate and exclude RACP costs.

6.1 Documentation for Defense

To sustain a claim against IDOR scrutiny, the taxpayer must present evidence that clearly delineates the end of the qualified R&D phase and the beginning of commercial production. Documentation must be contemporaneous and objective.13

Key documentary evidence required includes:

• Project Plans and Stage-Gate Documentation: Dated project schedules showing the intended R&D period, engineering sign-off sheets, and internal memos confirming that the business component has met the basic functional requirements necessary for commercial release.14
• Time Tracking Systems: Detailed daily or weekly time-tracking logs from all personnel whose wages are claimed as QREs. These logs must differentiate hours spent resolving core technical uncertainties (qualifying) from time spent on RACP activities such as tooling, debugging, or routine quality control.3
• Financial Records: Bills of materials, purchase orders for production assets, and expense reports that show a clear segregation between R&D supplies/prototyping materials and inventory/routine manufacturing inputs.3

6.2 Segregation of Manufacturing Costs

For Illinois businesses operating in advanced manufacturing—a sector Illinois actively supports 5—the line between R&D and production is exceptionally fluid, making RACP compliance challenging. Activities such as developing new custom tooling, improving production processes for optimization, and material testing often take place on or adjacent to the manufacturing floor.16

A successful compliance strategy requires sophisticated cost accounting that separates the qualifying development of new, uncertain processes (which is often eligible) from the excluded routine operation and maintenance of the existing, commercialized process (which is RACP). The expenses for production monitoring, efficiency surveys, and management functions must be filtered out, even if the personnel performing them are engineers or scientists.14 Failure to establish internal controls that ensure this granular segregation of pre- and post-CPC activities will expose the entire QRE claim to challenge and potential disallowance.

VII. Conclusion

The Research After Commercial Production exclusion is the fundamental time-based constraint dictating eligibility for the Illinois R&D tax credit (35 ILCS 5/201(k)). Because the Illinois credit is structurally dependent on the strict technical standards of federal IRC Section 41, businesses must adopt federal regulatory guidance—particularly the definitions surrounding the Commencement of Commercial Production (CPC)—as their primary compliance benchmark.

To maximize the long-term economic benefit of the credit, which provides a non-refundable 6.5% incentive on incremental QREs, Illinois taxpayers must focus on two critical strategic objectives. First, they must implement detailed documentation protocols that clearly define and record the exact transition point from experimentation to commercial readiness. Second, they must rigorously segregate costs to ensure that recurring post-commercial activities, such as tooling, troubleshooting, and quality control, do not inflate the three-year base period average. Adherence to these strict boundaries ensures compliance with IDOR requirements, mitigates audit risk, and prevents the insidious effect of Credit Erosion, thereby preserving the full value of the limited five-year carryforward period.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/