Analysis of the Fifty Percent Average Qualified Research Expense Base in the Indiana Research Expense Credit (IC 6-3.1-4)

The meaning of the 50% of Average Indiana Qualified Research Expense (IQRE) base amount is its function as a statutory threshold used within the state’s Alternative Simplified Credit (AIC) calculation. This metric establishes the baseline research investment, mandating that only IQREs exceeding fifty percent of the prior three-year average qualify for the 10% incremental tax benefit.

The Alternative Simplified Credit (AIC) methodology, available through an election by the taxpayer, simplifies the calculation of the Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC) by replacing the complex Fixed-Base Percentage derived from historical gross receipts with this defined percentage of recent average IQREs.

I. Executive Summary: The 50% IQRE Base Defined in Indiana Tax Law

A. Introduction to the Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC)

The State of Indiana actively incentivizes innovation through the Research Expense Credit (REC), a targeted tax measure codified under Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4.1 The legislative intent behind the credit is to stimulate and increase qualified research activities conducted within Indiana.2 Taxpayers who incur qualified research expenses (QREs) within the state are eligible to claim a credit against their Indiana state income tax liability.1

Eligibility for the credit extends broadly to various business structures, including corporations, S corporations, partnerships, Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs). Certain trusts and estates may also claim the credit against their own liabilities, though beneficiaries of trusts or estates (except Grantor Trusts) are typically excluded.3

Indiana provides two distinct calculation methodologies for determining the final credit amount: the traditional method, which relies on a Fixed-Base Percentage calculation mirroring the federal Regular Research Credit (RRC), and the Alternative Simplified Credit (AIC) method. The selection of the calculation method is at the discretion of the taxpayer, depending on which formula yields the greater benefit.4

B. Defining Indiana Qualified Research Expenses (IQREs)

To understand the base calculation, one must first define the expense pool used, the Indiana Qualified Research Expenses (IQREs). An IQRE is defined as the sum of amounts incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year for:

1. Wages paid to employees performing or directly supervising qualified research activities.
2. Costs of supplies used in the conduct of qualified research.
3. Payments for services performed for qualified research activities.5

Statutory Alignment and Conformity Date

A critical legal aspect of the Indiana REC is its definition of a QRE. The state statute explicitly defines a QRE by referencing Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as in effect on January 1, 2001.1 This date represents a point of “static conformity,” meaning Indiana has decoupled from subsequent federal legislative and regulatory changes to the R&D credit definition that occurred after January 1, 2001.

This static conformity creates a necessary compliance hurdle for taxpayers. Although the federal R&D tax credit calculation follows the most current version of IRC Section 41, Indiana taxpayers must maintain separate, meticulously documented records to demonstrate that their IQREs satisfy the older, 2001 federal criteria. Furthermore, the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) has statutory authority to consider additional factors when prescribing what qualifies as a research expense, including the physical location where services are performed, the residence of the person performing the services, and where qualified research supplies are consumed, ensuring the research activity genuinely benefits Indiana.6

Another notable divergence occurred in recent Indiana legislation. Beginning in the 2022 tax year, Indiana decoupled from the federal requirement under IRC Section 174 that mandates the capitalization and amortization of R&D expenses over five or fifteen years. Indiana allows a current-year deduction for these expenses for state income tax purposes, further highlighting the required separation between state and federal R&D compliance.7

II. The Alternative Simplified Credit (AIC) Election: Statutory Foundation and Mechanics

The Alternative Simplified Credit (AIC) method, sometimes referred to as the Alternative Incremental Credit, was introduced for Indiana qualified research expenses incurred after December 31, 2009.6 This alternative methodology was established to provide a more direct and less administratively burdensome path to claiming the R&D tax credit, particularly for companies experiencing consistent growth in their R&D spending.

A. Statutory Basis and Availability

The statutory basis for the AIC is found within IC 6-3.1-4, which permits a taxpayer election to utilize this alternative method.6 The election must be affirmatively made by the taxpayer on the prescribed DOR forms, replacing the Traditional Method calculation for that taxable year. Once elected, the AIC provides a simplified base calculation that focuses solely on historical IQREs, eliminating the need to track historical Indiana gross receipts and complex fixed-base percentage formulas required by the traditional method.4

B. Structure of the General AIC Calculation

The standard AIC calculation involves a three-step process to determine the creditable amount. The overarching structure is defined by applying a flat credit rate to the amount by which current-year IQREs exceed the statutory base.

The formula is expressed as:

$$\text{Credit} = 10\% \times (\text{Current Year IQRE} – \text{AIC Base})$$

The AIC Base is defined precisely as fifty percent (50%) of the taxpayer’s average IQREs for the three taxable years preceding the credit year.4

This structure provides a distinct advantage to companies with rapidly escalating R&D expenditures. By benchmarking the current investment against only 50% of the recent average, the state effectively grants credit on the entire top half of the average spending, plus all expenditure above that average.

Comparison to the Traditional Method

The AIC stands in contrast to the Traditional Method, which determines the base using a Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) multiplied by the average Indiana gross receipts from the four prior tax years.4 Furthermore, the Traditional Method applies a two-tiered credit rate: 15% on the first $1 million of excess QREs, and 10% on any excess QREs above $1 million.3

The election of the AIC, utilizing the 50% base, generally makes sense for businesses with volatile or growing QREs relative to historical gross receipts, or for those whose FBP calculation results in an unfeasibly high base. The flat 10% rate is sometimes less generous than the initial 15% tier of the Traditional Method, but the lower barrier established by the 50% base often results in a larger incremental expense amount, compensating for the lower maximum rate.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of Indiana REC Calculation Methods

III. Exhaustive Analysis of the AIC Base: Fifty Percent of Average IQRE

The 50% average IQRE calculation is fundamental to the AIC method, serving as the regulatory mechanism for distinguishing routine, recurring research expenditures from genuinely incremental investments that the credit is designed to reward.

A. Defining the Three-Year Base Period (P3Y)

The calculation explicitly mandates using the IQREs from the three taxable years immediately preceding the taxable year for which the credit is being determined.4 This look-back period is shorter than the four-year gross receipts look-back required for the Traditional Method’s FBP calculation, providing a tighter historical snapshot.

For a taxpayer claiming the credit for the current taxable year (e.g., Year 5), the base period consists of the IQREs incurred in Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4. The accuracy and defensibility of the AIC claim depend entirely on the taxpayer’s ability to precisely document and substantiate the IQRE figures used in these three prior years, adhering to the 2001 IRC § 41 definition.1

B. The Function and Calculation of the Average IQRE

The calculation proceeds by first determining the arithmetic average of the IQREs incurred during the three-year base period (P3Y).

$$\text{Average IQRE} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{3} \text{IQRE}_{\text{P3Y}, i}}{3}$$

The Significance of the 50% Multiplier

The critical step is the application of the 50% multiplier. This multiplication establishes the AIC Base, which represents the threshold of expected R&D activity. The underlying economic policy holds that R&D activity equal to or less than half of the recent average is considered maintenance or expected expenditure and should not qualify for the state subsidy.

$$\text{AIC Base} = 50\% \times \text{Average IQRE}_{\text{P3Y}}$$

The entire structure of the AIC calculation—using a prior three-year rolling average and applying a 50% haircut—directly parallels the federal Alternative Simplified Credit framework, albeit with a reduced credit rate in Indiana (10% state vs. 14% federal).9 By adopting this formula, Indiana ensures that the incentive is highly responsive to recent R&D activity. Companies that have steadily increased their R&D commitment over the past three years will establish a base that is significantly lower than their current spending, thereby maximizing the “incremental” portion eligible for the 10% credit. This strategic alignment makes the Indiana AIC an effective mechanism for incentivizing sustained, accelerating investment in in-state research capacity.

C. The Final Calculation: Incremental Excess

The creditable expense—the incremental research expenditure—is the amount by which the current year’s IQRE exceeds the calculated AIC Base. If the current-year IQRE is equal to or less than the 50% base amount, no credit is generated under the 10% rate calculation.

$$\text{Incremental Excess} = \text{Current Year IQRE} – \text{AIC Base}$$

If this incremental excess is positive, the 10% credit rate is applied. This focuses the tax benefit exclusively on the newest tier of investment, rather than subsidizing the general research budget. The calculation reinforces the purpose of the REC: to reward increasing qualified research activities.2

IV. Indiana Department of Revenue Guidance and Critical Exceptions

The successful utilization of the AIC method requires rigorous attention to the exceptions and filing requirements specified by the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) and established in the Indiana Code.

A. The Mandatory 5% Fallback Rule

The single most critical complexity associated with the 50% Average IQRE calculation is the mandatory application of the 5% fallback rule. This rule applies when the taxpayer fails to meet the historical continuity requirement necessary to calculate the three-year average IQRE accurately.

Statutory Trigger

Statutory guidance stipulates that if the taxpayer did not have Indiana qualified research expenses (IQREs) in any one of the three taxable years preceding the credit year, the standard 50% base calculation is nullified.6 This condition is often referred to as the “Zero-QRE Trap.”

Fallback Rate Determination

When the condition is triggered—even if only one prior year recorded $0 IQREs—the amount of the research expense tax credit is not based on the incremental excess calculation. Instead, the credit is calculated as a fixed five percent (5%) of the taxpayer’s entire current-year IQRE.4

$$\text{Fallback Credit} = 5\% \times \text{Current Year IQRE}$$

The application of this fallback provision significantly reduces the potential credit value for growing companies. While the 10% AIC rate is applied only to the incremental excess (Current IQRE – 50% Average Base), the 5% fallback rate is applied to the entire current IQRE amount. For any company where the incremental excess represents more than half of the total current QREs (which is common for rapidly growing R&D departments), the 5% fallback results in a substantially smaller credit.

This structure strongly encourages consistent, non-zero R&D spending. Tax planning should prioritize ensuring that documentation exists to prove some qualified expenditure in all three look-back years to maintain access to the higher-value 10% incremental credit calculation, thereby avoiding the substantial penalty associated with the 5% flat rate.4

B. Special Alternative Credit for Defense and Aerospace (IC 6-3.1-4-2.5)

Indiana maintains a separate, highly specialized research credit for specific high-value manufacturing and defense contractors, reinforcing its commitment to strategic industrial sectors. This provision, codified under IC 6-3.1-4-2.5, targets taxpayers engaged in the production of civil and military jet propulsion systems, certified aerospace advanced manufacturers, or US Department of Defense contractors who maintain manufacturing facilities in Indiana with at least 3,000 full-time employees and pay above a certain wage threshold.4

Identical Base Calculation

Crucially, the base calculation for this specialized aerospace credit utilizes the identical methodology found in the general AIC: the base is defined as fifty percent (50%) of the taxpayer’s average Indiana qualified research expenses for the three taxable years preceding the taxable year for which the credit is being determined.8

Credit Rate Determination by IEDC

While the base calculation remains 50% of the three-year average, the credit rate is not automatically 10%. For this specialized group, the credit may be authorized by the Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC), and the authorized percentage is determined by the IEDC, not to exceed ten percent (10%).8

This delegation of authority transforms the tax credit into a sophisticated economic development tool. By setting the maximum rate at 10% but requiring IEDC authorization and determination of the final rate, the state allows for flexibility in negotiating the level of state subsidy based on the specific economic impact, job creation, and investment commitment of the defense or aerospace manufacturer. This policy mechanism ensures that large, strategic R&D investments in these critical sectors are incentivized efficiently and targeted specifically through a collaborative process between the taxpayer and the state’s economic development authority.4

C. Federal Claim Disclosure Requirements

To maintain tax integrity and prevent unsubstantiated claims, the DOR imposes specific reporting requirements regarding federal R&D credit claims. Indiana law (IC 6-3.1-4-8) requires a taxpayer claiming the Indiana REC to disclose whether they have determined and claimed the corresponding federal R&D credit under IRC Sec. 41(a)(1) or (c)(4).3

Furthermore, if a taxpayer claims the Indiana credit but chooses not to claim the federal credit for the same qualified research expenses, the taxpayer is required to disclose the reasons for this decision to the DOR in the manner specified by the department.3

This mandate serves as a critical audit selection filter. Since the Indiana QRE definition is tied directly to the federal IRC § 41 (as of 2001), a discrepancy between state and federal claims must be meticulously justified. If a legitimate reason for the difference does not exist (e.g., differing state allocation rules, timing issues, or the federal credit being prohibited by other limits), the DOR views this divergence as a strong indication that the expenses claimed at the state level may not meet the foundational QRE definition. Such non-conforming state-only claims automatically increase the likelihood of state audit scrutiny.

V. Numerical Case Study: Modeling the 50% IQRE Base

To illustrate the mechanics and implications of the 50% IQRE base, two detailed scenarios demonstrate the standard AIC calculation and the mandatory application of the 5% fallback rule.

A. Scenario 1: Successful Utilization of the AIC (10% Credit)

Innovate Corp. is claiming the Indiana REC for Tax Year 2024, electing the AIC method due to strong R&D growth over the past three years. The goal is to maximize the incremental 10% credit.

Historical Data (P3Y Look-back):

• Y2021 IQREs: $800,000
• Y2022 IQREs: $1,000,000
• Y2023 IQREs: $1,200,000
• Current Year (Y2024) IQREs: $1,500,000

The calculation proceeds by determining the average IQREs and then applying the 50% multiplier to establish the statutory base.

Table 2: Detailed AIC Calculation Example (Credit Year 2024)

Innovate Corp. successfully establishes a relatively low base of $500,000 against its $1.5 million current spending, leading to a substantial $100,000 tax credit.

B. Scenario 2: Application of the 5% Fallback Rule

Zero-Year Tech also plans to claim the AIC for Tax Year 2024, with high current-year spending, but the company ceased all R&D activity during Y2022 due to market conditions.

Historical Data (P3Y Look-back):

• Y2021 IQREs: $700,000
• Y2022 IQREs: $0
• Y2023 IQREs: $1,100,000
• Current Year (Y2024) IQREs: $1,500,000

Table 3: Fallback Rule Application (5% Credit)

This scenario starkly demonstrates how the AIC structure disadvantages taxpayers whose R&D activities are non-continuous or highly cyclical, forcing them into a significantly reduced tax benefit regardless of high current-year spending.

VI. Strategic Planning and Maximizing the Indiana REC

Tax planning involving the Indiana REC requires a rigorous comparative analysis between the Traditional Method and the AIC, coupled with robust long-term documentation strategies.

A. Decision Framework: Choosing the Right Method

The decision to elect the AIC method hinges on whether the resulting 50% base provides a lower threshold for calculating incremental spending than the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) derived from historical gross receipts under the Traditional Method.

1. Elect AIC when:

• The company has had sustained recent growth in IQREs, meaning the current year QRE significantly surpasses 50% of the three-year average.
• The historical gross receipts are disproportionately high compared to historical QREs (e.g., a company acquired an established non-R&D business), which would result in a punitive, high FBP base under the Traditional Method.

1. Elect Traditional Method when:

• The FBP calculation results in an exceptionally low base amount, allowing the company to leverage the Traditional Method’s more advantageous tiered rate structure (15% on the first $1 million of excess QREs).4
• The current year IQRE is only slightly higher than the 50% AIC base, making the 15% rate on the limited excess under the Traditional Method more valuable than the flat 10% rate on the slightly larger AIC excess.

The taxpayer is required to calculate both methods prior to filing and select the most beneficial method for that taxable year. However, the AIC is generally preferred by young or rapidly expanding enterprises that lack a long history of high gross receipts but are incurring significant new R&D costs.

B. Utilizing Credit Carryforward Provisions

A crucial aspect enhancing the financial value of the Indiana REC is the ability to carry forward any unused credit. Indiana law permits credits awarded under IC 6-3.1-4 to be carried forward for up to ten taxable years.6

This extended carryforward window is particularly beneficial for early-stage or emerging technology companies that incur substantial research expenses—and thus generate large credits—before achieving profitability or sufficient state taxable income against which the credit can be utilized. The 10-year period guarantees that the economic value of the R&D incentive is preserved and remains available for application against future Indiana income tax liability, significantly improving the net present value of the credit for long-term fiscal planning.

C. Documentation and Audit Defense

The successful substantiation of the AIC claim relies on meticulous record-keeping, extending beyond the current year’s expenditures to encompass the entire look-back period.

Requirements for IQRE Substantiation

Taxpayers must maintain comprehensive records substantiating the IQREs claimed for the current year, ensuring they strictly adhere to the static 2001 definition of QRE under IRC § 41.6 This includes documentation of employee time allocation, purpose and use of supplies, and detailed contracts for third-party research services, all confirmed to be performed or consumed within Indiana.6

Defending the 50% Base

In addition to current-year documentation, taxpayers must be prepared to defend the IQRE figures used in the three preceding taxable years. Because the $50\%$ IQRE average forms the denominator of the base calculation, any adjustments made by the DOR to a prior year’s IQRE figure (for instance, reducing a claimed QRE amount in a look-back year) will directly increase the current year’s 50% base, consequently reducing the incremental excess and the final credit amount.

Furthermore, a failure to provide adequate documentation for any of the three preceding years may lead the DOR to conclude that the taxpayer did not incur QREs in that year, thereby triggering the mandatory 5% fallback rule. The risk of losing 50% or more of the potential credit value due to insufficient historical record-keeping necessitates a proactive approach to maintaining audit-ready documentation for the entire three-year base period required for the AIC calculation.4

VII. Conclusion

The “50% of Average IQRE” calculation is the central defining characteristic of the Indiana Research Expense Credit’s Alternative Simplified Credit (AIC) methodology. It functions as a statutory baseline, ensuring that only research investment demonstrably incremental to the taxpayer’s recent three-year average level of activity is subsidized via the 10% credit rate.

For tax professionals, the complexity lies not in the arithmetic, but in adhering to the statutory constraints imposed by the Indiana Department of Revenue. Key considerations for compliance and maximization include: (1) ensuring all IQREs conform to the definition under IRC Section 41 as specifically adopted on January 1, 2001, irrespective of subsequent federal law changes; (2) strictly avoiding a $0 QRE figure in any of the three preceding years to circumvent the mandatory, value-reducing 5% fallback rate; and (3) maintaining the requisite documentation for the full three-year look-back period to substantiate the calculated average IQRE base. By rigorously managing these historical and definitional requirements, taxpayers can effectively leverage the AIC method to maximize the incentivization of sustained R&D growth within Indiana.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/