Expert Report on the Indiana Research Expense Credit: Analysis of the AIC 5% Rate for Limited Qualified Research Expense History

I. Executive Summary and Statutory Introduction

The Indiana Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) 5% Rate is a statutory fallback mechanism allowing taxpayers who lack Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) in any one of the three preceding tax years (Limited QRE History) to claim a simplified tax credit. This mandatory rate is calculated as 5% of their current year Indiana QREs, avoiding the administrative complexity of establishing a historical base amount.

A. Legislative Authority and Adoption of IRC § 41 Standards

The Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC) is established under Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4, designed to provide a financial incentive for increasing qualified research activities conducted within the state.1 The legislative framework aligns closely with federal standards, defining a Qualified Research Expense (QRE) according to Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as it existed on January 1, 2001.1

A key complexity for multi-state entities claiming the credit is the requirement that while the definition of research activity is based on federal IRC standards, the calculation parameters for the credit—including the base amount and gross receipts—must strictly utilize only Indiana QREs and Indiana gross receipts.3 This mandate necessitates robust internal tracking and compliance systems to properly allocate and document research expenses based on the physical location of the qualifying activities.

B. Introduction of the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)

The Alternative Simplified Credit methodology, which includes the 5% fallback provision, was introduced for Indiana qualified research expenses incurred after December 31, 2009.2 This legislative amendment was a significant step toward broadening the accessibility of the credit, particularly for businesses that found the Traditional Incremental Method’s base calculation unduly burdensome or restrictive.

The introduction of the ASC, and subsequently the 5% fallback, addresses the administrative challenges faced by new or rapidly growing R&D performers. Specifically, the highly complex statutory base period calculation under the Traditional Method (which involves fixed-base percentages for startups that phase up over many years 3) can deter immediate credit utilization. By offering a simplified path, the state lowers the entry barrier for true start-up entities or those newly commencing R&D within Indiana. Furthermore, when assessing eligibility for the 5% rate in any current tax year, taxpayers must look back three years, potentially requiring a review of tax years governed by transitional rules following the 2009 effective date of the ASC provision.

II. The Framework of the Indiana REC Calculation Methodologies

A. Overview of Taxpayer Eligibility and Nexus Rules (IC 6-3.1-4)

The Indiana REC is available to a wide range of entities defined as “Taxpayers” who have liability under IC 6-3 (Adjusted Gross Income Tax), including individuals, corporations, limited liability companies (LLCs), trusts, and partnerships.4 S corporations and partnerships are permitted to pass the credit through to their shareholders and partners.5

In applying the credit, the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) possesses the authority to prescribe standards for determining which qualified research expenses are specifically considered “Indiana qualified research expenses.” In this determination, the DOR considers criteria such as the physical location where services are performed, the residence or business location of the personnel conducting the research, the place where qualified research supplies are consumed, and other factors deemed relevant for proper allocation.4

B. The Traditional Incremental Method (Tiered Rates)

The Traditional Method calculates the credit based on the excess of current year QREs over a calculated base amount. This base amount is typically determined using a fixed-base percentage multiplied by the average Indiana gross receipts for the four preceding tax years.1

The Traditional Method applies tiered rates to the excess QREs: 15% on the first $1 million of excess QREs, and 10% on any excess QREs exceeding $1 million.2

C. The Standard Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method (The 10% Rule)

For Indiana qualified research expenses incurred after December 31, 2009, taxpayers may elect the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method.2 This method simplifies the calculation by defining the base amount as 50% of the taxpayer’s average Indiana QREs for the three preceding taxable years.2 The standard rate for this method is 10% of the current year QREs that exceed this 50% base.2

The existence of the ASC and its specialized 5% fallback is directly linked to the administrative difficulties associated with the Traditional Method. The complexity inherent in the Traditional Method’s fixed-base percentage calculation, especially for companies without a long operating history, created a necessity for the simpler, data-limited ASC. While the 10% ASC provides a significantly simpler calculation than the Traditional Method, it still requires three years of historical data, which further necessitates the 5% fallback provision for the newest market entrants who have insufficient history for even the 10% method.

III. Detailed Examination of the AIC 5% Limited QRE History Fallback

A. The Statutory Trigger: Limited QRE History

The AIC 5% rate is not an elective calculation; it is a mandatory fallback provision triggered by a lack of historical data. The specific statutory language is explicit and rigid: the 5% calculation is required “if the taxpayer did not have Indiana qualified research expenses in any one of the three taxable years preceding the taxable year for which the credit is being determined”.2

This condition requires the taxpayer to have continuous, non-zero QREs in the three lookback years (T-1, T-2, and T-3) to qualify for the standard 10% ASC rate. The presence of a single year with zero reported Indiana QREs, or a year where QREs cannot be properly documented to meet the Indiana nexus requirements, compels the taxpayer to use the 5% fallback rate.

B. Calculation Formula and Financial Mechanics

When the limited QRE history trigger is met, the calculation of the credit is dramatically simplified. The amount of the tax credit is “equal to five percent of the taxpayer’s Indiana qualified research expense for the taxable year”.2 Critically, the need to compute or subtract a base amount—which is the main source of complexity and dispute in traditional R&D tax credit calculations—is eliminated.3

For many firms with low historical R&D spend, the 5% gross QRE rate achieves an effective credit rate similar to the 10% ASC rate applied against the excess amount. For instance, the standard 10% ASC is applied to the excess QRE over 50% of the three-year average base. If a company’s R&D spend has been relatively stable, the 10% ASC calculation often results in a 5% effective rate on the current year’s gross QREs. The 5% fallback codifies this effective rate while removing all complexity, providing certainty and simplicity.

C. Policy Rationale and Policy Implications

The primary policy rationale for the 5% fallback is to immediately accommodate new market entrants and start-up companies that are performing QREs in Indiana but lack the required three years of operating history to establish a viable base period.1 By offering a simplified, gross calculation, the state ensures these innovative businesses can access the incentive instantly.

The credit itself is nonrefundable, meaning it cannot reduce the tax liability below the minimum tax, but any unused credit can be carried forward for up to ten taxable years.2 This long carryforward period is vital for start-up companies utilizing the 5% credit, as they often operate at a net loss in early years. The ability to carry the credit forward for a decade transforms the annual credit amount into a deferred asset, ensuring the incentive retains its value until the company achieves sufficient taxable income to utilize it.

The structural simplicity of the 5% fallback yields a unique benefit in tax compliance. Because the calculation uses gross QREs and waives the base period subtraction, the DOR’s audit focus shifts away from the often contentious issue of base period calculations. Instead, compliance review is concentrated entirely on proving two facts: the technical qualification and Indiana nexus of the current year QREs 4, and the conclusive documentation proving the necessary zero QREs in the lookback period that triggered the fallback. If a taxpayer cannot definitively prove that they had zero QREs in a preceding year, the DOR may attempt to mandate the use of the standard 10% ASC calculation, which could result in a significantly smaller credit if a high base amount were to be calculated.

IV. Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Compliance

A. Administrative Resources

The Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) provides administrative guidance primarily through the Research Expense Credit (REC) Handbook.1 This resource outlines the rules, procedures, and definitions governing the credit under IC 6-3.1-4. Although the DOR maintains a repository of information bulletins and fact sheets 5, the specific details and compliance requirements regarding the 5% rate are integrated into the general guidance for the Alternative Simplified Credit.2

B. Reporting Requirements and Federal Nexus (IC 6-3.1-4-8)

A critical compliance element was introduced by legislative changes effective January 1, 2019 (HEA 1001, Section 121), which added mandatory disclosure requirements under IC 6-3.1-4-8.5 Taxpayers claiming the Indiana REC must now report to the DOR whether they determined and claimed the corresponding federal R&D credit (IRC Sec. 41(a)(1) or (c)(4)).

If the Indiana credit is claimed but the federal credit is not, the taxpayer must explicitly disclose the reasons for the divergence to the DOR.5 This requirement is particularly relevant for new businesses claiming the 5% rate, as federal limitations (e.g., liability constraints, or inability to maximize the federal payroll tax offset option) frequently prevent a full federal claim, even when state QREs fully qualify. Robust documentation detailing the specific federal limitations is therefore required to satisfy the state disclosure mandate.

C. Auditing and Documentation Focus

The application of the 5% fallback significantly influences DOR audit strategy. Because the calculation avoids the establishment of a base amount, the incentive for taxpayers to manipulate historical QREs (T-1 to T-3) to minimize the base and maximize the excess QRE is removed.

Instead of debating historical base calculations, DOR auditors focus their scrutiny on validating two primary elements:

1. QRE Qualification: Ensuring the current year’s gross QREs meet the technical federal definition (IRC § 41(b)) and the specific Indiana nexus criteria (place of services, supply consumption).4
2. Fallback Trigger: Requiring irrefutable evidence—usually in the form of tax returns, ledgers, and payroll documentation—that QREs were truly absent (zero) in at least one of the three preceding tax years to justify the use of the simplified 5% gross rate.

V. Practical Application and Comparative Calculation Examples

A. Methodology for Determining the Applicable Rate

When a taxpayer elects the Alternative Simplified Credit method, the applicable rate is determined by a strict three-year historical review:

1. Threshold Check: The taxpayer must verify if Indiana QREs were greater than zero in all three preceding tax years (T-1, T-2, and T-3).
2. Rate Application: If the threshold is met (QREs present in all three years), the standard 10% ASC rate is applied to the excess QREs (CY QRE minus 50% average base).2 If the condition fails (at least one year is $0), the mandatory 5% Fallback Rate applies to the Current Year Gross QREs.2

B. Case Study 1: Standard ASC Calculation (10% Rate for Continuous History)

This example illustrates the maximum credit potential when the three-year continuous history threshold is satisfied, allowing the use of the 10% rate against excess QREs.

Illustrative Example: Standard 10% ASC Calculation

C. Case Study 2: The AIC 5% Fallback Calculation (Limited QRE History)

This example demonstrates the required application of the statutory 5% fallback rate due to insufficient historical QREs.3

Illustrative Example: Application of the AIC 5% Limited QRE History Rate (IC 6-3.1-4)

D. Comparative Financial Impact and Strategic Choice

Comparing the two scenarios demonstrates that a failure to meet the continuous three-year QRE threshold resulted in a $40,000 reduction in the credit calculation ($140,000 vs. $100,000). While the 5% rate provides unparalleled simplicity and guarantees a credit amount against gross expenditures, there is a clear financial incentive for established companies to ensure continuous, documented QREs in their lookback period to qualify for the 10% ASC method. The strategic benefit of the 5% rate lies in its certainty and low administrative cost, trading a slightly lower potential maximum credit for guaranteed utilization when historical data is non-existent or incomplete.

VI. Strategic Tax Planning and Conclusions

A. Optimizing QRE Thresholds and Carryforward

For companies either initiating R&D in Indiana or with intermittent R&D projects, careful attention must be paid to documentation during the lookback period (T-1, T-2, T-3). The determination of the applicable rate hinges on proving QREs were performed every year. For taxpayers anticipating high QREs in future years, strategic documentation proving even a minimal QRE amount is advisable to avoid the mandatory 5% fallback and maintain eligibility for the higher potential 10% ASC rate.

Given the nonrefundable nature of the credit and the generous ten-year carryforward period 2, the 5% credit is particularly valuable for pre-revenue and capital-intensive start-ups. Even if the credit cannot be used immediately due to a lack of adjusted gross income tax liability, the credit generated in the early years using the simplified 5% gross calculation is preserved and acts as a deferred asset. This ensures that the state’s incentive is realized once the company achieves profitability, maximizing the value of the tax relief over the long-term business lifecycle.

B. Integration with Supplementary Tax Incentives

Taxpayers claiming the REC, regardless of the calculation methodology used (Traditional, 10% ASC, or 5% Fallback), should ensure they concurrently utilize the complementary state incentives. Specifically, Indiana offers a 100 percent sales tax exemption for qualified research and development equipment and property purchased for use in Indiana (IC 6-2.5-5-40).1 For R&D companies making significant capital investments, this immediate sales tax exemption often provides a cash savings that rivals or exceeds the annual income tax credit amount, making the combination of incentives critical for cash flow management.

C. Specialized Industry Limitations

It is important to recognize that the general ASC rules, including the 5% fallback, may be superseded by highly specific statutory provisions. For example, taxpayers engaged in the production of civil and military jet propulsion have a specialized ASC calculation method determined by the Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC), which allows for a percentage not exceeding 10% of QREs minus 50% of the average of the previous three years.7 Domain specialists must review all applicable statutory exceptions to ensure the correct calculation is applied.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/