The Strategic Value and Technical Mechanics of Indiana’s Alternative Incremental Credit (AIC)

I. Executive Summary: Positioning the AIC in Indiana’s R&D Incentive Landscape

The State of Indiana offers a comprehensive suite of incentives designed to stimulate corporate investment in innovation, centered around the Research Expense Tax Credit established under Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4. Taxpayers incurring Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) within Indiana are eligible for a credit against their state income tax liability. Crucially, the statute provides taxpayers with a choice between two primary calculation methodologies: the Regular Research Credit (RRC) and the Alternative Incremental Credit (AIC), sometimes referred to as the Alternative Calculation Method.1

The AIC, made broadly available for expenses incurred after December 31, 2009, is strategically positioned as a modern, elective tool designed to provide maximum predictability and simplified compliance for businesses that are rapidly accelerating their research investments.1

The core benefit of the AIC is its predictable calculation structure. It offers a flat credit rate of 10% applied to current year Indiana QREs that exceed a defined historical base. This base is standardized as 50% of the taxpayer’s average Indiana QREs for the three preceding taxable years.3 This formula avoids the complexities inherent in the RRC, which requires calculating a dynamic fixed-base percentage based on historical gross receipts.5 This simplified calculation, focusing only on three years of Indiana-specific QRE data, significantly lowers the administrative burden, making the AIC an indispensable tool for growth-stage companies or established firms undertaking large, targeted, and rapid increases in R&D spending.

II. Statutory Foundation and Legislative Context of IC 6-3.1-4

To understand the application of the AIC, it is necessary to establish the underlying legal and legislative framework governing research incentives in Indiana.

A. Defining Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)

The foundation of the Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit is its reliance on federal definitions. Indiana adheres closely to the requirements set forth in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41(b) to define what constitutes a Qualified Research Expense.2 To qualify, expenses must be incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year for research conducted within Indiana. These QREs typically encompass three categories of costs: wages paid to employees engaged in qualified research or the supervision of research activities, costs of supplies used in the research process, and amounts paid for contract research.3

B. Historical Basis: The Aerospace Industry Carve-Out

The AIC did not originate as a general elective credit. Historically, this alternative calculation was enacted under IC 6-3.1-4-2.5 to address a specific industry challenge. Prior to January 1, 2010, the alternative incremental credit could only be utilized by taxpayers actively engaged in the aerospace industry who satisfied specific criteria detailed in IC 6-3.1-4-2.5(b).6

The Indiana General Assembly formally acknowledged that the standard federal R&D tax credit calculation methods, which relied heavily on historical fixed-base percentages, adversely affected the aerospace industry, primarily due to the volatility and trends observed in federal defense spending during the 1980s.8 This adverse impact created a disincentive for necessary qualified research expenditures in a critical sector. The introduction of the AIC, therefore, initially served as a highly targeted legislative correction designed to provide consistent, predictable relief to certified aerospace advanced manufacturers.5

C. General Availability Post-2009

The restrictive nature of the AIC changed significantly for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009. For expenses incurred in these subsequent periods, the alternative calculation method—employing the same simplified 10% rate and 50% prior-average base—was made available for election by general taxpayers across all industries.1

It is notable that while the alternative calculation became broadly available, the original statute (IC 6-3.1-4-2.5) remains in the Indiana Code, still specifically pertaining to the aerospace industry.9 The continued existence of a separate, industry-specific calculation method, despite the general election, suggests a policy consideration: certified aerospace advanced manufacturers, particularly Department of Defense contractors with at least 3,000 Indiana employees, may receive administration or review benefits through the Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC) that complement the credit.5 This structure indicates that the state maintains a specialized mechanism for targeted, strategic support to key industrial anchors, alongside the general availability of the advantageous simplified calculation method.

III. Deep Dive: The Alternative Incremental Credit (AIC) Mechanism and Formula

The AIC offers a clean, mathematically clear path to maximizing R&D tax benefits, contrasting sharply with the complex base calculations of the RRC. The computation schedule for the AIC typically begins on line 14 of the state tax credit forms.6

A. The Core AIC Calculation

The AIC is calculated by identifying the amount of current year QREs that exceeds a predefined incremental threshold and applying a flat 10% rate to that excess amount.3

The calculation proceeds as follows:

1. Calculate the 3-Year Average Base: Determine the average Indiana Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) incurred during the three taxable years immediately preceding the current credit year.
2. Determine the AIC Base Amount: Multiply the 3-year average by 50% (0.50).
3. Calculate Excess QREs: Subtract the AIC Base Amount from the current year’s Indiana QREs.
4. Calculate the Credit: Multiply the resulting excess QREs by the 10% credit rate.

This can be expressed as the following formula:

$$Credit = 0.10 \times$$

The advantage of this structure is that it eliminates the volatility associated with using historical gross receipts and fixed-base percentages, which are required under the RRC.5 For a company experiencing exponential growth in R&D spend, this calculation guarantees that a large percentage of the current year’s QREs will be eligible for the credit, maximizing the incremental benefit.

B. The Critical 5% Fallback Rule

A critical statutory provision applies when a taxpayer lacks the necessary history of QREs to establish a three-year average. This provision is designed to provide guaranteed relief for new businesses or those with unstable or intermittent R&D activities.

The statute dictates that if the taxpayer did not have Indiana qualified research expenses in any one of the three taxable years preceding the credit year, the standard 10% incremental calculation is disqualified. In this scenario, the taxpayer must default to a 5% credit rate.3

The calculation in this fallback scenario is significantly simpler: the 5% rate is applied against the taxpayer’s entire current year Indiana QREs, rather than just the excess amount.

$$Credit = 0.05 \times QRE_{CY}$$

This provision, which denies the 10% incremental calculation if even one of the three preceding years shows zero QREs, serves as a mechanism to incentivize continuous R&D investment.5 A company that temporarily halts research activities could inadvertently disqualify itself from the preferred 10% rate upon resuming its spend, thereby facing a lower, non-incremental 5% credit. This structure suggests a policy premium is placed on firms that demonstrate stable, multi-year R&D commitment within the state.

IV. Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Compliance Requirements

To successfully claim the AIC, taxpayers must adhere to specific procedural and documentation requirements set forth by the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR), along with rules regarding the utilization of the resulting credit.

A. Claiming and Documentation Procedures

Taxpayers wishing to claim the AIC must file Form CT-1120 RDC alongside their annual income tax return.10 As the Indiana credit relies on the federal definition of QREs (IRC § 41(b)), taxpayers must maintain detailed documentation of all expenditures—including wages, supplies, and contract costs—to substantiate the qualified research activities conducted specifically within Indiana.10

DOR guidance clarifies that while Indiana mirrors federal base rules (IRC § 41(c)), all calculations must utilize state-specific data.5 This means that the determination of the base amount must substitute federal figures with Indiana qualified research expenses and Indiana gross receipts, ensuring that only localized economic activity contributes to the incentive calculation.5

B. Credit Utilization and Carryforward Rules

Once the AIC is calculated, its use is governed by IC 6-3.1-4-3.

1. Limitation on Use: The total amount of the credit utilized in a particular taxable year cannot exceed the taxpayer’s liability under IC 6-3, after all previously mandated credits have been applied.12
2. Carryforward Period: A generous provision in Indiana law permits unused research expense credits to be carried forward and applied against tax liability for up to ten (10) taxable years following the year the credit was earned.3
3. No Carryback or Refund: State law explicitly prohibits both the carryback and the refund of any unused portion of the credit.11

The provision allowing a 10-year carryforward period is a substantial advantage, functioning as a long-term mechanism for capital preservation. Since R&D investments, particularly in high-technology sectors like life sciences or advanced manufacturing, often do not generate immediate taxable profits, the extended carryforward period acknowledges this reality. It ensures that the credit, which cannot be refunded, remains a monetizable asset that the company can eventually apply against future state income tax obligations as the research projects yield profitability.

V. Comparative Analysis: AIC vs. Regular Credit Method (RRC)

For taxpayers with qualified expenses, the annual decision between the RRC and the AIC is strategic, driven by the company’s QRE growth rate, historical data availability, and current-year tax planning objectives.

A. Regular Credit Method (RRC) Mechanics

The RRC provides the highest potential credit rate but is subject to a significantly more complex base calculation:

• Credit Rates: The RRC utilizes a tiered structure: 15% on the increase in Indiana QREs over the base amount, up to $1 million, and a 10% rate on any excess QREs exceeding $1 million.5
• Base Complexity: The base amount is calculated by multiplying the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) by the average Indiana gross receipts over the four preceding tax years.5 The calculation of the FBP itself involves historical data, making the method burdensome for newer or data-poor firms.14
• Minimum Base Floor: A critical constraint of the RRC is the rule that the base period research expenses cannot be less than 50% of the current year research expenses.7

B. Strategic Election Summary

The primary differentiation lies in complexity and predictability. The AIC eliminates the need to gather and calculate historical gross receipts data, simplifying compliance dramatically by using only a three-year average of QREs.3

Comparison of Indiana R&D Tax Credit Calculation Methods

The AIC often proves strategically superior for companies experiencing high growth because it bypasses the RRC’s 50% minimum base floor.7 For a rapidly growing R&D firm, the RRC’s minimum base constraint can inflate the base amount, reducing the overall “excess” eligible for the credit. Conversely, the AIC’s base is fixed at 50% of the three-year average QREs. When current year QREs significantly outstrip the three-year average, the AIC structure guarantees a large incremental excess amount, often resulting in a higher credit value or, at minimum, a more predictable calculation for planning purposes.

VI. Practical Application and Detailed Example

The strategic value of the AIC is best demonstrated through concrete application in two common business scenarios.

A. Example 1: Standard AIC Calculation (High-Growth Scenario)

This scenario illustrates a company that has experienced consistent, measurable growth in R&D investment, qualifying for the 10% incremental rate.

Scenario Parameters:

• Current Year Indiana QREs ($QRE_{CY}$): $2,000,000
• Prior 3-Year Average Indiana QREs: $1,200,000 (meaning QREs in Y-1, Y-2, and Y-3 were non-zero)

AIC Calculation Example (Growth Scenario)

In this scenario, the company earns a credit of $140,000, maximizing the benefit of its aggressive R&D increase relative to its recent historical average.

B. Example 2: The 5% Fallback in Action (New or Intermittent R&D Activity)

This scenario illustrates the operation of the 5% fallback rule, which is triggered if a company lacks QREs in any one of the three preceding years.3

Scenario Parameters:

• Current Year Indiana QREs ($QRE_{CY}$): $2,000,000
• Prior QREs Status: The taxpayer had $0 Indiana QREs in Year 2 of the three preceding years.

AIC Calculation Example (Fallback Scenario)

Although the 5% rate yields a lower credit amount than the 10% incremental method, the 5% fallback calculation is often administratively advantageous for new or newly investing businesses.5 If this same new company were forced to use the RRC, the RRC’s minimum base rule would set the base at 50% of the current QREs (i.e., $1,000,000 base for $2,000,000 QREs), yielding a potential credit of $150,000 on the $1,000,000 excess.5 However, calculating the RRC requires determining a fixed-base percentage based on four years of gross receipts and QREs, an often impossible task for a company with no history or incomplete records.14 The 5% AIC fallback guarantees a meaningful, simple, and administratively efficient credit realization without the compliance cost associated with establishing a fixed-base percentage.

VII. Strategic Implications and Complementary Incentives

The Alternative Incremental Credit must be considered within the context of Indiana’s broader strategy to attract and retain high-value R&D activities.

A. The R&D Sales and Use Tax Exemption

Complementing the income tax credit, Indiana provides a significant capital expenditure incentive: a 100% sales tax exemption for qualified research and development equipment and property purchased for use in the state (IC 6-2.5-5-40).2 This exemption offers immediate cash flow relief, reducing the upfront costs of establishing or expanding R&D infrastructure. Taxpayers may claim a refund for sales tax paid on qualified transactions if the exemption was not applied at the time of purchase.2 By combining the deferred benefit of the AIC (the income tax reduction) with the immediate capital savings of the sales tax exemption, Indiana significantly enhances the total economic incentive package for innovative enterprises.

B. Economic Impact and Beneficiary Profile

The Research Expense Credit, in conjunction with the R&D Sales Tax Exemption, constitutes a substantial incentive program in Indiana. The combined incentives provide more than $100 million in annual tax relief.15

Analysis conducted by the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) in its 2023 Tax Incentive Review indicated that the tax relief provided by the Research Expense Credit tends to reduce the cost of R&D for a small number of large businesses.15 This concentration of benefits among a limited pool of major corporate taxpayers suggests that Indiana leverages this incentive primarily as a tool for economic retention and competition for established anchor institutions in manufacturing, technology, and life sciences. The LSA concluded that, although state incentives are small relative to federal counterparts, they are likely effective in increasing Indiana’s competitiveness with neighboring states in attracting targeted R&D activities.15

While the available legislative reviews confirm high overall utilization and effectiveness, specific data distinguishing the total claims or monetary value generated solely by the AIC versus the RRC remains aggregated and is not generally available in public reports.15

C. Coordination with Federal Credits

Taxpayers claiming the Indiana AIC must also coordinate their state claim with their federal R&D tax credit calculation. While Indiana requires QREs and gross receipts to be localized to the state for the base calculation 5, the definition of “Qualified Research” remains tethered to IRC Section 41. Although Indiana explicitly prohibits the carryback of unused state credits 11, the federal credit can be claimed retroactively by filing amended returns for up to three years (or longer if the company experienced losses).11 Therefore, identifying and documenting QREs is a unified effort that provides both immediate and retroactive recovery opportunities at the state and federal levels.

VIII. Conclusion: Maximizing Innovation Investment in Indiana

The Alternative Incremental Credit is a critical component of Indiana’s strategy to foster research and innovation. It offers taxpayers a predictable, streamlined method for capitalizing on Qualified Research Expenditures incurred within the state.

For established firms anticipating sustained or rapid growth in R&D spending, the AIC’s flat 10% rate calculated over the simplified 50% prior-year QRE base often yields the maximum financial benefit with minimal administrative complexity, bypassing the base volatility and complex calculation rules associated with the Regular Research Credit. Furthermore, for new ventures or companies initiating R&D in Indiana, the 5% fallback rule guarantees a measurable tax reduction on all QREs, establishing an immediate path to relief that is superior in administrative efficiency to attempting the full RRC calculation.

Given the substantial value of the credit and the generous ten-year carryforward period 12, meticulous documentation of all Indiana QREs is not merely a compliance requirement but a crucial step in preserving a long-term financial asset. Taxpayers are strongly advised to engage in annual scenario modeling, comparing both the RRC and the AIC methodologies to ensure the maximization of the state incentive, while simultaneously leveraging the complimentary 100% R&D Sales and Use Tax Exemption to achieve immediate capital cost reductions on research infrastructure.2 Through strategic use of the AIC and continuous compliance with the Indiana Department of Revenue requirements, businesses can significantly reduce their state tax burden and enhance their competitive position.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/