Navigating Fiduciary Tax Strategy: The Eligibility of Grantor Trusts for the Indiana Research Expense Credit (IC 6-3.1-4)

A Grantor Trust, for Indiana R&D tax credit purposes, is treated as a disregarded entity, meaning the Grantor (creator) is legally deemed the owner of the underlying assets. This crucial status allows the Grantor, rather than the trust or its traditional beneficiaries, to directly claim the Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC) against their individual state income tax liability.

This report details the legal and administrative framework provided by the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) that sanctions this exception, analyzes the mechanics of the Research Expense Credit (REC), and outlines the essential compliance steps required for proper claim reporting.

Section 1: Foundation of the Grantor Trust and Disregarded Entity Status

Federal Definition and Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Treatment

The status of a Grantor Trust derives from federal law, specifically the rules governing tax ownership defined in IRC Sections 671 through 679. A trust is designated as a Grantor Trust when the creator, or Grantor, retains certain rights or powers over the trust’s assets, such as the power of substitution (the ability to swap assets with the trust).1

For income tax purposes, the consequences of this designation are fundamental: the Grantor Trust is considered a disregarded entity.1 This status legally dictates that the Grantor is treated as the owner of the assets contained within the trust. Consequently, all items of income, deduction, and credit generated by the trust’s activities must be reported directly by the Grantor when computing their personal taxable income.2 A significant administrative relief stemming from this status is that, in many cases, the trust itself is not required to file a trust income tax return (Form 1041); instead, the income and related attributes are reported directly under the grantor’s Social Security Number.1

Indiana’s Recognition of Deemed Ownership and the “Trade or Business” Imperative

The State of Indiana’s tax policy aligns with this federal definition, particularly in the context of research credits. While Indiana Code (IC 6-3-1-7) broadly defines “fiduciary” and requires trustees to file Form IT-41 (Indiana Fiduciary Income Tax Return), this general rule is superseded by the specific policy governing the Research Expense Credit.4

The Grantor Trust structure is crucial because the Indiana REC is fundamentally linked to activities conducted “in carrying on your trade or business in Indiana”.5 Qualified research expenses (QREs) are defined by reference to Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).6 By treating the trust as a disregarded entity, the trade or business activity conducted within the trust is legally imputed as being conducted by the Grantor. This critical linkage ensures that the Grantor, who ultimately claims the credit on their individual income tax return (Form IT-40), satisfies the required trade or business test at the appropriate taxpayer level.

Furthermore, Indiana Code (IC 30-4-3-38) implicitly confirms the state’s recognition of the deemed owner concept by referencing the ability of a person treated as the “deemed owner of only part of a trust for income tax purposes” to receive reimbursement for income taxes paid.7 This state trust law mechanism validates the underlying principle that the Grantor bears the primary income tax liability associated with the trust’s activities.

The Disregarded Status as a Credit Utilization Strategy

The deliberate policy choice by the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) to grant an exception for Grantor Trusts serves a vital purpose related to the utilization of nonrefundable credits. The Indiana REC is nonrefundable; it can only offset existing tax liability and cannot generate a refund.8

In a standard fiduciary structure, such as a simple or complex trust, income is often distributed to beneficiaries. When income is distributed, the trust claims a distribution deduction, which drastically reduces its adjusted gross income and its resulting tax liability on Form IT-41. If the trust’s liability is minimal, the nonrefundable REC generated by its activities would be “stranded” at the entity level, forcing it into a carryforward status or potentially leading to expiration before full utilization.

By explicitly confirming that Grantor Trust beneficiaries (i.e., the Grantor) are eligible for the credit, the DOR ensures the credit flows directly to the Grantor’s IT-40 liability.5 As the Grantor typically has substantial taxable income derived from multiple sources, this flow-through maximizes the utilization of the nonrefundable credit against a comprehensive state income tax base. This structural advantage is fundamental to preserving the economic value of the R&D incentive for closely held businesses managed through sophisticated fiduciary vehicles.

Audit Scrutiny and Trade or Business Documentation

While the disregarded entity status is beneficial for credit flow, it does not alleviate the stringent audit requirements for the underlying R&D claim. The credit claimed on the Grantor’s IT-40 must be substantiated as genuine QREs incurred in a “trade or business”.5 Since the structure is often employed by high-net-worth individuals, who may have complex portfolios mixing active business interests with passive investments, auditors will rigorously examine whether the activities conducted by the trust meet the four-part test under IRC § 41, which defines qualified research.6 The Grantor must maintain meticulous, contemporaneous documentation to prove that the trust’s activities meet the statutory requirements at the business component level.6 Failure to satisfy the trade or business test, even within a properly structured Grantor Trust, invalidates the entire credit claim.

Section 2: Mechanics of the Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC)

Statutory Basis and General Eligibility

The Indiana Research Expense Credit is codified under Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4.6 This state credit mirrors the federal R&D tax credit but requires that all qualified research expenses (QREs) be incurred exclusively for activities conducted in Indiana.6

The credit is available to a wide range of taxpayers, including corporations, S corporations, partnerships, LLCs, LLPs, trusts, and estates.5 For taxable entities that are not pass-throughs, such as standard trusts, the credit is generally claimed against the entity’s own tax liabilities.5

Calculating the REC Amount (Form IT-20REC)

The Grantor, acting as the deemed owner, must calculate the credit based on the QREs incurred by the underlying business held in the trust. Indiana provides two primary methods for calculating the credit, detailed on Form IT-20REC.

Regular Method (Tiered Rates)

The regular method calculates the credit based on the increase in current QREs over a statutorily defined Base Amount:

1. Determine QREs: Ascertain the total Indiana QREs for the taxable year.
2. Compute the Base Amount: This amount is the greater of two figures: (a) 50% of the current year QREs (the statutory floor); or (b) the fixed-base percentage multiplied by the average Indiana gross receipts for the four preceding tax years.11 For startups, a fixed-base percentage phase-in applies, starting at 3% for the first five years.11
3. Calculate Excess QREs: Subtract the Base Amount from the current QREs.
4. Apply Tiered Rates: Apply a 15% rate to the first $1 million of Excess QREs, and a 10% rate to any remaining Excess QREs above $1 million.6

Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)

The ASC method, available for tax years after 2009, is often preferred for its predictability.12

1. Calculation: The credit is 10% of the current year’s QREs that exceed 50% of the average QREs incurred during the three preceding tax years.11
2. Startup Fallback: If the Grantor does not have QREs in any one of the three prior years, a fallback rule applies, limiting the credit to 5% of the current year QREs.11

The election of the ASC method is critically important for tax planning, particularly for mature R&D operations housed within a Grantor Trust. When a business has significant historical gross receipts, the regular method’s fixed-base calculation can easily result in a base amount that equals or exceeds the current year’s QREs, effectively zeroing out the credit.11 By contrast, the ASC ties the credit calculation solely to the historical R&D spend, providing a more reliable and consistent tax benefit derived from sustained R&D investment. Tax advisors must model QRE projections against both methodologies annually to ensure the maximum credit is generated.

Credit Limitations and Carryforward Rules

The Indiana REC is nonrefundable.8 While this means the credit cannot result in a tax refund, any unused portion can be carried forward for a generous period of 10 years.11 No carryback is permitted.8

A key utilization rule under IC 6-3.1-4-3(b) requires that any current year credit generated must be applied to offset that year’s tax liability before any accumulated carryforward credit is applied.6

A significant structural benefit of the Indiana REC, particularly when claimed through the Grantor Trust mechanism, is that the credit is not limited, unlike the federal credit, to offsetting only the taxes imposed on the income specifically attributed to the business activity that generated the expense.14 This provides expansive utility to the Grantor, allowing the credit to offset any overall state income tax liability reported on Form IT-40, including tax due on wages, passive investments, or capital gains.

Table 2.1: Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC) Calculation Rates

Section 3: Eligibility Rules and the Grantor Trust Exception

Standard Pass-Through Mechanisms and Fiduciary Limitations

In Indiana, standard pass-through entities such as S corporations and partnerships are permitted to allocate the REC pro-rata to their owners (shareholders or partners) using Schedule IN K-1.9 These individuals then claim their share of the credit on their personal IT-40 returns.

Conversely, standard trusts and estates (simple or complex trusts) are treated as taxable entities required to calculate and claim the REC against their own liabilities on Form IT-41.5 Crucially, Indiana law explicitly states that beneficiaries of such trusts or estates are not eligible for this pass-through provision for state tax purposes.5

The Grantor Trust Exception

The specific guidance issued by the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) establishes the Grantor Trust as the singular exception to the beneficiary prohibition. DOR publications clearly state that while beneficiaries are generally ineligible, this rule excludes Grantor Trusts.5

This exception confirms that the Grantor—the deemed owner of the R&D activity—claims the credit directly on their individual Indiana tax return (Form IT-40). This policy recognition provides a critical benefit, effectively treating the Grantor Trust structure as an elected pass-through status for the specific purpose of the R&D credit.

This structural distinction has profound implications for estate and tax planning. If a business generating significant R&D credits is transferred into a non-grantor trust, the REC benefit is likely curtailed or lost entirely because the trust’s limited tax liability on Form IT-41 cannot absorb the full credit amount. By utilizing a Grantor Trust, the credit benefit is fully preserved and directed to the Grantor’s comprehensive state tax liability. The Grantor Trust, therefore, serves as an invaluable transitional vehicle for R&D-intensive businesses, allowing the tax benefit to continue flowing to the original owner until the trust’s grantor status is intentionally terminated or naturally lapses (e.g., upon death).

Table 3.1: Summary of Indiana R&D Credit Eligibility Flow-Through

Section 4: Compliance and Reporting Procedures

Documentation and Disclosure Requirements

For the Grantor to properly claim the REC, the underlying calculation must be prepared using Form IT-20REC, although this form is generally kept with the taxpayer’s records and not always filed with the return.9 Comprehensive documentation is mandatory, requiring the taxpayer to substantiate all Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) by detailing activities, personnel, supplies, and contracts specifically located or used in Indiana.11 These records must be retained for at least four years to support any potential audit.11

A critical compliance requirement, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018, mandates disclosure regarding the federal claim status. A Grantor claiming the Indiana REC must report to the DOR whether they also determined a credit for those QREs under federal IRC Sec. 41(a)(1) or (c)(4).5 If the Grantor claims the Indiana credit but does not claim the corresponding federal credit, they must disclose to the DOR the specific reasons for not claiming the federal benefit.5 This requirement is intended to mitigate aggressive state-only claims and emphasizes that any change in the federal credit status is considered a modification for state tax purposes.

Filing Flow and Administrative Complexity

Due to the disregarded status, the Grantor Trust generally bypasses the traditional fiduciary filing process for the REC. The trust does not file an IT-41 to claim the credit, nor does it typically issue a Schedule IN K-1 (which is reserved for partners or S corporation shareholders).14 Instead, the calculated credit amount is directly reported by the Grantor on their personal Indiana Individual Income Tax Return (Form IT-40), usually entered on Schedule 5: Credits.15

While the flow of the credit is streamlined to the individual return, the administrative burden on the Grantor increases. When a credit is received via an IN K-1 from a third-party partnership, the DOR relies substantially on the partnership’s filing (IT-65) for compliance. Conversely, in the Grantor Trust scenario, the Grantor must internally generate all the necessary support—including the complex calculations of the IT-20REC and the detailed QRE substantiation—and maintain this documentation directly within their personal tax file, demanding exceptional organizational rigor to ensure audit defense capability.

Interaction with the Indiana Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET)

Indiana allows certain pass-through entities, including trusts, to elect into the entity-level Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET) for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022.17 However, since a Grantor Trust is disregarded, its income is already taxed directly to the Grantor, rendering a PTET election for the Grantor Trust itself largely irrelevant.

If the Grantor Trust holds an interest in an underlying partnership or S corporation that elects the PTET, Indiana permits the use of certain state tax credits against the PTET liability.19 Regardless of the PTET election at the underlying entity level, the tax attributes specific to the Grantor Trust’s ownership share will ultimately flow through to and be taxed by the Grantor, reinforcing the fundamental rule that the Grantor is the ultimate taxpayer in this structure.

Section 5: Detailed Case Study: REC Flow-Through via a Grantor Trust

This example demonstrates the critical election between the Regular Method and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) and illustrates the direct flow of the credit to the Grantor.

Scenario Setup

An Indiana resident, Grantor G, utilizes the Apex Innovation Grantor Trust (AIGT) to hold and operate an R&D-intensive manufacturing business.

Step 1: Calculating the Indiana REC (Form IT-20REC)

The Grantor (deemed owner) evaluates the two available methods:

Table 5.1: Indiana REC Calculation Comparison

The calculation clearly demonstrates that, due to the high historical gross receipts associated with the business activity, the Regular Method generates zero credit. Grantor G elects the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method, yielding an Indiana REC of $110,000.

Step 2: Allocation and Utilization by the Grantor

Because AIGT is legally disregarded for income tax purposes, the $110,000 REC is immediately attributed to and claimed by Grantor G on their individual tax filing (Form IT-40, Schedule 5).

• Tax Liability Offset: Grantor G’s total state tax liability is $150,000.
• Credit Application: The $110,000 credit offsets the liability.

• Final Tax Due: $150,000 – $110,000 = $40,000.

The credit is fully utilized against the Grantor’s comprehensive state income tax liability, including tax generated by non-R&D income sources, confirming the broad utility permitted under Indiana law.14

Step 3: Comparison to a Non-Grantor Trust

If AIGT were structured as a standard Simple Trust and distributed all of its income (e.g., $500,000) to beneficiaries, the trust’s tax liability on Form IT-41 would be near zero after the distribution deduction. The trust would attempt to claim the $110,000 REC against this negligible liability. Since the beneficiaries are explicitly ineligible for the pass-through credit 5, the entire $110,000 credit would be stranded at the entity level, only available for carryforward, significantly diminishing the immediate economic benefit of the R&D incentive.

Section 6: Conclusions and Strategic Recommendations

The ability to pass the Indiana Research Expense Credit through a Grantor Trust structure represents a highly valuable, intentional exception within Indiana’s tax code that supports innovation investment. This mechanism is critical for complex tax structures involving closely held businesses.

The analysis confirms three primary strategic advantages for utilizing the Grantor Trust structure:

1. Guaranteed Credit Utilization: By treating the trust as a disregarded entity, the state ensures that the nonrefundable REC flows directly to the Grantor’s robust individual income tax liability (IT-40), preventing the credit from being trapped and wasted at the fiduciary level (IT-41).
2. Expanded Offset Scope: The Grantor can use the credit to offset their entire Indiana income tax liability, regardless of the source of that income, a broader application than is permitted under federal R&D tax credit rules.
3. Optimal Method Selection: Tax planning must include rigorous modeling of the credit calculation. For most mature R&D businesses, the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method will yield a significantly higher and more predictable credit amount than the Regular Method, which is often hindered by a large historical gross receipts base.

For compliance purposes, professionals must ensure the Grantor maintains meticulous records that meet the “trade or business” requirement and be prepared to satisfy the DOR’s 2019 disclosure mandate regarding the decision not to claim a corresponding federal credit, if applicable. The Grantor Trust structure, therefore, is not merely a beneficial structure but a necessary tax planning tool for ensuring the effectiveness of the Indiana R&D Tax Credit for individual owners of qualifying research activities.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/