Maximizing Innovation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Indiana Code $\S 6-3.1-4$ and the Research Expense Credit Landscape

Indiana Code $\S 6-3.1-4$ establishes the Research Expense Credit, a tiered, incremental income tax credit designed to incentivize qualified research and development (R&D) activities conducted within the state. This critical statute grants eligible taxpayers a tax credit against their Indiana state income tax liability based on the excess of current-year Indiana Qualified Research Expenses (IQREs) over a historical base amount.1 The framework offers a maximum credit rate of 15% and provides taxpayers a robust 10-year carryforward for any unused credits, making it a powerful tool for financing in-state innovation.3

I. Statutory Foundation and Regulatory Framework (IC 6-3.1-4)

The Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC) is codified under IC 6-3.1-4, establishing the legal framework, key definitions, and calculation methodology for the state’s primary R&D incentive. The REC is one of two key tax incentives offered by the state to support innovation, the other being a 100% sales tax exemption for R&D equipment.1

A. Legislative Purpose and Economic Rationale

The primary legislative purpose of the Indiana Research Expense Credit is to provide a direct incentive for increasing qualified research activities that are conducted within Indiana.1 This policy is supported by economic principles recognizing that technological advancement is a powerful driver of economic output, often more effective than traditional labor or capital investments.5

R&D activity frequently generates knowledge that is fluid and transferable (positive externalities), meaning the benefit extends beyond the firm conducting the research, often benefiting competitors and the broader industry.5 Because private firms may not capture the full economic value of their innovations, they tend to underinvest in research. By offering a substantial tax credit based on input (expenses) rather than output (patents), the state reduces the financial risk inherent in R&D projects, thereby stimulating investment that maximizes societal benefit.5 This tax incentive acts as a justifiable governmental intervention to encourage high-risk, high-reward economic activity.

B. Key Statutory Definitions (IC 6-3.1-4-1)

The statute relies heavily on federal definitions while imposing specific geographical sourcing rules.6

• Indiana Qualified Research Expense (IQRE): This is defined as qualified research expense that is incurred exclusively for research conducted in Indiana.7 Only expenses traceable to activities performed within the state qualify for the credit.8
• Qualified Research Expense (QRE): This mirrors the federal definition found in Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).7
• Base Amount: This amount uses the formula defined in IRC $\S 41(\text{c})$, but the calculation is modified to include only Indiana qualified research expenses and gross receipts attributable to Indiana.7 This modification ensures the comparison is appropriately localized to the taxpayer’s Indiana activity.
• Pass-Through Entity (PTE): The definition is broad, including S corporations, partnerships, Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs).2 These entities may claim the credit against their own liabilities or allocate the credit to their shareholders, partners, or members.10

C. Federal Integration and Conformity (IC 6-3.1-4-4)

Indiana’s statutory framework is complex because it strategically links to, and selectively decouples from, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) through a dual set of effective dates, requiring careful compliance analysis.

1. Foundational Interpretation (Pre-2016 Law): IC 6-3.1-4-4 mandates that the provisions of IRC $\S 41$ and its corresponding regulations as in effect on January 1, 2001, are applicable for the interpretation and administration of the Indiana credit.12 This older statutory reference sets the foundational rules for structural elements such as the allocation and pass-through of the credit, as well as transitional rules for determining the base period.12
2. Definition Alignment (Post-2016 Law): To ensure the credit remains modern and comprehensive, HEA 1472-2015, effective January 1, 2016, amended the research expense tax credit definitions to align with the current IRC.4

This dual referencing means that tax professionals must consult the 2001 regulations for guidance on the foundational structure and calculation of the base amount, while using current IRC $\S 41(\text{b})$ definitions for classifying whether specific expenditures qualify as QREs (e.g., supplies or wages).14 This structure prevents Indiana’s credit from being disrupted by frequent federal legislative changes that might affect the IRC $\S 41$ framework. Furthermore, Indiana explicitly decouples from the federal sunset provisions, confirming that the termination date in IRC $\S 41(\text{h})$ does not apply to the Indiana credit.12

II. Defining Qualified Research Activities (QRA) (IDOR Guidance)

The Indiana Department of Revenue (IDOR) enforces the federal standard for qualified research, requiring strict adherence to the four-part test established under IRC $\S 41(\text{d})$.1

A. The Four-Part Test: Nexus to IRC $\S 41(\text{d})$

For research expenditures to qualify for the Indiana credit, the underlying activities must satisfy the following four requirements:

1. Expenses under IRC $\S 174$ Test: The expenditures must be those that may be treated as expenses under IRC $\S 174$ (research and experimentation expenditures).1 This dictates that the expense must be reasonable under the circumstances.
2. Discovering Technological Information Test: The research must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information that is technological in nature. This requires that the process of experimentation relies fundamentally on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.1 The information discovered must be intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved business component.1
3. Business Component Test: The research must relate to a “business component” of the taxpayer. A business component includes any product, process, computer software, technique, formula, or invention that is held for sale, lease, or license, or used by the taxpayer in their trade or business.1
4. Process of Experimentation Test: Substantially all (80% or more) of the activities must constitute elements of a process of experimentation. This process is designed to evaluate alternatives to achieve a result when the capability, method, or appropriate design is uncertain at the start of the research.1

B. Categories of Indiana Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)

IQREs are expenses incurred in Indiana that fall into two main categories, defined by Section 41(b) of the IRC 1:

• In-House Research Expenses: These are 100% includable if performed within Indiana.1

• Wages: Payments made to an employee for “qualified services,” which include the actual conduct of qualified research, the direct supervision (first-line management) of qualified research, or services in direct support (such as clerical or lab support) of those conducting or supervising the research.1 Wages are generally defined as taxable wages reported on Form W-2.1
• Supplies: Costs of materials consumed in the conduct of qualified research.1
• Use of Computers: Amounts paid or incurred for the right to use computers in conducting qualified research.1

• Contract Research Expenses: This includes 65% of any amount paid or incurred by the taxpayer to an unrelated third party for qualified research performed in Indiana.1

C. Activities Explicitly Excluded from Qualification

IDOR guidance adopts the explicit exclusions found in IRC $\S 41(\text{d})(4)$, ensuring that certain activities, while perhaps necessary for the business, do not qualify for the tax credit.1 These excluded activities include:

• Research conducted after the beginning of commercial production of the business component.1
• Research related to style, taste, cosmetic, or seasonal design factors.1
• Ordinary testing or inspection of materials for quality control.1
• Efficiency surveys or management studies.1
• Acquisition of another’s patent, model, production, or process.1
• Adaptation of an existing business component to a particular customer’s requirement.1

III. Mechanics of the Research Expense Credit Calculation

Taxpayers are entitled to a research expense tax credit if they incur Indiana qualified research expense in a particular taxable year.10 They must evaluate two distinct calculation methods annually and choose the one that yields the greatest credit amount.

A. The Regular Incremental Research Credit Method

This method aligns closely with the original federal R&D tax credit calculation structure, focusing on the incremental increase over a historical base.

1. Determine the Base Amount: The Base Amount is determined as the greater of two figures 15:

• The result of multiplying the taxpayer’s fixed-base percentage (FBP) by the average Indiana gross receipts for the four preceding tax years.15 Startups have special rules, using a 3% fixed-base percentage for the first five years, phasing up to 16% by year ten.15
• 50% of the current year’s Indiana Qualified Research Expenses (IQREs).15 This serves as the statutory minimum base amount.

1. Calculate Excess QREs: The excess is calculated by subtracting the Base Amount from the current year’s total IQREs.15
2. Apply the Tiered Rate Structure: Indiana applies a generous tiered rate to the calculated excess QREs 2:

• 15% is applied to the first $\$1,000,000$ of excess QREs.14
• 10% is applied to any amount of excess QREs greater than $\$1,000,000$.14

B. The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method (IC 6-3.1-4-2.5)

The ASC method is available at the taxpayer’s election for IQREs incurred after December 31, 2009, and provides a less complex alternative, often benefiting businesses with fluctuating research expenditures.14

1. Compute the ASC Base Amount: The ASC base is simpler, defined as 50% of the taxpayer’s average Indiana qualified research expense for the three taxable years preceding the current year.14
2. Calculate Excess QREs: The excess is the current year’s IQREs minus the ASC Base Amount.
3. Apply the Credit Rate: A flat 10% is applied to the calculated excess QREs.14
4. Start-up Provision: If the taxpayer did not have Indiana qualified research expenses in any one of the three taxable years preceding the current year, the amount of the research expense tax credit is simplified to 5% of the total current year IQREs.14

C. Strategic Choice and Carryover Provisions

The decision to use the Regular or ASC method is highly strategic. The Regular Method, with its 15% rate on the first $\$1$ million of incremental spending, can maximize the credit if a company has a low historical fixed base percentage (FBP). However, if a company has experienced high growth in gross receipts without a commensurate increase in R&D, the 50% minimum base requirement under the Regular Method can substantially erode the credit.15 The ASC provides a simpler, more predictable base (50% of the prior three-year average) which may result in a higher usable credit, necessitating the modeling of both calculation types annually.15

The resulting credit is non-refundable, meaning it can only offset state tax liability.3 However, the credit is highly valuable because any unused amount may be carried forward for up to 10 succeeding taxable years.11 The credit is generally applied against the taxpayer’s total tax liability, not just the tax imposed on income attributable to the specific business segment that generated the research expense.11

IV. State Tax Planning Advantage: The IRC § 174 Decoupling

A significant competitive advantage for businesses performing R&D in Indiana stems from the state’s decision to decouple from the recent federal changes to the treatment of research and experimentation expenses under IRC $\S 174$.

A. Context of Federal Amortization Requirements

Under the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, R&D expenses defined under IRC $\S 174$ must be capitalized and amortized over five years (15 years for foreign research). This federal requirement severely delays the deductibility of these expenses, creating an adverse impact on taxable income and cash flow for R&D-intensive businesses.

B. Indiana’s Policy for Full State Deductibility

Indiana legislation explicitly chose not to conform to this federal tax treatment. Beginning in tax year 2022, IRC $\S 174$ research and development expenses remain fully deductible for Indiana state income tax purposes in the year they are incurred.16 This crucial state-level benefit is retroactive for the 2022 tax year, providing immediate relief for taxpayers.17

This decoupling allows taxpayers to fully deduct their research and experimental costs when determining their state tax liability.17 For returns already filed for tax year 2022, they may need to be amended to reflect this $\S 174$ adjustment, unless a Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET) election was made.16 This legislative action mitigates the financial burden imposed by federal amortization rules, enhancing Indiana’s attractiveness compared to states that conform to the federal mandate. The total value proposition of R&D in Indiana—a state tax credit on IQREs plus a full immediate deduction of all $\S 174$ R&D costs—is maximized.

V. Indiana Department of Revenue (IDOR) Guidance and Compliance

The Indiana Department of Revenue oversees these incentive programs and has stringent requirements regarding the application process, allocation rules, and, most critically, documentation.13

A. Administrative Requirements and Claiming the Credit

The primary instrument for claiming the credit is Schedule IT-20REC (Indiana Research Expense Credit).11 This form is comparable to the federal Form 6765, and taxpayers claiming the Indiana credit must attach a copy of the completed federal Form 6765 to their IT-20REC.8

• Pass-Through Allocation: Pass-through entities (PTEs) such as partnerships or S corporations must enclose the IT-20REC with their annual return (e.g., IT-65 or IT-20S).11 They then allocate the remaining annual research expense credit pro rata to each owner (shareholder, partner, or member) using an attachment to the Indiana K-1.11 The statute explicitly forbids both the PTE and the individual owners from claiming a credit for the same qualified research expenses.12
• Application Order: A credit earned in the current year is applied against the current year’s tax liability before any credit carryover is applied.11

B. The Burden of Proof: Contemporaneous Documentation

IDOR administrative rulings have established a strict interpretation of documentation requirements, representing the single greatest risk to taxpayers claiming the credit.19 The Department acknowledges that research activities may have occurred, but recent decisions confirm that credits will be disallowed if the documentation is “insufficient to meet the taxpayers’ burden of establishing they were entitled to claim credits”.19

Taxpayers must retain records in an audit-ready format, created contemporaneously—at the time the research activities are performed—to substantiate claimed IQREs.1

Table 1: IDOR Required Contemporaneous Documentation Checklist

Documentation must clearly demonstrate the nexus of the expense to research conducted in Indiana, specifying the place where services were performed, the residence of the personnel performing the services, and the location where supplies were consumed.8 Studies or analyses compiled subsequent to the research are generally deemed insufficient to substantiate the credit during an audit.1

C. Disclosure Mandates

The IDOR has a specific disclosure requirement for claims that appear inconsistent with federal filings. If a taxpayer claims the Indiana credit for qualified research expenses but does not claim the federal R&D credit for those same expenses, the taxpayer must disclose to the IDOR any reasons for not claiming the federal credit.2 This serves as a quality control mechanism for the IDOR. Since the Indiana QRE definition relies entirely on the federal framework, claiming the state credit while omitting the federal claim suggests a potential weakness in eligibility or documentation. The Department uses this disclosure to flag returns for closer audit scrutiny to verify that the claimed research activities truly meet the four-part test.

VI. Detailed Calculation Example and Practical Case Study

The following example illustrates the critical difference between the Regular Incremental Method and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method, demonstrating why both must be modeled annually.

A. Scenario Setup: Industrial Manufacturer (“Innovate IN”)

Assume an Indiana-based manufacturing company, “Innovate IN,” has the following data for Tax Year 2024:

B. Calculation using the Regular Incremental Method

1. Calculate FBP Base: $5.0\% \times \$50,000,000$ (Average Gross Receipts) = $\$2,500,000$.
2. Calculate Minimum Base Check: $50\% \times \$2,500,000$ (Current IQREs) = $\$1,250,000$.
3. Determine Base Amount: The Base Amount is the greater of the two, resulting in $\$2,500,000$.15
4. Calculate Excess QREs: Current IQREs $(\$2,500,000)$ minus Base Amount $(\$2,500,000)$ equals $\$0$.
5. Final Credit Determination: Since the excess is $\$0$, the credit under the Regular Method is $\$0$.

C. Calculation using the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method

1. Calculate ASC Base Amount:

• Average prior 3 years IQREs: $(\$1,000,000 + \$1,500,000 + \$2,000,000) / 3 = \$1,500,000$.
• ASC Base Amount: $50\% \times \$1,500,000 = **\$750,000**$.14

1. Calculate Excess QREs: Current IQREs $(\$2,500,000)$ minus ASC Base Amount $(\$750,000)$ equals $\$1,750,000$.
2. Final Credit Determination:

• Credit Rate: $10\%$ on the excess amount.15
• Credit Earned: $10\% \times \$1,750,000 = **\$175,000**$.

Table 2: Case Study Comparison: Regular vs. ASC Calculation

This scenario demonstrates the absolute necessity of evaluating both methods. Because the manufacturer’s historical base amount under the Regular Method was high due to significant prior gross receipts, that method yielded no credit. However, the ASC method, with its focus on the three-year average of QREs, provided a substantial credit of $\$175,000$.15

VII. Ancillary Indiana R&D Incentives

In addition to the income tax credit, Indiana offers parallel incentives that further reduce the cost of R&D activities.

A. 100% Sales and Use Tax Exemption for R&D Equipment (IC 6-2.5-5-40)

Indiana provides a 100% sales tax exemption for qualified research and development equipment and tangible personal property purchased for use in Indiana.1

To qualify for this exemption, the property must meet specific criteria: it must not have been previously used in Indiana for any purpose, and it must be acquired by the purchaser explicitly for experimental or laboratory R&D activities related to new products, new uses of existing products, or improving or testing existing products.20

Taxpayers may either secure the exemption at the time of purchase or file a claim for refund for sales tax paid on such a retail transaction through a manner prescribed by the IDOR.13 The form IT-20REC is used to facilitate claims related to research credits and exemptions.13

VIII. Conclusion: Strategic Compliance and Maximizing Indiana R&D Benefits

Indiana Code $\S 6-3.1-4$ establishes a robust and competitive Research Expense Credit, characterized by a generous tiered rate structure reaching $15\%$ and supported by a 10-year carryforward period. The state’s commitment to innovation is further solidified by its critical decision to decouple from the federal IRC $\S 174$ amortization requirement, allowing for the immediate deduction of R&D costs for state tax purposes beginning in 2022. This combination of a high credit rate, full expense deductibility, and the accompanying sales tax exemption for R&D equipment positions Indiana as an exceptionally favorable environment for research-intensive businesses.

Successful utilization of the Indiana Research Expense Credit hinges on two core strategic areas. First, taxpayers must annually model both the Regular Incremental Credit and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) to determine the optimal claim, as demonstrated by scenarios where a high fixed-base percentage under the Regular Method may completely negate the credit benefit, while the ASC provides substantial savings. Second, and equally important, taxpayers must adhere strictly to the IDOR’s requirement for rigorous, contemporaneous documentation. The IDOR’s policy of disallowing credits based solely on insufficient proof places a heavy burden on the taxpayer to maintain audit-ready records that clearly link time, expense, and activity to the four-part test for qualified research. Compliance in documentation is paramount to realizing the substantial tax benefits offered under IC 6-3.1-4.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/