Navigating the Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC): Statutory Requirements, DOR Compliance, and Strategic Tax Planning

I. Executive Summary: The Indiana DOR and Research Incentives

The Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) is the state agency tasked with administering, interpreting, and enforcing tax laws, including the complex provisions of the Research Expense Credit (REC). Specifically, the DOR provides mandatory compliance guidance and ensures adherence to the credit eligibility and calculation requirements established under Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4.

The Indiana REC offers eligible taxpayers a potentially significant, nonrefundable state income tax credit based on qualified research expenses (QREs) incurred within the state. The DOR’s administrative posture is one of active oversight, highlighted by unique state statutes requiring taxpayers to disclose their corresponding federal R&D tax credit position, thereby tying state compliance directly to federal filing requirements. Furthermore, Indiana’s recent decision to decouple from federal R&D expense capitalization rules under IRC Section 174 introduces substantial state tax planning opportunities that the DOR must manage and enforce. This report details the foundational statutes, outlines the specific administrative guidance from the DOR, and presents the strategic implications of these regulations for R&D-intensive businesses operating in Indiana.

II. Foundational Principles and Statutory Authority

This section establishes the legislative foundation for the credit and defines the fundamental terms required for strict compliance, focusing specifically on Indiana’s unique adoption of federal tax definitions.

A. The Legislative Mandate: Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4

The Research Expense Credit is a cornerstone of Indiana’s economic development strategy, formally established under Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4.1 The credit is explicitly designed to function as an incentive for increasing qualified research activities that are performed in Indiana.3

IC 6-3.1-4 confirms the fundamental entitlement for taxpayers: any taxpayer who incurs Indiana qualified research expenses in a particular taxable year is entitled to claim the research expense tax credit for that year against their state income tax liability.1 The potential value of the credit is calculated as a percentage of qualified research expenses incurred in Indiana.2

B. Defining Qualified Research Expenses (QREs): The Interplay with IRC Section 41

A critical aspect of Indiana compliance is the definition of a Qualified Research Expense (QRE), which does not rely on current federal statute but rather references an historical version. Specifically, the definition of a QRE for Indiana tax purposes is explicitly defined by Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as in effect on January 1, 2001.2

This fixed date of reference creates a vital point of divergence from current federal R&D tax law (IRC 41) that mandates detailed technical review by taxpayers. If an activity or expenditure qualifies under current federal law, it may still fail to qualify for the Indiana REC if the scope of qualifying activities has expanded since 2001 (e.g., specific treatment of internal-use software). Taxpayers must ensure that their QRE calculations adhere strictly to the more restrictive 2001 federal definition for state purposes, regardless of their current federal Form 6765 filing position. Failure to perform this historical reconciliation exposes the taxpayer to substantial state audit risk, making accurate qualification far more complex than a simple transfer of current federal figures. The Indiana qualified research expense is defined as the sum of amounts incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year, including wages paid to employees, costs of supplies, and amounts paid for services used in qualified research or supervision of research activities, provided the research is conducted specifically in Indiana.4

C. Eligible Taxpayers and Pass-Through Entity Considerations

The Indiana REC is broadly available across various business structures. Eligibility extends to Corporations and pass-through entities, including S corporations, partnerships, Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs).3 Trusts and estates are also eligible to claim the credit, provided they apply it against their own liabilities.3

For flow-through entities, the credit mechanism is designed to benefit the owners: S corporations and partnerships are expressly permitted to pass the calculated credit through to their shareholders and partners.3 However, the eligibility is not universal among trusts and estates; beneficiaries of estates or trusts are generally not eligible to claim the credit, with the singular exception of Grantor Trusts.3

III. The Indiana Department of Revenue’s (DOR) Administrative Framework and Oversight

The DOR is the authoritative body that provides the necessary guidance and administrative framework for the REC. Its role extends beyond simple tax collection, encompassing active enforcement of unique state disclosure mandates.

A. DOR’s Core Function in Tax Credit Administration

The DOR administers the Research Expense Credit, providing critical resources to ensure compliance. This administrative authority includes specifying the precise manner in which reporting and claims are made.3 The DOR maintains the infrastructure for filing claims, such as utilizing Schedule E (Indiana Credits) within the state tax return forms.6

To assist taxpayers, the DOR publishes several key compliance resources, including the Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC) Handbook, the REC Fact Sheet, and specific technical guidelines such as Internal Use Software Guidelines for REC and Sampling Guidelines for REC.3 While the credit is intended to spur economic activity, state legislative reviews have indicated difficulty in definitively determining whether the incentive has successfully increased or caused the shifting of R&D activities into Indiana, underscoring the ongoing focus on effective utilization monitoring.7

B. Mandatory Compliance: Federal Reporting Disclosures (IC 6-3.1-4-8)

Indiana has implemented a distinctive statutory obligation under IC 6-3.1-4-8, effective January 1, 2019, which closely links the state credit claim to the taxpayer’s federal R&D credit position.3 This creates a significant procedural hurdle and risk area for taxpayers.

The primary requirement involves a two-part disclosure:

1. Reporting a Claimed Federal Credit: A taxpayer claiming the Indiana REC must report to the DOR whether they have calculated and claimed a credit for those Indiana QREs under IRC Section 41(a)(1) or (c)(4) for federal tax purposes.3 For this purpose, the “computation of a positive federal credit” is defined as a computation based on federal Form 6765, supplied with the federal tax return.2 “Claiming the credit” means reporting it on the federal return or, for a pass-through entity, making the credit available to the owners.2
2. Disclosing Reasons for Unclaimed Federal Credit: If a taxpayer claims the Indiana REC but elects not to claim the corresponding federal credit for those QREs, the taxpayer must disclose to DOR any reasons for this discrepancy.3 This disclosure must be made in the manner specified by the DOR.3

This unique disclosure mandate transforms the federal R&D credit filing process into an effective pre-screening mechanism for the DOR. If a taxpayer attempts to claim the state credit without a corresponding federal claim or without robust justification, the claim is automatically flagged for higher state scrutiny. The rule essentially dictates that taxpayers must document the federal computation (typically Form 6765) and prepare a comprehensive justification letter for the DOR, even if they strategically choose to forgo the federal credit. Furthermore, a subsequent change to the federal credit determination under IRC 41 is formally considered a “modification” for Indiana tax purposes, potentially triggering a requirement for amended state returns.3

Table Title: Mandatory DOR Disclosure Requirements (IC 6-3.1-4-8)

C. Clarifying Guidance: DOR Handbooks and Information Bulletins

The DOR regularly publishes Information Bulletins (IBs) to clarify statutes and procedures.8 One key piece of guidance relates to the sales tax incentive. Sales Tax Information Bulletin #75, for instance, provides clarification regarding the 100% sales tax exemption for research and development property established under IC 6-2.5-5-40.9

This bulletin defines “Research and development property” as tangible personal property that has not previously been used in Indiana and is acquired specifically for R&D activities.9 “Research and development activities” are defined to include the design, refinement, and testing of prototypes of new or improved commercial products, conducted before sales have begun, for the purpose of increasing scientific knowledge.9 This guidance ensures taxpayers can properly distinguish qualifying property from general operational or manufacturing equipment.

IV. Detailed Calculation Methodologies for the Research Expense Credit

Indiana permits taxpayers to utilize two distinct methods for calculating the Research Expense Credit: the traditional Regular Method (utilizing tiered rates) and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method. The option allows businesses to choose the methodology that maximizes their benefit based on their historical spending and revenue trajectory.

A. Method One: The Regular (Tiered Rate) Calculation

The Regular Method is an incremental approach based on the fixed-base percentage calculation, similar to the federal method but localized to Indiana operations.

1. Establishing the Base Amount: Indiana adheres to the federal IRC $\S 41(\text{c})$ base rules but requires substitution of Indiana Qualified Research Expenses and Indiana gross receipts for the federal figures in both the fixed-base percentage calculation and the average receipts calculation.10 The base amount is calculated by multiplying the fixed-base percentage by the average Indiana gross receipts for the prior four tax years.10 A crucial provision dictates that the base amount is subject to a minimum floor, set at 50% of the current year’s QREs.10 New businesses (startups) utilize a phased-in fixed-base percentage, starting at 3% for the first five years and gradually phasing up to 16% by the tenth year.10
2. Applying Tiered Credit Rates (15% and 10%): The resulting credit amount is derived from the Excess QREs (Current QREs minus the Base Amount).5 This methodology uses tiered rates:

• The first $1 million of the excess QREs is multiplied by a higher rate of 15%.3
• Any amount of excess QREs greater than $1 million is multiplied by a rate of 10%.3

This tiered structure is designed to heavily reward substantial growth in R&D investment. For the aerospace industry involved in civil and military jet propulsion, an alternative method of calculation may apply.3

B. Method Two: The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)

The ASC method is available for tax years after 2009 11 and offers a simplified, three-year historical average approach, which often provides greater predictability and benefit for businesses experiencing fluctuations in historical spending.

1. Determining the Base: The base amount under the ASC is derived from the prior three tax years. The taxpayer first calculates the average Indiana QREs for those three years. The base amount is then set at 50% of that three-year average QREs.10
2. Calculating the Credit: The credit is calculated as 10% of the excess QREs (the current year QREs minus the ASC base amount).10
3. Fallback Rule: For businesses lacking sufficient historical data, a fallback rule applies. If the taxpayer had zero Indiana QREs in any one of the three preceding tax years, they must apply a simplified rule where the credit is calculated as 5% of the current year’s total Indiana QREs.5

The availability of both the tiered Regular Method and the ASC compels sophisticated tax optimization. Businesses with relatively low historical QREs but significant current R&D spending often find the 50% ASC base to be significantly lower than the Regular Method’s fixed-base percentage derived from gross receipts, potentially maximizing the credit despite the lower 10% rate. Conversely, large, mature companies with robust, consistent R&D spending may achieve a greater benefit through the Regular Method due to the 15% rate applied to the first $1 million of excess QREs. Tax managers must conduct annual calculations using both methodologies to ensure the client selects the most advantageous approach.

V. Practical Application and Calculation Case Study

To illustrate the mechanics of the Indiana Research Expense Credit, the following examples demonstrate how the two primary methodologies are applied to derive the final credit amount.

A. Hypothetical Scenario Setup: Defining QREs and Base Period Data

Consider Innovate Dynamics Corp. (IDC), an Indiana manufacturer incurring substantial QREs in the current tax year. The company calculates its potential credit under both available methods.

Data Points for the Current Tax Year (2024):

• Current Year QREs: $2,500,000
• Regular Method Base Amount (calculated using fixed-base percentage): $800,000
• Prior 3-Year Average QREs (for ASC): $1,200,000

B. Calculation Example 1: Regular Method Implementation

The Regular Method is the appropriate choice when the difference between current QREs and the calculated base is high, allowing for significant utilization of the 15% rate.

Table Title: Calculation Example 1: Regular (Tiered Rate) Method

C. Calculation Example 2: Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Implementation

Using the Alternative Simplified Credit method for comparison demonstrates how a simplified base can lead to a smaller, but still significant, credit amount. We adjust the current QRE figure slightly in this example to align with a known ASC calculation model:

• Current QREs used for ASC Example: $2,000,000$ 10
• Prior 3-year average QREs: $1,200,000$ 10

Table Title: Calculation Example 2: Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method

In this scenario, if IDC had no QREs in one of the three prior years, the fallback rule would apply, yielding $5\%$ of the current QREs ($\$2,000,000$), resulting in a credit of $\$100,000$.10 The comparison demonstrates that the Regular Method, while requiring a more complex base calculation, often yields a larger credit due to the generous 15% rate on the first $\$1$ million of excess QREs.

VI. Critical Compliance Considerations and Strategic Tax Planning

Effective utilization of the Indiana REC requires careful management of utilization rules and acknowledgment of Indiana’s strategic non-conformity with recent federal legislation, which presents both opportunities and compliance complexities.

A. Utilization Rules: Non-Refundability, Carryforward Periods, and Stacking Order

The Indiana research credit is nonrefundable, meaning it can only be used to offset the taxpayer’s Indiana state income tax liability; it cannot result in a direct refund.5 This necessitates strategic planning for credit utilization, especially since unused credits are allowed a substantial carryforward period of 10 years.5

The stacking order prescribed by IC 6-3.1-4-3(b) is a critical compliance detail that affects long-term credit management. The statute mandates that the current year credit must be used first to offset the tax liability for that year before any carryforward credit from previous years is applied.2 This rule contrasts with the taxpayer-preferred FIFO (First-In, First-Out) method, which prioritizes the use of the oldest credits to prevent expiration. By requiring the use of the most recent credit first, Indiana’s rule effectively accelerates the expiration risk of older credit vintages if the taxpayer consistently generates new, large credits annually. For combined groups, the research expense credit carryforward must also be used first by the earning member up to their liability, and subsequently by other members of the group up to their respective liabilities.2 Robust tracking of the exact acquisition date and expiration date of every credit cohort is essential due to this mandatory utilization sequence.

B. State Non-Conformity: The Treatment of IRC Section 174 R&D Expense Amortization

Perhaps the most significant strategic advantage provided by Indiana’s tax policy is its decision regarding the federal treatment of R&D expenses under IRC Section 174.

The federal law mandates a major change: starting in 2022, IRC Section 174 requires R&D expenses to be capitalized and amortized over five years (or 15 years for foreign research).12 In a deliberate move to maintain a pro-R&D tax environment, Indiana proactively chose not to conform to this federal amortization mandate.12

Consequently, for state income tax purposes, Indiana taxpayers can continue to fully deduct R&D expenses in the year they are incurred.12 This decoupling policy necessitates that taxpayers making federal amortization adjustments must make a corresponding subtraction adjustment on their Indiana state return to reflect the full deduction of R&D expenses. For tax returns already filed for Tax Year 2022, amended Indiana returns may be required to reflect the IRC 174 adjustment, unless a specific election (such as the Pass-Through Entity Tax, or PTET) was made.12

This non-conformity establishes a powerful dual incentive structure (Immediate Full Deduction + Nonrefundable Credit) that provides a major, immediate cash-flow benefit for R&D-intensive businesses. This deduction is often more substantial in the short term than the nonrefundable credit itself, positioning Indiana as highly competitive against states that have conformed to the federal IRC 174 capitalization requirement, thereby serving as a strategic attractor for in-state R&D investment.

C. Leveraging the Related 100% R&D Sales Tax Exemption

Separate from the income tax credit, Indiana provides a related, critical incentive: a 100 percent sales tax exemption for qualified research and development equipment and property purchased for use in Indiana.2

Taxpayers should attempt to secure this exemption at the time of purchase to avoid unnecessary expenditure. If sales tax is paid on a qualifying retail transaction, taxpayers are permitted to file a timely claim for refund with the DOR.2 This exemption covers property used in “Research and development activities,” which includes design, refinement, and testing of prototypes conducted before sales, aimed at increasing scientific knowledge.9 Comprehensive planning must therefore integrate the management of both the income tax credit and the sales tax exemption to maximize total R&D investment savings.

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations for Compliance

The Indiana Research Expense Credit (REC) is a strategically important but technically demanding state tax incentive governed meticulously by the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) under IC 6-3.1-4. Successful compliance and optimization require rigorous adherence to state-specific rules that often diverge from current federal tax practice.

Summary of Key Compliance Focus Areas

1. Fixed QRE Definition: All claims must be technically defensible under the definition of Qualified Research Expenses established by IRC Section 41(b) as effective on January 1, 2001.2 Taxpayers relying solely on current federal eligibility rules risk state audit exposure if they fail to address the statutory fixed date.
2. Federal Disclosure Obligation: The DOR’s unique requirement under IC 6-3.1-4-8 elevates the federal R&D claim to an implicit state audit threshold. Taxpayers claiming the state REC must proactively document and either report the federal claim or justify the reasons for a state-only claim.3
3. Method Optimization: Sophisticated tax departments must calculate and compare the result of the tiered Regular Method (which offers a maximum rate of 15%) against the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method (10% rate with a 50% QRE base) annually to ensure maximum credit realization.10

Strategic Recommendations for R&D Investment

• Capitalize on IRC 174 Decoupling: Taxpayers must immediately recognize and act upon Indiana’s non-conformity with federal IRC Section 174. The full state deduction of R&D expenses provides an immediate, superior cash-flow benefit compared to federal amortization, significantly reducing the effective state tax rate for R&D operations.12
• Implement Vintage Tracking for Utilization: Given the nonrefundable nature and the mandatory stacking order (current credit used first, preceding carryforwards), detailed tracking of REC vintages is crucial. This proactive management mitigates the heightened risk of older credits expiring before they can be applied against a 10-year limit.2
• Integrate Dual Incentives: R&D planning should holistically address both the state income tax credit and the 100% sales tax exemption for R&D equipment. Utilizing the sales tax exemption ensures that capital expenditures related to research activities are cost-optimized from the outset.2

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/