An Expert Analysis of the Research Conducted in Indiana Requirement and the IC 6-3.1-4 Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: The Indiana Research Expense Credit

The Indiana Research Expense Credit (IC 6-3.1-4) is a nonrefundable state income tax incentive designed to boost investment in qualified research activities. The foundational jurisdictional mandate for claiming the credit is that all associated Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) must be incurred for research activities physically conducted in Indiana.1

This state-level incentive program offers competitive rates—15% on the first $1 million of incremental QREs that exceed a determined base amount, and 10% on subsequent excess QREs.3 The strategic structure of the credit, which is closely linked to but modified from Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, provides a significant financial advantage to companies conducting innovation within the state’s borders. For multi-state taxpayers, rigorous compliance demands detailed documentation proving physical location and adherence to the Indiana Department of Revenue’s (DOR) unique “lesser of” apportionment limitation mechanism. The overall incentive package is further enhanced by Indiana’s policy of non-conformity to federal IRC Section 174 amortization rules and a 100% sales tax exemption for qualified research equipment.5

II. Statutory Framework: Defining Qualified Research Expense (QRE)

Indiana’s statutory framework for the Research Expense Credit, codified under IC 6-3.1-4, is fundamentally designed to align with federal standards while maintaining a strict geographical focus. This hybrid approach requires taxpayers to satisfy both the technical federal definition of qualified research and the specific Indiana nexus requirement.

A. Foundation in Indiana Code (IC 6-3.1-4)

The state legislature established the research expense credit specifically to provide an incentive for increasing qualified research activities that are conducted within Indiana.1 The credit is claimed against the taxpayer’s Indiana state income tax liability, and its magnitude is directly proportional to the volume of QREs incurred within the state.1

1. Eligibility and Flow-Through Provisions

Eligibility for the credit extends broadly to most business forms that incur Indiana research expenses, including corporations and pass-through entities such as S corporations, partnerships, Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs).7 Pass-through entities are explicitly directed to calculate the credit at the entity level, and then subsequently distribute or “pass through” the resulting credit amount to each partner or shareholder according to their respective income distribution percentage.8 Individuals claiming the credit based on their interest in a pass-through entity use the amount shown on their Indiana K-1.

A notable deviation from federal practice exists for trusts and estates. While federal law often affords a pass-through provision for beneficiaries, Indiana law specifies that beneficiaries of trusts and estates are generally not afforded this pass-through provision for the state tax credit.8

2. Definition Flow: Federal Adoption with State Modification

The Indiana statute establishes a clear flow for defining eligible expenses:

• The term “Qualified research expense” is directly derived from the definition provided in Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).2 This link ensures that taxpayers utilize the established federal criteria for identifying costs related to wages, supplies, and contract research.1 The state explicitly adopts the IRC definition of QRE, generally referring to IRC Section 41(b) as it existed on January 1, 2001, though alignment with subsequent IRC amendments occurred for taxable years after 2015.5
• The critical modification is the definition of “Indiana qualified research expense,” which is defined simply as qualified research expense that is incurred for research conducted in Indiana.2 This localized definition mandates a geographic filter be applied to all federally qualified expenses before they can be considered for the state credit calculation.

B. Adherence to IRC § 41 (The Four-Part Test)

To be eligible for the Indiana credit, the underlying activities must first meet the foundational federal requirements of qualified research. This mandates that the research activities satisfy the four-part test defined under IRC § 41 3:

1. Technological in Nature: The research must fundamentally rely upon the principles of physical sciences, engineering, or computer science.
2. Permitted Purpose: The research must aim to develop a new or improved product, process, technique, invention, formula, or software that improves functionality, performance, reliability, or quality.
3. Eliminate Uncertainty: The activity must seek to resolve uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a product or process, particularly related to the capability, methodology, or appropriate design of the innovation.
4. Experimentation: The process must involve a systematic trial-and-error approach or structured evaluation of alternatives, such as modeling, simulation, or testing, to eliminate the identified technical uncertainty.

C. Defining “Research Conducted in Indiana” – The Nexus Requirement

The core of the Indiana credit requirement lies in the strict interpretation of “research conducted in Indiana.” This geographic constraint dictates that QREs are only eligible if the research activities physically took place within the state’s boundaries. This focus is particularly crucial when dealing with the three main categories of QREs:

1. Wages for Qualified Services: This expense category, which typically forms the largest component of QREs, is limited to wages paid to employees engaged in qualified services (direct research, direct supervision, or direct support) performed specifically in Indiana.9

The complexity for multi-state employers arises when personnel split their time across state lines. Since the statute requires the research to be physically conducted in Indiana, companies must precisely track the location where the researcher’s qualified services were delivered. For example, if a researcher is involved in qualified activities, but performs 60% of that work in an Indiana facility and 40% remotely or in an out-of-state facility, only the 60% allocable to Indiana time can be included in the Indiana QRE calculation. This necessitates robust time-tracking mechanisms and documentation that go beyond standard payroll allocation methods.

1. Supplies: Costs related to tangible property (supplies) used and consumed in the conduct of qualified research are only included if the consumption occurs within Indiana.9
2. Contract Research Expenses: Only 65% of amounts paid to non-employees (contract researchers) qualify, provided the services are performed in Indiana.9

The jurisdictional filter ensures that the tax incentive achieves its stated purpose of increasing qualified research activities within Indiana.1 Because the definition of QREs is tied directly to the physical location of the research activities, a company must maintain detailed documentary evidence demonstrating where the research work was performed. The Department of Revenue explicitly warns that random and unsupported allocations or estimates are generally insufficient to support a claim and are not accepted during audit.1 The acceptance of allocation percentages applied to Indiana-incurred expenses is contingent upon substantial evidence and records justifying such allocations.1

III. Calculation Mechanics and the Modified Base Amount

Indiana utilizes the same incremental approach as the federal R&D tax credit, focusing on the increase in current-year QREs over a historical “base amount.” However, Indiana strategically modifies the base calculation by localizing all components to maximize the incentive for in-state growth.

A. Localizing the Base Amount Calculation

The determination of the “Base amount” is central to calculating the credit. While defined by IRC Section 41(c), Indiana mandates a critical modification: the base amount is calculated by considering only Indiana qualified research expenses and gross receipts attributable to Indiana.2

For companies with significant operations outside of Indiana, excluding prior QREs and gross receipts generated in other jurisdictions creates a substantial strategic advantage. If a multi-state company historically incurred large QREs nationally but only recently established or expanded its R&D footprint in Indiana, their historical base calculated using only Indiana data will be significantly lower, potentially near zero if no prior Indiana QREs existed. A lower base amount immediately translates into a larger incremental QRE amount, maximizing the current year credit potential. This localized base calculation is a powerful policy mechanism explicitly designed to incentivize out-of-state companies to locate or expand new R&D centers within Indiana, rewarding them for initiating or increasing in-state investment.

B. Calculation Methodologies

Indiana taxpayers are generally afforded two primary methodologies for calculating the Research Expense Credit, aligning closely with federal options but strictly utilizing localized Indiana figures.

1. Traditional Incremental Method (IC 6-3.1-4)

The Traditional Method calculates the credit using a two-tiered rate structure applied to the excess of current-year Indiana QREs over the localized base amount.1

• Step 1: Determine Incremental QREs. Subtract the localized Indiana Base Amount from the current year Indiana QREs.3
• Step 2: Apply the 15% Rate. The credit is 15% of the lesser of $\$1,000,000$ or the result of Step 1 (the incremental QREs).3
• Step 3: Apply the 10% Rate. If the incremental QREs calculated in Step 1 exceed $\$1,000,000$, a credit percentage of $10\%$ is applied to that excess amount.3
• Step 4: Total Credit. The final credit is the sum of the amounts calculated in Steps 2 and 3.3

2. Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method

For tax years after 2009, taxpayers may elect to use the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method.5 This method simplifies the base calculation for businesses, particularly those experiencing fluctuating QREs, by fixing the base as a percentage of recent history.

• Base Calculation: The base amount under the ASC is defined as $50\%$ of the taxpayer’s average Indiana qualified research expense for the three preceding taxable years.4
• Credit Rate: The resulting credit is $10\%$ of the part of the current year’s Indiana QREs that exceeds this $50\%$ average base.4

3. The ASC Fallback Provision

A specific fallback provision exists for taxpayers who do not have three complete prior years of Indiana QRE history. If the taxpayer did not incur Indiana QREs in any one of the three taxable years preceding the current year (i.e., had a zero amount in at least one prior year), the credit simplifies significantly. In this scenario, the credit amount is equal to $5\%$ of the taxpayer’s current year Indiana QREs, without calculating a complex base.3

The availability of both methods allows taxpayers to choose the calculation that maximizes their credit based on their historical R&D spending patterns in Indiana.

Table: Indiana R&D Credit Calculation Summary

IV. Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Multi-State Apportionment

The compliance requirements established by the Indiana Department of Revenue are crucial, particularly for businesses that conduct research across multiple jurisdictions. The DOR not only requires stringent documentation for the physical location of QREs but also imposes a unique multi-state limitation mechanism.

A. DOR Audit and Documentation Requirements

To ensure the integrity of the credit claim, the DOR utilizes guidance derived from the IRS in auditing the research credit.1 The standard for proving that research activities were truly “conducted in Indiana” is high, and the DOR explicitly focuses on evidence-based documentation.

The DOR handbook and instructions clearly state that random and unsupported allocations, meaning estimates lacking rigorous backup, are generally insufficient to support a claim and will be rejected during an audit.1 If a taxpayer utilizes allocation percentages—for example, to split a project manager’s salary between qualified research and general management, or between Indiana and Ohio—these percentages must be supported by substantial evidence and precise records.1 For wages, this translates into the need for detailed time-tracking, project narratives, and expense reports that link specific activities, timing, and location directly to the claimed expense. This rigorous expectation minimizes the risk of taxpayers improperly shifting QREs from non-incentivized jurisdictions to Indiana.

B. The Critical “Lesser Of” Limitation for Multi-State Taxpayers

The Indiana DOR implements a mandatory two-part limitation, often referred to as the “lesser of A or B” rule, which is a key mechanism for jurisdictional control over the final credit amount for multi-state filers.8 This rule is designed to ensure that the credit claimed does not exceed either the actual, verifiable research physically conducted in the state or the taxpayer’s general economic footprint in Indiana as measured by the income apportionment percentage.

1. Calculation A: Indiana-Specific Credit

Calculation A represents the preliminary credit amount. It is derived from the calculation of the credit using only the taxpayer’s documented Indiana qualified research expenses and the localized Indiana base amount.11 This amount represents the maximum credit value generated by the activities that meet the physical “research conducted in Indiana” nexus requirement, determined using either the Traditional or ASC methodology.

2. Calculation B: Apportionment Limitation

Calculation B introduces the jurisdictional cap. This calculation begins with the taxpayer’s total Qualified Research Expenses incurred everywhere (as reported federally on Form 6765) and reduces that amount by applying the taxpayer’s Indiana income apportionment percentage.8 The resulting apportioned QRE dollar amount is then run through the standard credit calculation formula (e.g., subtracting the Indiana base amount and applying the 15%/10% or 10% rates).

The resulting credit amount in Calculation B serves as an upper bound, representing the credit that corresponds to the taxpayer’s overall economic connection to Indiana, based on the statutory apportionment formula used for income tax liability.12

3. The Final Determination

The taxpayer is entitled to claim a credit equal to the lesser amount derived from Calculation A or Calculation B.8

This “lesser of” mechanism serves a critical compliance function. If a taxpayer performs extensive qualified research activities throughout the country (high total QREs) but has minimal income subject to Indiana tax (low apportionment percentage), Calculation B will impose a low cap on the available credit. Conversely, if a taxpayer physically relocates all R&D activity to Indiana (high Calculation A) but their overall business operations still result in a low income tax apportionment percentage for Indiana, the credit generated by the physical activity (A) might be limited by the economic footprint (B). This structure prevents the credit from disproportionately subsidizing activities that generate minimal taxable income in the state while also ensuring the physical nexus requirement is honored.

V. Comprehensive Case Study: Multi-State Research Apportionment

To fully illustrate how the DOR’s jurisdictional limitation functions, a detailed example demonstrating the interaction between the localized QREs (Calculation A) and the state’s apportionment limit (Calculation B) is necessary. This example utilizes the Traditional Incremental Method for simplicity.

A. Scenario Setup: GlobalTech Innovations, Inc.

GlobalTech Innovations is a research-intensive firm with facilities in Indiana and Illinois. The company files multi-state tax returns.

• Tax Year: 2024
• Total Federal QREs (Everywhere): $\$5,000,000$ (Reported on Federal Form 6765)
• QREs Physically Conducted in Indiana: $\$1,500,000$ (Verified through time sheets and expense receipts)
• Indiana Income Apportionment Percentage: $40.0\%$ (Based on the established formula for income tax)
• Indiana Base Amount: $\$500,000$ (Localized historical base amount)

B. Calculation Walkthrough

1. Calculation A: Credit Based on Physical Activity (Indiana-Specific QREs)

This calculation determines the credit generated solely by the research physically documented as conducted in Indiana.

2. Calculation B: Credit Based on Apportionment Limitation (Federal QREs)

This calculation applies the company’s overall Indiana economic nexus to its total federal R&D expenditure base.

C. Final Determination and Implications

The final allowable Indiana Research Expense Credit is the lesser of the two calculations.11

• Calculation A: $\$150,000$
• Calculation B: $\$200,000$

Final Allowable Credit: $\$150,000$

In this scenario, the credit is limited by Calculation A, meaning the actual, verifiable physical research conducted in Indiana ($\$1.5$ million in QREs generating a $\$150,000$ credit) constrained the final claim. The company’s overall economic presence (represented by the $40\%$ apportionment percentage) was broad enough to support a higher credit ($\$200,000$), but the claim is ultimately tethered to the documented activities physically executed within the state. This result reinforces the primary directive for compliance: the maximization of verifiable in-state QREs (Calculation A) is the key driver for maximizing the final allowable credit, provided the apportionment percentage is not unusually low.

VI. Administrative Provisions and Integrated Compliance Benefits

The strategic value of conducting research in Indiana extends beyond the calculation of the income tax credit, encompassing favorable administrative rules and powerful parallel tax incentives.

A. Credit Utilization and Carryforward Rules

The Indiana Research Expense Credit is nonrefundable.3 A taxpayer is not entitled to any carryback or refund of unused credit amounts.8 However, the state provides a substantial administrative benefit through its carryforward rules. Any unused credit amount may be carried forward for up to 10 years.3

The DOR specifies a priority order for utilizing these credits: a taxpayer’s current year credit must be applied first to offset the current year’s tax liability before any carried forward credits from prior years are applied.1 For combined groups, the priority is further defined: the credit carry forward must first be used by the earning member up to the amount of their tax liability, and then by other members of the group up to the amount of their tax liability.1

B. State Non-Conformity Regarding IRC Section 174 Amortization

One of the most significant state-level advantages for Indiana-based R&D firms relates to Indiana’s policy of non-conformity with recent federal tax law changes regarding the capitalization of R&D expenditures.

The federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 required, starting in 2022, that all specified research or experimental expenditures (R&E expenses, including those that qualify as QREs) must be capitalized and amortized over five years (for domestic research) or 15 years (for foreign research), eliminating the ability to immediately deduct these costs.6

Indiana, however, chose not to conform to this federal requirement. Consequently, for state tax purposes, Indiana taxpayers can continue to fully deduct R&D expenses in the year they are incurred.6 This policy choice delivers an immediate and significant state tax deduction that runs parallel to the calculation of the R&D tax credit. The ability to claim a dollar-for-dollar deduction against state income while simultaneously generating a credit against the increase in spending creates a highly favorable cash flow environment for companies engaged in aggressive R&D investment in the state.

C. The 100% Sales and Use Tax Exemption

Complementing the income tax credit, Indiana offers a powerful second incentive designed to reduce the capital barriers to establishing research infrastructure: a 100% sales tax exemption for qualified research and development equipment and property purchased for use in Indiana.1 This exemption is specified under IC 6-2.5-5-40.1

This exemption is pivotal for R&D-intensive industries, such as life sciences, advanced manufacturing, and aerospace, which often require highly expensive, specialized equipment. By exempting these capital expenditures from sales tax, Indiana immediately reduces the cost of starting or expanding research facilities. For a business acquiring sophisticated R&D machinery, this exemption represents an immediate cost saving equivalent to the state sales tax rate, greatly enhancing the return on investment for large-scale R&D capital projects.1 Taxpayers must maintain records to document that the equipment purchased was indeed qualified R&D property for use in Indiana, but the financial benefit is substantial.

VII. Conclusion: Strategic Value and Compliance Roadmap

The Indiana Research Expense Credit (IC 6-3.1-4) is a carefully engineered tax incentive that provides significant financial benefits to innovation-focused businesses. Success in maximizing this credit requires a deep understanding of the statutory localization requirements and the complex multi-state apportionment rules enforced by the Indiana Department of Revenue.

A. Synthesis of Key Requirements

The entire compliance structure hinges on the phrase “Research Conducted in Indiana.” This physical nexus requirement translates into mandatory, rigorous documentation standards for payroll, supplies, and contract research expenses, distinguishing time spent on qualified activities within Indiana from time spent elsewhere.1 The localization mandate extends to the base calculation, where only Indiana QREs and Indiana gross receipts are considered, which strategically benefits companies new to the state or those demonstrating rapid growth in their Indiana R&D presence.2

For multi-state taxpayers, the “lesser of A or B” limitation detailed in DOR guidance is a critical compliance check. It operates to prevent the credit from exceeding either the actual, verifiable in-state physical activity (Calculation A) or the portion of the federal QREs corresponding to the taxpayer’s overall Indiana economic footprint (Calculation B).8 A failure to properly calculate and document both components risks the invalidation of the entire claim during an audit.

B. Actionable Compliance Roadmap

To effectively claim and defend the Indiana Research Expense Credit, sophisticated taxpayers must adopt the following compliance strategy:

1. Prioritize Localization Documentation: Implement robust internal accounting systems, such as detailed time tracking and expense allocation methodologies, that accurately capture the physical location where qualified services are rendered and supplies are consumed. Random estimations should be eliminated to meet the DOR’s standard of substantial evidence.1
2. Strategic Base Management: Model the credit calculation annually, comparing the Traditional Incremental Method against the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method. Leverage the localized Indiana base calculation to maximize incremental QREs, particularly if the Indiana R&D footprint is newer or expanding rapidly.4
3. Mandatory Multi-State Modeling: For multi-state filers, the annual tax calculation must explicitly include modeling both Calculation A (Indiana QRE Credit) and Calculation B (Apportionment Limitation) on Schedule IT-20REC or similar forms. The final credit amount must rigorously adhere to the lesser of the two results.8
4. Leverage Dual Incentives: Integrate capital expenditure planning with the R&D credit claim. Utilizing the 100% sales tax exemption for R&D equipment significantly lowers the cost basis of in-state facilities.1 Simultaneously, understand the ongoing state tax benefit derived from fully deducting R&D expenses immediately, which enhances the overall return on Indiana R&D investment.6
5. Utilize Carryforward: Establish a rigorous system for tracking the 10-year carryforward of any unused credit, ensuring compliance with the rule that current year credits must be applied first.1

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/