Navigating the Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit (REC): Statutory Guidance, Compliance, and Calculation Strategies

The Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit (REC), codified under IC 6-3.1-4, provides a significant incentive for businesses that increase qualified research activities within the state, offering tiered credit rates applied against state income tax liability. The credit is specifically designed to encourage in-state innovation by partially offsetting the cost of qualified research expenses (QREs) conducted within Indiana borders, aligning closely with—but modifying—the federal IRC §41 R&D credit.

The REC is a cornerstone of Indiana’s economic policy aimed at fostering technology and manufacturing growth. It functions as a powerful, non-refundable credit against a taxpayer’s state adjusted gross income tax liability. A detailed understanding of the credit requires careful review of the Indiana Code (IC 6-3.1-4) and the administrative guidance provided by the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR), particularly concerning the critical divergence from federal law regarding geographic nexus and fixed statutory definitions.

I. Executive Summary: The Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit (REC) Defined

A. Purpose and Statutory Authority

The primary purpose of the REC is to provide a direct economic incentive for increasing qualified research activities that are conducted within Indiana.1 This statutory benefit is established under Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4.

The credit is broadly available to a variety of taxpayer structures. Eligibility extends to individuals, corporations, pass-through entities (PTEs)—including S corporations, partnerships, Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs)—as well as trusts and estates.2 These eligible entities utilize the credit against their Indiana state income tax liability, which helps reduce the overall tax burden associated with in-state innovation and development spending.5

B. Defining Qualified Research Expense (QRE): Federal Foundation, State Scope

Indiana’s definition of Qualified Research Expense (QRE) is rooted in federal tax law, specifically Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).5 This definition typically encompasses three primary categories of costs incurred during the taxable year: wages paid to employees for performing, supervising, or supporting qualified research; costs of supplies consumed during the research process; and 65% of contract research expenses.7 The expenses must also relate to a “particular business” being carried on by the taxpayer.1

A critical element of compliance lies in Indiana’s fixed-date conformity to the federal definition. While HEA 1472-2015, effective January 1, 2016, aimed to generally align the definitions with the current IRC, for many years, the statutory guidance referred specifically to Section 41 of the IRC and its associated regulations as in effect on January 1, 2001.3

The implication of adopting a fixed federal statutory date means that Indiana does not automatically conform to subsequent revisions made by the federal government, such as changes related to qualified activities (e.g., internal-use software criteria) or shifts in treatment (like the IRC $\S 174$ capitalization requirements). Taxpayers claiming the Indiana REC must analyze their research activities against the specific, potentially dated, version of IRC $\S 41$ that Indiana law embraces. This necessitates specialized tax expertise to correctly apply federal regulatory interpretations from a past era to current research spending, a requirement that significantly elevates the technical complexity of compliance and audit defense.

II. The Legal Framework: REC Conformity and Qualified Expenses

A. The Requirement for Indiana Qualified Research Expense (QRE-IN)

While Indiana adopts the definitional framework of the federal QRE, the most significant state-level modification is the mandate for geographic nexus. To qualify for the state credit, QREs must be designated as “Indiana qualified research expense” (QRE-IN), meaning the expenses must be incurred for research conducted in Indiana.1 The requirement for in-state research applies both to in-house research expenses and contract research expenses.1

This geographic restriction also permeates the calculation of the Base Amount, which is crucial for determining the incremental increase in R&D spending eligible for the credit. The “Base Amount,” as defined in IRC $\S 41(\mathrm{c})$, is modified for Indiana purposes by considering only QRE-IN and gross receipts specifically attributable to Indiana in the calculation of the taxpayer’s fixed-base percentage and average gross receipts.6 For multi-state taxpayers, this necessitates accurate apportionment of both historical research expenses and historical revenues based strictly on Indiana nexus rules, a process that requires meticulous tracking across multiple reporting periods.

B. Eligibility, Pass-Through Mechanics, and Exclusions

The breadth of eligibility reflects Indiana’s desire to support innovation across all business sizes and structures.

1. Pass-Through Entity Mechanics

Pass-through entities (PTEs), such as S corporations, partnerships, LLCs, and LLPs, are fully eligible to generate the credit. These entities calculate the credit at the entity level, and the computed credit then flows through to the individual partners, shareholders, or members. The distribution of the credit is performed on a pro rata basis, typically multiplied by the percentage of income distribution to which the owner is entitled.4 These individuals then claim their pro rata share of the credit on their personal Indiana individual income tax return.4

2. Trusts and Estate Limitations

Trusts and estates can claim the credit against their own Indiana adjusted gross income tax liabilities. However, beneficiaries of trusts and estates are generally not eligible to receive the pass-through credit, unlike the rules governing the federal credit.2 The one specified exception to this exclusion is Grantor Trusts.2

Table 1: Indiana REC Eligibility and Utilization Summary (IC 6-3.1-4)

C. Credit Utilization and Carryforward Provisions

The utilization rules for the REC are defined in IC 6-3.1-4 and govern how the credit reduces tax liability and how unused amounts are handled.

The REC is a non-refundable credit, meaning that if the credit exceeds the taxpayer’s liability, the excess amount cannot be refunded.8 Furthermore, a taxpayer is explicitly not entitled to any carryback of any unused credit to prior taxable years.9

To ensure the credit remains valuable even when a taxpayer has limited current-year tax liability (such as in periods of heavy investment or startup losses), Indiana allows any unused credit to be carried forward for up to ten (10) succeeding taxable years.7 This generous 10-year carryforward period is a critical aspect of the credit’s financial utility, particularly for high-growth R&D companies that often accrue significant QREs long before generating substantial taxable income.

In applying the credit, specific credit ordering rules must be observed. The credit earned by a taxpayer in the current taxable year must be applied against the current tax liability before any credit carryover from a prior year is applied.8 The need for proper documentation and claim filing is essential even during loss years, as failure to file or improper computation could jeopardize a credit that is effectively an asset that might not be fully utilized for up to a decade.

III. Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) Compliance and Nexus Documentation

The Indiana DOR places significant emphasis on documenting the nexus between research expenses and Indiana soil, a requirement that often proves challenging for multi-state or remote-work organizations.

A. Proving the Indiana Nexus: DOR Standards for QRE-IN Determination

To address the challenge of allocating QREs, IC 6-3.1-4-5 grants the DOR the authority to prescribe standards for determining which QREs are considered QRE-IN.9 The statute specifically outlines four factors the department may consider when determining geographic nexus 9:

1. Place of Service Performance: The physical location within Indiana where the research services are performed.9
2. Personnel Location: The residence or business location of the person or persons performing the services.9
3. Consumption of Supplies: The place where qualified research supplies are consumed.9
4. Other Relevant Factors: Any other factors that the department determines are relevant for the determination.9

These statutory factors necessitate that taxpayers implement granular tracking systems, particularly for employee wages (the largest component of QRE). Businesses must demonstrate, through detailed records, that their research personnel were physically located in Indiana, that materials were consumed in Indiana, and that the research work itself occurred within the state’s borders.

Table 3: DOR Criteria for Establishing Indiana QRE Nexus

B. Audit Readiness and Contemporaneous Documentation

The DOR requires rigorous documentation standards to substantiate QRE-IN claims. The agency explicitly instructs taxpayers to retain records in a “sufficiently usable form” that is “IRS audit ready,” referencing the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Audit Technique Guidelines for research tax credit claims.1

This means the standard of proof for the Indiana REC is effectively equivalent to the stringent federal standard. The DOR requires detail to substantiate claimed QREs (wages, supplies, and contract research) and Qualified Research Activities (QRAs) at the project level.1

Crucially, the documentation must be contemporaneous, meaning it must generally be identified, gathered, and properly compiled at the time the qualified research was performed, rather than being retroactively constructed.1 Generalized ledger entries are insufficient; the documentation must confirm the IRC $\S 41$ four-part test (new or improved business component, technological in nature, elimination of uncertainty, and process of experimentation) for each project.

Examples of critical substantiation documents the DOR may request during an examination include:

• Complete project lists identifying the full scope of research projects versus the actual claimed projects.
• Patents or patent applications (often serving as the strongest forms of proof).
• Annual R&D or technology plans.
• Research Project Authorization Requests.1

In regulated sectors, such as Life Science (pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and medical devices), existing governmental record-keeping requirements, such as those imposed by the FDA, can be utilized to support the research activities claimed.1 The consistent application of the federal documentation standard indicates that taxpayers should anticipate that a claim for the Indiana REC will trigger a parallel, in-depth review of the documentation rigor used for the federal R&D credit claim.

C. Mandatory Filing Requirements

To claim the REC, taxpayers must adhere to specific filing procedures detailed by the DOR.

All taxpayers must complete Schedule IT-20REC and enclose this form with their annual state income tax return (e.g., Form IT-20 for corporations).3 Schedule IT-20REC (Form Code #822) serves as the detailed calculation and allocation form for the state credit.3 Furthermore, the instructions mandate that a copy of the federal computation form, federal Form 6765 (Credit for Increasing Research Activities) or federal Form 8820 (Orphan Drug Credit), must be attached to the IT-20REC.3 If a prior-year credit carryover is utilized, the original Schedule IT-20REC from the year the credit was earned must also be included.12

The DOR is prescriptive regarding these steps: failure to include the completed IT-20REC and supporting documentation, especially the corresponding federal Form 6765, “will result in denial of your claimed credit”.12

IV. Calculation Methodology I: The Standard (Tiered) Credit

Indiana provides two primary methods for calculating the REC, offering taxpayers the ability to select the method that generates the greatest credit amount in a given year. The first is the Standard Tiered Method, which aligns closely with the federal Regular Research Credit (RRC) framework but uses Indiana-specific inputs and tiered rates.

A. Computing the Indiana Base Amount

The calculation begins by determining the Base Amount, which represents the minimum level of historical R&D spending that must be exceeded before a credit can be generated. The definition of the “Base Amount” is taken from IRC $\S 41(\mathrm{c})$ but is critically modified to utilize only Indiana-sourced data.6 Specifically, the fixed-base percentage is multiplied by the average Indiana gross receipts for the four tax years preceding the current year.10

The 50% Minimum Base Provision

Crucially, the calculated base amount is subject to a statutory minimum floor. The base amount may not be less than 50% of the taxpayer’s current year QRE-IN.3

This 50% minimum base serves as a control mechanism. If a company has high current QREs but low historical QREs or low historical gross receipts in Indiana (resulting in a small fixed-base percentage calculation), the floor rule automatically increases the Base Amount to 50% of current year QRE-IN. This structure prevents taxpayers from claiming a credit on more than half of their QRE-IN when their historical spending is minimal or absent, ensuring the credit remains an incremental incentive.10

B. The Tiered Rate Structure (IC 6-3.1-4-2)

For QRE-IN incurred after December 31, 2007, the REC utilizes a unique two-tier structure applied to the amount of QRE-IN that exceeds the calculated Base Amount (the “excess QRE-IN”).13 The calculation follows a four-step formula defined in IC 6-3.1-4-2:

• STEP ONE: Subtract the taxpayer’s Base Amount from the taxpayer’s current year QRE-IN to determine the Excess QRE-IN.13
• STEP TWO (Tier 1 Rate): A rate of 15% is applied to the lesser of: (A) one million dollars ($\$ 1,000,000$); or (B) the Excess QRE-IN calculated in STEP ONE. This product is the Tier 1 credit.7
• STEP THREE (Tier 2 Rate): If the Excess QRE-IN exceeds $\$ 1,000,000$, a rate of 10% is applied to the amount of that excess.7
• STEP FOUR: The Total Standard REC is determined by adding the STEP TWO and STEP THREE products.13

The tiered structure is strategically designed to provide the highest subsidy rate (15%) for the first $\$ 1$ million of incremental R&D investment. For companies with substantial R&D activities, the marginal credit benefit decreases beyond the $\$ 1$ million threshold, where the rate drops to $10\%$. This design structure maximizes the financial return on smaller or mid-range increases in research activity.

V. Calculation Methodology II: The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)

The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) provides a streamlined calculation method designed primarily to assist businesses with volatile or growing QREs, avoiding the complexities of calculating the fixed-base percentage and historical gross receipts.10 The ASC method has been available for QRE-IN incurred after December 31, 2009.5

A. ASC Election Criteria and Formula

A taxpayer may elect to use the ASC method. The calculation is defined as follows:

1. ASC Base Determination: The base amount is calculated as 50% of the taxpayer’s average QRE-IN for the three taxable years immediately preceding the current taxable year.5
2. Excess Calculation: The ASC Base is subtracted from the current year QRE-IN to determine the excess amount.
3. Standard ASC Rate: The resulting credit is equal to ten percent (10%) of the determined excess.5

It is essential to note that while the federal ASC rate is $14\%$, the Indiana rate used for calculating the credit remains $10\%$.10

B. The Critical 5% Fallback Rate Provision

A specific and crucial provision within the ASC methodology applies to taxpayers with inconsistent R&D spending history. This provision is commonly referred to as the 5% fallback rate.

The fallback rate is triggered if the taxpayer did not have Indiana qualified research expenses (QRE-IN) in any one of the three taxable years preceding the current year (i.e., if QRE-IN was zero in any part of the lookback period).5

When this trigger condition is met, the taxpayer does not calculate an incremental base amount. Instead, the credit is calculated as five percent (5%) of the taxpayer’s total current year QRE-IN.5

The application of the 5% fallback rate represents a significant reduction in potential credit value compared to the 10% standard ASC rate or the 15%/10% tiered rates. For companies new to Indiana or those with highly cyclical R&D activity, this low rate may yield a dramatically smaller credit. Taxpayers must meticulously review their three-year QRE-IN history before electing the ASC, as the Standard Tiered Method may offer a greater benefit, even with its more complex base calculation, if the 5% fallback applies.

Table 2: Indiana REC Calculation Rate Comparison (Current Law)

VI. Special Exemptions and Tax Incentives

Beyond the two general calculation methods, Indiana law provides highly specific incentives targeting critical industries and offers a parallel incentive to reduce the cost of R&D capital expenditures.

A. The Aerospace Industry Alternative Computation (IC 6-3.1-4-2.5)

The General Assembly recognized that the standard federal R&D credit calculation methodology, particularly its treatment of federal defense spending in the 1980s, could unfairly impact the aerospace industry by inflating the historical base amount.15 This adverse impact was found to create a disincentive for making qualified research expenditures in Indiana, potentially harming a major in-state employer of science and engineering graduates.15 To mitigate this structural disadvantage, an alternative computation was established under IC 6-3.1-4-2.5.

This alternative is not broadly available; it is highly targeted and applies only to a taxpayer that meets all four of the following strict criteria 16:

1. Is primarily engaged in the production of civil and military jet propulsion systems.
2. Is certified by the Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC) as an aerospace advanced manufacturer.
3. Is a United States Department of Defense contractor.
4. Maintains one or more manufacturing facilities in Indiana employing at least three thousand (3,000) employees in full-time positions that pay on average more than 400% of the hourly minimum wage.16

Qualified taxpayers meeting these benchmarks may elect to calculate the credit under this section instead of the Standard Tiered Method (IC 6-3.1-4-2). Typically, the alternative calculation for aerospace firms follows the 10% ASC formula.17 The stringent criteria demonstrate Indiana’s commitment to providing highly specialized tax relief to strategically important, high-wage defense manufacturers that are critical to the state’s economic base.

B. Related R&D Sales Tax Exemption

Taxpayers engaged in qualified R&D activities should leverage a related and complementary incentive: the 100% sales and use tax exemption available for qualified research and development equipment and property purchased for use in Indiana (IC 6-2.5-5-40).5 This exemption provides an immediate cost reduction on capital expenditures, enhancing the state’s overall support for research investment when combined with the REC income tax credit.

VII. Detailed Calculation Example and Analysis

The strategic selection between the Standard Tiered Method and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) can significantly impact the final credit amount. This example illustrates the complexity introduced by the 50% minimum base rule in the Standard Method.

A. Case Study Parameters: Hoosier Innovations Corp. (HIC)

HIC is a growing corporation conducting $\$ 3,000,000$ of QRE-IN in the Current Year (CY 2024). HIC’s growth has outpaced its historical R&D investment, making the 50% minimum test a key variable.

B. Standard Tiered Method Calculation

The Standard Tiered Method (IC 6-3.1-4-2) requires calculating the Base Amount using the Fixed-Base Percentage method, subject to the $50\%$ minimum floor.

1. Calculate Base Amount (Fixed-Base Percentage Method):
   
   $$\text{Fixed Base Amount} = 2.5\% \times \$40,000,000 = \$1,000,000$$
2. Apply 50% Minimum Base Test:
   
   $$\text{Minimum Base} = 50\% \times \text{CY QRE-IN } (\$3,000,000) = \$1,500,000$$
3. Determine Applicable Base: Since the calculated Minimum Base ($\$ 1,500,000$) exceeds the Fixed Base Amount ($\$ 1,000,000$), the required Base Amount for the Standard Method is $\$ 1,500,000$.10
4. Calculate Excess QRE-IN (STEP ONE):
   
   $$\text{Excess QRE-IN} = \$3,000,000 – \$1,500,000 = \$1,500,000$$
5. Apply Tiered Rates (STEP TWO and STEP THREE):

• Tier 1 (15% on first $\$ 1\text{M}$ of excess):
  
  $$0.15 \times \$1,000,000 = \$150,000$$
• Tier 2 (10% on excess over $\$ 1\text{M}$):
  
  $$\$1,500,000 – \$1,000,000 = \$500,000 \text{ remaining excess}$$
  $$0.10 \times \$500,000 = \$50,000$$

1. Total Standard REC (STEP FOUR):
   
   $$\text{Total Credit} = \$150,000 + \$50,000 = \mathbf{\$200,000}$$

C. Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Calculation

The ASC (IC 6-3.1-4-2.5) utilizes 50% of the prior three-year average QRE-IN as its base.

1. Determine ASC Base:
   
   $$\text{ASC Base} = 50\% \times \text{Prior 3-Year Avg QRE-IN } (\$1,500,000) = \mathbf{\$750,000}$$
2. Calculate Excess QRE-IN:
   
   $$\text{Excess QRE-IN} = \$3,000,000 – \$750,000 = \$2,250,000$$
3. Apply ASC Rate (10%):
   
   $$\text{Total ASC} = 0.10 \times \$2,250,000 = \mathbf{\$225,000}$$

D. Strategic Analysis of Calculation Results

In this example, the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) is the optimal choice, yielding an additional $\$ 25,000$ in credit. The analysis demonstrates the significant operational impact of the 50% minimum base rule in the Standard Method; the rule nearly doubled the required incremental threshold, reducing the credit benefit. Conversely, the ASC’s reliance solely on the three-year average led to a lower base and a higher overall credit value. The determination of the optimal calculation method requires careful annual modeling, especially for companies experiencing substantial growth in QRE-IN.

VIII. Conclusion: Maximizing the REC Benefit in Indiana

The Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit (REC) is a powerful, legislatively supported mechanism for encouraging domestic innovation. Its complex framework, which adopts federal definitions but strictly modifies them for Indiana nexus and base calculation, demands specialized tax expertise to navigate effectively.

To maximize the financial benefit and ensure compliance with the Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR), corporate tax departments and their advisors must adhere to four core strategies:

1. Mandatory Annual Modeling of Calculation Methods: Taxpayers must not assume conformity with prior years’ elections. The ASC and the Standard Tiered Method (RRC equivalent) must be calculated annually. Companies must remain vigilant against the high-risk scenario of the 5% ASC fallback rate, triggered by zero QRE-IN in any one of the three prior years, which often makes the Standard Tiered Method a superior option even with its complex base calculation.
2. Rigorous Geographic Nexus Tracking: Since the credit is restricted only to research conducted in Indiana, sophisticated time tracking and allocation methodologies are required to substantiate the location of services performed, personnel, and supplies consumption. Reliance on general ledger data without detailed, project-level, contemporaneous documentation that proves Indiana nexus will expose the claim to denial upon audit.
3. Strict Adherence to Filing Procedures: The claim is procedural. Failure to enclose the required Schedule IT-20REC with the annual state return, along with the corresponding federal Form 6765, will result in the immediate denial of the credit.12 This requirement enforces alignment between the federal and state claims and validates the DOR’s use of federal audit guidelines.
4. Strategic Management of Carryforwards: The 10-year carryforward period should be treated as a valuable corporate asset. Because the credit is non-refundable, securing the maximum allowed credit in the current year, even when a company is in a loss position, is critical for future tax liability reduction. Comprehensive historical documentation must be maintained for the entire carryforward period to support utilization in subsequent years.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/