The Indiana R&D Tax Credit: Analysis of the Tiered 15% and 10% Rate Structure

The Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit provides a 15% tax credit on the first $1 million of qualified research expenses that exceed a historical base amount, offering a significant incentive for initial incremental investment.

For major R&D projects, the rate then steps down to 10% for all qualified research expenses exceeding that initial $1 million threshold over the base amount, ensuring scalability for large-scale innovation.

I. Detailed Overview and Context of the Tiered Credit

The tiered rate structure—specifically 15% and 10%—is the foundational mechanism of the Regular Credit Method (RCM) within the Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit, established under Indiana Code (IC) 6-3.1-4. This structure is strategically designed to maximize the economic impact of the credit across Indiana’s diverse industrial landscape, particularly supporting the state’s robust manufacturing sector.1

The primary function of the 15% rate is to act as a high-value catalyst, providing an accelerated incentive for incremental research investment. This higher initial rate benefits growing firms or those initiating significant new research programs. Once a taxpayer’s incremental investment surpasses the critical $1 million threshold, the rate moderates to 10%.2 This second tier ensures that the financial benefits continue to scale effectively for substantial, capital-intensive research projects, providing sustained support without disproportionately concentrating the state subsidy at the highest levels of expenditure. The entire calculation focuses exclusively on excess QREs—the amount by which current-year Indiana qualified research expenses (QREs) surpass a historically defined “Base Amount”.1

II. The Statutory and Regulatory Framework: Alignment and Decoupling

Understanding the application of the tiered rates requires a precise grasp of the state’s definitions for Qualified Research Expenses and the Base Amount, which are codified in IC 6-3.1-4.3 The credit is broadly available to various business structures, including corporations, S corporations, partnerships, Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs).4

The Critical Definition of Qualified Research Expense (QRE)

Indiana aligns its definition of research activities and expenses with federal law, specifically referencing Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).5 However, the state introduces a crucial nuance: the definition of “Qualified Research Expense” is explicitly constrained to the IRC as it was in effect on January 1, 2001.1

This constraint, often termed “decoupling,” has significant implications for compliance and planning. Since federal law regarding R&D credits has undergone various changes since 2001, taxpayers seeking both federal and Indiana credits must effectively perform two separate QRE calculations. The federal credit calculation uses current IRC Section 41 rules, while the Indiana state credit calculation must adhere to the pre-2001 version of IRC Section 41(b) definitions for qualifying wages, supplies, and contract research services.1 This introduces complexity and increases the administrative burden, as firms must rigorously document that their research activities meet the narrower, older Indiana statutory definition, even if they qualify under modern federal criteria.

Determining the Base Amount

The calculation of the credit relies entirely on the level of incremental research expenditure above the “Base Amount.” This Base Amount is defined by IC 6-3.1-4-1 through reference to IRC § 41(c) rules.5 Crucially, Indiana modifies this federal methodology by considering only Indiana qualified research expenses and only gross receipts attributable to Indiana.6

The Base Amount is determined as the lesser of two calculated figures 3:

1. The taxpayer’s calculated fixed-base percentage (as computed under IRC § 41(c), modified for Indiana data) multiplied by the average Indiana gross receipts for the four preceding taxable years.
2. Fifty percent (50%) of the Indiana QREs for the current taxable year.

The Base Amount calculation effectively establishes the historical research spending baseline. Any QREs incurred in the current year that exceed this baseline are considered “Excess QREs” and are eligible for the tiered credit rates.

III. The Regular Credit Method (RCM): The Mechanics of the Tiered Rates

The tiered structure within the RCM is designed to maximize the marginal incentive provided to businesses for increasing their research commitment in Indiana. The tiered rates encourage the heavy subsidy of the first substantial increase in expenditure while ensuring the benefit remains valuable for exceptionally large projects.

Tier 1: The Incremental Threshold (15% Rate)

The 15% rate is the initial and most potent incentive level. This rate is applied to the difference between the current year’s Indiana QREs and the calculated Base Amount, specifically targeted up to a threshold of $1,000,000.1

The policy goal of this high 15% rate is to provide “high immediate value” for businesses making measurable increases in their R&D spending, thereby supporting smaller or rapidly growing firms.2 This tier provides a substantial tax reduction for incremental spending below the $1 million level. If the Excess QREs are $1,000,000 or greater, the maximum credit generated solely within Tier 1 is always $150,000 ($1,000,000 multiplied by 15%).3

Tier 2: The Scalability Incentive (10% Rate)

The 10% rate applies to the portion of the Excess QREs that surpasses the initial $1,000,000 threshold.1 This tier ensures that even the largest industrial research programs receive a valuable, scaled incentive. This structure is particularly advantageous for entities with high research expenditure profiles, such as those in Indiana’s manufacturing or pharmaceutical sectors, where annual QREs may reach several million dollars.2

The design decision to maintain a 10% rate ensures that the credit mechanism supports large-scale investment, preventing the incentive from plateauing for companies whose incremental research expenses greatly exceed the Base Amount.

IV. Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Calculation Protocol

The Indiana Department of Revenue (DOR) provides explicit guidance in its publications, such as the Research Expense Credit Handbook, detailing the exact calculation protocol for taxpayers claiming the credit under IC 6-3.1-4.3 Adherence to this protocol is critical for audit readiness and accurate claims.

Official Tiered Calculation Methodology

The calculation of the Research Credit for Increasing Research is defined through specific steps 3:

1. Determine Excess QREs: Calculate the difference between the current taxable year’s Indiana QREs and the determined Base Amount.
2. Apply Tier 1 (15%): If the Excess QREs are not greater than $1,000,000, the credit is 15% of the total excess.
3. Apply Tier 2 (10%) and the Step-Up: If the Excess QREs are greater than $1,000,000, the calculation is performed in two parts to ensure the full 15% benefit is captured for the first million dollars. The total credit is calculated as:

• 10% of the portion of Excess QREs above $1,000,000,
• PLUS a fixed amount of $150,000 (which represents 15% of the first $1,000,000).3

This $150,000 “step-up” figure is the administrative mechanism by which the DOR ensures taxpayers receive the maximum benefit from the highest credit tier when their incremental research spending is substantial.

Administrative Requirements

The DOR emphasizes the necessity of maintaining comprehensive records to substantiate all qualified research activities and associated expenses incurred in Indiana.3 Qualified research expense components include wages paid to employees, costs of supplies utilized, and payments for contract services directly related to qualified research or the supervision of research activities.1 Given the complex historical base calculations and the pre-2001 IRC adherence required by Indiana law, meticulous documentation is paramount for defending the credit during an audit.

V. Comprehensive Numerical Illustration of the Tiered Credit

To illustrate the tiered rate structure and the official DOR calculation protocol, consider a hypothetical high-growth company utilizing the Regular Credit Method.

Example Scenario Setup

A taxpayer in Indiana incurred $4,000,000 in Indiana QREs during the 2024 tax year. Based on the IRC § 41(c) methodology modified for Indiana data, the calculated Base Amount is $1,500,000.

Goal: Calculate the total Research Expense Tax Credit using the Regular Credit Method (RCM).

Step-by-Step Tiered Calculation Application

Step 1: Calculate Excess QREs

The total incremental research spending is the difference between current QREs and the Base Amount 3:

$$\text{Excess QREs} = \$4,000,000 – \$1,500,000 = \$2,500,000$$

Since the Excess QREs of $2,500,000 exceed the $1,000,000 threshold, both tiers of the credit calculation will apply.3

Step 2: Calculate Tier 1 Credit (15% Rate)

The 15% rate applies to the first $1,000,000 of the excess 1:

$$\text{Tier 1 Credit} = \$1,000,000 \times 15\% = \$150,000$$

Step 3: Calculate Tier 2 Excess (10% Rate)

The remaining portion of the excess QREs is subject to the 10% rate 1:

$$\text{Tier 2 QREs} = \$2,500,000 – \$1,000,000 = \$1,500,000$$

Step 4: Calculate Tier 2 Credit

$$\text{Tier 2 Credit} = \$1,500,000 \times 10\% = \$150,000$$

Step 5: Total Regular Credit Earned

The total credit is the sum of the amounts calculated in the two tiers:

$$\text{Total R\&D Credit} = \$150,000 (\text{Tier 1}) + \$150,000 (\text{Tier 2}) = \$300,000$$

The taxpayer has earned a total Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit of $300,000.

Table: Numerical Illustration of the Tiered R&D Credit Calculation

VI. Strategic Context: Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Comparison

For Indiana qualified research expenses incurred after December 31, 2009, taxpayers have the ability to elect the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method, providing an important comparison point against the tiered RCM.1 The ASC simplifies the calculation of the Base Amount, making it particularly beneficial for businesses with fluctuating QREs or incomplete historical data. The rates associated with the ASC are 10% and 5%.

Overview of the ASC (10% and 5% Rates)

The ASC eliminates the complex fixed-base percentage calculation required by the RCM.2

1. 10% Standard Rate: The credit equals 10% of the portion of the current year’s QREs that exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the average Indiana QREs for the three preceding taxable years.1 This method is administratively simpler as it relies only on prior QRE data, not gross receipts.
2. 5% Fallback Rate: A critical component of the ASC is the provision for new or non-continuous R&D performers. If the taxpayer did not incur Indiana QREs in any one of the three preceding taxable years, the credit defaults to 5% of the current year’s Indiana QREs.1

Example Comparison: RCM vs. ASC

Using the same $4,000,000 in Current QREs as the previous example, the strategic importance of comparing the RCM and ASC methods becomes clear.

Assume:

• Current QREs: $4,000,000
• Prior 3-Year Average QREs: $2,800,000

ASC Calculation

1. ASC Base: 50% of the 3-year average QREs:
   
   $$\$2,800,000 \times 50\% = \$1,400,000$$
2. ASC Excess: Current QREs minus the ASC Base:
   
   $$\$4,000,000 – \$1,400,000 = \$2,600,000$$
3. ASC Credit (10% Rate):
   
   $$\$2,600,000 \times 10\% = \$260,000$$

Strategic Implications of Method Selection

In this direct comparison, the RCM generated a credit of $300,000, while the ASC generated $260,000. The RCM provides a $40,000 premium because of the preferential 15% rate applied to the first $1,000,000 of incremental spending.

This differential demonstrates that for companies anticipating high incremental spending, particularly those where the Excess QREs significantly surpass the $1 million threshold, the RCM is frequently the most advantageous method, provided the administrative complexity of calculating the fixed-base percentage is manageable. The 15% incentive guarantees a superior marginal subsidy on that initial million compared to the ASC’s flat 10% rate.2 Conversely, the ASC is strategically valuable when historical gross receipts data is incomplete or when the QREs are increasing steadily but slowly, allowing the taxpayer to benefit from a potentially lower, simplified base calculation.

Table: Strategic Comparison of Credit Calculation Methods

VII. Comprehensive Utility and Additional Incentives

The Research Expense Tax Credit is part of a broader, integrated suite of incentives aimed at fostering innovation in Indiana. The utility of the credit is extended through generous carryforward provisions and is complemented by a substantial sales and use tax exemption.

Credit Carryforward Provision

The state acknowledges that research-intensive companies, particularly startups and growing technology firms, often incur substantial R&D expenses well before achieving profitability and generating sufficient taxable income to utilize the credit immediately. To mitigate this challenge and improve cash flow planning, Indiana allows credits awarded under IC 6-3.1-4 to be carried forward for up to ten taxable years.1 This extended carryforward period ensures that the economic benefit of the R&D investment is eventually realized by the taxpayer, significantly reducing tax risk.

Additional R&D Incentives: The 100% Sales and Use Tax Exemption

In conjunction with the income tax credit, Indiana provides a powerful capital expenditure incentive: a 100 percent sales tax exemption (IC 6-2.5-5-40) for qualified research and development equipment and property purchased for use in the state.2

This measure substantially lowers the upfront capital investment required for R&D activities, such as purchasing complex laboratory equipment, specialized tooling, or manufacturing prototypes.2 By coupling the sales tax exemption with the tiered income tax credit, Indiana offers a comprehensive, two-pronged approach that reduces both operational tax burden and critical capital expenditure costs. This holistic strategy reinforces the state’s commitment to advancing technological progress and supporting knowledge creation within its borders.9

VIII. Conclusion: Maximizing Benefits through Strategic Modeling

The Indiana Research Expense Tax Credit provides robust financial encouragement for in-state innovation through a precisely structured, tiered approach under the Regular Credit Method (RCM). The core mechanism of the credit is the tiered rate: 15% on the first $1 million of incremental research spending over the historical base, stepping down to 10% thereafter. This structure ensures that the marginal incentive is highest for new or expanding research endeavors, significantly benefiting businesses across Indiana.

Accurate claim filing necessitates strict adherence to IC 6-3.1-4, including recognition of the critical January 1, 2001, decoupling date for the Qualified Research Expense definition, which requires tax practitioners to use the older federal statutory language for state compliance. Furthermore, taxpayers must follow the specific Indiana Department of Revenue protocol regarding the calculation of the Base Amount and the application of the $150,000 step-up rule when Excess QREs exceed the initial $1 million threshold.3

For optimal financial management, businesses must engage in strategic tax planning that includes annual modeling of both the RCM and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC). While the RCM generally offers a higher maximum potential credit due to the 15% rate on the initial incremental spending, the ASC provides administrative simplicity and stability, making it advantageous in scenarios where historical data is complex or spending is unpredictable. By fully leveraging the tiered R&D income tax credit and the 100% sales and use tax exemption, Indiana taxpayers can significantly reduce the net cost of innovation, enhancing competitiveness and fostering long-term growth.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/