Expert Report: The $20 Million Annual Gross Revenue Threshold in the Iowa R&D Supplemental Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: The Strategic Value of the Supplemental R&D Threshold

The Annual Gross Revenue (AGR) Threshold of $20 Million is the key financial metric determining the rate of the Iowa Supplemental Research Activities Tax Credit (SRAC). This threshold grants smaller businesses the potential for a significantly higher refundable tax credit, dramatically boosting liquidity for qualified research and development investments.

The $20 million Annual Gross Revenue (AGR) threshold is arguably the most critical financial determinant within the Iowa R&D tax credit structure, specifically concerning the Supplemental Research Activities Tax Credit (SRAC). This demarcation point implements a deliberate tiered incentive structure designed to maximize the economic benefit for small-to-midsize enterprises (SMEs).1 Iowa Code Section 15.335 establishes this threshold, differentiating the SRAC multiplier by seven percentage points (10% vs. 3%).2

The policy intention behind this significant tiering is clearly aimed at prioritizing the capitalization and financial flexibility of smaller firms conducting research in Iowa. Because the SRAC is highly refundable (up to 90% of the supplemental credit earned can be refunded as cash), securing the 10% rate offers a substantial cash flow advantage to smaller, potentially capital-constrained firms.4 For firms approaching the $20 million revenue boundary, the threshold creates a pivotal decision point where marginal revenue gain must be carefully assessed against the potential loss of a high-value tax incentive, making the $20 million AGR line a strategic tax cliff that necessitates precise revenue forecasting and planning.

Table 1. AGR Threshold Rate Summary

II. Legislative and Programmatic Foundation

The Supplemental Research Activities Credit (SRAC) is an additional layer of incentive built upon the standard Iowa Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC) framework, conditional on participation in state economic development programs managed by the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA).

A. The Context of the Base Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC)

The foundational Iowa RAC structure closely mirrors the federal IRC §41 credit, focusing on qualified research expenditures (QREs) that surpass a defined historical base amount.7 To qualify for the Iowa RAC, a business must demonstrate eligibility for the federal credit and generally must be engaged in one of Iowa’s targeted industries, such as manufacturing.7

The calculation of the base RAC uses either the Regular Method (6.5% of excess QREs) or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method (4.55% of excess QREs).4 Under the Regular Method, the base amount calculation involves multiplying the fixed-base percentage by the average annual gross receipts of the taxpayer for the four preceding taxable years.9 This required historical lookback mechanism for determining the base QREs stands in contrast to the current-year metric used to determine the AGR threshold for the supplemental rate.

B. The Supplemental Credit (SRAC) Mandate

The SRAC is codified in Iowa Code § 15.335 and is intended to incentivize additional R&D investment by firms participating in state economic initiatives.10 The SRAC is available exclusively to companies that have received an award under the High Quality Jobs (HQJ) Program, or historically, the Enterprise Zone program.5

This prerequisite means that SRAC eligibility is tied to meeting specific non-R&D criteria, including stringent wage thresholds and job creation or retention commitments outlined by the HQJ program.12 The SRAC is applied to qualifying incremental research expenditures—those QREs made in the state that exceed the base amount, effectively adding a supplemental percentage (10% or 3%) on top of the base RAC already calculated.1

C. Programmatic Oversight: The Compliance Gateway

The SRAC is uniquely authorized under Iowa Code § 15.335, tying the tax benefit directly to an HQJ award. As such, the AGR threshold determination is subject to the review and compliance structure of the IEDA, the agency managing the HQJ program, before the company can claim the credit with the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR).5 Compliance with all HQJ contractual requirements is therefore paramount; a company could accurately report an AGR below $20 million and perform significant R&D, qualifying for the 10% rate, but if it fails to maintain the required high-quality jobs wage or benefits thresholds stipulated in its HQJ agreement, the IEDA retains the authority to reduce or revoke the entire SRAC award. This cross-program compliance means that tax planning for the SRAC must first ensure continuous IEDA contractual assurance.

III. In-Depth Analysis of the Annual Gross Revenue (AGR) Threshold

The $20 million AGR threshold is the definitive factor implementing the state’s targeted incentive policy for research activities.

A. Statutory Implementation of the Tiered System

IDR guidance confirms that Iowa Code section 15.335 specifies the tiered benefit structure, applying differentially based on annual gross revenues 3:

1. Small Business Tier (AGR < $20 Million): Businesses with annual gross revenues of less than $20 million can claim a supplemental credit up to an additional 10 percent of qualifying incremental research expenditures made in the state.1
2. Large Enterprise Tier (AGR $\ge$ $20 Million): Businesses with annual gross revenues of $20 million or more are limited to a supplemental credit up to an additional 3 percent.3

The profound difference of 7 percentage points between the two tiers reflects a calculated policy decision to funnel intensive, highly valuable, and refundable financial support to SMEs, bolstering their capacity for R&D investment relative to established large corporations.

B. The Definitional Conflict: AGR versus Gross Receipts

A critical compliance detail involves the use of two distinct revenue measurements within the R&D statute. The $20 million SRAC threshold uses Annual Gross Revenue (AGR) 5, typically interpreted as current-year total income before cost adjustments. Conversely, the calculation for the base RAC uses average annual gross receipts of the taxpayer for the four preceding taxable years.9

For a fast-growing company, this distinction creates a complex planning risk. A firm may benefit from a low historical four-year average gross receipts figure (maximizing its base RAC), yet its current-year AGR could minimally exceed $20 million. A revenue figure of $20,000,010, for example, would classify the company in the 3% tier instead of the 10% tier, resulting in a substantial reduction in the SRAC earned. This material variance mandates that taxpayers rigorously define and document the methodology used for “Annual Gross Revenue,” ensuring it is applied to the current tax year for threshold testing, and is not confused with the historical average definition used for the base calculation.

C. Calculation Compatibility and Method Selection

The SRAC rate (10% or 3%) determined by the AGR threshold must be applied using the calculation methodology selected for the base RAC.1 Companies must use either the Regular Calculation Method (IA 128) or the Alternative Simplified Method (ASC, IA 128S) for both credits.2

While the Regular Method (IA 128) is most straightforward, the SRAC calculation for businesses electing the ASC (IA 128S) may require reference to specific supplemental percentages and line calculations detailed within their original HQJ contract terms. Regardless of the method chosen, the $20 million AGR threshold dictates the percentage multiplier used against the incremental QREs.

IV. Iowa Revenue Office Guidance and Compliance

The Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) provides clear and consistent guidance concerning the application of the $20 million AGR threshold, primarily through instructional materials and reports related to Iowa Code Section 15.335.

IDR reports confirm that the SRAC amount is explicitly dependent upon the annual gross revenue of the business.2 The guidance consistently states that businesses below $20 million qualify for up to an additional 10%, while those at or above $20 million are capped at 3%.1 These calculations are performed by the taxpayer on Form IA 128 or IA 128S.2

The enforcement structure places a shared responsibility on the taxpayer: the initial qualification for the supplemental credit, including the determination of the appropriate rate tier, is validated through the IEDA’s HQJ award process.13 The IDR then ensures that the credit calculation on the tax forms adheres to the certified rate and the statutory definitions of incremental QREs. This necessitates comprehensive business record-keeping that satisfies both the economic development authority’s programmatic compliance requirements and the Department of Revenue’s tax documentation standards.

V. Calculation Mechanics and Practical Case Study

The following example demonstrates the material financial difference resulting from crossing the $20 million AGR threshold, focusing solely on the supplemental portion of the credit.

A. Case Study Scenario: R&D Firm Near the Threshold

A High Quality Jobs (HQJ) approved technology company incurs $500,000 in incremental Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs)—that is, QREs exceeding the established base amount, making them eligible for the supplemental credit.

Example A: AGR $19,500,000 (Maximum Benefit)

The firm’s Annual Gross Revenue is under $20 million, qualifying it for the maximum supplemental rate of 10%.

• Supplemental SRAC Earned (10%): $500,000 Incremental QREs $\times$ 10% = $50,000
• Total Credit Earned (Including Base RAC): $32,500 + $50,000 = $82,500
• Refundable Cash Benefit (SRAC Only): $50,000 $\times$ 90% = $45,000

Example B: AGR $20,500,000 (Reduced Benefit)

The firm’s Annual Gross Revenue exceeds $20 million, limiting it to the maximum supplemental rate of 3%.

• Supplemental SRAC Earned (3%): $500,000 Incremental QREs $\times$ 3% = $15,000
• Total Credit Earned (Including Base RAC): $32,500 + $15,000 = $47,500
• Refundable Cash Benefit (SRAC Only): $15,000 $\times$ 90% = $13,500

B. Comparative Impact Analysis

The difference in SRAC earned is $35,000, illustrating the disproportionate financial impact of the threshold.

Table 3. Financial Impact of Crossing the $20M Threshold

This result confirms that the $20 million AGR threshold functions as a pivotal financial control point. For a business nearing the line, the decision to generate incremental revenue must be weighed against the significant loss in refundable R&D tax credit value. Taxpayers must proactively manage their revenue recognition and forecasting processes to avoid inadvertently incurring a major reduction in this critical R&D funding source.

VII. Conclusion

The $20 million Annual Gross Revenue threshold is the linchpin of the Iowa Supplemental Research Activities Tax Credit, creating a high-incentive environment for smaller businesses engaged in HQJ-approved R&D.

The strategic financial value for companies with AGR below $20 million is exceptional, allowing them to access a 10% supplemental rate, 90% of which is refundable.4 This cash liquidity is designed to spur innovation and growth.

For corporate tax planning, the following conclusions derived from the analysis are paramount:

1. Revenue Distinction: The taxpayer must accurately distinguish between Annual Gross Revenue (current-year metric for the $20M SRAC threshold) and the Average Annual Gross Receipts (four-year historical metric for the base RAC calculation) to ensure compliance and maximize the incentive rate.
2. Programmatic Risk: The SRAC is tethered to IEDA approval under the HQJ program. The high value of the credit is contingent upon maintaining compliance with HQJ commitments, including high-wage and job creation thresholds, placing a necessary dual compliance burden on the claimant.
3. Threshold Management: Businesses approaching $20 million in AGR must integrate this tax constraint into their annual revenue forecasting and financial strategy. The risk of losing 7 percentage points on incremental QREs by marginally exceeding the threshold represents a material financial penalty that often outweighs the benefit of marginal revenue growth.
4. Imminent Change: The current Research Activities Tax Credit structure, including the SRAC and its tiered rates, faces sunset risk after 2025. This situation warrants that businesses currently eligible for the 10% supplemental rate accelerate their R&D spending plans and ensure maximum credit utilization before potential legislative changes reduce or eliminate the current differential incentive.4

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/