The Advanced Tax Planning Guide: Basic Research Payments and the Iowa R&D Tax Credit Landscape

I. Executive Summary: Basic Research Payments and Iowa’s Tax Landscape

Basic Research Payments (BRP) are defined federally as cash payments made by a C corporation to a qualified educational or scientific organization for basic research pursuant to a written contract.1 For Iowa purposes, BRP forms a critical, separate component of the refundable Research Activities Credit (RAC), calculated at 6.5% of the incremental amount above an Iowa-apportioned base.3

The Research Activities Credit (RAC), including the BRP component, provides significant incentives for qualified companies to invest in foundational research within Iowa. This credit is designed to reward increased activity over historical base periods, ensuring that the state subsidizes genuine growth in research expenditure. The BRP component specifically targets collaboration between corporate entities and institutions such as universities, providing a 6.5% credit on the incremental increase of these specific expenditures incurred within Iowa.5

However, strategic tax planning for BRP is immediately impacted by the impending repeal of the RAC. Senate File 657 (SF 657) repeals the current RAC after the 2025 tax year, transitioning Iowa’s research incentive system to a new, capped program under the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA).5 This forthcoming legislative shift necessitates immediate action and a reassessment of long-term BRP funding strategies, as the incentive rate will be reduced and the credit will become competitive and capped at the state level.

II. Definitional and Statutory Framework of Basic Research Payments (BRP)

The foundational understanding of Basic Research Payments originates entirely within the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Iowa state law explicitly incorporates these definitions, requiring any analysis of the Iowa BRP component to begin with IRC Section 41(e).7

A. Statutory Basis: IRC Section 41(e) and the Definition of Basic Research

Iowa Code §422.10 explicitly adopts the definitions of “basic research payment” and “qualified research expense” as defined for the federal credit for increasing research activities under IRC §41.7 This conformity mandates strict adherence to the federal criteria.

The term “basic research payment” is narrowly defined. It means any amount paid in cash during the taxable year by a corporation to any qualified organization for basic research.1 Crucially, two specific conditions must be met for the payment to qualify: (i) the payment must be pursuant to a written agreement between the corporation and the qualified organization, and (ii) the basic research must be performed by that qualified organization.1

Basic research, in this context, is distinct from the general Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) that typically fund activities like experimentation, engineering, and product development.8 Basic research seeks to advance fundamental scientific knowledge without a specific commercial objective in mind.

B. Criteria for Qualified Organizations

To qualify for the BRP credit, the funds must be directed to a “qualified organization.” Federally and for Iowa purposes, these generally include educational institutions (universities and colleges) and certain scientific research organizations.2 The requirement that the research be performed by the qualified organization itself ensures that the corporate cash payments are directly channeled into foundational scientific efforts, rather than simply paying an administrative fee or acting as a conduit for applied research.2

C. Corporate Eligibility and Exclusions

The federal definition places a significant restriction on the type of entity eligible to claim BRPs. The term “basic research payment” is specifically defined as an amount paid by a corporation.1 This means that the BRP component of the research credit is available only to C corporations. Entities explicitly excluded from claiming the credit at the entity level include S corporations, personal holding companies (as defined in section 542), and service organizations (as defined in section 414(m)(3)).11

This restriction leads to a structural disparity critical for multi-state entities operating in Iowa. While Iowa permits S corporations and partnerships/LLCs to claim and pass through the general Research Activities Credit (RAC) derived from Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) to their owners via Schedule K-1 5, these pass-through entities are structurally barred from claiming the BRP component of the credit. This bar exists because the foundational definition of a BRP claimant is a C corporation under IRC §41.11 Therefore, if maximizing incentives for basic research funding is a primary goal, taxpayers structured as pass-throughs must consider utilizing a subsidiary C corporation for the specific purpose of contracting and paying for basic research conducted at Iowa universities.

III. Integrating Federal BRP into the Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC) (Pre-2026 Law)

The Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC), codified under Iowa Code §15.335 5, utilizes the federal IRC §41 definitions but layers on two state-specific requirements: a mandatory federal claim and strict localization criteria, along with industry restrictions.

A. Iowa Code Conformity and Departures from IRC §41

A taxpayer must meet two initial gateways to claim the Iowa RAC, including the BRP component:

1. Mandatory Federal Claim: Iowa law explicitly requires that the researching business must claim and be allowed the Federal Credit for Increasing Research Activities under IRC section 41 for the same taxable year in order to be eligible for the Iowa credit.13
2. Localization Requirement: While the definitions are federal, the expenses must be strictly localized. Iowa only considers expenses incurred for research activities conducted within this state.3 This requirement means that only cash payments made to qualified organizations located in Iowa for research performed in Iowa can be counted toward the Iowa BRP credit.13

B. Mandatory Iowa Eligibility: Industry Restrictions

Iowa imposes industry restrictions that narrow eligibility beyond the federal requirement that the research be conducted “in carrying on any trade or business”.2 A taxpayer may only claim the Iowa credit if the business conducting the qualified research is engaged in specific, targeted sectors.13

Eligible Industries (Pre-2026): Manufacturing, life sciences, agriscience, software engineering, or the aviation and aerospace industry.5

Explicitly Ineligible Sectors (Pre-2026): Ineligible businesses include, but are not limited to, those engaged in agricultural production, financial or investment companies, retailers, wholesalers, publishers, transportation companies, real estate companies, accountants, architects, contractors, subcontractors, or builders, or businesses engaged in commercial and residential repair and installation.13

C. BRP Treatment under the Regular Method (6.5%)

Under the regular calculation method, filed using Iowa Form IA 128 13, the BRP component is computed distinctly from the QRE component.4 The credit equals 6.5% of the excess (incremental) basic research payments over the Iowa-apportioned base amount.3 The regular credit calculation for the entire RAC is the sum of 6.5% of excess Iowa QREs over the base amount, plus 6.5% of the qualified basic research payments.5

D. Refundability and Carryforward Provisions

A significant attraction of the Iowa RAC is its refundability. The credit offsets income tax liabilities, and excess amounts may be refunded to the taxpayer, subject to statutory limits.5 Current guidance indicates that the regular RAC is refundable up to 80% of the excess credit, while the Supplemental RAC (discussed below) may be refunded up to 90%.5 Any overpayment otherwise eligible for a refund may, in lieu of the refund, be credited to the estimated tax liability for the following year.12 Unlike some state credits, the excess credit does not carry forward indefinitely.5

IV. Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) Guidance: Apportionment and Compliance Mechanics

The complexity of the BRP calculation lies not in the final rate (6.5%) but in the mandatory apportionment required by the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) to localize the historical base period amount. This calculation is formalized in Part II of the IA 128 form.

A. Navigating IDR Form IA 128

Taxpayers electing the regular RAC method must use Form IA 128 (while the Alternative Simplified Credit, or ASC, uses IA 128S).13 The form requires the taxpayer to first report the global (federal) BRP amounts in Part I, and then report the Iowa-specific amounts in Part II.13 This dual-reporting structure provides the necessary variables for the IDR to perform the critical apportionment calculation.

B. Detailed Analysis of the Base Period Amount and Incremental Calculation

The federal credit structure, adopted by Iowa, is designed to be an incremental credit, rewarding expenditures only to the extent they exceed a historical baseline. For BRP, this baseline is the Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA), derived from historical BRP and Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) over a look-back period (known as the “minimum basic research amount”).1

Iowa adopts this incremental philosophy but applies it strictly to in-state activities. The state does not simply grant a credit on all Iowa BRP. Instead, it must adjust the historical federal QOBPA to reflect the proportion of research activity conducted in Iowa.

C. The Apportionment Formula for the Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA)

The calculation of the Iowa apportioned QOBPA (Line 18 on IA 128) is a mandatory step that links the federal history to the current localized activity.

The following data points are essential for this calculation, as derived from the IA 128 instructions 13:

• Line 3: Total Basic Research Payments (Federal).13
• Line 4: Federal Qualified Organization Base Period Amount (QOBPA).13
• Line 17: Iowa Basic Research Payments (BRP paid in cash pursuant to a written contract to a qualified university or scientific research organization in Iowa).13

The IDR instructs taxpayers to calculate the Iowa apportioned QOBPA (Line 18) using the following formula 13:

$$\text{Line 18} = \text{Line 4} \times \left( \frac{\text{Line 17}}{\text{Line 3}} \right)$$

This formula ensures that the taxpayer’s historical base amount is adjusted by the ratio of their current Iowa BRP to their total federal BRP. The resulting Line 18 amount is then subtracted from Line 17 (Iowa BRP) to determine the Excess Iowa Basic Research Payments (Line 19).13 Line 19, which must be zero if the calculation results in a negative amount, represents the incremental research increase eligible for the 6.5% credit.13

This apportionment mechanism serves a crucial function in state tax policy. If a corporation conducts substantial basic research nationally, contributing to a high federal QOBPA, Iowa avoids subsidizing that entire historical base. By apportioning the base, the credit is focused precisely on the increase in basic research investment that the State of Iowa contributed to the national expansion, rewarding only the incremental activity localized within the state’s borders.

Table 1: Iowa RAC Regular Method Calculation Flow (BRP Component)

V. Advanced Context: The Supplemental Research Activities Credit (SRAC) for BRP

Beyond the standard 6.5% Research Activities Credit, Iowa provides a Supplemental Research Activities Tax Credit (SRAC) to businesses that have been approved under targeted economic development programs, such as the High Quality Jobs (HQJ) program or the Enterprise Zone program.3 The SRAC offers significantly enhanced rates for the BRP component, requiring coordination with the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA).

A. Eligibility via High Quality Jobs (HQJ) and Enterprise Zone Programs

The SRAC is an additional credit awarded by the IEDA.17 To claim it, the taxpayer must use the same calculation method (regular or ASC) used for the standard RAC in that given year.17 The SRAC calculation applies a distinct, higher percentage to the same qualifying incremental research expenditure determined in the standard RAC calculation, including the excess BRP amount calculated on IA 128 Line 19.

B. Enhanced BRP Calculation Rates Under SRAC

The SRAC rates vary based on the size of the business, defined by annual gross receipts 18:

• Small Businesses ($\le\$20M$ Gross Receipts): For businesses with annual gross receipts of $20 million or less, the maximum supplemental tax credit is 10% of the sum of the incremental QREs and the incremental BRP.13 This provides a 10% credit rate specifically for the incremental BRP component.
• Large Businesses ($>\$20M$ Gross Receipts): For businesses with annual gross receipts exceeding $20 million, the maximum supplemental tax credit is 3% of the sum of the incremental QREs and the incremental BRP.13

C. Specialized Rates for Quality Jobs Enterprise Zones

Iowa Administrative Rules provide further specialized provisions for certain geographically targeted activities. For basic research activities conducted within a quality jobs enterprise zone, the credit may be calculated in lieu of the standard RAC, offering highly preferential rates.14

Under this specific zone provision, the BRP component is 13% of the basic research payments determined under IRC §41(e)(1)(A), based upon the state’s apportioned share of the qualifying expenditures.14 This 13% rate is nearly double the standard RAC rate of 6.5%.4 This structure compels large manufacturing or bioscience corporations (such as those historically claiming large credits in Iowa 19) to carefully strategize the location of their outsourced basic research funding to maximize these powerful state incentives.

Table 2: BRP Component Rate Summary (Pre-2026 RAC)

VI. Case Study: Detailed Calculation of the Iowa BRP Tax Credit Component

This example illustrates the necessary apportionment process for calculating the BRP component of the standard 6.5% Iowa RAC.

A. Scenario Inputs: Federal BRP, Federal QOBPA, Iowa BRP

Assume a C corporation engaged in the manufacturing industry meets all federal and Iowa eligibility requirements for the 2025 tax year.

B. Calculation of the Apportionment Ratio and Adjusted Base Amount

The objective is to determine the incremental Iowa basic research payment (Line 19).

1. BRP Apportionment Ratio: First, the percentage of the corporation’s total national basic research expenditures paid in Iowa must be determined.
   $$\text{Apportionment Ratio} = \frac{\text{Iowa BRP (\$750,000)}}{\text{Federal BRP (\$1,000,000)}} = 75.00\%$$
2. Apportioned Iowa QOBPA (Base Amount): The federal QOBPA (Line 4) must be adjusted using the calculated ratio to establish the historical baseline that must be exceeded in Iowa.
   $$\text{Line 18 (Apportioned Base)} = \text{Federal QOBPA (\$400,000)} \times \text{Apportionment Ratio (75.00\%)} = \mathbf{\$300,000}$$
   This $300,000 figure represents the portion of the historical basic research base that Iowa attributes to its proportionate share of the current BRP activity.
3. Excess Iowa BRP (Incremental Amount): The creditable amount is the current Iowa investment above the apportioned base.
   $$\text{Line 19 (Excess BRP)} = \text{Iowa BRP (\$750,000)} – \text{Apportioned QOBPA (\$300,000)} = \mathbf{\$450,000}$$

C. Determination of Final 6.5% Credit Amount

The excess incremental amount is then multiplied by the standard RAC rate of 6.5%.

$$\text{Line 20 (Final BRP Credit)} = \text{Excess Iowa BRP (\$450,000)} \times 6.5\% = \mathbf{\$29,250}$$

The final BRP component of the Research Activities Tax Credit is $29,250. This amount is then added to the calculated credit based on incremental QREs to determine the total refundable Iowa RAC.

Table 3: BRP Calculation Example for Iowa RAC (Apportionment)

VII. Legislative Outlook: Transition to the IEDA R&D Program (SF 657)

The Iowa R&D tax credit landscape is undergoing a monumental shift mandated by Senate File 657 (SF 657), which fundamentally alters the mechanism and value of the BRP incentive starting in 2026. This transition necessitates an immediate shift in strategic planning for all current and prospective claimants.

A. The Sunset of the RAC (Effective 2026) and Implications for Current BRP Claimants

The existing Research Activities Credit (RAC), which utilizes the incremental calculation based on IRC §41 and provides up to 6.5% (or 10-13% via SRAC) on incremental BRP, is repealed for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.5

The current RAC operated as an entitlement program: if a taxpayer met the statutory criteria, filed Form IA 128, and was allowed the federal credit, they were entitled to the refund (subject to statutory limits).4 The program was uncapped, leading to substantial utilization; for instance, $84.6 million in RAC subsidy claims were processed in 2023.19

Corporations with existing multi-year basic research contracts with Iowa universities entered into these agreements expecting the high, uncapped rate. The immediate prospect of this program sunsetting and being replaced by a substantially less lucrative alternative introduces considerable uncertainty and potential erosion of the expected financial return on those long-term basic research commitments.

B. Structure of the New IEDA-Administered Program

The new R&D Tax Credit Program, established under SF 657, introduces two critical changes: a shift in administrative authority and the imposition of a statewide cap.21

1. New Authority and Oversight: The oversight and administration of the credit shift from the technical tax administration of the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) to the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA).21 This change signifies a transition in focus from simple compliance to economic development policy.
2. Statewide Cap: The most significant change is the imposition of a statewide cap on the total amount of tax credits available. Beginning in FY 2026, the total combined amount of tax credits available for all taxpayers in a year is limited to a maximum of $40.0 million.21 Given that the previous uncapped RAC generated $84.6 million in claims in 2023 19, the $40 million cap introduces a highly competitive and rationing environment for future claimants.
3. Credit Calculation Change: The new program abandons the incremental (excess over base) calculation method based on IRC §41. Instead, the credit is limited to a maximum of 3.5% of the qualified business’s eligible expenditure (QREs and BRPs).5 This is a flat-rate approach that does not reward the incremental increase in activity in the same manner as the previous RAC.

C. Changes to Eligibility, Certification, and BRP Credit Rate

The new program imposes stringent requirements that did not exist under the RAC.

1. Pre-Certification and Administrative Burden: To be eligible, businesses must first pre-apply with IEDA to determine if they fit a specific targeted sector and are engaged in qualifying research. Approved businesses must then reapply every five years.6 This new pre-certification requirement imposes substantial administrative burden and introduces significant regulatory risk, as the IEDA has discretion in awarding the credit.
2. Narrowed Industry Focus: Eligibility is focused on four targeted industries: advanced manufacturing, bioscience, insurance and finance (a sector previously ineligible under RAC), and technology and innovation.6 Certain exclusions, such as agricultural production, construction, and real estate, remain.21
3. Devaluation of Basic Research: The shift from a potential credit rate of 6.5% (or up to 13% for specialized zones 14) down to a maximum of 3.5% fundamentally reduces the economic incentive for large corporations to finance basic research within Iowa institutions.5 Furthermore, the $40 million state cap subjects large BRP claimants, such as major life sciences or aerospace firms, to allocation risk, as their claims may constitute a significant portion of the total available state subsidy. This transformation alters the calculation from a predictable entitlement to a competitive economic incentive, significantly affecting projected returns on investment for basic research.

Table 4: Comparison: Iowa RAC vs. IEDA R&D Program (Post-2025)

VIII. Conclusion and Strategic Tax Planning Recommendations

The Basic Research Payments component of the Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC) offers substantial, potentially refundable, tax savings for eligible C corporations, provided they adhere to strict federal definitions and the IDR’s complex apportionment rules detailed on Form IA 128.4 The mechanism ensures that the 6.5% credit (or up to 13% via certain supplemental programs 14) is applied only to the incremental, localized basic research investment above the historical, apportioned base.

However, the impending legislative overhaul presents an urgent need for strategic tax planning. The repeal of the RAC after the 2025 tax year, mandated by SF 657, introduces a capped, lower-rate, and competitively administered program under the IEDA.5

Recommendations for Taxpayers:

1. Accelerate 2025 BRP Expenditures: C corporations with planned basic research payments scheduled for early 2026 should evaluate accelerating these cash payments into the 2025 tax year. This proactive step secures the benefit of the higher, uncapped 6.5% (or 10%/13%) credit rate structure before the program transitions to the maximum 3.5% IEDA rate and becomes subject to the $40 million state cap.5
2. Verify C-Corporation Status: Pass-through entities intending to utilize the BRP credit component must confirm that the basic research activity is conducted and paid for by a subsidiary structured as a C corporation, as required by the federal IRC §41 definition adopted by Iowa.11
3. Initiate IEDA Certification Process: For continued research activities beyond 2025, businesses must prioritize the new administrative requirements, including the mandatory pre-application and certification process with the IEDA.6 Failure to secure IEDA approval will render all BRP and QRE expenditures ineligible for the credit, regardless of their intrinsic scientific merit.
4. Re-evaluate Economic Returns: Taxpayers must recalculate the expected return on future Iowa-based basic research investments, factoring in the reduced maximum credit rate of 3.5% and the inherent risk of the $40 million statewide cap, which may lead to prorating or denial of claims in future years.21

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/