The Iowa Apportioned Share: A Critical Analysis of the Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC) Apportionment Methodology

The Iowa Apportioned Share is a ratio that isolates the portion of a taxpayer’s total incremental research expenses that are eligible for the Iowa Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC). It is calculated by dividing Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) incurred within Iowa by the total Qualified Research Expenditures incurred everywhere.

This critical mechanism serves to localize research tax benefits, ensuring that multi-state businesses only receive Iowa tax credit for expenditures that are physically performed within the state’s borders, thereby aligning the incentive directly with local economic investment and job creation. This detailed report synthesizes Iowa Code, Department of Revenue (IDR) guidance, and complex calculation methodologies required for accurate claim filing.

I. Statutory and Regulatory Foundation of the Iowa RAC

The determination of the Iowa Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC) is a rigorous, multi-layered process that begins with strict adherence to federal standards, followed by the application of state-specific limitations and apportionment rules.

A. Legal Mandate and Federal Conformity

The Iowa RAC is authorized primarily under Iowa Code § 422.10 for income tax purposes and § 15.335 for businesses participating in specific economic development initiatives.1 As an incremental credit, its core function is to reward taxpayers for increasing their research spending above a historical base amount, mirroring the philosophy of the federal Research and Experimentation Tax Credit.3

A fundamental prerequisite for claiming the Iowa credit is the requirement that the taxpayer’s business must first claim and be allowed a research credit for such qualified research expenses under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) for the same taxable year.4 This mandate strictly links the definition of “Qualified Research Expenditures” (QREs) and the rigorous four-part test for qualified research activity—which requires the activity to be experimental, aimed at developing new products, and intended to discover information that is technological in nature—directly to federal standards.3

B. Layered Eligibility and Industry Focus

Beyond federal conformity, Iowa imposes specific restrictions related to the taxpayer’s business activity, which represents a crucial, preliminary check on eligibility. Since the 2018 Iowa Tax Reform Bill, the credit has been retroactively limited to businesses engaged in qualified research within specific high-value industries: manufacturing, life sciences, agriscience, software engineering, or the aviation and aerospace industry.3

This restriction emphasizes Iowa’s policy goal of directing financial incentives toward sectors that generate the highest potential for innovation and economic impact within the state. Consequently, businesses primarily engaged in certain excluded activities, such as agricultural production, retail, wholesale, finance, investment, or real estate, are explicitly ineligible.3 The successful determination of the Apportioned Share—the ratio of research activity physically performed in Iowa—is secondary to this initial industry eligibility screening. A multi-state taxpayer must first establish that its principal activities fall within the targeted sectors. If the primary activity is determined to be ineligible (e.g., a financial company), the subsequent calculation of the Apportioned Share, regardless of its accuracy, will result in the disallowance of the entire credit.3

C. Calculation Methods and Refundability

Iowa offers two primary methods for calculating the RAC, requiring taxpayers to use the same method elected or required federally 4:

1. Regular Method (Form IA 128): The base rate is 6.5% of the excess of qualified research expenses during the tax year over the computed base amount, calculated using Iowa’s apportioned share of research expenses.8
2. Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method (Form IA 128S): This method utilizes a rate of 4.55% of the difference between the current year’s Iowa QREs and 50% of the average of the prior three years’ Iowa QREs.8 The rate is 1.95% of current year Iowa QREs if no prior research was conducted.7

The RAC also offers a substantial cash-flow advantage through its refundability. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2023, ninety percent (90%) of any credit amount that exceeds the taxpayer’s liability is refundable, with interest paid on the refund amount.1

II. Detailed Analysis of the Iowa Apportioned Share

The Iowa Apportioned Share Factor is the cornerstone of the state’s R&D tax calculation, ensuring the tax benefit is accurately limited to localized research activity.

A. Definition and Statutory Derivation

The Apportioned Share is statutorily defined in the Iowa Code, specifying the requirement for multi-state apportionment:

The state’s apportioned share of the qualifying expenditures for increasing research activities is a percent equal to the ratio of qualified research expenditures in this state to total qualified research expenditures. 1

This formula yields the Iowa Apportioned Share Factor:

$$\text{Iowa Apportioned Share Factor} = \frac{\text{Qualified Research Expenditures in Iowa (Numerator)}}{\text{Total Qualified Research Expenditures (Everywhere) (Denominator)}}$$

B. QRE Sourcing Criteria for “In This State”

For multi-state firms, accurately determining the numerator—the Qualified Research Expenditures in Iowa (Iowa QREs)—is the most frequent point of contention during audit. Unlike general corporate income tax apportionment, which often uses market-based sourcing for sales 9, the RAC mandates a cost-based, physical presence sourcing rule.

Iowa Code stipulates that QREs are sourced to Iowa if the expenditures meet the following criteria 1:

1. Wages: Wages paid to an employee for qualified services, provided the services are physically performed within Iowa.
2. Supplies: The cost of supplies consumed or used in the conduct of qualified research that occurs within Iowa.
3. Contract Research: Contract research expenses paid to a third party, provided the underlying research services are conducted within Iowa.

This criterion necessitates that the taxpayer meticulously track and document the physical location where the R&D activity is executed, including the specific time and effort devoted by researchers within the state.

C. Divergence from General Income Apportionment

The sourcing methodology employed for the RAC represents a significant divergence from the standard corporate income tax apportionment in Iowa. For corporate income tax purposes, Iowa generally utilizes a single sales factor formula.9 However, the RAC calculation requires a completely separate QRE-based apportionment calculation.1

This disparity mandates that multi-state businesses manage two distinct apportionment methods: one based on market sales nexus (for income tax) and one based solely on physical research activity (for the credit). This disparity greatly increases the compliance burden, as it requires specialized tracking systems to isolate and document R&D costs—such as payroll, supplies, and contract expenses—to the specific physical locations where the research occurs, independent of where the resulting sales are derived.3

D. Application to the Incremental Base Amount

The Apportioned Share Factor is crucial because it localizes the historical base amount, thereby determining the incremental research eligible for the state credit. For the Regular Method, the base amount is the product of the fixed-base percentage multiplied by the average annual gross receipts of the taxpayer for the four preceding years, subject to a minimum of fifty percent of the qualified research expenses for the credit year.8

When a multi-state firm utilizes the Regular Method, the Iowa Apportioned Share Factor is applied to the federally calculated base amount to arrive at the Iowa Base Period Amount.10 This scaling ensures that the historical expenditures used to determine the incremental growth are properly confined to the economic activity within Iowa. The integrity of this calculation hinges on the firm’s ability to maintain meticulous records of Total QREs (the denominator) and Iowa QREs (the numerator) for the current year, alongside four years of historical Iowa-apportioned gross receipts necessary for calculating the federal fixed-base percentage.8 Failure to maintain this specialized, historically sourced apportionment data renders the incremental calculation susceptible to challenge.

III. Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) Compliance and Guidance

The Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) administers the RAC and its associated apportionment rules primarily through Iowa Administrative Code rule 701-501.7.4

A. Required Forms and Reporting

To claim the credit, taxpayers must submit a specific set of forms to the IDR:

• Form IA 128 (or IA 128S): Used for the mechanical calculation of the credit under the Regular or Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method, respectively.8
• Federal Form 6765: The pass-through entity must file this federal form with its Iowa return to demonstrate federal compliance.12
• IA 148 Tax Credits Schedule: The final calculated credit amount must be reported on the IA 148, using tax credit code 58.4

B. Mechanical Application of the Apportioned Share

The instructions for Form IA 128 explicitly detail the application of the Apportioned Share Factor to localize the base amount. For computing the Iowa base period amount (typically reported on Line 18 of the IA 128), the guidance directs the taxpayer to multiply the Federal Base Amount (Line 4) by the quotient derived from dividing Iowa QREs (Line 17) by Total QREs (Line 3).10

This formal instruction confirms the statutory methodology:

$$\text{Iowa Base Period Amount (L18)} = \text{Federal Base Amount (L4)} \times \left( \frac{\text{Iowa QREs (L17)}}{\text{Total QREs (L3)}} \right)$$

This calculation scales down the federal base, ensuring that the resulting credit is based only on the incremental QREs that exceed the portion of the historical base specifically attributable to Iowa activity.

C. Apportionment for Pass-Through Entities (PTEs)

For partnerships, S corporations, limited liability companies, estates, or trusts, the calculation of the RAC and the Apportioned Share Factor is first completed at the entity level.12 The PTE is required to file the IA 128/128S and Federal 6765 with its return.

The resulting tax credit amount is then apportioned to the members (owners) based on their pro rata share of the income of the entity.4 The PTE reports the apportioned tax credit for each member on a Schedule K-1 or an attachment to the K-1, instructing the members to report the passed-through credit on their individual IA 128 or IA 128S and include it with their own tax returns.12 The separate reporting requirement ensures proper tracking of credit usage at the individual taxpayer level.

IV. Practical Application: Detailed Calculation Example

This example demonstrates the application of the Iowa Apportioned Share Factor in calculating the Regular Method RAC for a multi-state manufacturing firm.

A. Example Scenario Assumptions

The following table summarizes the financial data for a multi-state corporation that has qualified for the credit under industry eligibility rules:

Table 1: Key Financial and Research Data

B. Step-by-Step RAC Calculation (Regular Method)

The calculation begins by establishing the Iowa Apportioned Share Factor, which quantifies the percentage of total research conducted locally.

Step 1: Calculate the Iowa Apportioned Share Factor

$$\text{Apportioned Share Factor} = \frac{\text{Iowa QREs}}{\text{Total Global QREs}} = \frac{\$600,000}{\$1,500,000} = 0.40 \text{ or } \mathbf{40.00\%}$$

Step 2: Localize the Base Amount

The 40.00% factor is applied to the Federal Base Amount to derive the portion of historical spending attributable to Iowa activity.

$$\text{Localized Base Amount (IA 128 L18)} = \text{Federal Base Amount} \times \text{Apportioned Share Factor}$$

$$\text{Localized Base Amount} = \$750,000 \times 40.00\% = \mathbf{\$300,000}$$

Step 3: Calculate Iowa Incremental Excess QREs

The incremental amount eligible for the credit is the difference between the current year’s Iowa QREs and the Localized Base Amount.

$$\text{Iowa Incremental Excess QREs} = \text{Iowa QREs} – \text{Localized Base Amount}$$

$$\text{Iowa Incremental Excess QREs} = \$600,000 – \$300,000 = \mathbf{\$300,000}$$

Step 4: Calculate the Iowa RAC Credit

The 6.5% regular rate is applied to the Iowa Incremental Excess QREs.8

$$\text{Iowa RAC Credit} = \text{Iowa Incremental Excess QREs} \times 6.5\%$$

$$\text{Iowa RAC Credit} = \$300,000 \times 6.5\% = \mathbf{\$19,500}$$

V. Nuanced Considerations: Supplemental Credits and Refundability

The Apportioned Share concept is also central to the calculation of the Supplemental Research Activities Tax Credit (SRAC), a substantial additional incentive available under specific state economic development contracts.

A. Supplemental Research Activities Tax Credit (SRAC)

The SRAC is awarded by the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA) to businesses approved under programs such as the High Quality Jobs (HQJ) Program or the Enterprise Zone Program.4

The calculation of the SRAC relies on the same incremental research expenditure base—the “excess of qualified research expenses during the tax year over the base amount for the tax year”—derived from the initial Apportioned Share calculation.2 The percentage applied to this apportioned base is tiered based on the company’s annual gross receipts 2:

Table 2: Supplemental Research Activities Credit (SRAC) Rates

B. Calculation Example Including SRAC

Continuing with the example from Section IV, where the calculated Iowa Incremental Excess QREs were $300,000, and the company’s gross revenue was $30,000,000 (qualifying it as a Large Business):

$$\text{SRAC Credit} = \text{Iowa Incremental Excess QREs} \times \text{Large Business SRAC Rate (3\%)}$$

$$\text{SRAC Credit} = \$300,000 \times 3\% = \mathbf{\$9,000}$$

The Total Iowa RAC Claim is the sum of the Regular RAC and the SRAC:

$$\text{Total Credit} = \$19,500 \text{ (Regular RAC)} + \$9,000 \text{ (SRAC)} = \mathbf{\$28,500}$$

C. Refundability and Financial Impact

The high level of refundability attached to the Iowa RAC dramatically enhances its financial benefit. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2023, 90% of the total credit that exceeds the tax liability imposed by Iowa Code § 422.5 is refundable.1 This substantial refundability makes accurate calculation and documentation of the Apportioned Share crucial for maximizing immediate cash recovery. The remaining non-refundable portion (10%) may be carried forward to offset future Iowa tax liabilities.13

VI. Economic Rationale and Compliance Risks

The utilization of the Apportioned Share Factor is integral to Iowa’s economic policy surrounding the RAC, yet its implementation creates specific challenges for multi-state firms subject to IDR compliance scrutiny.

A. Policy Justification and Economic Impact

The fundamental purpose of the RAC, reinforced by the apportionment requirement, is to encourage businesses to increase R&D activity in Iowa.14 This state-level support is justified by the economic principle of addressing positive externalities, where research often generates social benefits that exceed the private benefits captured by the firm itself.14

The Apportioned Share factor explicitly links the state’s fiscal expenditure (the tax credit cost) to quantifiable R&D inputs located physically within Iowa, thereby localizing the economic benefit.14 This design choice is critical in mitigating a major criticism against state tax credits: that positive externalities are not contained by state boundaries, potentially allowing other states to benefit from Iowa’s subsidy. Empirical data suggests that states with RAC programs consistently report higher R&D inputs; between 1981 and 2019, RAC states reported, on average, 85% higher R&D per capita compared to non-RAC states, indicating the credit successfully incentivizes research inputs.14

B. Key Compliance and Audit Hotspots

The integrity of the Iowa Apportioned Share Factor is the primary focus of IDR compliance reviews, as errors in sourcing QREs directly lead to overstating the refundable tax credit.

1. QRE Sourcing Documentation Failures

The requirement that QREs be physically incurred in Iowa (wages for services performed in Iowa, supplies consumed in Iowa, etc.) demands rigorous record-keeping.1 Auditors preparing for an RAC claim review will demand granular documentation—such as specific labor records, time-tracking logs, and supply invoices tied to a physical Iowa location—to verify the numerator of the Apportioned Share ratio. For multi-state companies, inadequate systems for tracking R&D employee time and effort by state represent a critical weakness that can lead to the disallowance of state-sourced QREs.3

2. The “Relabeling Problem”

The IDR is aware of the risk that firms may inappropriately categorize existing, non-R&D expenses as qualified research expenditures to inflate their claim—a phenomenon known as the “relabeling problem.” Studies have estimated that approximately 24% of reported increases in R&D expenditures in such programs can be attributed to relabeling rather than genuinely new research.14 The Apportioned Share Factor acts as an internal control; if an auditor observes a disproportionate increase in Iowa QREs (the numerator) without corroborating increases in Iowa-based R&D payroll or facilities, the claim is highly likely to be flagged for an in-depth review.

3. Misapplication of Historical Base Data

Accurate calculation of the historical base amount required for the Regular Method is frequently challenging, particularly for businesses that have experienced organizational or geographical changes. The proper calculation requires using four years of historical Iowa-apportioned gross receipts to determine the fixed-base percentage.8 This requirement means that businesses must maintain segregated historical data that is compliant with Iowa’s apportionment rules for those past years. The inability to produce or accurately calculate this historical, state-specific apportionment data will invalidate the entire incremental calculation upon which both the Regular RAC and the SRAC are based.8

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Iowa Apportioned Share is a sophisticated mechanism that precisely targets tax incentives toward localized research activity. For multi-state taxpayers, achieving compliance requires navigating the complexity of conforming to federal IRC § 41 standards while simultaneously adhering to Iowa’s stringent, activity-based QRE sourcing rules for apportionment. Accurate determination of the Apportioned Share Factor is not merely a calculation step; it is the fundamental justification for the credit claim against the state treasury.

Based on the statutory framework and administrative requirements, the following strategic recommendations are essential for optimizing and defending the Iowa RAC claim:

1. Establish Primary Eligibility: Prioritize confirming that the business’s core activities fall within the narrow list of eligible industries (manufacturing, life sciences, etc.) before investing in calculation efforts, as ineligibility voids any claim.3
2. Ensure Rigorous QRE Sourcing: Implement robust time and expense tracking systems capable of isolating and documenting qualified employee time, supplies usage, and contract research execution based on specific physical performance locations within Iowa. This documentation provides irrefutable evidence supporting the Iowa QREs (the numerator).1
3. Validate Historical Data Integrity: Maintain and verify the accuracy of all required historical data—whether the four years of Iowa-apportioned gross receipts (Regular Method) or the three years of Iowa-specific QREs (ASC Method)—to ensure the correct localization of the Base Amount calculation.8
4. Confirm Method Consistency: Verify that the RAC calculation method elected for Iowa (IA 128 or IA 128S) strictly aligns with the method used or required for the federal IRC Section 41 credit.4

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/