Expert-Level Report: Analysis of Iowa Code $\S 422.33(5)$ (Corporate Tax Credit Application) in Context of the Research and Development Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: The Meaning and Function of Iowa Code $\S 422.33(5)$

Iowa Code $\S 422.33(5)$ is the foundational corporate tax statute that authorizes taxpayers to reduce their corporate income tax liability by the amount of applicable state tax credits. Crucially, this subsection, read in conjunction with related administrative rules, dictates whether any excess credit is eligible for refund or carryforward after the corporate tax liability has been reduced to zero.

1.1 The Statutory Mandate: Simple Meaning

Iowa Code $\S 422.33(5)$ functions as the general enabling provision within the corporate income tax framework, allowing eligible corporations to apply specific credits against their calculated tax liability.1 This subsection has historically been the mechanism by which the Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC) is utilized, determining both the offset against tax due and the treatment (refund or carryforward) of any residual credit amount.2

1.2 Deep Analysis: Corporate Tax Structure and Credit Application

The statutory provision for credit application is situated within the broader context of corporate taxation imposed by Iowa Code Chapter 422, Division III. Section $\S 422.33$ imposes an annual tax upon every corporation conducting business in Iowa or deriving income from Iowa sources, pursuant to subsection (1).1 The core process requires the corporation to first establish taxable nexus in Iowa and calculate its Iowa net income before applying the tax rates.6

A prerequisite for utilizing the credit authorized by $\S 422.33(5)$ is the accurate determination of the state’s tax base. Subsection $\S 422.33(3)$ addresses situations where standard allocation and apportionment methods may be deemed inapplicable or inequitable, allowing the Director of Revenue to redetermine the taxable income.7 This ensures the tax base is calculated strictly based on the portion of income “reasonably attributable to business and sources within the state”.7 The calculation of this final tax liability, against which the credit is applied under $\S 422.33(5)$, is fundamental to assessing the final value of the Research Activities Credit (RAC).

The specific role of $\S 422.33(5)$ has historically been to explicitly link the calculation of the Research Activities Credit (RAC), detailed in Iowa Administrative Code (IAC) 701—52.7, to the resulting reduction in corporate tax liability. This linkage cross-references related statutes, including $\S 422.10$ (for individual claimants of pass-through entity credits) and $\S 15.335$ (for supplemental credits awarded by the Iowa Economic Development Authority, or IEDA).2

Structural Implications of Statutory Codification

The significance of $\S 422.33(5)$ is currently undergoing a substantial shift due to recent legislative activity. While $\S 422.33(5)$ governed the historical application of the Research Activities Credit (RAC), the new, overhauled R&D tax credit program is now codified under a specific, distinct provision: Iowa Code $\S 422.33(17)$.8 This codification split, moving the R&D incentive to a dedicated, programmatic subsection, is not a mere technical change; it reflects a deliberate regulatory strategy. By defining the new R&D credit within $\S 422.33(17)$, rather than relying solely on the general credit application language in $\S 422.33(5)$, the state government, particularly the Department of Revenue (IDOR) and IEDA, gains increased statutory flexibility to enforce unique, program-specific limitations. These specific limitations include the introduction of an annual $\$40$ million credit cap and mandatory pre-application and review requirements, which distinguish this incentive from older, general-use tax credits that continue to operate under the broader application framework of $\S 422.33(5)$.8 This architectural separation signifies that the R&D benefit is now treated as a distinct, capped incentive subject to annual budgetary controls, rather than a universal reduction mechanism against the corporate tax base.

Operational Risk from Apportionment Methodologies

The determination of the final value and usability of the credit authorized by $\S 422.33(5)$ is inherently tied to the corporation’s apportionment results. Iowa corporate taxation relies on apportionment to determine taxable net income.7 Furthermore, the R&D credit itself is calculated based only on Iowa-apportioned Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs).10 If a corporation elects to rely on $\S 422.33(3)$ to petition the Director of Revenue for an alternative apportionment method, any successful redetermination that reduces Iowa taxable income will directly affect the corporate tax liability against which the credit is applied under $\S 422.33(5)$. A successful petition resulting in a lower liability could inadvertently reduce the total amount of credit offset needed, potentially increasing the portion of the credit deemed “excess.” Following recent legislative changes that imposed refund caps (discussed in Section III), increasing the refundable excess exposes the taxpayer to the non-refundable portion of the credit (the 20% lost portion). This mandates a trade-off analysis for corporate tax planners: maximizing tax base reduction through alternative apportionment versus maximizing the overall economic value of the R&D credit before hitting the $80\%$ refund limitation.

II. Foundational Legal Framework and Calculation Mechanics (Pre-2025 RAC)

Prior to the full implementation of the New R&D Tax Credit Program, the former Research Activities Credit (RAC) framework, which was governed by $\S 422.33(5)$, established specific eligibility criteria and detailed calculation methodologies. Understanding this historical framework is crucial for transitional compliance and historical filings.

2.1 Eligibility and Scope (Iowa Admin. Code 701)

Eligibility for the credit is strictly defined by industry classification. The credit, as authorized for reduction of corporate income tax under $\S 422.33(5)$, is reserved primarily for businesses engaged in advanced activities, specifically manufacturing, life sciences, software engineering, aviation, and aerospace industries.11 The legislature also added agriscience as a qualifying industry during the 2019 legislative session.3

Conversely, Iowa law explicitly excludes numerous sectors from claiming the credit. Ineligible businesses include, but are not limited to, those engaged in agricultural production, agricultural cooperatives, financial or investment companies, retailers, wholesalers, publishers, transportation companies, real estate companies, collection agencies, accountants, architects, contractors, subcontractors, or builders, and businesses engaged in commercial and residential repair and installation.11

Regarding the qualified expenditures, Iowa law is largely based on the federal research and experimentation tax credit definitions found in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) $\S 41$. Eligible expenses typically include wages for qualified research services, the cost of supplies used in research, and the rental or lease cost of personal property used in conducting qualified research.10 However, only expenses incurred within Iowa are applicable toward the Iowa research activities credit.2

2.2 RAC Calculation Methods (Pre-2025)

The credit amount used to reduce the tax liability via $\S 422.33(5)$ is determined using one of two methods, which the taxpayer may elect annually for Iowa tax purposes.2

Regular Method (Form IA 128)

The credit is calculated as $6.5\%$ of the excess of qualified research expenses (QREs) during the tax year over a computed base amount of expenditures.2 The calculation relies on Iowa’s apportioned share of research expenses.2 The base amount is defined as the product of the fixed-base percentage multiplied by the average annual gross receipts (GR) for the four preceding tax years.2

A critical operational constraint for this method is the 50% QRE Floor. As clarified by IDOR guidance, the calculated base amount must adhere to a minimum: “in no event shall the base amount be less than fifty (50) percent of the qualified research expenses for the credit year”.2 This minimum 50% threshold acts as a crucial limitation, ensuring that the 6.5% rate is only applied to truly incremental research spending that exceeds both the historical baseline and this mandatory floor. This structural feature prevents corporations from claiming the credit on stagnant or baseline operational research expenditures, thus ensuring the credit fulfills its objective of stimulating increased research activities.

Alternative Simplified Method (ASC) (Form IA 128S)

The Alternative Simplified Method offers a lower, simpler calculation rate. The credit is $4.55\%$ of the difference between the current year’s Iowa QREs and $50\%$ of the average of the prior three years’ Iowa QREs.2 This method became available starting in the 2010 tax year and provides an important planning alternative.

The strategic choice between the Regular (6.5%) and the ASC (4.55%) methodologies must be analyzed annually.2 While the Regular method offers a higher rate, the complexity of its base calculation, which incorporates a fixed-base percentage and four years of gross receipts, may yield a higher base amount, thus reducing the incremental QREs eligible for the credit. Conversely, the ASC calculation relies on a simpler base derived only from the average of the prior three years’ QREs. Corporations experiencing rapid expansion in QREs but stable gross receipts might find the Regular method advantageous, whereas companies with highly volatile or erratic research spending patterns may prefer the predictability of the ASC, even with its lower rate. The objective is always to choose the method that results in the lowest calculated base amount relative to current QREs to maximize the credit generated before application under $\S 422.33(5)$.

2.3 Supplemental Research Activities Tax Credit

In addition to the base Research Activities Credit, certain companies approved under legacy economic development programs, specifically the Enterprise Zone Program (which was repealed in 2014, but credits earned remain valid 15) or the High Quality Jobs (HQJ) Program, may calculate a Supplemental Research Activities Credit.2

The Supplemental Credit provides an additional incentive based on gross revenues: $10\%$ of qualifying incremental research expense for companies with gross revenues less than $\$20$ million, and $3\%$ for companies with gross revenues over $\$20$ million.2 Supplemental credits are subject to cumulative award caps set by the IEDA, which have historically fluctuated (e.g., set at $\$185$ million initially, reduced to $\$105$ million for fiscal years 2017 through 2021, and later increased).3

III. Operationalizing $\S 422.33(5)$: Application and Refundability

Iowa Code $\S 422.33(5)$ is most crucial in governing the ultimate utility of the calculated R&D credit amount. This subsection dictates the order of application against corporate tax liability and establishes the rules for the disposition of any resulting excess credit.

3.1 The Principle of Refundability (Pre-HF 2317)

Historically, the Research Activities Tax Credit provided powerful economic leverage because it was fully refundable. The statutory authority, exercised through $\S 422.33(5)$ and detailed in Administrative Code, stipulated that any credit in excess of the corporation’s tax liability for the taxable year “may be refunded to the taxpayer or credited to the corporation’s tax liability for the following year”.2

This full refundability was significant for firms with marginal profitability or those utilizing Net Operating Losses (NOLs) that resulted in zero corporate tax liability. For such entities, the state effectively provided a direct subsidy for research expenditures, regardless of whether tax was due. In 2023, data showed that $42\%$ of the total RAC subsidy claims processed (or $\$35.3$ million out of $\$84.6$ million processed) were paid directly to firms that owed no state income tax, demonstrating the immense value of this cash-flow mechanism.19

3.2 The Transitional and Future Limitations on $\S 422.33(5)$ Application

The landscape governing the economic realization of the credit was fundamentally altered by the passage of House File 2317 (HF 2317) in 2022, which imposed limitations that directly modify the application of credits under $\S 422.33(5)$.12

Imposition of Refund Cap

The credit is no longer fully refundable. Limitations have been placed on the refundable portion of the excess credit:

• Standard RAC claims: Only $80\%$ of the excess credit remaining after tax liability offset is refundable.18
• Supplemental RAC claims: Only $90\%$ of the excess supplemental credit is refundable.18

This implementation of the $80\%$ cap on refundability directly diminishes the cash value of the credit for high-R&D, low-profit, or zero-tax firms, which historically relied entirely on the refund mechanism for monetization. If a corporation generates a $\$100,000$ excess credit after applying the maximum amount to its liability, the corporation can now only claim an $\$80,000$ cash refund, effectively losing the remaining $\$20,000$ (as discussed below regarding carryforward limits).

Carryforward Status

Iowa law allows the excess research credit to be credited to the corporation’s tax liability for the following year.2 However, the RAC framework generally does not provide for a multi-year carryforward period, and many sources assert that if a credit is refundable and the refund is claimed, there is no indefinite carryforward.12 Strategic planning necessitates that the priority of application under $\S 422.33(5)$ must be (1) reduction of current year tax liability, followed by (2) maximizing the $80\%$ refund claim, or, alternatively, (3) electing to carry the excess forward for offset against the immediate succeeding tax year’s liability.

Non-Transferability

A consistent feature across both the old and new regimes is the non-transferability of the credit. Tax credit certificates shall not be transferred to any other person.15

Interaction with Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

In addition to the regular corporate tax imposed under $\S 422.33(1)$, Iowa imposes a corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).7 The AMT is calculated as $60\%$ of the maximum state corporate income tax rate, applied to the state alternative minimum taxable income.7 Credits applied under $\S 422.33(5)$ must be offset against the determined corporate tax liability. When a corporation falls into an AMT regime, the R&D credit must first offset the higher of the regular tax or the AMT (if permissible by statute), before the excess, subject to the $80\%$ cap, is determined. This complexity requires careful planning to ensure the credit is fully utilized against the corporation’s total tax obligation before the restrictive refund cap is encountered.

IV. The Legislative Overhaul: The New R&D Tax Credit Program (Post-2025)

The future context of R&D credit application under $\S 422.33$ is governed by the phased transition to the New R&D Tax Credit Program, which is expected to take full effect following the equalization of corporate tax rates (potentially Fiscal Year 2026).8 This overhaul introduces systemic changes to both the calculation and administration of the incentive.

4.1 Structural Changes to the Credit

The transition introduces two major financial constraints: a reduction in the incentive rate and the establishment of a program cap.

• New Statutory Home and Reduced Rate: The credit is transitioning from the general application provisions of $\S 422.33(5)$ to be specifically codified under $\S 422.33(17)$.8 Under this new program, the credit rate is significantly reduced from the prior $6.5\%$ (Regular Method) to a maximum of $3.5\%$ of qualifying in-state QREs.8
• Capped Program and Allocation Risk: A strict annual statewide program cap of $\$40.0$ million is established, starting in Fiscal Year 2026.8 This maximum funding introduces a competitive allocation risk. If the total amount of approved claims from all applicants exceeds the $\$40$ million cap in any given year, the credits will be allocated pro rata.9 This converts the incentive from a statutory entitlement to a competitive, budget-limited allocation, creating funding uncertainty for corporations relying on the credit.

4.2 Enhanced Administrative Oversight (IEDA Control)

The oversight and administration of the program have shifted substantially, demanding greater compliance and administrative interaction with the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA).

• Mandatory Pre-Application: Businesses must formally pre-apply with the IEDA to certify that they fit within one of the approved sectors (advanced manufacturing, bioscience, technology, etc.) and are engaged in qualifying research.9
• CPA Verification and Reporting: The application requires the submission of independent CPA-verified reports detailing Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) to the IEDA.8 Furthermore, the qualified business is required to file an annual report to the IEDA disclosing the R&D investment, location of R&D within Iowa, jobs created, and associated wages and employee residency.8
• Duration and Recertification: Credits can be secured for up to five consecutive years, contingent upon successful annual reapplication and certification with the IEDA.8

The shift to a capped program administered by IEDA fundamentally changes the nature of the benefit. The historical RAC, applied via $\S 422.33(5)$, was an entitlement based solely on qualified research activity and technical filing compliance. The new program requires meticulous strategic planning around the IEDA approval process and is constrained by budgetary limits. High-volume R&D firms now face the dual constraint of a rate reduction (from $6.5\%$ to $3.5\%$) and the potential for a pro-rata reduction if the program is oversubscribed.

4.3 Decoupling from Federal Definitions (QRE Limitations)

The legislative overhaul signals a deliberate move to decouple the state’s QRE definition from automatic federal conformity, introducing complexity for multi-state tax compliance.

• Supplies Phase-Out: Supplies expenses, which were previously includable in Iowa QREs based on federal IRC $\S 41$ definitions 12, are now being phased out of the Iowa credit calculation. Allowable supplies expenses will be reduced by $20\%$ annually, achieving complete exclusion for tax years beginning in 2027.21
• Exclusions: Cloud computing expenses have been explicitly excluded from eligibility as Iowa QREs.21
• Wage Allocation Change: The federal “substantially all” rule, which allows for $100\%$ inclusion of an employee’s wages as QREs if $80\%$ or more of their time is spent performing qualified research, is no longer applicable for calculating Iowa QREs.21

The elimination of the “substantially all” rule and the phase-out of supplies expenses compel corporations to implement entirely separate payroll and expense tracking methodologies solely for Iowa R&D claims. This transition mandates more granular diligence in allocating employee time, increasing the internal compliance cost and raising the potential for audit risk. Failure to accurately segment Iowa QREs based on these unique state-level exclusions will be a primary focus for IDOR review, even as the resulting credit is applied against tax liability per $\S 422.33(17)$.

V. IDOR Guidance and Administrative Requirements

The Iowa Department of Revenue (IDOR) sets forth the necessary administrative rules (IAC 701) and requires specific forms to execute the application and monitoring of the R&D credit, whether claimed under the historical $\S 422.33(5)$ framework or the successor regime.

5.1 Required Forms and Documentation

Corporate taxpayers claiming the credit must utilize specific forms for calculation and application:

• Form IA 128: Used for the Research Activities Tax Credit based on the Regular Calculation Method.2
• Form IA 128S: Used for the Iowa Alternative Simplified Research Activities Tax Credit.2
• Filing Schedule (IA 148): All nonrefundable and refundable tax credit claims against corporate income tax, including the R&D credit, must be summarized and reported on the IA 148 Tax Credits Schedule.23

The R&D credit may also be claimed by individuals with an ownership interest in pass-through entities (such as S corporations, partnerships, or limited liability companies). In these instances, the corporate form (IA 128/128S) is filed at the entity level, and the credit flows down to the individual income tax returns ($\S 422.10$).22

5.2 Specific Administrative Limitations and Guidance

Strict Limitation on Amended Claims

A highly restrictive rule introduced by recent legislation imposes a strict limitation on amended claims: any claim seeking an increase in the R&D credit amount must be filed within six months of the original return due date, including extensions.21 This administrative ruling severely curtails the typical three-year statute of limitations for general amendments. The six-month temporal constraint is uniquely punitive for R&D studies, which often require complex internal data gathering and third-party verification that can take many months to finalize. This mandates that corporations claiming the credit must execute and finalize their QRE analysis much earlier than standard tax compliance cycles allow, or permanently waive the ability to retroactively claim the full, authorized credit amount.

Federal Audit Consequences

The Administrative Code provides explicit guidance regarding federal audit outcomes.24 If the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audits or reviews a return and subsequently disallows the federal R&D credit, the taxpayer is required to file an amended Iowa return. The purpose of the amended Iowa return is to “add back the Iowa credit to the extent not previously disallowed by the department”.24 This ensures Iowa benefits are commensurate with federally recognized research activity, reinforcing the state’s reliance on the federal IRC $\S 41$ definition base.

Administrative Coordination Risk

The transition to the new regime introduces dual administrative oversight: the IEDA certifies eligibility and allocates the $\$40$ million cap 9, while the IDOR manages the application, offset, and refund process under $\S 422.33(17)$.8 This separation of duties creates significant coordination risk. A business may secure IEDA pre-approval and have its QREs certified, but the credit could still face denial or delay if the subsequent filing with the IDOR via Form IA 128/128S, which implements the rules of $\S 422.33$, contains procedural or calculation errors. Taxpayers must ensure meticulous internal documentation linking the IEDA certificate with the final IDOR tax compliance forms to mitigate administrative denial.

VI. Illustrative Numerical Example: Application under $\S 422.33(5)$ (Transition Rules)

This example details the application of the Research Activities Credit (RAC) using the Regular Method (IA 128), demonstrating how the credit is calculated, applied against corporate tax liability, and limited by the post-2022 refund cap, as governed by the authority of $\S 422.33(5)$.

6.1 Calculation Scenario Setup

The scenario involves Beta Manufacturing Inc., an eligible industry, filing for the 2024 tax year, which is subject to the historical RAC rules but incorporates the recently imposed HF 2317 refund limitations.

• Current Iowa QREs (CY QRE): $\$1,500,000$
• Prior 4 Years Average Gross Receipts (AGR): $\$20,000,000$
• Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP): $4.0\%$
• Pre-Credit Corporate Tax Liability ($\S 422.33(1)$): $\$40,000$

6.2 Step-by-Step Calculation (Regular Method, IA 128)

1. Calculate Historical Base: The historical base is determined by multiplying the average gross receipts by the fixed-base percentage:
   
   $$\$20,000,000 \times 4.0\% = \$800,000$$
2. Calculate Minimum 50% QRE Floor: The mandatory minimum floor requires that the base cannot be less than $50\%$ of the current year QREs 2:
   
   $$\$1,500,000 \times 50\% = \$750,000$$
3. Determine Recognized Base Amount: The taxpayer must use the greater of the historical base or the $50\%$ QRE floor:
   
   $$\text{Recognized Base} = \text{Greater}(\$800,000, \$750,000) = \$800,000$$
   
   In this case, the historical base of $\$800,000$ is the binding constraint on the credit calculation.
4. Calculate Excess QREs (Incremental Research): The excess QREs represent the incremental research spending eligible for the credit:
   
   $$\$1,500,000 – \$800,000 = \$700,000$$
5. Calculate Research Activities Credit (RAC) Earned: The credit is calculated at the $6.5\%$ rate on the incremental research expenditures 2:
   
   $$\$700,000 \times 6.5\% = \$45,500$$

6.3 Application of Credit Under $\S 422.33(5)$ and Refund Determination

This stage reflects the direct mandate of $\S 422.33(5)$—the reduction of the corporate tax liability and the determination of the excess.

1. Corporate Tax Liability Offset: The RAC earned is applied to reduce the corporate tax liability:
   
   $$\text{Credit Applied} = \text{Lesser}(\$45,500 \text{ RAC Earned}, \$40,000 \text{ Tax Liability}) = \$40,000$$
   
   The corporate tax liability is reduced to zero.
2. Excess Credit Determination: The remaining credit amount is the excess subject to refund rules:
   
   $$\text{Excess Credit} = \$45,500 – \$40,000 = \$5,500$$
3. Refundability Cap Application: The excess credit is subject to the $80\%$ refund limit imposed by the 2022 legislation 18:
   
   $$\text{Refundable Portion} = \$5,500 \times 80\% = \$4,400$$
4. Unutilized Credit (Lost Value): The remaining $20\%$ of the excess credit is unutilized, as the RAC typically lacks an unlimited carryforward provision, and the credit is non-transferable 18:
   
   $$\text{Unutilized Credit} = \$5,500 – \$4,400 = \$1,100$$

The total realized financial benefit for Beta Manufacturing Inc. is $\$44,400$ ( $\$40,000$ tax offset plus $\$4,400$ cash refund). The application of the $80\%$ refund cap, authorized under the limitations appended to $\S 422.33(5)$ or its successor, resulted in a direct economic loss of $\$1,100$ that the corporation previously would have recovered.

The following table summarizes the financial outcome of this application.

Table of Illustrative Application of Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC) Under $\S 422.33(5)$

VII. Strategic Planning and Compliance Recommendations

The shift in Iowa’s R&D tax credit regime, moving from an entitlement model under $\S 422.33(5)$ to a competitively capped program under $\S 422.33(17)$, requires significant revision of corporate tax strategy and compliance protocols. The primary goal is navigating the increased administrative complexity and mitigating the risk associated with financial constraints.

7.1 Preparing for the New Program (Post-2025)

The most immediate change impacting cash flow planning is the fundamental alteration of the program structure, as summarized below:

Table of Iowa R&D Tax Credit Program Comparison (Pre- and Post-2025)

To adapt to the New R&D Tax Credit Program, corporations must make the IEDA pre-application process the critical choke point in their annual tax calendar. Given the $\$40$ million competitive cap and the risk of pro-rata allocation if claims exceed this limit, formal application and certification with the IEDA must be completed well in advance of the expenses being incurred to secure a position against the annual cap.9 Failure to obtain timely pre-approval may result in a complete loss of the credit, regardless of research activity.

7.2 Mitigating Compliance and Audit Risk

The move away from federal conformity for QRE definition creates a high compliance risk environment:

Table of Iowa R&D QRE Decoupling Summary (Post-HF 2317)

Corporations must immediately adjust internal accounting systems to separately track and categorize Iowa QREs. Specific system modifications are required to exclude cloud computing costs, manage the gradual phase-out of supplies expenses, and implement meticulous fractional wage allocation for R&D personnel, as the simpler “substantially all” rule is no longer applicable.21

7.3 Navigating Refund and Amended Claim Risk

The strict administrative constraints demand heightened vigilance regarding filing deadlines:

• Timely Filing: The imposition of a strict six-month limitation on filing amended claims seeking an increased credit amount is a severe temporal constraint.21 Taxpayers must prioritize and finalize their QRE documentation and credit calculation immediately following the tax year close to ensure the full, authorized benefit can be claimed, circumventing the risk of permanent forfeiture.
• Refund Modeling: For companies with fluctuating profitability, modeling the economic impact of the $80\%$ refund cap is critical. The analysis should determine whether intentionally increasing Iowa taxable income (if permissible under apportionment rules) to absorb more of the credit against liability—and thereby reducing the excess credit subject to the $80\%$ cap—yields a greater total economic benefit than maximizing the tax base reduction. This strategic modeling is essential for optimizing the realized value authorized by $\S 422.33$.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/