Analysis of the Iowa Research Activities Tax Credit: The Statutory Constraint of “No Carryforward (for Refundable Excess)”

The Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC) provides a refundable benefit, but recent statutory changes mandate that only a percentage (typically 80% or 90%) of the credit amount exceeding the state tax liability is eligible for refund, and the unrefunded remainder is permanently forfeited, with no ability to be carried forward to future tax years. This restriction means the “No Carryforward” rule applies specifically to the portion of the excess credit that falls outside the statutory refund limit (i.e., the 20% or 10% balance). This policy represents a crucial distinction from traditional state tax attributes, where unutilized credits typically benefit from extended carryforward periods, necessitating meticulous planning for Iowa taxpayers seeking to maximize benefit realization.

II. Foundational Principles of Iowa’s Research Activities Credit (RAC)

Understanding the structure and legislative history of the RAC is necessary to grasp the financial implications of the “No Carryforward” rule. The current program, codified in Iowa law since 1985, is undergoing significant policy changes that center on balancing immediate economic stimulus with state budgetary constraints.1

A. Statutory Basis and Administration

The authority for the Research Activities Tax Credit is established under Iowa Code Sections 422.10, pertaining to Individual Income Tax, and 422.33(5), governing Corporate Income Tax.1 The program involves joint administration by the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR), which handles the processing of claims, compliance, and refunds, and the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA), which oversees the approval process for specialized incentives, particularly the Supplemental credits.1

B. Eligibility and Calculation

Iowa’s credit mechanism aligns closely with the federal research and experimentation tax credit, using Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) to define Qualified Research Expenses (QREs).3 However, specific Iowa rules apply, especially concerning how expenses incurred within the state qualify.

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2023, a mandate was introduced requiring taxpayers to utilize the same methodology—either the Regular Method or the Alternative Simplified Method (ASC)—for calculating the Iowa credit as they employ for federal tax purposes.5 This requirement eliminated prior state-level flexibility that allowed taxpayers to choose the most advantageous calculation method for Iowa independently of their federal election.6 This increased compliance rigidity requires that taxpayers align their federal and state R&D strategy, potentially influencing their overall decision to claim the credit if the federal outcome is less than optimal.

The credit rates are typically 6.5% of excess QREs over the calculated base amount (Regular Method) or 4.55% of the difference between current QREs and 50% of the average of the prior three years’ QREs (ASC).2 Furthermore, the credit is limited to businesses engaged in specified, eligible industries, including advanced manufacturing, bioscience, life sciences, software engineering, and aviation/aerospace.3

C. The Evolution from Full Refundability to Restricted Refundability

Historically, the Iowa RAC was viewed as highly attractive due to its “fully refundable” status after a company’s tax liabilities were exhausted.2 This full refundability ensured a 100% realization rate for the credit, providing maximal cash flow advantages regardless of the firm’s current income tax position.

The recent introduction of the statutory refund caps, effective for recent tax years, fundamentally restructured the economic utility of the credit.5 This legislative shift, driven by measures such as House File 2317, changed the incentive from a fully realized subsidy to a restricted cash grant. The decision to cap the refund at 80% or 90% is a strong indication that the state is prioritizing budgetary certainty and reducing the uncapped exposure of the tax expenditure. By limiting the cash reimbursement, the state effectively lowers its net subsidy rate for R&D activities while still offering crucial cash flow benefits, particularly to high-growth, early-stage companies that traditionally lack substantial taxable income.

III. The Mechanics of Refundability and the Statutory Cap

The “No Carryforward” rule is a direct consequence of the state’s decision to limit the refundable portion of the excess credit. This section details the steps taken to determine the final, forfeited amount.

A. Defining the Gross Excess Credit

Initially, the total Research Activities Credit earned is utilized to offset the taxpayer’s current year Iowa income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis. This is the most efficient use of the credit, as 100% of the value is realized immediately. The remaining amount of the credit that exceeds this current year liability is defined as the Gross Excess Credit.2 This Gross Excess Credit is the pool that becomes subject to the state’s unique refundability limitations.

B. Statutory Limits on Refundable Excess (IDR Guidance)

The limitations on refundability dictate how much of the Gross Excess Credit is converted to cash and, consequently, how much is forfeited under the “No Carryforward” rule.9 Current guidance from the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) establishes tiered limits based on the credit type:

1. Regular Research Activities Credit (RAC): Only 80% of the Gross Excess Credit is refundable.9
2. Supplemental Research Activities Credit (Supplemental RAC): For firms approved under programs like the High Quality Jobs (HQJ) or Enterprise Zones, only 90% of the Supplemental excess is refundable.9

C. Detailed Analysis: The Meaning of “No Carryforward (for Refundable Excess)”

The “No Carryforward” rule mandates the permanent forfeiture of the unrefunded balance. This unrefunded balance amounts to 20% of the Gross Excess Credit for the Regular RAC and 10% for the Supplemental RAC.9

This rule is critical because it prevents taxpayers from preserving the lost portion as a carryforward tax attribute, which is common practice for non-refundable credits in Iowa and other states. For instance, many Iowa non-refundable credits provide for carryforward periods lasting five to ten years.10 The absence of this preservation mechanism for the R&D excess confirms that the legislature intended the RAC to function as an immediate subsidy, not a mechanism for long-term tax liability reduction.

While some administrative tax rules and forms mention the option to credit an “overpayment” to the subsequent tax year in lieu of claiming a refund 1, this election applies only to the amount that is statutorily eligible for the refund (the 80% or 90%). The forfeited 10% or 20% never qualifies as a recognized “overpayment” or an active tax attribute, ensuring it is permanently extinguished upon the determination of the credit.

The policy choice to offer a lower forfeiture rate (90% refund, 10% forfeiture) for the Supplemental RAC, compared to the Regular RAC (80% refund, 20% forfeiture), clearly confirms a legislative preference for companies approved under high-value economic development initiatives.2 By reducing the cash penalty, the state maximizes the realized value of the R&D incentive for these highly targeted economic drivers, enhancing the overall financial attractiveness of the associated economic development agreements.

Table 1 provides a concise overview of the current statutory limitations defining the forfeiture.

Table 1: Statutory Refund Limits and Forfeiture Rates (Current Iowa RAC)

IV. Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) Guidance and Administrative Requirements

The IDR oversees the administrative process, which imposes stringent requirements on claiming the credit, further amplifying the financial risk associated with the “No Carryforward” rule.

A. Compliance Forms and Documentation

Taxpayers utilize specific forms to claim the credit: Form IA 128 for the Regular Method or Form IA 128S for the Alternative Simplified Method.2 When the credit is received through a pass-through entity (such as a partnership or S corporation), the amount must be properly reported on the IA 148 Tax Credits Schedule.4 Although form instructions may contain generic language regarding the ability to credit an excess amount to the subsequent tax year’s liability 2, this flexibility only extends to the portion of the credit that falls within the statutory 80% or 90% refund limit.

B. Rigidity of Claiming and Audit Focus

The IDR guidance requires that the tax credit must be claimed on a timely filed return, including extensions.5 Furthermore, the ability to amend a return to increase the claimed Research Activities Tax Credit is highly restricted, generally requiring the amended return to be filed within six months of the original due date or resulting directly from an audit.5

This restriction, combined with the permanent forfeiture of the unrefunded balance, creates a substantial penalty for any initial under-calculation or improper documentation. If a taxpayer realizes they significantly under-claimed QREs after the narrow amendment window closes, the forfeited value cannot be preserved or recovered in subsequent years because the credit attribute is not subject to a statutory carryforward period. This heightens the necessity for initial meticulous QRE documentation and precise claim filing.

In addition to timing restrictions, the IDR has implemented specific criteria for calculating Iowa QREs that diverge from federal IRC $\S 41$ rules, effective post-2023. These criteria include modifications to the “substantially all” rule for wages, the exclusion of certain computer lease costs, and limiting supplies QREs to those directly related to research performed in Iowa, with a phased reduction in the percentage of supplies allowed over time.5

C. Transparency and Large Claim Monitoring

Iowa maintains a high degree of transparency regarding R&D credit utilization. The IDR is statutorily required to report annually to the Legislature, detailing the total amount of RAC and Supplemental RAC claims, the total amounts paid as refunds, and listing the name and amount earned for any claimant earning a tax credit in excess of $500,000.5 The public reporting of large beneficiaries (such as EIDP, Skyworks Solutions, and Bayer Corporation, reported in 2024 data 5) places these firms under enhanced scrutiny. Large claimants must maintain impeccable compliance, as any negative adjustment resulting from an audit could lead to an immediate and permanent forfeiture of the unrefunded portion of the disputed credit value.

V. Strategic and Financial Implications

The “No Carryforward” rule compels financial officers and tax practitioners to shift their focus from long-term tax attribute management to immediate cash flow optimization.

A. Liquidity Management and Realized Value

The core competitive advantage of the Iowa RAC is its ability to provide immediate cash liquidity, which is essential for R&D-intensive companies, particularly startups or those with large capital expenditures and minimal current taxable income.8 However, this liquidity comes with a quantifiable trade-off: the forfeited 10% or 20% of the Gross Excess Credit. Financial modeling must incorporate the 80% (or 90%) realization rate into the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) calculations for R&D projects. For a zero-liability firm, the effective cost of generating $\$100$ in credit is the forfeited $\$20$, meaning the true subsidy value is reduced by 20% in exchange for the certainty of immediate cash.

B. Maximizing Utilization against Tax Liability

The strategic goal for any taxpayer claiming the RAC is to minimize the amount of credit that enters the Gross Excess pool. The credit utilized against the current year’s Iowa tax liability is realized at 100% of its face value. Once the credit exceeds the liability, it is subjected to the 80% or 90% haircut. Therefore, tactical planning should explore options to maximize Iowa taxable income or tax liability in the credit year to absorb the credit fully, thereby circumventing the forfeiture mechanism entirely.

C. Comparison to Standard Carryforwards

The legislative decision to exempt the unrefunded RAC excess from standard carryforward provisions distinguishes it sharply from other Iowa tax incentives. For example, Iowa offers a five-year carryforward for the Innovation Fund Tax Credit and ten-year carryforwards for the Solar Energy System Tax Credit.10 The complete absence of any preservation mechanism for the R&D excess confirms that policymakers view the refundable RAC as a distinct economic subsidy designed for short-term stimulation and immediate cash injection, rather than a tax reduction tool preserved for future high-income years.

VI. Detailed Case Study: Calculating and Applying the “No Carryforward” Rule

This example demonstrates the direct application of the statutory refund limits and the resulting forfeiture under the Regular RAC provisions.

A. Scenario Setup: Research Firm XYZ (Regular RAC Method)

Assume a research-intensive firm, XYZ, operating in an eligible industry (e.g., software engineering), calculated its Iowa credit for the 2024 tax year.

• Total Iowa RAC Earned (Gross Credit): $\$100,000$
• Iowa Tax Liability (Pre-Credit): $\$25,000$
• Applicable Refund Limit: $80\%$ (Regular RAC).9

B. Step 1: Applying the Tax Liability Offset

The Gross Credit is first used to eliminate the tax liability:

$$\text{Gross Credit } (\$100,000) – \text{Liability Offset } (\$25,000) = \text{Gross Excess Credit } (\$75,000)$$

The firm realizes $\$25,000$ of value at a 100% rate through the offset. The remaining $\$75,000$ enters the refundable pool.

C. Step 2: Calculation of Refundable Amount

The 80% statutory limit is applied to the Gross Excess Credit:

$$\text{Gross Excess Credit } (\$75,000) \times 80\% = \text{Refundable Amount } (\$60,000)$$

The firm receives a cash refund of $\$60,000$ (or elects to credit this amount to the following year’s estimated liability).

D. Step 3: Calculation of Unrefunded/Forfeited Amount

The remainder of the Gross Excess Credit is subject to forfeiture under the “No Carryforward” rule:

$$\text{Gross Excess Credit } (\$75,000) – \text{Refundable Amount } (\$60,000) = \text{Forfeited Amount } (\$15,000)$$

The $\$15,000$ represents 20% of the Gross Excess Credit and is permanently lost. The firm realizes a total benefit of $\$85,000$ (the $\$25,000$ offset plus the $\$60,000$ refund) from the $\$100,000$ credit earned, resulting in a 15% net forfeiture of the total credit value.

Table 2: Example Calculation of Forfeited Credit (Regular RAC)

VII. Forward Look: The Repeal of RAC and the 2026 Transition

The financial analysis of the current “No Carryforward” rule is inextricably linked to the impending repeal of the Research Activities Credit program.

A. Statutory Sunset and Repeal

The current structure of the Research Activities Credit, including the 6.5% rate and the 80%/90% refund rules, is scheduled to cease being awarded for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, and the credit will be fully repealed from the Iowa Code on January 1, 2027.1 This mandated sunset increases the criticality of the “No Carryforward” rule, as the forfeited credit has absolutely no possibility of future utilization under either the existing or a successor regime.

B. The New IEDA Program (Senate File 657)

The current RAC will be supplanted by a new, application-based program administered by the IEDA, as outlined under Senate File 657.9 This replacement program will introduce significant limitations that fundamentally change R&D incentive planning in Iowa:

• A considerably lower maximum credit rate, capped at 3.5% of QREs.9
• A strict, statewide annual cap on awards, limited to $\$40$ million.9
• A transition from an entitlement-based system to a competitive, application-based process that requires mandatory CPA verification.9

C. Implications for Taxpayers and the Forfeiture Rule Post-2026

The impending program repeal reinforces the urgency for taxpayers to maximize the benefit realization under the current, more generous program structure. Taxpayers should accelerate planned QREs into 2024 and 2025 where economically feasible to capture the higher 6.5% rate.

The loss associated with forfeiting 20% of a 6.5% credit (an effective loss rate of $1.3\%$) is significantly outweighed by the potential risk of being excluded from the new capped program or having to accept the lower 3.5% rate. The immediate liquidity afforded by the current credit, even if restricted to 80% or 90%, is considered a stronger incentive than relying on the uncertain, capped, and application-based structure scheduled for 2026. Any credit forfeited under the current 80%/90% rule in the remaining eligible years (2024 and 2025) constitutes a definitive, permanent loss that cannot be carried into or recovered under the new IEDA regime.

VIII. Conclusion and Expert Recommendations

The “No Carryforward (for refundable excess)” provision operates as a defined constraint on the Iowa R&D tax incentive, limiting state financial exposure while directing the credit’s benefit primarily toward immediate cash flow improvement. It transforms the Iowa RAC into a constrained, yet highly valuable, cash grant program. Tax planning must focus on optimizing the utilization rate to minimize the unavoidable forfeiture inherent in the program design.

Actionable Recommendations for Tax Planning

1. Maximize Liability Offset: Taxpayers should prioritize strategies to increase Iowa taxable income or ensure existing liabilities are covered, as this utilizes the credit at 100% of its value and reduces the Gross Excess Credit amount subject to the 80% or 90% forfeiture rule.
2. Verify Supplemental Credit Eligibility: Entities approved for the Supplemental RAC through High Quality Jobs or Enterprise Zone programs must ensure they claim this credit, as the resulting 90% refund limit significantly reduces the forfeiture penalty (10% vs. 20%) and maximizes realized value.
3. Strict Compliance and Timely Filing: Given the severe restrictions on amending returns to increase the credit amount and the permanent loss of the forfeited portion, resources must be dedicated to generating highly accurate QRE calculations and ensuring the claim is filed on a timely basis to prevent the permanent loss of potential tax attributes.
4. Accelerate and Quantify: Due to the 2026 repeal and the transition to a lower-rate, capped program, companies should quantify the cost of the 80%/90% cap in current financial models and accelerate qualifying research expenditures to capture the higher 6.5% rate before it sunsets.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/