The Dual Standard of Innovation: Defining “Technological in Nature” for the Iowa R&D Tax Credit

The requirement that research be “Technological in Nature” means the activity must fundamentally rely on principles of physical, biological science, engineering, or computer science.1 In Iowa, this federal standard is critically paired with a mandatory industry test, limiting applicability primarily to taxpayers engaged in manufacturing, life sciences, and software engineering.3

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the “Technological in Nature” (TIN) requirement within the context of the Iowa Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC), detailing the application of local state revenue office guidance, mandatory industry limitations, and the critical implications of the program’s upcoming legislative overhaul.

I. Executive Summary: Defining Technological Innovation in Iowa

Overview of the Iowa Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC)

The Iowa Research Activities Tax Credit (RAC), administered by the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR), is a key state incentive rewarding businesses for qualified research and development (R&D) investments conducted within the state. The defining characteristic of the RAC is its direct linkage to the federal Research Credit established under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41.3

This structure imposes a significant compliance complexity on taxpayers: they must successfully navigate the qualitative technical scrutiny of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)—including satisfying the TIN requirement—and satisfy the restrictive categorical hurdles established by Iowa state law regarding eligible industries. A failure to satisfy either the federal technical definition or the state’s industry requirement results in the denial of the Iowa credit.

Strategic Implications of State-Specific Requirements

The current RAC program is characterized by a high refundable credit rate (up to 6.5%) and historically lacked an overall claim cap, leading to substantial annual expenditures (e.g., $77.6 million claimed in fiscal year 2024).4 However, this program is unstable, as Senate File 657, enacted in 2025, mandates its repeal effective January 1, 2026, replacing it with a new, capped program managed by the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA).4

For R&D activities conducted through the 2025 tax year, demonstrating that expenditures are “Technological in Nature” remains a core requirement, essential for substantiation against IDR audits. Taxpayers must simultaneously focus on immediate compliance under the existing rules while undertaking strategic preparations for the new competitive, lower-rate framework scheduled to begin in 2026.

II. Foundational Law: The Federal Four-Part Test Nexus

Iowa Code requires that, to qualify for the state RAC, the underlying research activity must conform to the Federal Research Credit definition provided in IRC Section 41. Therefore, compliance with the federal qualitative standard is a mandatory prerequisite for any state claim.

A. Integration of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 into Iowa Law

Iowa law makes the state credit contingent upon success at the federal level. To claim the Iowa credit, a taxpayer must meet two core requirements 3:

1. The business must claim and be allowed a Federal Research Credit for qualified research expenses under IRC Section 41 for the same taxable year.
2. The business must be engaged in one of the specific, qualified industries as defined by Iowa Administrative Code rule 701—304.11 (e.g., manufacturing, life sciences, or software engineering).3

If the IRS reduces or disallows the federal claim based on a failure to meet the technical requirements—such as a finding that the activities were not “Technological in Nature”—the corresponding Iowa credit calculated on those same expenditures will fail automatically.

B. The Comprehensive Four-Part Test for Qualified Research Activities (QRAs)

The “Technological in Nature” criterion is one of four cumulative standards that must be met for an activity to be considered Qualified Research.1 All four parts must be satisfied:

1. Technological in Nature (TIN): The research must fundamentally rely on the principles of hard science, such as physical science, engineering, or computer science.1
2. Permitted Purpose: The objective of the research must be to develop or improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a business component (e.g., a product, process, technique, or software).8
3. Eliminate Uncertainty: The activity must be intended to discover information that resolves technical uncertainty regarding the capability of the improvement, the methodology to achieve it, or the appropriate design of the business component.1
4. Process of Experimentation: The taxpayer must utilize a systematic process, such as modeling, simulation, or trial and error, designed to evaluate one or more alternatives to achieve the desired result and resolve the technical uncertainty.9

III. Deep Dive: Decoding “Technological in Nature” (TIN)

The TIN requirement serves to ensure that the incentivized activities are genuinely focused on scientific or engineering advancement, filtering out non-technical activities like market research, efficiency studies, or general management functions.

A. Statutory Interpretation: Reliance on Hard Sciences

For an activity to be deemed TIN, the research process must fundamentally rely on the specific scientific disciplines enumerated in the federal regulations.1 This establishes the rigorous, technical standard required for eligibility.

1. The Role of Physical and Biological Sciences

TIN related to physical sciences focuses on areas like chemistry and material science, often involving the creation or modification of physical substances. Biological sciences encompass life sciences such as botany, zoology, microbiology, physiology, and biochemistry.10 For example, research into new food ingredients or diagnostic analytics inherently relies on biological science principles.

2. The Function of Engineering Principles

Engineering refers to the application of scientific principles to design and build structures, processes, or systems. An activity satisfies the TIN test when it involves the application of mechanical, electrical, or chemical engineering principles to address a technical challenge where the solution is not self-evident or routinely available.

3. Computer Science and Software Development as TIN

Activities that utilize principles of computer science, such as developing novel algorithms, operating systems, or intricate software architectures, meet the TIN standard.9 The development of aerospace components or software prototypes are classic examples of activities relying on engineering and computer science that typically satisfy this criterion.11

B. Contextualizing TIN within the Other Three Criteria

The technical documentation strategy for the TIN requirement benefits substantially from established federal tax precedent. Federal regulations define the research purpose as the goal of discovering information which is technological in nature.12 If the activity results in the issuance of a patent for the business component, federal guidance often considers this conclusive evidence that the taxpayer has discovered information that is technological in nature and intended to eliminate technical uncertainty.13

Therefore, businesses claiming the Iowa RAC must prioritize robust federal compliance documentation. This preparation is the most effective defense mechanism against both federal and state audits, as successful substantiation of the scientific basis (TIN) and the elimination of technical uncertainty at the federal level directly supports the Iowa claim.

C. Exclusionary Rules: Activities Deemed Non-Technological

Federal law, and consequently Iowa law, excludes research activities that fail the fundamental TIN test, typically because they involve subjective criteria or routine application of existing knowledge:

• Routine Data Collection: Simple data gathering or routine testing for quality control or efficiency.1
• Adaptation of Existing Components: Minor modification or adaptation of an existing component unless the effort results in technical uncertainty regarding performance improvement.8
• Market Research: Studies related to consumer preferences, market trends, or style.
• Administrative Functions: Training, overhead, and general management activities.

IV. Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) Regulatory Framework

The Iowa Department of Revenue’s administrative guidance acts as a critical overlay to the federal law, restricting the applicability of the RAC to achieve targeted economic goals within the state.

A. Alignment with Iowa Administrative Code Rule 701—304.11

The primary source of local guidance is Iowa Administrative Code rule 701—304.11, which specifies the mandatory conditions for claiming the credit.3 This rule reiterates that a taxpayer must claim and be allowed the federal credit for the same taxable year.6 Most importantly, it rigorously defines and limits the businesses that are eligible, ensuring the credit is tightly focused on specific, high-growth sectors.15

B. The Incremental Nature of the Credit

The RAC is calculated using an incremental methodology, meaning the credit is generally limited to research expenditures that exceed a historical baseline. The two available calculation methods are:

1. The Regular Credit (IA 128): Equals 6.5% of the excess of Iowa Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) over the calculated base amount.2 This structure incentivizes increasing R&D investment year-over-year.15
2. The Alternative Simplified Credit (IA 128S): An alternative option calculated at 4.55% of qualifying research expenditures.3 A taxpayer must use the same method selected for their federal claim.3

C. IDR Guidance on Documentation and Compliance Audits

The IDR has historically maintained a stringent audit focus on the RAC. Audits target not only the technical satisfaction of the Four-Part Test (including TIN) but also the non-technical requirement of industry eligibility.4 Successful navigation of an IDR audit requires comprehensive contemporaneous records that clearly connect QREs (wages, cost of supplies, contract expenses 15) to activities grounded in the hard science principles required by the TIN standard.

V. The Iowa Industry Constraint: Narrowing Eligibility (701—304.11)

Iowa’s most significant deviation from the federal framework is the imposition of strict industry constraints. Even if a business conducts research that perfectly meets the “Technological in Nature” federal standard, the claim will be disallowed if the primary business activity is not in an explicitly included sector.

A. Mandatory Qualified Industries (The “Inclusion Zone”)

For tax years through 2025, the credit is limited to businesses primarily engaged in 3:

• Manufacturing
• Life Sciences (including agriscience, biology, botany, zoology, microbiology, etc.) 10
• Agriscience
• Software Engineering (detailed study of design, development, operation, and maintenance of software) 10
• Aviation and Aerospace (design, development, or production of aircraft, rockets, etc.) 10

B. Explicitly Ineligible Businesses (The “Exclusion Zone”)

A central feature of the IDR guidance is the long list of excluded businesses, effectively barring entire sectors from claiming the RAC regardless of whether their R&D meets the technical TIN definition 10:

This extensive list demonstrates that legislative policy overrides technical qualification. A finance company developing a complex, proprietary trading algorithm (which satisfies TIN) will still be denied the credit because the entity is explicitly ineligible.

VI. Case Study and Practical Application of Technological in Nature

A complete understanding of the Iowa RAC requires integrating the TIN requirement with both the remaining federal tests and the mandatory industry screen.

A. Illustrative Example: Developing Aerospace Components (Qualifying Activity)

Taxpayer Profile: An Iowa S-Corporation primarily engaged in Aviation and Aerospace.10

Research Activity: The company is developing a new composite material and manufacturing process for a specific aerospace component. The goal is to reduce the component’s weight by 15% without sacrificing structural integrity, a technical objective for which the optimal material composition and heating process parameters are unknown.

• Technological in Nature (TIN): Satisfied. The activity fundamentally relies on principles of physical science (material chemistry) and engineering (stress analysis, process design).1
• Elimination of Uncertainty: Satisfied. Technical uncertainty exists regarding whether the 15% weight reduction target can be met while adhering to required safety standards using the novel composite mixture.
• Permitted Purpose: Satisfied. The goal is improving the quality and performance (weight reduction/structural integrity) of a business component.
• Process of Experimentation: Satisfied. The company runs systematic trials, varying material ratios, heat temperatures, and curing times to evaluate alternatives and achieve the desired result.

Conclusion: The activity qualifies. The research meets the TIN requirement, and the business is explicitly designated as eligible within the Aviation and Aerospace industry.10 QREs, such as the wages of the composite engineers and the cost of the materials used in the trials, can be claimed.15 Developing aerospace components is considered a qualifying research activity.11

B. Example of Disqualified Activity

Taxpayer Profile: A major Iowa Wholesaler.10 A wholesaler is defined as a person who primarily engages in buying large quantities of goods and reselling them in smaller quantities to retailers.6

Research Activity: The company develops custom software using computer science principles to integrate blockchain technology into its global logistics tracking system, aiming for a 99% reduction in transaction lag time to achieve unprecedented efficiency in supply chain management.

Analysis: Although the activity relies on computer science and aims to solve a complex technical problem (potentially satisfying the TIN test), the taxpayer’s primary business classification is explicitly listed as ineligible under Iowa Administrative Code 701—304.11.10 Consequently, the claim is disallowed. This exemplifies how the state’s industry constraints supersede the technical merits of the R&D.

VII. Calculation Methodologies and Claiming Procedures

Iowa provides two distinct calculation methods for the refundable credit, requiring annual comparative analysis to maximize the cash return, particularly because the state credit is non-carryforward.

Refundability and Claiming Procedures

The RAC is highly valued because it is refundable, allowing the business to receive a cash payment for the credit amount that exceeds its income tax liability.11

• Refund Limits and Loss of Value: The refundability is subject to statutory limits, typically 80% for the Regular RAC excess and 90% for the Supplemental RAC excess.11 Crucially, Iowa law mandates that any unused excess credit cannot be carried forward to subsequent years.11 This structure makes minimizing lost credit value a priority: taxpayers must carefully compare the results of the Regular and ASC methods (IA 128 and IA 128S) annually to ensure the highest possible refundable amount is secured in the current filing year.
• Procedure: Taxpayers must file the appropriate Iowa form (IA 128 or IA 128S) alongside their Iowa return, which must follow the preparation and filing of the corresponding Federal Form 6765.11

VIII. Strategic Foresight: The 2026 Legislative Overhaul (SF 657)

The most pressing factor influencing R&D investment planning in Iowa is the impending restructuring of the incentive program. Senate File 657 repeals the current RAC, replacing it with a financially limited, competitive program managed by the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA).4

A. Repeal of the Existing RAC Structure (Effective January 1, 2026)

The current formula-based RAC ceases to exist for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.11 The legislative motivation behind this shift was to tighten fiscal control over an uncapped credit that frequently exceeded legislative targets.5

B. Introduction of the New IEDA-Managed R&D Tax Credit Program

The new R&D Tax Credit Program shifts control from the passive formula calculation of the IDR to a competitive application process overseen by the IEDA. This marks a fundamental change in the state’s approach to R&D incentives.

The R&D Tax Credit Shift: RAC vs. IEDA Program (Post-2025)

C. Compliance Checklist for Transitioning Taxpayers

The transition demands immediate strategic evaluation and adjustment to R&D investment projections.

1. Financial Impact of Rate Reduction: The maximum credit rate drops from 6.5% to 3.5%.5 This substantial reduction requires businesses to reevaluate their R&D investments, as the return on investment from the tax credit will be significantly lower.
2. Risk of Prorated Allocation: The $40 million annual cap introduces a new element of financial uncertainty. If the total demand from approved applicants exceeds this cap, credits will be allocated on a pro-rata basis, meaning the realized credit may be less than 3.5%.5
3. Mandatory Pre-Application: Businesses must formally pre-apply with the IEDA to secure eligibility under the new, narrower industry definitions (e.g., specific sectors within Advanced Manufacturing, Bioscience, or Technology and Innovation).4
4. Administrative Burden: The process shifts from post-filing calculation to pre-approval and annual certification. Businesses must submit CPA-verified Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs) reports to the IEDA.5 The initial application deadline for 2026 claims is set for January 31, 2027.5

IX. Conclusion: Navigating the Intersection of Technology and Tax

The criterion that research be “Technological in Nature” ensures that the Iowa Research Activities Tax Credit rewards efforts grounded in genuine hard science. This technical requirement is derived directly from IRC Section 41 and involves a rigorous four-part test, compelling taxpayers to document their reliance on principles of physical science, engineering, or computer science to eliminate technical uncertainty.

However, the effective eligibility for the Iowa RAC is significantly constrained by state-specific policy. Iowa stands apart by applying an explicit industry filter (Iowa Administrative Code 701—304.11), which dictates that technological research conducted by excluded sectors—such as finance, retail, or construction contractors—is ineligible for the credit, regardless of its scientific merit.

For the final year of the existing program (2025), businesses must maintain meticulous documentation to support both the technological nature of their research and their compliance with the eligible industry definitions to successfully claim the 6.5% refundable credit. Given the non-carryforward rule, strategic analysis between the Regular and Alternative Simplified Credit methods is paramount to maximizing current-year refund value.

Looking ahead, the 2026 shift to the IEDA-managed, capped program mandates immediate strategic planning. The lower credit rate and competitive, administrative application process require businesses to move away from relying on formula-based tax projections toward active engagement with the IEDA, securing pre-approval, and preparing CPA-verified QRE reports to secure a share of the limited $40 million annual fund. Compliance in Iowa is evolving from passive documentation to active, competitive pursuit of innovation incentives.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/