Analysis of Wages for Qualified Services in the Context of the Iowa Research Activities Credit

Wages for Qualified Services (WQS) in Iowa are defined as compensation paid to an employee for performing qualified research activities entirely within the state, provided that the employee dedicates more than 50% (a majority) of their total services during the applicable research period directly to those research projects.

This state standard requires precise tracking, as Iowa rejects the federal “substantially all” rule, mandating that taxpayers include only the actual percentage of eligible wages, even when the majority qualification threshold is surpassed.

I. Executive Summary: The Definition of Wages for Qualified Services (WQS)

The Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC), established under Iowa Code §422.10 (Corporate Income Tax) and §422.12Q (Individual Income Tax), serves as a substantial state incentive to encourage qualified research and development (R&D) activities within the state borders.1 The RAC closely follows the federal structure of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41, but incorporates several critical modifications, particularly concerning the eligibility and allocation rules for wages, which form the largest component of qualified expenditures.

The standard RAC calculation offers a 6.5% credit on the excess of current Iowa Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) over a defined base amount, plus an additional 6.5% on qualified basic research payments.3 A significant feature that makes the Iowa RAC highly competitive is its refundability.2 Data from 2023 claims demonstrates the importance of this feature, showing that $35.3 million, representing 42% of the total claimed credit amount, was paid directly as tax credit refunds to firms that had no corresponding state income tax liability.5 This mechanism solidifies the credit’s role as a direct state investment in R&D labor and infrastructure.

The definition and compliance requirements surrounding WQS are critical to maximizing the Iowa RAC, given that wages represent the largest expenditure category. A nuanced understanding of the divergence between Iowa and federal statutes is essential for accurate claim preparation and audit readiness.

II. Statutory and Regulatory Foundation of WQS under Iowa Code §422.10

For wages to be eligible as an Iowa Qualified Research Expense, the taxpayer must satisfy foundational requirements concerning federal qualification, industry limitations, geographic performance, and a specific Iowa-mandated employment activity test.

A. The Mandatory Federal Linkage and Eligibility Limitations

The foundation of any Iowa RAC claim rests upon adherence to federal tax law. To claim and be allowed the Iowa credit, the taxpayer must first “claim and be allowed a Federal Research Credit for qualified research expenses under Internal Revenue Code section 41” for the same taxable year.2 This prerequisite dictates that the underlying activities—the research projects themselves—must satisfy the four-part federal test for qualified research. Any deficiency in meeting the federal standards for qualified activities will invalidate the corresponding state claim, even if the Iowa-specific wage rules are followed perfectly.

Beyond the federal linkage, Iowa imposes restrictions on which taxpayers may claim the credit based on their primary business activities. Eligibility is targeted toward specific sectors deemed critical for state economic development, including Manufacturing, Life Sciences, Agrisciences, Software Engineering, and Aviation/Aerospace.4 Conversely, many common business sectors are explicitly excluded from eligibility, such as agricultural producers, contractors, finance companies, retailers, wholesalers, transportation companies, accountants, and publishers.1 This targeted approach aligns with a broader trend across states to focus R&D incentives strategically.2

B. Prerequisites for Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)

Iowa QREs are generally confined to three categories, echoing the federal structure but applying a strict geographic test 8:

1. Wages for qualified research services performed in Iowa.9
2. Cost of supplies used in conducting qualified research in Iowa.8
3. Rental or lease cost of personal property used in Iowa.8

The Iowa Code dictates that wages paid for qualified services “shall only constitute qualified research expenses in this state if the services are performed in this state”.9 For businesses operating across state lines, this requirement is a crucial consideration. While the Iowa administrative rules provide clear proration guidance for leased property used both inside and outside the state (based on the ratio of days used in Iowa to total days used everywhere) 8, the rule for wages is highly restrictive. This necessitates rigorous geographic time tracking for any employee whose work location may fluctuate between Iowa and other states, ensuring that only wages earned for time physically spent performing Qualified Research Activities (QRAs) within Iowa are included in the QRE calculation.

C. Prerequisite 2: The Critical “Majority Work” Test

The central statutory prerequisite for determining employee wage eligibility in Iowa is the “majority work” test, codified in Iowa Code §422.10(a)(i). This rule stipulates that for wages paid to an employee to qualify, “a majority of the total services performed by the employee for the business are directly related to those research projects”.9

The Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) guidance clarifies that “majority” means the time spent on qualified research services must be “greater than 50%” of the employee’s total services.12 This 50% benchmark must be met during the specific “period of the tax year that the business is engaging in one or more research projects”.9 The temporal segmentation of the qualification test is highly significant. If an employee is only involved in research during a six-month phase of the tax year, the total services (the denominator of the 50% test) are measured against those six months, not the full twelve-month tax year. Accurate determination of this applicable period requires the taxpayer to maintain precise documentation linking employee activities and payroll to the beginning and end dates of specific R&D projects.

III. Nuance in Compliance: Allocation Rules and the IDR Guidance

The greatest area of divergence between the Iowa RAC and the federal credit lies in the treatment of wage allocation once the employee qualification threshold is met. This difference creates a critical compliance challenge requiring specialized accounting practices for Iowa claims.

A. Federal Standard: The IRC §41 “Substantially All” Rule

Under federal IRC §41, the “substantially all” rule provides a mechanism to simplify wage inclusion. If an employee dedicates 80% or more of their services to qualified research activities during the relevant period, the federal standard permits 100% of that employee’s wages to be treated as Qualified Research Expenses (QREs). This allowance is commonly referred to as the “round-up” rule.13

B. Iowa’s Explicit Rejection and the Actual Allocation Mandate

The IDR has issued clear administrative guidance rejecting the federal simplification rule. The guidance states unequivocally that the federal “substantially all” rule (IRC §41(b)(2)(B)) “does not apply” to the calculation of Iowa QREs.12

The operative rule in Iowa requires that once the employee satisfies the 50% majority work threshold, the taxpayer must only include the amount corresponding to the actual wage allocation for qualified research services performed in the state.12 This regulation shifts the compliance burden from merely meeting a threshold to meticulously documenting and justifying the precise percentage of time spent on qualifying activities.

This mandate represents a substantial trade-off in the Iowa RAC structure. By setting a relatively lower threshold for employee qualification (50% versus the federal 80%), Iowa potentially broadens the pool of eligible employees—particularly supervisory staff or project managers who divide their time closely between research and administrative duties. However, the state eliminates the federal accounting simplification benefit. Consequently, employees who meet the 50% threshold but fall below the 80% federal threshold, and even highly dedicated researchers who exceed 80%, all require granular, hour-by-hour time tracking to justify the exact percentage of wages claimed for Iowa purposes. A company claiming 100% of an employee’s wages federally (due to 90% actual research time) must reduce that claim to 90% for the Iowa credit.

C. IDR Documentation Requirements

The instructions for the relevant state tax forms (IA 128 and IA 128S) reflect these specific compliance demands. The forms require the calculation of total Iowa wages, followed by an explicit subtraction of wages that must be excluded pursuant to the “majority work” limitation.12 To withstand review, documentation must serve two distinct compliance purposes: first, demonstrating proof of qualification by showing the employee met the $>50\%$ benchmark during the applicable period; and second, providing proof of apportionment by supplying detailed time records to justify the exact percentage of wages claimed as QREs. The integrity of the Iowa claim relies heavily on the reliability and precision of these underlying time and labor records.

IV. Practical Application: A Case Study in Wage Apportionment

The implementation of the Iowa “majority work” test and the “actual allocation” mandate creates tangible differences in the amount of WQS that can be claimed compared to the federal return. The following comparative analysis illustrates this divergence.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Wage Eligibility Rules (Federal vs. Iowa)

Case Study Scenario: Three Iowa-Based Engineers

To quantify the difference, consider three engineers working for a qualified Iowa manufacturer. Each earns a $100,000 annual salary and works 2,000 total hours during the applicable project period, all performing services exclusively in Iowa.

Table 2: Calculation of Qualified Wages Under Federal and Iowa Rules

Analysis:

1. Engineer A (45% QRA): This employee fails the Iowa 50% majority test, rendering $0 of their wages eligible for the Iowa credit, despite performing the services in the state. For federal purposes, since the 80% round-up test failed, the actual 45% ($45,000) is claimed.
2. Engineer B (57.5% QRA): This employee qualifies for the Iowa credit because 57.5% is greater than 50%. Since the QRA percentage is below the federal 80% threshold, both jurisdictions utilize the actual allocation of 57.5% ($57,500).
3. Engineer C (85% QRA): This employee easily qualifies for both credits. Federally, the 85% utilization allows the taxpayer to claim 100% of the wages ($100,000) under the “substantially all” rule. Crucially, for Iowa purposes, the taxpayer must disregard the federal round-up and only claim the actual 85% ($85,000).12

The difference in WQS claimed for Engineer C ($15,000) directly illustrates the need for a separate, distinct calculation pathway for Iowa QREs that strictly adheres to the state’s “actual allocation” mandate. Failure to reduce the claim from the federal 100% inclusion level to the actual percentage risks assessment and penalty upon audit.

V. The Economic Context: WQS as Iowa’s Primary Research Investment

Statistical evidence compiled by the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) confirms that WQS is the foundational component of the state’s R&D tax expenditure, underscoring the necessity of robust compliance in this area.

A. Statistical Weight of Wages (2023 Data)

For claims processed in Calendar Year 2023, the total reported Iowa Qualifying Research Expenditures (QREs) amounted to $3,102,177,526.6 Of this total, expenditures categorized as Iowa Research Expenditures on Wages reached $1,751,621,882.6

This wage expenditure accounted for 56.5% of the total Iowa QREs reported on Forms IA 128 and IA 128S.6 This high percentage confirms the state’s use of the RAC as a primary tool for incentivizing the creation and retention of skilled technical labor, particularly within manufacturing and life sciences, sectors heavily represented by top claimants such as Deere & Company and Rockwell Collins Inc..6

Table 3: 2023 Iowa Research Expenditures and Wage Share

The total amount of Research Activities Tax Credits and Supplemental Research Activities Tax Credits reported as earned in 2023 was $88,603,043.6 Analysis of utilization shows a high degree of concentration; twenty companies earning credits exceeding $500,000 accounted for approximately $71.6 million of the total earned amount.6 The average benefit derived from the credit was calculated at $0.029 per dollar of qualifying research expenditure.6

B. Program Constraints and Optimization Urgency

While the Iowa RAC has historically been remunerative, legislative changes signal future constraints. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2026, the total combined maximum amount of tax credits available annually for all taxpayers will be capped at $40.0 million.1 Furthermore, recent legislation (SF 657) indicates that the standard 6.5% credit on excess QREs may sunset after 2025.3

The implementation of a hard cap, coupled with the possibility of the standard credit expiring, introduces significant risk for taxpayers relying on the program. As the available credit dollars decrease substantially from current levels (over $88 million earned in 2023), the competition for the remaining pool will increase. This heightened competition suggests that the IDR will likely intensify administrative scrutiny of claimed QREs, placing immense pressure on the reliability and defensibility of WQS documentation. Businesses must recognize the immediate need to optimize WQS calculations to secure the maximum benefit possible before the constraints take effect.

VI. Conclusion and Strategic Compliance Recommendations

The Iowa Research Activities Credit provides a valuable, often refundable, incentive for corporate R&D investment. However, effective compliance requires meticulous adherence to state-specific rules, particularly those governing Wages for Qualified Services, which differ fundamentally from federal standards.

The principal compliance challenge stems from two interconnected rules: the Iowa Majority Threshold ($>50\%$) for employee eligibility and the Actual Allocation Mandate, which strictly prohibits the federal 100% round-up of wages, requiring only the exact percentage of time spent on qualifying services to be claimed.9 This divergence forces taxpayers to maintain a distinct calculation methodology for Iowa QREs.

To ensure audit readiness and maximize claims within the state’s unique structure, corporate tax teams and compliance specialists should adopt the following strategic recommendations:

1. Mandate Granular Time and Labor Tracking: Establish a rigorous system that tracks employee time contemporaneously, logging hours across three categories: qualified research activities (QRAs), non-qualified administrative time, and specific geographic location (Iowa versus non-Iowa). This system must be robust enough to support both the qualification test (proving the $>50\%$ benchmark was met) and the precise allocation percentage for the final wage claim.
2. Define and Document the Applicable Period: Proactively identify and document the “applicable period” for the 50% majority work test for each employee, ensuring it aligns with the duration of their involvement in qualified research projects during the tax year, rather than simply defaulting to the full 12-month tax period.
3. Segregate Federal and Iowa Wage Calculations: Maintain a separate calculation matrix specifically for the Iowa RAC. This matrix must override any 100% federal inclusion resulting from the “substantially all” rule and instead utilize the actual, documented percentage of time spent on QRAs for WQS inclusion on Forms IA 128 and IA 128S.
4. Confirm Ongoing Industry Eligibility: Given the targeted nature of the Iowa RAC, taxpayers should conduct an annual review to confirm their continued engagement in one of the approved industries (e.g., Manufacturing, Agrisciences) and ensure they do not fall into any of the explicitly excluded categories.7

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/