The Mandate of Full Credit Transfer in the Kansas Research and Development Tax Incentive Program: Compliance and Strategic Monetization

I. Executive Summary: The Kansas R&D Tax Credit Transfer Mechanism

The Kansas Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit (K.S.A. §79-32,182b), significantly enhanced post-2022, provides crucial liquidity for innovative companies. The core mandate governing its monetization is the Full Credit Transfer (FCT) requirement, which stipulates that only the entire credit amount may be sold, and this transaction is strictly limited to a single occurrence.

This report offers an exhaustive analysis of the FCT requirement in the context of the Kansas R&D credit, detailing the statutory framework, compliance directives from the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR), and the financial implications stemming from the utilization limitations placed on the transferred asset. This mechanism is designed to facilitate immediate cash infusion for enterprises that generate R&D credits but lack sufficient state income tax liability to realize the benefit themselves.

Key Enhancement (Post-2023)

The legislative amendments effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022, dramatically expanded the strategic utility of the Kansas R&D credit. Prior to these changes, the credit rate was 6.5%, and eligibility was often restricted primarily to C-corporations.1 The reforms increased the credit rate to 10% on eligible expenditures and, critically, removed the C-corporation limitation, making the incentive accessible to all Kansas income taxpayers, including individuals and various flow-through entities (S-corporations, partnerships, LLCs).1

This expansion, coupled with the introduction of transferability, positioned Kansas as a competitive state for R&D investment, particularly in growth sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and technology.3 The ability for taxpayers with no current Kansas income tax liability to transfer the credit provides a crucial monetization pathway, transforming a non-refundable, carryforward tax asset into immediate working capital.1

II. Legislative and Regulatory Foundation of Credit Transfer

The transferability rules for the Kansas R&D tax credit are enshrined in K.S.A. §79-32,182b, which explicitly defines the parameters under which an earned credit may be converted into a transferable asset. Compliance with these statutes is non-negotiable for both the Transferor (the entity earning the credit) and the Transferee (the entity acquiring the credit).

A. Statutory Authority and Credit Mechanics

The governing law establishes the formula for calculating the tax credit amount. For tax years commencing after December 31, 2022, the credit is set at 10%.2 This percentage is applied to the difference between the actual Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) incurred during the current tax year and the three-year average of QREs.1

The Base Calculation Method requires the taxpayer to:

1. Identify Kansas-apportioned QREs for the current year.
2. Calculate the average of the QREs incurred during the current year and the two previous tax years. If QREs were zero in prior years (common for startups or new claimants), those years are counted as zero.3
3. Apply the 10% rate to the amount by which the current year’s QREs exceed this three-year average.2

This methodology is explicitly designed to reward growth in R&D investment. A company merely maintaining its existing R&D expenditure levels will generate little to no credit, while a company significantly increasing its investment in Kansas-based innovation will generate a larger excess QRE base upon which the 10% credit is calculated.3

B. Defining the Full Credit Transfer (FCT) Mandate

The core regulatory requirement governing monetization is the absolute prohibition against partial transfers. The statutory language is unequivocal: “Only the full credit may be transferred, and the credit may only be transferred one time”.2

Interpretation of “Full Credit”

The requirement to transfer the “full credit” mandates that the entirety of the calculated credit amount must be sold in one single block.2 This prevents a company from fragmenting a large credit—for example, by selling 20% to one party and 80% to another, or reserving a portion for potential future internal use. The state avoids the complex administrative burden that would arise from tracking fractional credit ownership across multiple entities, each potentially subject to different utilization timelines and audit considerations.

Interpretation of “One Time”

The “one time” limitation is equally rigid. Once the original earning entity (Transferor) executes the transfer, the credit is permanently fixed to the Transferee.2 The Transferee may not subsequently re-transfer or sell the credit to a third party. This constraint stabilizes the tax asset in the secondary market and simplifies the tax administration by ensuring that the utilization limitations and requirements remain attached to a single taxpayer throughout the carryforward period.2

This combination of the “Full Credit” and “One-Time” rule operates as a necessary anti-fragmentation and anti-abuse mechanism. If partial or multi-stage transfers were permitted, the KDOR would face significant complexity in verifying the application of the annual 25% utilization cap across numerous different entities, thereby increasing compliance risk for both the state and the involved taxpayers. By forcing a single, complete transaction, the state ensures that the entire tax history and utilization schedule is consolidated under one recipient entity, significantly streamlining compliance and audit efforts.

C. Transferor Eligibility: The Zero Liability Trigger

The ability to transfer the credit is predicated on a specific financial status of the Transferor. Transferability is explicitly conditional upon the taxpayer having “no Kansas income tax liability” in the tax year the credit was generated.1

This requirement is central to the credit’s policy objective: to support growth-stage companies, often non-profitable in the early phases of R&D, which would otherwise be forced to carry forward a potentially unusable credit indefinitely.3 By targeting non-taxable entities, the state ensures the incentive acts as a true cash-flow generator, rather than merely an income tax offset for profitable, established firms.

Furthermore, state guidance confirms that only the original entity that earned the credit is permitted to perform the transfer.2

The KDOR formalized these criteria in Notice 23-09 (September 6, 2023), which clarified the legislative changes, including the increase in the credit amount, the expanded eligibility to all Kansas income taxpayers (including flow-through entities), and the ability for non-liability taxpayers to monetize their credits through a single transfer.1 The inclusion of flow-through entities, which typically have no corporate income tax liability but incur substantial QREs, confirms the credit’s role as a targeted liquidity mechanism for small and mid-sized innovative businesses, accelerating the economic benefit of the R&D incentive.1

III. KDOR Administrative Guidance and Required Documentation

The successful execution and validation of a Full Credit Transfer are dependent upon strict adherence to documentation requirements set forth by the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR).

A. Documentation of the Transfer

The KDOR requires specific forms to be completed by both parties to ensure the transfer is legally recognized and auditable.

Transferee Compliance (Form K-260)

The Transferee, the acquiring entity, must complete and submit Form K-260, Transfer of Research and Development Tax Credit, to the KDOR.2 This form serves as the official documentation certifying the acquisition of the transferred credit amount and establishes the Transferee as the new legal holder of the tax asset.

Transferor Compliance (Schedule K-53)

The Transferor must submit Schedule K-53, Research and Development Credit, with its Kansas income tax return.2 This schedule calculates the final credit amount and must be completed through Part A (the calculation section).7 Crucially, the transfer instructions require the Transferor to provide the completed Schedule K-53 to the Transferee.7

The K-53 also includes a checkbox requiring the Transferor to identify the transferee’s name and Employer Identification Number (EIN).7 The KDOR emphasizes that it reserves the right to request itemized schedules of expenditures to substantiate the Qualified Research Expenses claimed on the K-53, confirming the fundamental validity of the credit before or after the transfer.7

The essential KDOR forms for documenting an R&D Credit Transfer are summarized below:

KDOR Forms Essential for R&D Credit Transfer

B. Tax Status and Utilization Constraints for the Transferee

A transferred credit is not a new asset in terms of its regulatory limitations; it carries the regulatory baggage of the credit earned by the Transferor.

Utilization Limitations Carry Over

The statute dictates that the credit claimed by the Transferee “shall be subject to the limitations and requirements in place at the time the credit was earned”.2 This is arguably the most significant administrative constraint for the Transferee. Specifically, the annual utilization cap, detailed below, applies immediately and perpetually to the Transferee.

Non-Refundable Status

The transferred credit remains non-refundable.5 This means that if the Transferee’s available credit (subject to the annual cap) exceeds their Kansas income tax liability in any given year, the excess cannot be claimed as a refund but must instead be carried forward.7

IV. Financial Modeling and Strategic Valuation

The Full Credit Transfer provision allows for immediate monetization, but the stringent utilization rules profoundly affect the economic valuation of the credit in the secondary market.

A. The Indefinite Carryforward with the 25% Annual Cap

The Kansas R&D credit is subject to a strict annual utilization limitation: “The credit allowed in any one tax year is limited to 25 percent of the credit plus any carry forward”.2 This cap applies to the total available credit at the time of calculation.

While the unused portion of the credit may be carried forward indefinitely 3, the 25% increment rule means that realizing the full face value of the credit requires a minimum of four tax years, assuming the Transferee has sufficient tax liability in each year to absorb the full 25% allowance.8

This 25% annual usage restriction serves as a significant administrative control mechanism for the state. By maintaining a severe liquidity limitation on an otherwise highly generous credit (10% rate and full transferability), the Kansas Legislature has engineered a mechanism that slows the immediate fiscal cost to the state treasury. Instead of a large, single-year revenue reduction, the cost of the incentive is smoothed out over a minimum of four years. This policy structure ensures the R&D program remains fiscally sustainable for the state while still providing a valuable asset to innovative firms.

B. Economic Valuation of a Transferable Credit

The time delay imposed by the 25% utilization cap necessitates that the transferred credit be sold at a discount to its face value. This discount is a necessary economic factor compensating the Transferee for the lack of immediate liquidity and the associated carrying costs and risks over the multi-year realization timeline.10

In transferable credit markets, such assets are rarely sold at 100 cents on the dollar. The secondary market pricing depends on factors such as the Transferee’s tax rate, their certainty of sufficient future tax liability, and the general market demand. While specific Kansas market pricing fluctuates, comparable transferable state credits often transact at 85 to 95 cents on the dollar.10

A further implication of the “Full Credit Transfer” rule is its effect on market dynamics. Since the Transferor must find a single purchaser to absorb the entire credit 2, this requirement tends to concentrate the secondary market. A firm generating a large credit must secure a buyer capable of absorbing a significant asset (e.g., $500,000 or more). This requirement limits the pool of potential buyers, generally favoring large, established Kansas taxpayers with substantial, stable tax liabilities. This concentration, while simplifying compliance for the KDOR, potentially grants greater negotiating power to the Transferees, thus influencing the final price (discount rate) of the transferred credit.

C. Risk Mitigation for Transferees

The core assumption underlying the transfer is that the Transferee is acquiring a valid tax asset. However, since the Transferee is subject to the limitations and requirements in place at the time the credit was earned 2, the Transferee effectively assumes the audit risk associated with the Transferor’s original calculation.

If the KDOR later audits the Transferor’s tax year and determines that the underlying QREs were improperly calculated, or that the research activities failed the federal Four-Part Test 11, the value of the credit held by the Transferee could be reduced or disallowed entirely. Therefore, robust due diligence—including a detailed review of the Transferor’s Schedule K-53 and supporting R&D documentation—is paramount for the Transferee to mitigate this contingent tax risk.7

V. Case Study: Full Credit Transfer in Practice (Numerical Example)

To illustrate the mechanism of the Full Credit Transfer and the application of the subsequent utilization cap, consider a hypothetical scenario involving two Kansas entities.

A. Step 1: Credit Generation and Calculation (Transferor: InnovateCo LLC)

Scenario Setup: InnovateCo LLC, a newly formed Kansas-based software development firm, begins operations in Tax Year (TY) 2024. As an early-stage startup, InnovateCo has no net taxable income and therefore has no Kansas income tax liability. In TY 2024, InnovateCo incurs $1,500,000 in Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) within Kansas.

Credit Calculation (Schedule K-53, Part A):

The calculation follows the three-year average methodology, where QREs for prior two years are zero:

InnovateCo generates a full credit of $100,000. Because it has no Kansas income tax liability, it is eligible to transfer the credit.2

B. Step 2: The Full Credit Transfer Transaction

InnovateCo seeks immediate working capital, prompting a sale of the credit.

Transaction: InnovateCo locates KC Manufacturing Corp, a profitable Kansas C-Corp, to purchase the credit. Due to the multi-year utilization schedule (see below), KC Manufacturing purchases the full $100,000 credit at a 10% discount, paying $90,000 cash to InnovateCo.

Compliance Documentation:

1. InnovateCo (Transferor) files Schedule K-53 with its return, indicating the full $100,000 credit generated and zeroing out its own use (as required for transfer).
2. KC Manufacturing (Transferee) completes and submits Form K-260 to the KDOR, documenting the acquisition of the $100,000 credit.
3. The transfer satisfies the FCT requirement, as the $100,000 was transferred fully and only once.

C. Step 3: Transferee Utilization Timeline (KC Manufacturing Corp)

KC Manufacturing Corp claims the $100,000 credit in the transfer year, subject to the 25% annual utilization cap.2

Utilization Schedule of a $100,000 Transferred R&D Credit

The analysis confirms that the full realization of the $100,000 benefit requires KC Manufacturing to maintain sufficient Kansas income tax liability for four consecutive years. The indefinite carryforward applies only to the unused balance, ensuring the credit does not expire, but the 25% limitation dictates the pace of utilization.

VI. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Kansas R&D Tax Credit transfer mechanism, effective post-2022, represents a critical enhancement designed to inject capital into the state’s innovation economy. The “Full Credit Transfer” requirement is the crucial regulatory gatekeeper, ensuring administrative simplicity and integrity in the monetization process.

A. Summary of Compliance and Risk

The rigid FCT requirement—demanding the transfer of the full credit amount in a single, one-time transaction—is central to the KDOR’s compliance strategy.2 This structure minimizes potential tracking and fragmentation errors that would arise if credits could be split and sold to multiple parties.5

For the Transferee, the primary risk lies not in utilization (which is guaranteed over time via the indefinite carryforward) but in validity. Since the credit’s limitations and requirements are determined at the time of earning, the Transferee must execute thorough due diligence on the original R&D qualification study and QRE documentation prepared by the Transferor. Tax indemnity clauses in the transfer agreement are essential to mitigate the risk of a future KDOR audit reducing the credit’s face value.

B. Strategic Recommendations for Innovation Firms (Transferors)

The decision to transfer the credit should be a deeply considered strategic action, as it can only occur once.

1. Maximize Credit Pool Before Transfer: Companies should evaluate their R&D expenditure trajectory. Since the transfer is a one-time event, the optimal financial outcome is generally achieved by maximizing the credit pool generated before the sale.5 Waiting until the R&D operation has stabilized and generated the largest possible credit may yield a greater immediate cash infusion than rushing to monetize an initial, smaller credit.
2. Analyze Net Present Value (NPV): The Transferor must calculate the NPV of receiving a discounted lump sum now versus the opportunity cost associated with carrying the full face value of a potentially unusable credit forward indefinitely.9 For startups needing immediate capital, receiving 85% to 95% of the credit’s value immediately often outweighs the uncertain, delayed realization of 100% of the face value.

C. Strategic Recommendations for Taxable Entities (Transferees)

For profitable corporations, the Kansas R&D credit offers a highly predictable, multi-year reduction in future Kansas income tax liability.

1. Focus on Predictable Utilization: The credit is best utilized by entities with stable, high Kansas income tax liabilities that can reliably absorb the full 25% annual allowance. The Transferee should model the credit as a guaranteed, four-year minimum offset, factoring this predictability into its long-term tax planning.3
2. Rigorous Due Diligence: Prior to closing the transaction, the Transferee must ensure that the Transferor has meticulously completed Schedule K-53 and provided comprehensive documentation of the underlying QREs, as required by the KDOR.7 The integrity of the original claim is transferred along with the financial asset.
3. Pricing Strategy: The Transferee’s offer price must accurately reflect the time value of money lost due to the mandatory 25% annual utilization cap. Pricing the credit requires calculating the discounted present value of a guaranteed stream of tax savings extending over a minimum of four years.

D. Final Assessment

The Kansas R&D credit, through the strategic use of the Full Credit Transfer mechanism, successfully supports innovation by providing critical liquidity to capital-constrained firms. However, its effectiveness is balanced by the 25% utilization cap, which governs the credit’s financial structure and ensures that the state manages its tax expenditure over a protracted period, thereby mitigating immediate fiscal impact. Successful navigation of this program requires both earning and acquiring taxpayers to possess a detailed technical understanding of KDOR compliance procedures and the financial implications of the delayed utilization timeline.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/