Deconstructing the R&D Credit Base Amount: Analyzing IRC Section 41(c) in the Context of Kansas Law

The federal IRC Section 41(c) Base Amount defines the threshold of historical research spending that current Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) must surpass to qualify for the incremental federal research credit.1 Crucially, while Kansas mandates the use of federal rules for defining qualified expenditures, the state replaces the complex IRC Section 41(c) methodology with a simple three-year rolling average of localized QREs to determine its own Base Amount.3

I. Executive Summary: The Dual Incremental Test of the R&D Credit

The federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41(c) Base Amount functions as a complex statutory benchmark derived from a taxpayer’s historical financial performance, requiring linkage to historical gross receipts to quantify incremental research investment.5 While Kansas utilizes the federal definition for qualifying research activities, the state’s research and development (R&D) tax credit utilizes a unique, simplified Base Amount calculation, significantly diverging from the federal IRC Section 41(c) formula.3 This divergence necessitates a dual compliance structure where taxpayers must satisfy federal standards for expenditure qualification and state standards for incrementality.

A. Summary of Key Operational Distinction and 2023 Reforms

The fundamental operational distinction between the federal and Kansas systems is the metric used to measure incrementality. The federal Base Amount under IRC Section 41(c) (Regular Credit Method) is tied to historical business activity dating back to the mid-1980s via the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) and a four-year average of gross receipts.1 This results in a complex calculation based on revenue scale. Conversely, Kansas utilizes a purely QRE-based incremental test, calculating the Base Amount as the simple average of the current year’s QREs and the QREs from the two immediately preceding tax years.3 This approach simplifies the calculation and focuses the incentive exclusively on recent, expanding localized research activity.

Effective for tax years commencing after December 31, 2022, Kansas enacted substantial 2023 legislative enhancements to its R&D program (K.S.A. 79-32,182b). These reforms included increasing the credit rate from 6.5% to 10% 3, expanding eligibility to all Kansas income taxpayers (including S corporations and individuals) 7, and introducing tax credit transferability.3 By allowing credits to be transferred, the state enables R&D-intensive businesses, which often incur losses in their initial years, to immediately convert their tax benefit into market value, thus providing enhanced cash flow and stimulating broader innovation across the state’s economy.9

II. Foundational Analysis: The Federal Base Amount (IRC § 41(c))

IRC Section 41(c) establishes the Base Amount for the federal Research Credit under the Regular Credit Method (RCM). This mechanism serves as the historical benchmark that current research expenditures must exceed to generate a credit.

A. Context and Purpose of the Incremental Research Credit

The federal credit is designed to function as an incremental incentive, rewarding taxpayers for investments in QREs that are in excess of a statutorily defined historical level.1 This framework prevents the credit from subsidizing routine or ongoing research expenses. The calculation of the credit under the RCM generally amounts to 20% of the difference between the current year’s QREs and the calculated Base Amount.1

B. Detailed Mechanics of IRC Section 41(c) Base Amount (Regular Credit Method)

The calculation of the Base Amount under the RCM involves two primary factors that link current QREs to historical revenue performance.

1. The RCM Formula: Incremental Excess

The Base Amount is determined by multiplying the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) by the Average Annual Gross Receipts (AAGR) of the taxpayer.2 The AAGR is calculated based on the gross receipts for the four tax years immediately preceding the credit year (the “credit year”).1 This formula requires complex historical financial analysis.

2. Defining the Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP)

The FBP is defined as the percentage determined by the ratio of the aggregate qualified research expenses to the aggregate gross receipts of the taxpayer for the “Base Period”—generally defined as taxable years beginning after December 31, 1983, and before January 1, 1989.10 This reliance on data from a historical period over three decades old often imposes significant administrative burdens on modern and high-growth companies.

3. The Statutory Floor: The 50% QRE Limitation

A critical provision within IRC Section 41(c) establishes a minimum Base Amount. The calculated Base Amount must be the greater of the product resulting from the FBP/AAGR formula or 50% of the QREs for the current tax year.1 This 50% statutory floor acts as a guardrail, ensuring that no matter how low a company’s historical research activity (and thus its FBP), at least half of the current year’s QREs are deemed non-incremental and ineligible for the 20% credit.

C. Alternative Federal Calculation Methods (Contextual Note)

The federal R&D credit also permits the use of the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC), which simplifies the calculation significantly. The ASC, effective post-2006, bases the credit on the excess of current QREs over 50% of the average QREs for the three preceding tax years, applying a 14% rate.11 The Kansas Base Amount calculation, which employs a three-year rolling QRE average (Current QREs plus the two prior years, divided by three) 4, shares structural similarities with the federal ASC method by focusing on recent QRE history rather than linking back to gross receipts and the 1980s Base Period data. This strategic decoupling provides a simplified, predictable incentive mechanism at the state level.

III. The Kansas R&D Credit Statute: K.S.A. 79-32,182b

Kansas statute K.S.A. 79-32,182b governs the state’s R&D credit, requiring federal alignment for activity definition while establishing a uniquely simple state Base Amount.

A. Statutory Qualification: Mandatory Alignment with Federal QREs

A foundational requirement for the Kansas credit is that the research expenditures must be “allowable under the provisions of the federal internal revenue code of 1986”.3 This means Kansas taxpayers must satisfy the stringent federal criteria for qualified research activities, including the four-part test. In addition to meeting these federal standards, the expenditures must also be for activities specifically “conducted within this state”.6

B. The Kansas Base Amount Calculation: Decoupling from Gross Receipts

The Kansas Base Amount calculation replaces the complicated FBP/AAGR formula of IRC Section 41(c) with a simple historical QRE average. The statute defines the credit as 10% (post-2022) of the difference between the actual qualified research and development expenses for the current year and “the average of the actual expenditures made during the year and the two previous tax years”.3

The Base Amount is mathematically computed as:

$$\text{Kansas Base Amount} = \frac{\text{QRE}_{\text{Current Year}} + \text{QRE}_{\text{Year}-1} + \text{QRE}_{\text{Year}-2}}{3}$$

This methodology, which uses only Kansas-apportioned QREs, inherently provides greater rewards for companies experiencing accelerating growth in their local R&D spending.4 However, the calculation also exposes taxpayers to a risk that the Base Amount may exceed the current year’s QREs if spending declines rapidly, resulting in zero creditable excess.12 This design ensures that the incentive is tightly focused on rewarding sustained, increasing local investment.

C. Legislative Reforms Effective 2023 (K.S.A. 79-32,182b, as amended)

The 2023 changes fundamentally altered the dynamics of the Kansas R&D credit, making it significantly more attractive:

1. Credit Rate Increase: The rate was increased from 6.5% to 10% for all taxable years commencing after December 31, 2022.3
2. Expanded Eligibility: The previous limitation primarily benefiting C corporations was removed, opening eligibility to all Kansas income taxpayers, including pass-through entities such as S corporations and LLCs.7
3. Transferability: New credits earned post-2022 became transferable by a taxpayer without a current tax liability to any person.3 By providing immediate market value for credits earned by startups and unprofitable R&D firms, this mechanism effectively transforms the tax credit into a viable capital-raising tool.

IV. KDOR Administrative Guidance: The Kansas Base Amount Computation

The Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR) administrative guidance provides the mandatory procedures and documentation requirements necessary to claim and transfer the credit.

A. Guidance from KDOR Notice 23-09

KDOR Notice 23-09, released in September 2023, confirmed the operational details of the legislative changes, including the increase in the credit rate to 10% and the expansion of eligibility.7

The notice details the strict protocols for transferability: the new credits may be transferred to any person, but the transfer is limited to the full credit amount, and it may only be transferred one time.3 The transferor must complete KDOR Form K-260, Kansas Tax Credit Transfer Notification Form, to document the transaction. Although the credit is not refundable to the transferee, any unused portion may be carried forward, subject to the limitations in place when the credit was originally earned.3

B. Computation via Form K-53: The Base Amount Calculation Step-by-Step

KDOR Schedule K-53, “Research and Development Credit,” provides the definitive step-by-step guidance for calculating the credit, directly implementing the statutory three-year QRE average as the Base Amount.12

The relevant Base Amount calculation steps (Part A, Lines 1 through 4) include:

1. Line 1: Enter Current Year Kansas QREs.12
2. Lines 2a & 2b: Enter Kansas QREs for the two preceding tax years.
3. Line 3: Total QREs (Sum of current year and two previous years).12
4. Line 4 (The Kansas Base Amount): Divide Line 3 by three (3). This result is the Base Amount.12
5. Line 5 (Excess QREs): Subtract the Base Amount (Line 4) from the Current Year QREs (Line 1). If the result is zero or negative, no creditable excess exists.12
6. Line 6 (Total Credit): Multiply Excess QREs (Line 5) by the 10% rate.12
7. Line 7 (Annual Limit): Apply the 25% annual limitation to the total credit generated.12

C. Special Considerations for New R&D Performers

For new businesses beginning R&D activity in Kansas, the Base Amount calculation is highly favorable. If a taxpayer has fewer than two prior years of QREs, the calculation still divides the available three-year QRE sum (which includes the current year’s QREs and zero for missing years) by three.4 For a company starting research today, the Base Amount is effectively one-third of the current year’s QREs, meaning two-thirds of the current QREs qualify as excess expenditures (before the 10% credit rate application).4 This structure maximizes the immediate incentive for startups to locate and begin R&D operations in the state.

V. Practical Example: Application of the Kansas Base Amount

This example demonstrates the application of the Base Amount calculation using the 10% rate and the three-year QRE average, as prescribed by KDOR guidance.

A. Case Study Assumptions

A Kansas technology manufacturer, Apex Innovation, reports the following Kansas-apportioned QREs:

B. Step-by-Step Calculation (TY 2024)

The calculation follows the required KDOR K-53 methodology:

1. Total 3-Year QREs (Line 3): $\$1,200,000 + \$900,000 + \$600,000 = \mathbf{\$2,700,000}$.
2. Kansas Base Amount (Line 4): $\$2,700,000 \div 3 = \mathbf{\$900,000}$.
3. Excess QREs (Line 5): Current QREs minus the Base Amount: $\$1,200,000 – \$900,000 = \mathbf{\$300,000}$.
4. Total Credit Generated (Line 6): Excess QREs multiplied by the 10% rate: $\$300,000 \times 0.10 = \mathbf{\$30,000}$.
5. Maximum Allowable Credit (Line 7): Applying the 25% annual limitation: $\$30,000 \times 0.25 = \mathbf{\$7,500}$.

C. Financial Conclusion

Apex Innovation generated a $30,000 credit for TY 2024. Due to the statutory limitation, only $7,500 may be utilized against the current year’s tax liability. The remaining $22,500 is subject to carryforward, to be utilized in 25% increments in future tax years.6

Kansas R&D Credit Calculation Summary (Post-2022 Rate)

VI. Compliance, Transferability, and Audit Readiness

Effective management of the Kansas R&D credit requires careful attention to utilization limitations, stringent documentation for transferability, and preparation for potential KDOR audits.

A. Credit Limitations and Carryforward

The credit allowed in any single tax year is strictly limited to 25% of the total generated credit plus any applicable carryforward amount.3 This significant annual restriction means that credits may take many years to fully utilize. However, the state allows any unused portion of the credit to be carried forward until the entire amount is used.6 This potentially indefinite carryforward ensures that the value of the tax incentive is preserved over the company’s lifespan, compensating for the slow annual utilization rate.3

B. Transfer Documentation Requirements

The transferability feature, a key component of the 2023 reforms, requires specific administrative compliance. To document a transfer, the taxpayer that earned the credit must file Schedule K-53 and the transfer documentation Form K-260, Kansas Tax Credit Transfer Notification Form, with the KDOR.3 The transfer must abide by strict limitations: only the full amount of the newly generated credit may be transferred, and the credit may only be transferred once.3 By enforcing the “full credit” and “one-time” rules, the KDOR ensures administrative simplicity and prevents the speculative fragmentation of the credit market, while requiring transferees to perform comprehensive due diligence on the transferor’s underlying QRE documentation, as the compliance risk transfers with the credit.

C. Audit Preparedness and Risk Mitigation

R&D claims are subject to thorough review by the KDOR, whose audits typically cover a three-year audit period.13 This period aligns perfectly with the three years of QRE data required for the Kansas Base Amount calculation.

Effective risk mitigation requires comprehensive, contemporaneous documentation to support two critical claim elements 14:

1. Federal Qualification: Records must substantiate that the research activities meet the technological and experimental requirements of IRC Section 41.
2. Kansas Calculation Accuracy: Documentation must prove that the QREs were performed within Kansas and accurately support the three-year history used in the Base Amount computation (K-53, Lines 1-3).4

Taxpayers should avoid relying on high-level estimations, sampling techniques, or oral testimony for substantiation, as federal guidance strongly advises against these methods, which could lead to disallowance upon review.15

VII. Conclusion: Strategic Planning and Maximizing the Kansas R&D Credit

The Kansas R&D credit offers a compelling state-level incentive distinguished by its use of a simplified, QRE-based incremental test, which stands apart from the complex, historically constrained Base Amount calculation mandated by federal IRC Section 41(c). This simpler approach provides greater certainty and predictability for R&D planning.

The 2023 legislative actions—including the rate increase to 10%, the expansion to pass-through entities, and the introduction of credit transferability—significantly enhanced the immediate financial impact of the credit. The ability for taxpayers without a current tax liability to monetize their generated credits provides a direct stimulus to the state’s innovation sector.

To maximize this incentive, companies must maintain strict compliance with federal standards for defining QREs while meticulously tracking Kansas-apportioned QREs to accurately calculate the Base Amount using the three-year average on KDOR Schedule K-53. Given the restrictive 25% annual utilization limit, taxpayers must factor the long carryforward period into their financial projections. Finally, compliance efforts must prioritize generating robust, contemporaneous documentation to successfully defend both the QRE qualifications and the Base Amount calculation during a state audit.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/