The Kansas R&D Tax Credit: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrefundable Status, Dual Limitations, and Strategic Monetization

I. Executive Summary: The Nonrefundable Credit Defined

A. Meeting the Two-Line Requirement (The Essential Distinction)

A nonrefundable tax credit reduces the total tax liability but cannot exceed the amount owed. If the credit exceeds the tax due, the excess amount is lost unless specific carryforward provisions apply.1 For businesses investing heavily in Research and Development (R&D), understanding this distinction is paramount, as the nonrefundable Kansas R&D Tax Credit (K.S.A. §79-32,182b) serves as a dollar-for-dollar offset against state income tax liability, positioning it as a critical deferred tax asset rather than an immediate cash reimbursement.

Nonrefundable credits function solely as liability reducers. For instance, if a company qualifies for a $10,000 nonrefundable credit but owes only $4,000 in state income tax, the credit will eliminate the $4,000 liability. The remaining $6,000, which exceeds the tax due, is not returned to the taxpayer as a refund.1 This mechanism stands in contrast to refundable credits, such as the federal Earned Income Credit, where any excess credit is treated as an overpayment and returned to the taxpayer, potentially creating a refund even when no tax liability initially existed.1

B. Key Takeaways for the Kansas R&D Credit

The Kansas R&D credit is unequivocally nonrefundable, meaning it cannot result in or increase a cash tax refund.3 This fundamental characteristic means that a taxpayer must possess a sufficient Kansas income tax liability to realize the economic benefit of the incentive.

Furthermore, the Kansas R&D credit is subject to a dual limitation structure: first, the nonrefundable tax liability ceiling, and second, a statutory 25% annual utilization limit.3 Unused portions of the credit are not permanently lost; Kansas statute is favorable in this regard, providing an indefinite carryforward period, which ensures that the credit’s value is preserved over time until the business has sufficient tax appetite for utilization.3

II. Fundamentals of Nonrefundable Tax Credits in the US Tax System

A. Defining Nonrefundable vs. Refundable Credits

In the realm of state and federal taxation, the distinction between nonrefundable and refundable credits dictates their strategic value and immediate cash flow impact. Nonrefundable credits, by definition, serve only to reduce the tax obligation to a floor of zero.2 If a taxpayer has a $350 nonrefundable credit but only $200 in tax liability, the realized benefit is limited to $200, and the excess $150 is either carried forward or, if no carryforward provision exists, forfeited.2

Refundable credits, conversely, operate as if the taxpayer has already made a payment to the state or federal government. If the total refundable credit exceeds the calculated tax liability, the government remits the difference to the taxpayer. This inherent nature of refundable credits makes them critical tools for immediate cash flow injection or social programs. Some credits, such as the federal American Opportunity Credit (AOC), employ a hybrid approach, where a portion (up to 40% for the AOC) may be designated as refundable, while the remainder is nonrefundable.1

The classification of the Kansas R&D credit as nonrefundable critically shapes its financial reporting treatment. Because the realization of the credit is contingent upon future taxable income, it must be recognized on the corporate balance sheet as a Deferred Tax Asset (DTA) rather than an immediate tax receivable. This classification requires sophisticated tax provisioning under accounting standards, where the credit’s value is often discounted to reflect the time value of money and potential risks associated with utilizing the full amount over a prolonged period due to the state’s utilization constraints.

B. The Critical Role of Carryforward Provisions

For any nonrefundable credit, the existence of a statutory carryforward provision is the primary mechanism that preserves the credit’s value against the annual tax liability ceiling. If a nonrefundable credit did not allow for a carryforward, any excess credit generated in a year where the tax liability was insufficient to absorb it would be permanently lost.2

Kansas law provides significant certainty regarding the R&D incentive by granting an indefinite carryforward period for any unused credit.3 This provision ensures that the full economic value derived from the R&D investment is ultimately realized, even if it must be amortized over many subsequent tax years. This indefinite carryforward mitigates the severe cash flow restrictions imposed by the nonrefundable status and the state’s slow utilization cap, assuring taxpayers that their incentive is deferred, not destroyed.

III. Statutory and Policy Framework of the Kansas R&D Tax Credit (K.S.A. §79-32,182b)

A. Legislative Authority and Credit Purpose

The Kansas Research and Development Tax Credit, authorized under K.S.A. §79-32,182b, is designed to incentivize businesses to invest in qualified research activities (QREs) conducted within the state.3 These QREs must align with the definitions allowable under federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41.

Recent legislative action, specifically House Bill 2239 (HB 2239), introduced significant enhancements to the incentive.6 The policy shift increased the credit percentage and expanded eligibility, demonstrating a strong legislative commitment to fostering innovation and technological advancement within Kansas sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and technology.3

B. Calculation Mechanics: Determining Credit Generation

The Kansas R&D credit calculation employs an incremental approach, rewarding growth in research spending relative to a historical baseline.

The fundamental components of the calculation, as guided by the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR) on Schedule K-53, are as follows:

• Current Rate: For tax years beginning after 2022, the credit equals 10% of the excess qualified research expenses (QREs).3 This marks a substantial increase from the previous rate of 6.5%.5
• Base Amount Methodology: The base amount is calculated as the average of actual QREs for the current year and the two previous tax years. If a company has fewer than two prior years of data, it uses the available data to compute this average.3
• KDOR Form K-53 Guidance (Calculation Steps): The mechanics are strictly defined by the KDOR compliance form:

Table 2: Kansas R&D Tax Credit Generation Formula and Utilization Limits (Schedule K-53 Steps)

The legislative decision to raise the credit percentage from 6.5% to 10% 3 means that businesses can generate large pools of nonrefundable credit at a much faster rate. Because the generation rate is high, and the utilization rate (discussed below) is slow, companies must be prepared to manage increasingly large nonrefundable Deferred Tax Assets. This amplified generation rate increases the importance of robust long-term forecasting and strategic carryforward management.

C. Required KDOR Documentation and Pre-Claim Procedures

To claim the R&D credit, taxpayers must complete and submit Kansas Schedule K-53 with their state income tax return.5

Furthermore, a critical compliance change introduced by recent legislation requires a pre-claim application. Unlike previous years, the taxpayer must now complete and submit Form K-204, the Research and Development Credit Application, prior to claiming the credit.6 This mandatory application process serves as a regulatory gatekeeper, ensuring KDOR verifies eligibility and compliance with the underlying statutory requirements before the credit is recognized and utilized.

IV. The Nuanced Nonrefundable Application: The Dual Limitation Structure

The nonrefundable status of the Kansas R&D credit is further complicated by a secondary statutory constraint, which together form a unique dual limitation structure governing how quickly the credit can be utilized.

A. Limitation One: Non-Refundability (The Liability Ceiling)

The first and most basic constraint is the credit’s non-refundable nature. In any given tax year, the amount of R&D credit used is absolutely limited by the taxpayer’s Kansas income tax liability for that year.1 If the credit use, even when combined with all other applied credits, would reduce the liability below zero, the use is capped at the liability amount, preventing any cash refund. This fundamental ceiling applies universally to all nonrefundable credits.

B. Limitation Two: The Critical 25% Annual Utilization Limitation

The complexity arises from the second constraint, which applies specifically to the Kansas R&D credit. The statute dictates that the credit allowed for utilization in any one tax year is limited to 25 percent of the total generated credit for that year, added to any carryforward balance from previous years.3 This maximum allowable use is calculated on Line 7 of Schedule K-53.7

This 25% annual utilization cap dictates the rate of amortization of the credit asset. For example, if a company has an aggregate available credit pool (current plus carryforward) of $1 million, the maximum credit they are allowed to use in that year is limited to $250,000, regardless of whether their tax liability is $250,000 or $5 million. This mechanism ensures that the state’s fiscal relief is spread slowly over time, preventing any single taxpayer from claiming a massive, immediate offset against their tax burden. This requires businesses to value the nonrefundable credit not at its face value, but as a heavily discounted long-term asset, incorporating the time value of money lost over potentially many years of slow utilization.

C. Indefinite Carryforward and Preservation of Value

Any credit generated that is not utilized in the current tax year, whether because the tax liability was too low (Limitation One) or because the 25% annual cap prevented full usage (Limitation Two), is carried forward.3 Kansas provides an indefinite carryforward period, allowing the unused credit to be preserved until it can be applied against future Kansas income tax liabilities.3 Furthermore, the credit must continue to be applied in subsequent years in 25% increments until the total amount of the credit is fully used.3

V. Strategic Implications: Transferability and the Transferee’s Non-Refundability

The introduction of transferability through House Bill 2239 (HB 2239) fundamentally changed how businesses, particularly startups and early-stage companies with low or no initial tax liability, monetize this otherwise nonrefundable asset.

A. Legislative Context of HB 2239

HB 2239, enacted during the 2022 legislative session, introduced the concept of transferable credits for the R&D incentive under K.S.A. 79-32,182b.6 This provision allows the original taxpayer (the transferor) to sell the credit to another party (the transferee) for cash, provided the transferor had no Kansas income tax liability in the tax year the credit was generated.3 The statute specifies that only the full generated credit may be transferred, and the credit may be transferred only one time.8

B. Nonrefundable Status for the Transferee

A crucial element of the transferability provision is the preservation of the credit’s fundamental constraint: the transferred credit remains explicitly non-refundable for the transferee.6 The transferee can use the credit against their Kansas income tax liability in the tax year it was acquired and carry it forward until fully utilized.6

However, the nonrefundable status explicitly prevents the transferee from receiving a cash refund for any excess credit obtained through the transfer.6 This structural limitation, combined with the underlying 25% annual utilization cap, significantly impacts the credit market dynamics. Because the transferee must realize the credit slowly and cannot receive a cash payout for excess amounts, the purchase price for the credit is typically heavily discounted from its face value. Transferees must project sufficient future tax liability over a long timeframe to justify the purchase, factoring in the inherent risk and the time value of money associated with slow amortization.

C. Strategic Planning for Transferors and Transferees

For the original taxpayer (transferor), the option to transfer the credit provides a vital pathway to immediate liquidity for a nonrefundable asset that might otherwise take decades to fully realize. This offers a substantial advantage to innovative but currently unprofitable firms.

For the purchasing entity (transferee), strategic planning requires extensive financial modeling. Rigorous due diligence must be conducted on the transferee’s own projected Kansas tax liability and the transferor’s statutory compliance (K-204 application and K-53 calculation). The transaction must be structured such that the purchase price reflects the delay in utilization caused by the 25% annual cap, and the valuation must account for the nonrefundable nature of the asset.

VI. Practical Application: A Kansas R&D Credit Utilization Example

To illustrate the complex interaction between the nonrefundable status and the 25% annual utilization limit, a detailed example is provided below.

A. Case Study Setup

Consider Tech Innovations Inc., a Kansas corporation that consistently generates R&D credits.

• Year 1 Generated R&D Credit (Total Credit on K-53, Line 6): $100,000.
• Year 1 Kansas Income Tax Liability: $15,000.

B. Year-by-Year Illustration of Dual Limitation Application

The following table demonstrates how the two limitations—the 25% utilization cap and the nonrefundable liability ceiling—dictate the annual application and indefinite carryforward of the credit pool.

Table 3: Numerical Example: Kansas R&D Credit Utilization Under Dual Limitation

Analysis of the Dual Constraint:

1. Year 1: Tech Innovations Inc. generated a $100,000 credit. The 25% rule would permit $25,000 in utilization. However, the company’s tax liability was only $15,000. Because the credit is nonrefundable, utilization is capped by the $15,000 tax liability, reducing the tax to zero. The unused $85,000 is carried forward indefinitely. In this case, the nonrefundable status was the binding constraint.
2. Year 2: The company carried forward $85,000 and generated $0 new credit. The 25% rule allows the use of $21,250 ($85,000 $\times$ 25%). Since the tax liability of $30,000 exceeds the maximum allowable use, the utilization is capped at $21,250. The remaining $63,750 is carried forward. Here, the 25% annual cap was the binding constraint.
3. Year 3: The company’s available pool is $83,750. The 25% rule allows a maximum use of $20,937.50. However, the tax liability is only $5,000. Utilization is once again limited to the tax liability of $5,000. The nonrefundable status is again the limiting factor, preserving the remaining $78,750 for future years.

This demonstration confirms that the success of a Kansas R&D tax strategy requires not only generating the credit but also maintaining a high, consistent Kansas tax liability over a prolonged period to maximize utilization efficiency against the restrictive 25% annual draw-down rate.

VII. Conclusion: Maximizing Nonrefundable Credit Value in Kansas

The Kansas R&D Tax Credit, governed by K.S.A. §79-32,182b, represents a significant state incentive for qualified research activities, but its utility is defined by its nonrefundable status and the complex dual-limitation structure.

The primary constraint is that the credit cannot generate a cash refund, limiting its usage strictly to offsetting state income tax liability. The secondary, and often more restrictive, constraint is the 25% annual utilization cap on the total credit pool (current year plus carryforward). This cap ensures that the economic benefit of the incentive is realized gradually, compelling taxpayers to forecast their tax liabilities for many years into the future.

The indefinite carryforward provision is the crucial element that preserves the credit’s full economic value, transforming the nonrefundable credit into a long-term deferred tax asset. For businesses lacking immediate tax liability, the transferability option introduced by HB 2239 offers a critical pathway to immediate monetization. However, the purchasing entity must recognize that the credit remains nonrefundable and subject to the 25% annual cap, necessitating deep discounts to account for the slow amortization schedule and utilization risk.

Given the complex interplay of generation rates (10%), utilization limits (25%), pre-approval requirements (Form K-204), and the strategic implications of transferability, businesses operating in Kansas should engage specialized State and Local Tax (SALT) experts. This expertise is necessary to accurately forecast the credit’s long-term realization value, manage statutory compliance (K-53 filing), and develop robust R&D investment strategies that maximize the eventual economic benefit of this nonrefundable state incentive.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/