The Strategic Imperative of the Kansas Research and Development Tax Credit (K.S.A. 79-32,234): A Comprehensive Analysis of Statutory Framework, KDOR Guidance (Notice 23-09), and Compliance

I. Executive Summary and Foundational Principles

1.1. Introduction to the Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit

The Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit provides a dollar-for-dollar reduction in income tax liability for businesses that incur expenses associated with developing or improving products, processes, or technologies. It serves as a vital economic tool, stimulating domestic innovation and investment in the United States.

The federal R&D Tax Credit was initially enacted in 1981 under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 to stimulate innovation and encourage greater investment in research and development activities across the United States.1 This incentive provides critical cash flow, which businesses may deploy to hire additional employees, expand research initiatives, or increase facilities capacity.1 State-level R&D credits, such such as the incentive offered by Kansas (K.S.A. 79-32,234), are designed to localize this effect, offering financial incentives to businesses that invest specifically within the state’s borders, thereby encouraging regional innovation and fostering economic growth.3

1.2. The Federal Nexus: Defining Qualified Research Activities (QRAs)

A crucial element of the Kansas R&D credit statute is its reliance on the federal definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs). Kansas law explicitly mandates that expenditures used for R&D credit qualification must be allowable under the provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of 1986.5 Consequently, IRC Section 41 establishes the foundational legal standard for all claims made under the Kansas R&D credit.2 Taxpayers must demonstrate that their research and development activities meet the rigorous four-part test established under federal guidelines to ensure their expenses are legitimate QREs.

The four-part test for defining qualified research activities includes:

1. Permitted Purpose: The activity must aim to develop or improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing business component. A business component can be defined as a product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention.2
2. Elimination of Uncertainty: The research must seek to discover information that resolves technical uncertainties regarding the appropriate design of the business component or the capability or method of its development.2
3. Process of Experimentation: The activities must involve a systematic process of experimentation, which includes evaluating various alternatives related to achieving the desired technological outcome.2
4. Technological in Nature: The research activities must fundamentally rely on principles of engineering, physics, chemistry, biology, or computer science.2

This explicit statutory linkage requiring Kansas QREs to align with federal IRC provisions establishes that the integrity of a Kansas credit claim is entirely dependent on the quality of the underlying federal documentation. Robust tax planning requires taxpayers to first ensure comprehensive documentation supporting the federal Four-Part Test. If a federal audit successfully challenges and disallows the underlying QREs, the corresponding state credit automatically becomes invalid, regardless of compliance with Kansas-specific calculation methodologies.

1.3. Synopsis of Major Kansas Legislative Enhancements (Effective TY 2023)

For many years, the Kansas R&D credit (K.S.A. 79-32,234) utilized a comparatively modest incentive rate and restricted eligibility. However, critical legislative changes implemented for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022, dramatically enhanced the value and accessibility of the program, transforming it into a substantially more powerful economic tool.5

The key transformations include:

• Increased Credit Rate: The credit rate was increased from 6.5% to a significantly more competitive 10% of the incremental qualified research expenditures.5
• Expanded Eligibility: Eligibility was expanded beyond its previous limitation to C-corporations subject to Kansas corporate income tax.6 The credit is now available to all Kansas income taxpayers, including individuals and various flow-through entities such as S-corporations and partnerships.5
• Credit Transferability: A mechanism was introduced allowing taxpayers who do not owe current taxes to transfer (sell) their R&D credit to another taxpayer, allowing for immediate monetization.6

These enhancements represent a strategic decision by the state to promote a technology-centric economy. The coupling of universal eligibility, especially for flow-through entities, with the immediate monetization opportunity afforded by transferability, creates a powerful targeted incentive for early-stage and high-growth technology companies. Such companies often incur substantial qualified research expenses but have little to no taxable income. By allowing these entities to earn the credit and immediately transfer it, the state facilitates immediate capital generation, effectively providing a source of non-dilutive financing to support innovation.

II. Kansas Statutory Framework and Legislative Requirements

2.1. Legislative Mandate and Economic Policy

The primary objective of K.S.A. 79-32,234 is to foster increased research activity by rewarding incremental growth in qualified expenditures rather than simply maintaining existing baseline levels.5 The incentive is designed to specifically offset Kansas income tax liability for those taxpayers incurring R&D expenditures exclusively within Kansas.4

A critical compliance requirement related to the utilization of this credit is the Prohibition on Credit Stacking. Kansas statute explicitly states that expenditures used to qualify for the R&D credit shall not be used to qualify for any other type of Kansas income tax credit.8 This mandate ensures that taxpayers do not receive duplicate benefits from the state for the same investment dollars, maintaining the fiscal integrity of the incentive programs.

2.2. Expansion of Eligible Taxpayers and Tax Planning Implications

The statutory change eliminating the C-corporation limitation for tax years beginning after 2022 significantly broadens the strategic utility of the R&D credit.6 Prior to this change, many technology and development firms, particularly smaller and mid-sized entities structured as pass-through businesses, were excluded from claiming the credit.

The current inclusion of individuals and flow-through entities—such as partnerships and S-corporations—allows the credit to be passed through to the owners, who may then claim the credit against their personal Kansas income tax liability.5 This expansion is vital for stimulating the smaller business sector in Kansas, which often drives initial innovation but operates primarily using flow-through structures.9 For these entities, the ability to claim the credit directly against personal income taxes represents a significant financial benefit and further supports the state’s goal of encouraging innovation across a wide variety of industries.1

2.3. KDOR Notice 23-09: Official Implementation Guidance

To address the major statutory amendments that became effective in 2023, the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR) released Notice 23-09 on September 6, 2023.10 This guidance provides the essential administrative and interpretative framework necessary for taxpayers and practitioners to comply with the modernized statute.6

Notice 23-09 affirms key changes, including the increase of the credit rate to 10% and the elimination of the requirement that claims be limited solely to corporations.6 It also confirms the new transferability rules, specifying that R&D tax credits may be transferred by a taxpayer without a current tax liability to any person, subject to specific constraints.5 The consistent interpretation provided by the KDOR notice is essential for ensuring uniform compliance across all Kansas income taxpayers now eligible to claim this incentive.

The following table summarizes the most salient changes effective for tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2023:

Table 1: Kansas R&D Credit Key Legislative Changes (Effective January 1, 2023)

III. Credit Calculation Methodology and Base Determination (Schedule K-53 Part A)

3.1. The Incremental Calculation Standard

The Kansas R&D credit is explicitly an incremental credit, meaning the benefit is earned only on expenditures that exceed a calculated historical base.5 The method for determining this incremental amount is formalized in Schedule K-53, which is mandatory for all taxpayers seeking to claim the credit and must be submitted with the income tax return.5

The incremental standard, detailed in Part A of Schedule K-53, utilizes a three-year moving average to establish the base expenditure amount.12 By structuring the credit this way, the state ensures that the financial incentive primarily rewards businesses that increase their commitment to R&D within Kansas year-over-year.

3.2. Detailed Breakdown of Schedule K-53 Part A

The calculation of the total R&D credit earned is a sequential process defined by the lines in Part A of Schedule K-53:

• Line 1 (Current QREs): The taxpayer enters the total allowable R&D expenditures conducted in Kansas for the current tax year.12
• Lines 2a & 2b (Preceding Year QREs): The qualified expenditures for the first and second preceding taxable years are entered.12
• Line 3 (Total): This line aggregates the QREs for the current year and the two preceding years (Lines 1, 2a, and 2b).12
• Line 4 (Average Base Amount): The total from Line 3 is divided by three (3) to determine the three-year moving average expenditure. This average establishes the benchmark that the current year’s QREs must surpass to generate a credit.12
• Line 5 (Expenditure Amount for Credit): This is the core calculation. The Average Base Amount (Line 4) is subtracted from the Current QREs (Line 1). If the Current QREs are less than or equal to the Average Base Amount, the result must be zero, effectively preventing the generation of any credit unless incremental spending occurs.12
• Line 6 (Total R&D Credit Earned): The eligible expenditure amount (Line 5) is multiplied by the new statutory rate of 10% (.10) to determine the total credit earned for the year.12
• Line 7 (Maximum Allowable Credit This Year): The total earned credit (Line 6) is multiplied by the statutory annual utilization cap of 25% (.25).12

The design of the average base calculation offers a significant advantage to new businesses or those newly relocating to Kansas. For a taxpayer in its first year of operation, the preceding two years of QREs are zero. This calculation results in an initial base that is substantially lower than that for a mature company. For example, in the first year, the current year’s expenditures (Line 1) are divided by three to establish the base (Line 4). Consequently, the credit is generated on approximately two-thirds (66.67%) of the first year’s QREs, maximizing the incentive for initial R&D investment within the state.

Conversely, the reliance on a three-year rolling average introduces sensitivity to spending volatility, sometimes referred to as a “cliff effect.” A year with a substantial increase in QREs significantly inflates the average base for the two subsequent years. If a company’s R&D expenditure then remains flat or slightly declines, the elevated base makes it difficult or impossible to generate new credits in the following periods. This structural element mandates that tax planning must prioritize consistent and aggressive year-over-year QRE growth to maximize continuous credit generation.

Table 2: Schedule K-53 Part A: Calculation of Research and Development Credit

IV. Limitation, Carryforward, and Credit Transferability

4.1. The Mandatory 25% Annual Utilization Constraint

A defining characteristic of the Kansas R&D credit is the limitation on its annual utilization. The statute restricts the amount of the credit claimable in any single tax year to 25% of the total earned credit (Line 7), plus any remaining carryforward from credits earned in prior years.5 This annual cap ensures that the financial benefit is realized gradually, necessitating that a C-corporation or any other eligible taxpayer with sufficient tax liability must spread the utilization of a single year’s earned credit over a minimum of four successive tax periods.7 This structure necessitates accurate long-term cash flow modeling for tax departments, as the full value of the credit cannot be realized immediately, even if the current tax liability is high.

4.2. Indefinite Carryforward Provisions (K-53 Parts C & D)

Any portion of the total earned credit (Line 6) that cannot be used in the current tax year due to either the 25% utilization limit or insufficient tax liability is eligible to be carried forward indefinitely until the total amount of the credit is fully exhausted.5

Schedule K-53 dedicates specific sections to managing this carryforward complexity:

• Part C (Line 10): This section calculates the amount of credit carryforward resulting from the current year’s expenditures by subtracting the allowed credit used this year (Line 9) from the total earned credit (Line 6).12
• Part D: This section is crucial for tracking credit vintages from prior years. Because the 25% utilization cap applies to the original earned amount of the credit, taxpayers must track the specific maximum credit allowable (Line 16) for each carryover year.12 This detailed tracking prevents unauthorized accelerated usage and ensures adherence to the statutory limitations for all outstanding credit amounts.12

While the indefinite carryforward provides flexibility, it carries the inherent administrative burden of tracking complex tax attributes over a protracted period. For companies engaged in mergers, acquisitions, or significant restructuring, managing these complex credit vintages can pose ongoing compliance challenges. The transferability mechanism, discussed below, provides an alternative strategic option for mitigating this long-term compliance exposure by allowing immediate monetization.

4.3. The Credit Transfer Mechanism and Administrative Requirements

The most transformative change for taxpayers without immediate tax liability is the new credit transfer mechanism, effective for tax years beginning 2023 and after. This allows non-taxable entities to sell their earned R&D credits, accelerating the financial benefit.5

Eligibility and Restrictions:

1. Transfer Condition: A taxpayer may transfer the credit only if they do not have a current Kansas income tax liability.5
2. Full Transfer Requirement: Only the total, full credit amount earned (K-53 Line 6) may be transferred, preventing partial transfers.5
3. One-Time Rule: The credit may only be transferred to a single recipient (transferee) one time.5
4. Non-Refundable Status: The credit is explicitly non-refundable for the transferee. Any credit exceeding the transferee’s tax liability must be carried forward; it cannot result in a refund.12
5. Inherited Limitations: The transferee must claim the credit subject to the limitations in place when the credit was originally earned by the transferor. This means the transferee is also subject to the original 25% annual usage cap.5

Documentation and Compliance Protocol:

The transfer process requires coordinated documentation between the parties and the KDOR:

• Transferor (Earner): The transferor must complete Schedule K-53 through Part A to determine the total credit earned and the annual utilization cap (Line 7). This partial K-53 is then provided to the transferee.5
• Transferee (Claimant): The transferee must submit the completed K-53 with their own income tax return, claiming the transferred amount on Line 9 (Part B). Crucially, the transferee must also complete and submit Form K-260 (Kansas Tax Credit Transfer Notification Form) to the KDOR to properly document the transfer.5

Because the transferee inherits the 25% annual cap and the non-refundable status, the transfer transaction inherently involves a discount in the marketplace. The buyer (transferee) is exchanging cash today for a multi-year stream of tax offsets, requiring them to conduct a rigorous Net Present Value (NPV) analysis based on their projected multi-year Kansas tax liability to determine the appropriate purchase price. This discounting reflects the market cost of accelerating monetization for the transferor. Furthermore, the transferee must exercise significant due diligence on the transferor’s original Schedule K-53 calculation. Since the transferee’s use of the credit depends entirely on the legitimacy of the QREs claimed by the transferor in Part A, any error in the initial calculation could lead to a future audit adjustment and loss of the purchased credit, making careful verification essential.

V. Detailed Calculation Example and Financial Modeling

This section provides a numerical example illustrating the calculation of the credit, the application of the 25% limitation, and the multi-year carryforward schedule using the enhanced 10% rate (TY 2024).

5.1. Scenario Definition: InnovateKS Technologies, Inc. (TY 2024 Start)

InnovateKS Technologies, Inc., a Kansas-based flow-through entity, has been increasing its R&D activities significantly. The following data details its Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) incurred exclusively within Kansas:

5.2. Computation of Total Earned Credit (TY 2024 – K-53 Part A)

The computation is performed utilizing the framework established in Schedule K-53, Part A:

• 1. Total QREs (K-53 Line 3): Summing the current and preceding two years’ QREs:
  
  $$200,000 + 400,000 + 1,000,000 = \$1,600,000$$
• 2. Average Base Amount (K-53 Line 4): Dividing the total QREs by three:
  
  $$\$1,600,000 / 3 = \$533,333$$
• 3. Excess QREs (K-53 Line 5): The incremental amount exceeding the base:
  
  $$\$1,000,000 (Current) – \$533,333 (Base) = \$466,667$$
• 4. Total R&D Credit Earned (K-53 Line 6 @ 10%):
  
  $$\$466,667 \times 0.10 = \$46,667$$
• 5. Maximum Annual Usage Cap (K-53 Line 7 @ 25%):
  
  $$\$46,667 \times 0.25 = \$11,667$$

5.3. Multi-Year Usage and Carryforward Schedule

InnovateKS Technologies, Inc. earned a total credit of $46,667 in TY 2024, but its utilization is capped at $11,667 in the current year. Since the estimated Kansas tax liability is $15,000, the full allowable amount of the credit is utilized.

• TY 2024 Calculation (K-53 Part B & C):

• Allowed Credit Used (K-53 Line 9): The lesser of the Cap ($11,667) or Liability ($15,000) is $11,667.
• Carryforward to TY 2025 (K-53 Line 10):
  
  $$\$46,667 (Total Credit) – \$11,667 (Credit Used) = \$35,000$$

The remaining $35,000 must be carried forward and utilized in subsequent years, subject to the annual 25% cap on the original credit vintage.

Table 3: Example: Kansas R&D Credit Utilization and Carryforward Schedule (TY 2024 Vintage)

5.4. Transfer Scenario Illustration

If, instead of a $15,000 liability, InnovateKS projected $0 tax liability for TY 2024, the entity would be eligible to transfer the credit. The optimal financial decision in this scenario involves a comparison between the present value of delayed credit realization (carryforward) versus the cash proceeds from immediate transfer. If the business projects low tax liability for the next 3 to 4 years, the opportunity cost of waiting for the credit to materialize often outweighs the loss of face value from a discounted sale.

In this instance, InnovateKS could elect to transfer the full earned credit of $46,667. The transferee, typically an entity with high current Kansas income tax liability, would purchase the credit at a discount. The transferee would then begin using the credit against their tax liability, adhering strictly to the original 25% annual cap of $11,667.5

This transfer option is a crucial financial modeling consideration. For the transferor, it provides immediate cash flow for growth. For the tax policy analyst advising the transferee, the primary concern is due diligence. The transferee must ensure the accuracy and validity of the transferor’s original QRE determination and K-53 Part A calculation. Given that the transferee inherits the 25% limitation and must track the credit vintage, the successful use of the purchased credit hinges entirely upon the integrity of the initial claim, necessitating meticulous record-keeping and validation of the Form K-260 documentation.12

VI. Conclusion: Maximizing the Value of the Enhanced Kansas R&D Incentive

6.1. Strategic Compliance Checklist for Taxpayers

The modernization of the Kansas R&D Tax Credit, particularly the elevation of the rate to 10% and the introduction of transferability, significantly increases its value as a strategic financial instrument. To maximize the benefit and ensure compliance, Kansas taxpayers should adopt the following strategic posture:

1. Federal Documentation Precedence: Prioritize the comprehensive documentation of R&D activities to satisfy the federal Four-Part Test mandated by IRC Section 41, as the validity of the Kansas credit is dependent on the acceptance of the underlying federal QREs.2
2. State-Specific QRE Segregation: Multi-state taxpayers must maintain granular records to accurately isolate and allocate Qualified Research Expenditures conducted exclusively within Kansas.4
3. Modeling Incremental Growth: Due to the structural mechanism of the three-year average base, businesses must actively model their projected R&D spending to target consistent QRE growth and avoid the “cliff effect,” which occurs when a significant spike in one year prematurely inflates the base for subsequent years.
4. Optimal Monetization Strategy: For flow-through entities or early-stage companies with low current tax liability, conduct a rigorous financial analysis comparing the present value of discounted cash proceeds from a credit transfer against the uncertain future value of carrying forward the credit for potential multi-year utilization.
5. Adherence to Transfer Protocol: If opting for transfer, ensure meticulous completion of Schedule K-53 through Part A by the transferor and the accurate submission of Form K-260 by the transferee to satisfy KDOR notification requirements.5

6.2. Final Policy Implications

The legislative enhancements codified for tax year 2023 and beyond represent a pivotal moment for state economic policy. By increasing the incentive to 10% and universally expanding eligibility, Kansas has created a robust incentive structure aimed at fostering a dynamic, technology-centric economy within the state.3 The introduction of the credit transfer mechanism provides an effective statutory solution to mitigate the limitations posed by the mandatory 25% annual utilization cap.5

This transferability feature effectively converts a deferred, non-refundable tax attribute into an immediate source of non-dilutive working capital for companies with high growth and low profitability. This mechanism, combined with the favorable calculation methodology for new businesses (which benefit from a lower starting base), makes the Kansas R&D credit a highly competitive and immediately actionable economic incentive compared to many other state tax credits that mandate prolonged carryforward periods. Through these strategic modifications, Kansas has positioned its R&D credit as a leading tool for encouraging innovation and attracting investment.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/