The 10-Year Carryforward Period for the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395)

I. Executive Summary: Defining the Carryforward Mechanism

The Carryforward Period (10 Years) allows taxpayers to utilize any portion of the nonrefundable Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit that exceeds the current year’s Kentucky tax liability. This period ensures the full value of the investment incentive can be recovered against future Corporate Income Tax, Individual Income Tax, or Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) over a maximum of ten subsequent tax years.1

Detailed Context of the Credit

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (QRF Credit), codified under KRS 141.395, is a strategic state incentive designed to promote long-term capital investment in research infrastructure within the Commonwealth.2 Unlike many state R&D tax credits that focus on operational expenditures such as wages and supplies, the Kentucky QRF Credit is strictly calculated at five percent (5%) of qualified costs related to constructing, remodeling, expanding, or equipping research facilities in the state.3 Because the credit incentivizes major capital projects—which often result in a significant, one-time credit generation—the extended 10-year carryforward provision is functionally essential for the viability of the incentive.2

The credit is nonrefundable, meaning it can only offset an existing tax liability; it cannot generate a cash refund back to the taxpayer.2 If the calculated 5% credit exceeds the total tax liability (against both Income Tax and LLET) in the year the facility is placed in service, the excess amount is preserved through the carryforward mechanism. This decade-long utilization window provides sustained value realization for large, long-term infrastructure investments by allowing the accumulated credit balance to be applied against future tax obligations.2

II. Statutory and Legislative Framework (KRS 141.395)

A. Enabling Legislation and Credit Qualification

The Kentucky General Assembly established the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2007, recognizing the importance of research infrastructure investment.3 The primary statutory authority rests in KRS 141.395. The credit is applicable against two primary state tax obligations: the income tax imposed by KRS 141.020 (individual income tax) or KRS 141.040 (corporation income tax), and the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) imposed by KRS 141.0401.1

B. Defining Qualified Expenditures and Property

The credit’s scope is rigorously defined to ensure it targets true capital investment in research facilities. The statutory language specifies that “Construction of research facilities” means constructing, remodeling, and equipping facilities in Kentucky or expanding existing facilities for qualified research.1

A crucial constraint is that costs must be limited to tangible, depreciable property.3 This includes the physical construction of the facility and the equipment necessary to conduct the research. Importantly, the statute explicitly excludes any amounts paid or incurred for replacement property.1 The research activities conducted within the facility must meet the definition of “qualified research” as defined in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).1 By referencing IRC § 41, Kentucky aligns the functional tests for qualified research while restricting the eligible expenditures solely to facility and equipment costs.

C. The 10-Year Statutory Mandate (KRS 141.395(3))

The core of the carryforward provision is explicitly stated in the legislation: “Any unused credit may be carried forward ten (10) years”.1 This specific time frame establishes the maximum period a company has to utilize the initial credit amount generated by a qualified investment.

This 10-year carryforward period distinguishes the Kentucky QRF credit from both federal tax provisions and certain other Kentucky incentives. The federal R&D credit, for instance, allows unused credits to be carried forward for up to 20 years.6 Conversely, other specific Kentucky credits, such as the Education Tuition Tax Credit, permit a shorter carryforward period of only five years.7 The choice of a decade-long carryforward term for the QRF credit is a strategic legislative recognition. It acknowledges that the substantial capital expenditure required for research facilities often yields a credit amount so large that immediate utilization is improbable, yet it imposes a finite limit shorter than the federal standard to encourage reasonable tax planning and eventual recovery.

III. Operational Mechanics of the Carryforward Period

A. The Critical Commencement Date: Placed in Service (PIS)

Understanding the start date for the 10-year carryforward is paramount for effective tax planning. The Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) guidance specifies that the credit is available once the tangible, depreciable property is placed in service (PIS).3 This is the trigger event for the 10-year utilization clock.

The PIS date, not the date construction began or the date the last invoice was paid, determines the precise expiration year. This timing difference allows sophisticated taxpayers a critical lever for maximizing the duration of the carryforward. For example, if a facility’s construction is physically completed in December 2024 but the facility is not officially placed in service (i.e., ready and available for its specifically assigned function, generally for depreciation purposes) until January 2025, the utilization window is effectively extended by one full tax year. Instead of expiring at the end of the 2034 tax year, the credit would remain available through the end of the 2035 tax year. Precision in documenting and justifying the PIS date is therefore vital to securing the longest possible carryforward duration.

B. Constraints of Nonrefundability and Utilization Management

The statutory designation of the QRF credit as nonrefundable fundamentally dictates its utilization strategy.2 A nonrefundable credit can only reduce the income tax or LLET liability to zero; it cannot generate a remittance of cash back to the taxpayer.

This nonrefundable status, when paired with the typically large magnitude of the facility credit, makes the 10-year carryforward a necessary safeguard. If a business generates a significant credit but experiences periods of low profitability or net operating losses (NOLs), its tax liability may be minimal or zero. During these years, the utilization of the credit pauses. The 10-year term provides a crucial buffer, allowing the credit to bridge temporary business downturns and be applied against future profits. However, since the clock continues to run regardless of profitability, aggressive utilization planning is required in profitable years to prevent the credit from expiring unused.

C. Separate Tracking for Income Tax and LLET Utilization

The QRF credit provides the flexibility to offset both the income tax and the LLET liability.1 However, this dual applicability comes with a significant administrative constraint: the credit balance generated must be tracked separately for each tax type. DOR instructions mandate that the balance of the credit calculated for the income tax liability cannot be used as a credit against the LLET liability, and conversely, any balance available for the LLET cannot be used against the income tax liability.8

This strict separation requires robust internal accounting and dual-tracking on the required compliance forms (Schedule QR and downstream schedules like TCS/ITC). A large corporate taxpayer that structures operations in a manner that generates high income tax liability but minimal LLET liability must strategically manage two independently expiring credit pools. Failure to properly allocate the credit utilization based on liability priority and type could result in one pool expiring prematurely while the other remains overfunded.

IV. Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) Compliance and Documentation

A. Mandatory Annual Documentation: Schedule QR

The cornerstone of compliance for the QRF credit is Kentucky Schedule QR (Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit).8 This form serves two critical functions: calculating the initial 5% credit amount and tracking its utilization and remaining carryforward period.8

The DOR requires that a copy of the Schedule QR be filed each year until the entire credit amount is utilized or the 10-year carryforward period has expired, whichever occurs first.1 This continuous annual filing serves as the formal record of the ongoing credit balance and the remaining statutory life.

The initial filing year is especially rigorous, requiring the attachment of a supporting schedule detailing the tangible, depreciable property. This schedule must list the date purchased, the critical date placed in service (PIS), a description of the asset, and the corresponding cost.1 Furthermore, if a taxpayer undertakes multiple research facility projects across different years, a separate Schedule QR must be completed and tracked for each qualifying project.8

B. The Implied FIFO Utilization Rule for Carryforwards

The fixed 10-year lifespan of the credit, beginning on the PIS date, coupled with the requirement to track credits by specific project via separate Schedule QR filings, imposes an essential First-In, First-Out (FIFO) utilization methodology.

This methodology is not merely a best practice; it is a necessity for risk management and audit defense. If a company generates a Credit A in 2024 (expiring 2034) and a Credit B in 2026 (expiring 2036), utilizing Credit B before Credit A would allow the 2024 credit to expire unnecessarily while a newer credit remains on the books. Taxpayers must prioritize the use of the oldest carryforward balances first, maximizing the life of every generated credit dollar. The structured format of Schedule QR Part III, which tracks utilization chronologically by year, is designed to support and enforce this necessary FIFO tracking.8

C. Claiming Procedures via Schedules TCS and ITC

Once the credit amount is calculated on Schedule QR and tracked through the carryforward schedule, the utilized portion must be applied against the tax liability using secondary forms. For C Corporations and entities subject to LLET, the credit amount is entered onto Schedule TCS (Tax Credit Summary).1 For individuals or entities passing credits through to individual returns (Form 740/741), Schedule ITC (Individual Income Tax Credit) may be used.1

The critical process here is the application of the credit, which is governed by the statutory ordering requirements specified in KRS 141.0205.1

Table 1: Key Kentucky R&D Credit Compliance Forms

V. Priority of Application (Credit Stacking) and Strategic Delay

A. Statutory Ordering Mandate (KRS 141.0205)

Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 141.0205 dictates the mandatory priority of application for all nonrefundable business incentive credits.9 When a taxpayer holds multiple state tax credits, they must be applied in a specific, legislatively prescribed sequence against the tax imposed by KRS 141.020, 141.040, and 141.0401.9

The Research Facilities Credit (KRS 141.395) is situated relatively late in this sequence, listed as item (j) within the defined order of nonrefundable business incentive credits.9 The credits that must be utilized before the QRF credit include, but are not limited to, the Limited Liability Entity Tax credit (a), and various major economic development credits (b), such as those computed under KRS 141.407 and 141.415.9

B. Strategic Implication of Low Priority

The placement of the QRF credit late in the statutory stacking order has a direct and profound operational implication. For high-liability taxpayers that benefit from multiple economic development incentives in Kentucky, the higher-priority credits—often larger or more urgently expiring—will be exhausted first. This means the utilization of the QRF credit is often deferred, making it a residual tax benefit.

This structural delay fundamentally increases the reliance on the full 10-year carryforward term. If the QRF credit were positioned early in the stacking order, a business might utilize it fully in the first year or two. Since it must wait for prior credits to be exhausted, the 10-year window becomes necessary to simply access the credit utilization opportunity over time. Taxpayers must incorporate the utilization patterns of these higher-priority credits into their long-range forecasting to ensure the QRF credit is scheduled for use before its expiration date.

C. Pass-Through Entity (PTE) Management

The QRF credit is available for utilization by Pass-Through Entities (PTEs)—such as S Corporations, Partnerships, and certain LLCs—at the entity level against the LLET, and the balance is then passed through to the partners, members, or shareholders pro-rata via Kentucky Schedule K-1.2 The individual owners then apply their share of the credit against their personal income tax liability (KRS 141.020).10

When the credit passes through to individual owners, strict administrative oversight is required. Each owner’s carryforward amount is based on the entity’s original PIS date, meaning all partners share the same expiration date. If an individual owner has low Kentucky-source income or ceases to be a Kentucky resident during the carryforward period, their individual portion of the carryforward may expire unutilized after 10 years. This risk necessitates precise communication between the entity and its owners regarding the carryforward lifespan and annual utilization status, as the unused portion is permanently lost upon expiration.

VI. Practical Application and Example of the 10-Year Carryforward

To illustrate the mechanism and the requirements for tracking, consider a hypothetical case study involving a company utilizing the 10-year carryforward.

A. Hypothetical Scenario: Credit Generation and PIS Trigger

Kentuckiana Tech Solutions (KTS) is an S Corporation that constructs a new materials testing facility in Lexington, Kentucky.

• Project: Construction of a new research facility.
• Qualified, Depreciable Facility Cost: $\$5,000,000$.
• PIS Date: December 1, 2024 (Tax Year 2024).
• Credit Calculation (5%): $\$5,000,000 \times 5\% = \$250,000$.
• Carryforward Window: The credit is generated for the 2024 tax year. Per the statutory 10-year carryforward, the credit is available for offset through the tax year ending December 31, 2034.

B. Multi-Year Utilization Tracking and Stacking

Assume KTS’s overall annual Kentucky tax liability (LLET and allocable shareholder income tax) is consistently $\$120,000$. Furthermore, KTS benefits from existing, higher-priority economic development credits totaling $\$90,000$, which must be applied first according to KRS 141.0205.

The required utilization follows the stacking rules, leaving the QRF credit to absorb the residual liability. This tracking requires annual submission of Schedule QR.

Table 2: Multi-Year Utilization and Carryforward Tracking (2024 Project)

In this scenario, the entire $\$250,000$ credit is fully utilized by the end of the 2026 tax year, 8 years before its statutory expiration in 2034.

C. Managing Simultaneous Credit Generations (FIFO Enforcement)

The necessity of the FIFO methodology becomes apparent if KTS undertakes a second qualifying project shortly after the first. Assume KTS generates a second research facility credit of $\$150,000$ in 2025, with a PIS date in 2025, resulting in an expiration year of 2035.

In 2026, KTS has an available liability of $\$150,000$ and two credit pools: $\$100,000$ remaining from the 2024 project (expiring 2034) and $\$150,000$ from the 2025 project (expiring 2035). To maximize the benefit and prevent the loss of the older credit, KTS must prioritize the 2024 balance (Priority 1) first.

Table 3: FIFO Tracking and Reconciliation for Multiple Carryforwards

In 2026, the entire $\$100,000$ balance of the older (2024) credit is applied first. The remaining liability of $\$50,000$ is then satisfied by utilizing a portion of the newer (2025) credit, leaving $\$100,000$ of the 2025 credit to be carried forward through 2035. This rigorous tracking confirms adherence to the spirit of the statute by ensuring the earliest-expiring assets are consumed first.

VII. Strategic Tax Planning and Risk Management

The decade-long duration of the QRF credit introduces specific requirements for long-term tax planning and risk mitigation that must be incorporated into a company’s financial controls.

A. Monitoring the Statute of Limitations and Expiration

Taxpayers cannot rely solely on the state to track approaching expiration dates. Financial teams must build robust forecasting models that extend 10 years into the future. These models must project sufficient Kentucky taxable income and, critically, model the anticipated exhaustion of all higher-priority credits defined under KRS 141.0205.9 The objective is to confirm that an adequate amount of residual tax liability will be available within the 10-year window to fully absorb the QRF credit before its mandatory expiration date. Failure to project utilization risks the permanent loss of the nonrefundable credit asset.

B. Documentation for Long-Term Audit Defense

The longevity of the carryforward significantly extends the required documentation retention period. While the typical statute of limitations for amending a return is three years, the documentation supporting the calculation of a credit must be retained until the year the last portion of that credit is utilized. For a credit generated in 2024 but utilized in 2034, the initial calculation documentation—including the Schedule QR, the PIS schedule, and the detailed breakdown of qualifying tangible, depreciable property costs 1—must be retained through the filing of the 2034 tax return, potentially requiring records retention for 11 to 14 years. Maintaining this historical record is essential for successfully defending the credit claim during a subsequent DOR audit.

C. Financial Reporting (ASC 740 Considerations)

From a financial reporting perspective (specifically under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, or ASC 740), the unused QRF carryforward credit must be recorded as a deferred tax asset (DTA). The extended 10-year carryforward period provides a substantial timeline over which management can assess the likelihood of realizing the DTA against future projected taxable income. This long realization period generally provides stronger evidence of future utility compared to short-term carryforwards. If management can demonstrate sufficient projected profitability within the 10-year statutory window, it reduces the probability that a valuation allowance will be required against the DTA, thereby maximizing the reported benefit of the tax credit on the financial statements.

VIII. Conclusion

The 10-year carryforward period for the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395) is a critical component that sustains the incentive’s economic value. Given the large, upfront nature of qualifying facility investments and the credit’s nonrefundable status, this decade-long window is necessary to ensure taxpayers can fully realize the 5% benefit against income tax or LLET liabilities.2

Effective management of this credit requires rigorous adherence to administrative guidelines. Taxpayers must meticulously determine the “placed in service” date, as this event initiates the non-negotiable 10-year clock.3 Furthermore, the late positioning of the QRF credit within the statutory priority of application (KRS 141.0205) means its utilization is often delayed until higher-priority credits are exhausted, reinforcing the dependency on the full 10-year term.9 Finally, companies must maintain separate Schedule QR forms for each project and strictly enforce a First-In, First-Out (FIFO) utilization methodology to ensure the oldest, soonest-expiring credit balances are applied first, thereby preserving the maximum benefit for long-term capital investments in Kentucky research infrastructure.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/