Analysis of Income Tax Liability in the Context of the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRFTC)

I. Executive Summary: The Definition and Scope of Tax Liability

The Income Tax Liability in Kentucky, against which the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRFTC) is applied, refers to the net tax due under KRS 141.020 (Individual Income Tax) or KRS 141.040 (Corporate Income Tax), and the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET, KRS 141.0401). This calculated net liability establishes the nonrefundable ceiling, determining the maximum KRFTC that a taxpayer can utilize in a given tax year.

1.1 Simple Definition of Income Tax Liability

The Income Tax Liability (against which the credit is applied) constitutes the total calculated tax due to Kentucky, comprising both net income taxes and the gross receipts-based entity tax, before the application of the KRFTC. This liability defines the ceiling for credit utilization because the KRFTC is a nonrefundable credit.

1.2 Overview of the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRFTC)

The KRFTC, codified under the Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS 141.395), is a specialized nonrefundable incentive designed to stimulate capital investment in research and development infrastructure within the state.1 Unlike the federal Research and Development (R&D) tax credit, which focuses on qualified research expenses (QREs), the Kentucky credit is explicitly directed at capital expenditures for physical facilities.

The credit is calculated as 5% of the qualified costs associated with the “construction of research facilities”.1 This definition of construction is specific, covering constructing, remodeling, equipping, or expanding existing facilities in Kentucky for qualified research.4 Crucially, only tangible, depreciable property qualifies for the credit calculation; amounts paid or incurred for replacement property are excluded.3

The eligibility of the research itself is tied directly to the federal standard, requiring that the activities constitute “qualified research” as defined in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).3 This dual focus—federal definition for activity but state focus on infrastructure cost—necessitates careful documentation to ensure the capital investments support eligible research programs.

The KRFTC is strictly nonrefundable, meaning it can only offset a pre-existing tax liability; it cannot result in a cash refund.1 If the credit generated in a single year exceeds the total liability, any unused portion may be carried forward for a period of ten (10) years.1 This carryforward mechanism provides long-term flexibility but mandates meticulous tracking, as the ten-year limit imposes an expiration risk on unused credit balances.

The specific focus on facility costs indicates a legislative intent to drive permanent, physical capital investment and job creation related to research infrastructure, distinguishing the state incentive from incentives targeting operational research spending. Businesses must, therefore, maintain separate tracking for federal QREs and Kentucky’s qualifying facility capital expenditures.

II. Statutory Framework of Kentucky Tax Liability (KRS 141)

The “Income Tax Liability” in Kentucky is complex, as the KRFTC is eligible to offset three distinct tax liabilities established under Chapter 141 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes. For the purposes of credit application, these taxes represent separate maximum ceilings that cannot be combined or interchanged.

2.1 The Components of Kentucky Tax Liability

The KRFTC can be applied against the liability arising from the Corporate Income Tax, the Individual Income Tax, and the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET).4

2.1.1 Corporate Income Tax (CIT) (KRS 141.040)

The CIT is imposed on C-corporations operating within Kentucky.5 Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, Kentucky imposes a flat 5% rate on corporate taxable net income.6 The calculation of this tax liability begins with the federal taxable income reported on the federal return, which is then subject to state-specific adjustments, such as subtracting dividend income not taxed by Kentucky.5 Corporations report this liability using Form 720 or 720U.

2.1.2 Individual Income Tax (IIT) (KRS 141.020)

The IIT applies to all income earned by Kentucky residents and income earned by nonresidents from Kentucky sources.8 Kentucky currently utilizes a flat individual income tax rate of 4%.6 This liability is the relevant base for various individual taxpayers, including sole proprietors reporting business income on federal Schedule C (Form 1040), or individuals who receive credits passed through from limited liability entities (via Schedule K-1).4 Individual taxpayers file Form 740 or Form 740-NP.

2.1.3 Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) (KRS 141.0401)

The LLET is a compulsory, gross receipts-based tax imposed on virtually every business that benefits from liability protection under Kentucky law, including corporations, S-Corporations, LLCs, and limited partnerships.5 Sole proprietorships and general partnerships are generally exempt because they do not have limited liability protection.5

The LLET is fundamentally a privilege tax, not a net income tax. However, Kentucky’s tax system integrates the LLET and the CIT by allowing a nonrefundable credit against the CIT or IIT liability equal to the amount of LLET paid, minus the required $175 minimum.10 This structure, which provides a credit for LLET paid against the income tax, prevents complete double taxation but introduces complexity when applying the KRFTC, as the KRFTC may offset both the LLET and the income tax liability.

2.2 Defining the Base Liability for Credit Application

The KRFTC is applicable against the LLET liability and the Income Tax liability (CIT or IIT).4 The application must adhere to the statutory hierarchy of credits set forth in KRS 141.0205.9 Therefore, the base liability available to absorb the KRFTC is the gross tax liability remaining after any higher-priority credits have already been applied.

The use of the credit must be calculated and tracked separately against the Income Tax stream (CIT or IIT) and the LLET stream.12 This separation is a crucial element of compliance, as the constraints governing utilization differ between the two tax types, especially due to the LLET minimum tax.

Kentucky Tax Liabilities Subject to the KRFTC

III. The Nonrefundable Nature and Dual Application of the KRFTC

The design of the KRFTC requires taxpayers to manage a single, calculated credit amount against two entirely separate and independent liability ceilings. This structure governs the strategic allocation and potential carryforward of the incentive.

3.1 Mechanics of the Qualified Research Facility Credit (KRS 141.395)

The credit is generated by taking 5% of all qualified costs for facilities placed in service during the tax year.1 Unlike the federal R&D credit, which often requires calculating an incremental amount above a historical base, the Kentucky law specifies “no base required,” meaning the full amount of eligible capital expenditures qualifies for the 5% rate.1

The credit’s status as strictly nonrefundable is fundamental to defining the liability threshold.1 The amount of the credit claimed in any given year cannot exceed the tax liability to which it is applied. If the credit generated is $100,000, but the total available liability is only $80,000, only $80,000 can be used in that year, and the remainder is carried forward.1

3.2 Credit Application Against Dual Tax Liabilities

The Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) mandates a strict separation in the application of the KRFTC against the Income Tax and the LLET. The tax law explicitly requires that the amount of credit claimed against the corporation income tax and the LLET be calculated separately.12

A critical constraint is the non-interchangeability rule: once the balance available for one tax stream (e.g., LLET) reaches zero, no further credit can be applied against that specific liability. Correspondingly, any balance available for the Income Tax liability cannot be used as a credit against the LLET, and vice versa.12 This statutory requirement introduces significant complexity for planning.

Because the credit is a single lump sum (5% of facility costs) but must be applied against two non-interchangeable liability streams, businesses face a strategic allocation requirement. Taxpayers must proactively decide how much of the total available credit to assign to the LLET stream and how much to the CIT/IIT stream annually. This allocation should aim to maximize current use and carryforward potential, requiring a predictive assessment of which tax stream is most likely to absorb the credit efficiently over the subsequent ten years. For example, if a company projects long-term losses resulting in zero CIT liability, allocating a large portion of the credit to the CIT stream increases the risk of the credit expiring unused, even if the LLET liability remains substantial due to high gross receipts.

IV. Administrative and Statutory Constraints on Credit Utilization

The maximum amount of KRFTC that can be utilized is not merely the gross calculated tax; it is the net liability defined after mandatory priority rules and statutory minimums have been enforced.

4.1 KRS 141.0205: Priority of Application and Credit Ordering

Kentucky law, specifically KRS 141.0205, establishes a precise hierarchy for applying tax credits.14 This statutory ordering determines the net base liability available for the KRFTC. All credits listed higher in the statutory ordering must be applied first, thereby reducing the liability ceiling against which the KRFTC can be claimed.

Compliance with this priority is managed through specialized schedules: Schedule TCS (Tax Credit Summary for corporations and pass-through entities) and Schedule ITC (Individual Tax Credit Summary).4 The general instructions for Schedule TCS emphasize that the priority of application must strictly follow the order listed on the schedule, as dictated by KRS 141.0205.15

The KRFTC is classified as an economic development tax credit.9 While instructions note that credits from economic development projects do not necessarily need to be utilized in a specific internal order among themselves, they must collectively be applied in the sequence established by KRS 141.0205 relative to other types of credits.16 This sequence is essential for accurately defining the net income tax liability available for the KRFTC.

4.2 The Mandated LLET Minimum Tax Floor

A critical administrative constraint applies specifically to the LLET liability, significantly limiting the utility of the KRFTC in that stream.

The LLET, imposed by KRS 141.0401, has a mandated statutory minimum tax of $175.5 The Kentucky DOR guidance explicitly states that the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit cannot reduce the LLET liability below this $175 minimum.1

This floor represents an unavoidable, non-offsettable tax payment. For entities with a gross LLET liability just above this threshold, the effective use of the KRFTC against the LLET is severely restricted. For instance, if the gross LLET is $5,000, only $4,825 ($5,000 minus $175) is creditable by the KRFTC. This constraint establishes the $175 tax payment as a permanent operational tax cost, regardless of the level of R&D investment made by the entity. For tax planning purposes, the $175 floor must be considered an absolute limitation on the LLET side of the credit application.

4.3 Carryforward Provision

If the total generated KRFTC exceeds the available tax liability, the unused amount is not forfeited but may be carried forward for utilization in subsequent years. The law permits a carryforward period of ten (10) years.1

Due to the fundamental non-interchangeability rule, the carryforward amount derived from the original credit calculation must be tracked as a single pool, but its future application remains subject to the limitations of both the Income Tax and LLET streams in each subsequent year. Taxpayers must attach a copy of the initial Schedule QR and any tracking schedules annually to record the credit claimed and the remaining balance.4

The separation of the tax streams creates an expiration risk. If a corporation allocates a large portion of the generated credit against its CIT liability, and future business conditions result in low or zero net income (and thus low CIT liability), that specific portion of the credit carryforward may expire after ten years, even if the company continues to generate substantial gross receipts and LLET liability.

V. DOR Compliance and Reporting Requirements

Claiming the KRFTC involves detailed documentation and annual filing requirements mandated by the Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) to track the generation, allocation, and utilization of the nonrefundable credit.

5.1 Required Forms for Claiming the Credit

The process of claiming the KRFTC involves two distinct phases: the generation of the credit and the application of the credit against liability.

• Schedule QR (Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit): This schedule is the primary mechanism for determining the amount of credit generated (5% of qualified costs) and tracking its usage over time.4 A separate Schedule QR must be completed for each new project that qualifies.4 Crucially, a copy of the Schedule QR must be attached to the tax return every year the credit is claimed, not just the year the costs were incurred, until the credit is fully utilized or the 10-year period expires.4 Supporting documentation detailing the tangible, depreciable property (date purchased, placed in service, description, and cost) must accompany the return.4
• Schedule TCS (Tax Credit Summary for Corporations and Pass-Through Entities): Corporations (Form 720/720U) and entities subject to LLET (Form PTE/725) use Schedule TCS to summarize all nonrefundable tax credits being claimed against both the Corporate Income Tax (KRS 141.040) and the LLET (KRS 141.0401).15 This form ensures the credit application adheres to the statutory priority ordering established by KRS 141.0205.15
• Schedule ITC (Individual Tax Credit Summary): Individuals who claim the credit, whether as a sole proprietor or through flow-through income from a partnership or S-corporation, use Schedule ITC to apply the credit against their Individual Income Tax liability (KRS 141.020).4

5.2 Pass-Through Entity Flow-Through

If the research facility is owned by a pass-through entity (such as an S-Corporation, partnership, or LLC), the credit is calculated and generated at the entity level, but the benefit is passed through to the owners.

The entity must file Schedule QR to establish the credit.4 The entity then allocates the partner’s, member’s, or shareholder’s pro rata share of the approved credit on a Kentucky Schedule K-1.9

Individual owners receiving the flow-through credit must then attach a copy of the entity’s Schedule QR and file Schedule ITC with their individual return (Form 740 or 740-NP) to claim the credit against their Individual Income Tax liability.4 Corporate partners must use Schedule TCS to apply the credit against their own CIT and LLET liabilities.4

The requirement to track the credit through these various forms annually highlights that the utilization process requires consistent annual compliance, not just an initial qualification, reinforcing the need for precise application against the separated tax liability streams.

VI. Practical Example: Navigating Liability Constraints

To illustrate the critical interplay between the dual liability streams, the statutory priority of credits, and the non-reducible LLET minimum, the following example details the annual application process for a Kentucky C-Corporation.

6.1 Scenario Setup

A Kentucky C-Corporation (Taxpayer T), filing Form 720, completes a $2,000,000 expansion of a qualified research facility.

6.2 Step-by-Step Liability Calculation and Credit Application

The taxpayer must first calculate the net available liability base for each tax stream before applying the KRFTC.

Step 1: Determine Available Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Base

The CIT liability must be reduced by all higher-priority credits according to KRS 141.0205 before the KRFTC can be applied.

Step 2: Determine Maximum Creditable LLET Base

The LLET liability is subject to the $175 minimum floor. The maximum amount of KRFTC that can offset LLET is the gross liability reduced by this mandatory payment.

Step 3: Allocate and Apply the KRFTC ($100,000 Total)

Taxpayer T decides to prioritize the use of the credit against the LLET first, as LLET credit benefits often precede the use of the LLET deduction against the CIT.

1. Application against LLET (Schedule TCS):

• The total KRFTC applied against the LLET is capped by Limit B: $14,825.
• Net LLET Due: $15,000 (Gross) – $14,825 (KRFTC) = $175.

1. Application against CIT (Schedule TCS):

• Total KRFTC Generated: $100,000.
• Less: Credit used against LLET: -$14,825.
• Remaining KRFTC Available for CIT: $85,175.
• The remaining KRFTC is applied against Limit A ($65,000).
• Credit Used (CIT Stream): $65,000 (Limited by available base).
• Net CIT Due: $65,000 (Base) – $65,000 (KRFTC) = $0.

Step 4: Calculate Total Tax Paid and Carryforward

6.3 Analysis of the Example

This example demonstrates how the liability constraints operate simultaneously. Taxpayer T successfully maximized the nonrefundable credit use in the current year, offsetting $79,825 of the total available $80,000 creditable liability.

The company was unable to offset the LLET liability below the $175 minimum, resulting in a permanent tax cost of $175 for the tax year, regardless of the significant R&D investment. For the LLET stream, the calculated credit provided only an 8% offset efficiency ($14,825 utilized against the $15,000 gross liability). In contrast, the credit successfully eliminated 100% of the remaining CIT liability after higher-priority credits were applied.

The remaining $20,175 credit balance is now a carryforward asset, which must be tracked via Schedule QR. In future years, this carryforward must be re-applied against the LLET and CIT liabilities, still observing the statutory ordering (KRS 141.0205) and the LLET $175 minimum.

KRFTC Application and Carryforward Analysis (Year 1)

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The definition of “Income Tax Liability” in Kentucky, specifically in relation to the nonrefundable Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit, is highly nuanced, determined not by the initial tax calculation but by a series of statutory limitations. The liability is a bifurcated base composed of the Income Tax (CIT or IIT) and the LLET. The application against this liability is complex due to three major constraints: the nonrefundable status, the strict credit ordering of KRS 141.0205, and the absolute $175 floor imposed on the LLET.

7.1 Summary of the Nuanced Definition

The liability against which the KRFTC is applied is a calculated residual amount. The requirement to separately track and apply the credit against the Income Tax and LLET streams, coupled with the rule that unused credit from one stream cannot be applied against the other 12, is a defining characteristic of this liability structure.

This structure demands meticulous foresight because the non-interchangeability rule elevates the risk of credit expiration. If a company fails to accurately predict the absorption capacity of each stream over the 10-year carryforward period, a portion of the credit may expire unused, even if the alternative tax stream has sufficient residual liability.

7.2 Strategic Planning Recommendations

For optimal utilization of the KRFTC, taxpayers should adhere to the following strategic planning and compliance principles:

1. Implement Predictive Modeling: Taxpayers should utilize long-range, 10-year projection models specifically designed to forecast future CIT/IIT liability versus LLET liability. This modeling is essential for determining the most efficient annual allocation of the credit between the non-interchangeable LLET and Income Tax bases, thereby mitigating the risk of credit expiration.
2. Confirm Credit Priority Annually: Before applying the KRFTC, businesses must confirm the statutory priority of all nonrefundable credits using KRS 141.0205 and the corresponding instructions for Schedule TCS or ITC. The calculated net liability base available for the KRFTC will be zero if higher-priority credits absorb the entire tax amount.
3. Recognize the LLET Floor as a Permanent Cost: The $175 LLET minimum payment is an absolute, non-offsettable tax expense. Strategic tax planning must account for this mandatory payment and focus on maximizing the utilization of the KRFTC against the Income Tax stream, which typically presents the largest available creditable liability base.
4. Maintain Rigorous Documentation and Annual Filing: Compliance requires meticulous segregation of qualified costs, focusing solely on tangible, depreciable facility property supporting IRC § 41 qualified research. Furthermore, the requirement to attach a copy of the foundational Schedule QR to the tax return for every year the credit is claimed is non-negotiable and failure to do so risks disallowance of the claimed credit.4

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/