Expert Analysis and Compliance Reporting: Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit and Form 720 Requirements

The Kentucky Form 720, Corporate Income Tax and LLET Return, is the primary tax schedule used by C-corporations to fulfill their annual tax obligations to the Commonwealth and calculate their overall liability. Schedule QR (Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit) is a mandatory supplementary form utilized to calculate the initial 5% nonrefundable research facility credit and subsequently track the utilization of the credit over its authorized 10-year carryforward period.

The Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit, established under Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 141.395, is a significant nonrefundable tax incentive designed to stimulate capital investment in research infrastructure within the state. The complex compliance process requires corporations to accurately substantiate their qualified capital investments, track the credit’s use against both corporate income tax and Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET), and adhere to specific Department of Revenue (DOR) mandates regarding annual documentation and carryforward reporting.

I. Statutory and Eligibility Foundations of the Qualified Research Facility Credit

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit represents a targeted economic initiative focusing on tangible asset accumulation rather than operational expenses. Understanding the precise legal definitions governing the credit is paramount to ensuring compliance and avoiding potential audit adjustments.

1.1. Governing Statute and Credit Structure

The legal framework for this credit is found in KRS 141.395.1 It has been statutorily available for taxable years commencing on or after January 1, 2007.2 The incentive provides a credit equal to 5% of the qualified costs associated with the eligible investment.1

The credit is fundamentally a nonrefundable mechanism, meaning it can only be applied to offset an existing tax liability and cannot generate a cash refund back to the taxpayer.1 This characteristic underscores the need for effective tax planning, as taxpayers must have sufficient tax liability against which to apply the credit. A critical feature designed to provide long-term utility is the ability for any unused portion of the credit to be carried forward for a period of ten (10) years.1

1.2. Defining “Construction of Research Facilities” and Qualified Basis

The qualifying basis for the credit is narrowly defined, restricting eligibility to specific types of capital expenditures. “Construction of research facilities” is defined as constructing, remodeling, and equipping facilities in Kentucky or expanding existing facilities in the state for qualified research.2

The definition is limited strictly to tangible, depreciable property.2 This prerequisite dictates that the investment must result in fixed assets, placed in service within the Commonwealth, which are subject to depreciation for federal tax purposes. This focus on capital investment restricts the basis solely to hard infrastructure costs. Furthermore, the definition specifically excludes “any amounts paid or incurred for replacement property”.2 This exclusion ensures that the incentive is directed toward new economic activity, rewarding genuine growth and facility expansion, rather than subsidizing routine maintenance or the mere replacement of aging capital assets.

1.3. Alignment with Federal Law (IRC § 41)

Although the credit’s monetary basis is calculated based on tangible facility costs, the purpose of the facility must align with federal research definitions. Kentucky statute explicitly requires “Qualified research” to meet the definition provided in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).3

The reference to IRC § 41 mandates that the activities conducted within the constructed or equipped facility satisfy the rigorous federal four-part test for qualified research. This test requires that the research activity be undertaken to discover information that is technological in nature, the application of which is intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved business component. Additionally, substantially all of the activities must constitute elements of a process of experimentation relating to function, performance, reliability, or quality.3

The credit’s exclusive focus on tangible, depreciable property highlights a distinct state policy choice: prioritizing the establishment of permanent R&D operational centers. This emphasis on infrastructure, rather than the operational expenses typically addressed by federal or other state R&D credits, positions the Kentucky incentive primarily as an economic development tool aimed at securing high-value fixed assets and a long-term corporate presence within the state.

1.4. Timing of Credit Generation and IRC § 174 Conformity

The credit is generated when the qualified tangible, depreciable property is placed in service in Kentucky.1 The placed-in-service date is a mandatory disclosure element on the required supporting schedule.3 Taxpayers must obtain and file a new, separate Schedule QR for each tax year that a new qualifying project is completed and generates a new credit balance.3 Consequently, the initial filing of Schedule QR must align precisely with the tax year the asset is deemed “placed in service” for federal tax purposes. Due to the long-term nature of construction projects, the taxpayer must carefully coordinate capital expenditure tracking and engineering documentation with tax filing timelines to ensure the credit is claimed in the proper tax year.

Furthermore, compliance is complicated by Kentucky’s recent conformity to changes in federal tax law regarding the treatment of research expenditures. House Bill 360 updated the Internal Revenue Code reference date to December 31, 2022, effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2023.4 This update mandates that Kentucky taxpayers must now conform to IRC Section 174, requiring the capitalization and amortization of operational Research and Experimental (R&E) expenses, rather than deducting them immediately.4 While the facility credit basis is a separate capital investment, the underlying activity must still qualify as research under IRC § 41. Therefore, corporations claiming the facility credit must simultaneously manage two distinct compliance tasks on Form 720: calculating the 5% credit based on tangible assets (Schedule QR) and making the necessary adjustments on Form 720 to capitalize and amortize their operational R&E costs. This creates complex reporting adjustments regarding depreciation and amortization differences on Form 720, Part I.4

II. Kentucky Form 720 and the Corporate Filing Framework

Form 720, the Kentucky Corporation Income Tax and LLET Return, is the central document for C-corporations. Its structure is complementary to the Federal Form 1120 series.4 The application of the Qualified Research Facility Credit must flow through a specific sequence of attached schedules before finalizing the tax due on Form 720.

2.1. The Central Role of Schedule QR (Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit)

Schedule QR is the foundational document for claiming this incentive. It serves two primary functions: the initial calculation of the 5% credit and the subsequent long-term tracking of the credit balance. The schedule is required to be filed with the income tax return to determine the credit against both the income tax and the LLET liability upon completion of construction.3

Crucially, the utilization tracking role of Schedule QR extends for the entire carryforward period. The Schedule QR must be used to record the amount claimed each tax year, and a copy must be submitted annually until the full credit is utilized or the 10-year carryforward period expires.3 This requirement mandates an 11-year documentation retention policy—the year of generation plus ten carryforward years—for the original Schedule QR and its mandatory supporting documentation. Failure to produce a copy of the original credit calculation in a later audit year (e.g., Year 7) could jeopardize the validity of the carryforward balance, making robust document management essential for compliance.

2.2. Credit Application via Schedule TCS (Tax Credit Summary)

For C-corporations, the credit amount calculated and tracked on Schedule QR does not directly enter Form 720. Instead, it must first be summarized and applied using Schedule TCS (Tax Credit Summary). Schedule TCS is utilized by corporations and limited liability pass-through entities to consolidate and summarize all tax credits claimed against the Income Tax (KRS 141.040) and the LLET (KRS 141.0401).6

This intermediate step is necessary because the credit can offset both taxes, and the amount applied against each tax may differ based on the specific liability and statutory constraints.6 The final allowable credit amount against each tax, as determined on Schedule TCS, is then entered onto the relevant lines of Form 720.

It is important to recognize that the Qualified Research Facility Credit operates under a distinct filing mechanism (Schedule QR feeding Schedule TCS), separating it from the compliance processes governing other specialized economic development credits (such as KIDA, KREDA, or KJDA), which may have different limitations and reporting requirements, sometimes being entered directly on Form 720, Part II.7 This requires corporations with multiple incentives to manage separate credit limitation and ordering rules across various schedules before synthesizing the total tax reduction on Form 720.

III. DOR Compliance Guidance and Documentation Mandates

The Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) maintains stringent documentation requirements for the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit to substantiate the initial cost basis and track its long-term application.

3.1. Required Documentation for Initial Claim

To initially claim the credit, the taxpayer must file the Schedule QR with the tax return.3 This initial filing must be accompanied by a mandatory, detailed supporting schedule.3

This supporting schedule must list every piece of tangible, depreciable property that contributed to the qualified cost basis, along with the following specific data points:

• The date purchased.
• The date placed in service.
• A clear description of the property.
• The cost of the property.3

As noted, a separate Schedule QR must be filed each year that a new project qualifies.3

3.2. Pass-Through Entity Dynamics and Owner Compliance

The compliance complexity increases significantly when the credit is generated by a pass-through entity (PTE), such as a partnership or an LLC taxed as a partnership. While the PTE utilizes the credit against its LLET liability via Schedule TCS, the remainder of the available credit is distributed to its owners (partners, members, or shareholders) via a Kentucky Schedule K-1.3

Owners receiving this credit, whether individuals or other corporations, inherit the responsibility for tracking and claiming the carryforward. They must file their own summary credit schedules:

• Corporate or PTE Owners: Use Schedule TCS to summarize the credit.3
• Individual Owners: Use Schedule ITC (Individual Tax Credit Summary).3

A critical and administratively burdensome mandate is that all recipients—whether filing Schedule TCS or Schedule ITC—must attach a copy of the original Schedule QR filed by the generating entity to their own tax returns each year the credit is claimed.3 This places a ten-year distribution and retention obligation on the PTE to provide the foundational compliance document to all partners, even passive investors, and creates a significant compliance risk for the individual owner if the PTE fails to maintain and distribute the required documentation annually.

Individual filers, including sole proprietors reporting on Federal Schedule C, can claim the credit directly.9 If married couples file separate Kentucky returns or file separately on a joint return, the credit must be split, unless the original application lists only one spouse, in which case the listed spouse is entitled to the full credit.9

Table 1: Qualified Research Facility Credit Documentation Flow and Compliance

IV. Credit Utilization, Ordering Rules, and LLET Constraints

The effective utilization of the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit depends entirely on the taxpayer’s annual Kentucky tax liability, which is composed of both the corporate income tax and the LLET.

4.1. Statutory Application and Ordering

The credit may be applied against the income tax imposed by KRS 141.020 (for individuals) or KRS 141.040 (for corporations), as well as the LLET imposed by KRS 141.0401.3 The application must strictly follow the statutory credit ordering sequence mandated by KRS 141.0205.1 This ordering rule prevents taxpayers from arbitrarily maximizing specific credit utilization in defiance of legislative priority.

4.2. The LLET Minimum Floor Limitation

A fundamental constraint on credit utilization for all entities subject to LLET is the statutory minimum floor. The facility credit is nonrefundable and cannot reduce the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) liability below the required minimum of $175.1

This constraint has significant implications for capital-intensive R&D companies that may be in a start-up or growth phase, resulting in high capital investment (generating large credits) but low current-year taxable income and corresponding LLET liability. Because the credit cannot fully eliminate the LLET, the rate of credit utilization is artificially slowed. This necessitates long-term tax planning focused on accelerating taxable income realization within the 10-year carryforward period to ensure the full $175 LLET minimum payment does not cumulatively erode the value of the incentive by causing the credit to expire unused.

4.3. The Combined Effect of Capitalization and Credit

The facility credit is designed to incentivize infrastructure investment, creating an upfront capital subsidy (5% credit). This capital investment often leads to increased depreciation or amortization deductions over time. However, the requirement that operational R&E expenditures (which validate the facility’s purpose under IRC § 41) must be capitalized and amortized for Kentucky tax purposes (under the new IRC § 174 conformity) creates a timing disparity.4

While the 5% facility credit provides an immediate offset against the current tax liability on Form 720, the mandated capitalization of operational R&E expenses simultaneously increases the corporation’s Kentucky taxable net income over the short term by deferring those operational deductions. Taxpayers must model this combined effect, understanding that the favorable capital credit is accompanied by a less favorable tax treatment of operational expenses, impacting cash flows and tax timing over the subsequent amortization period.

V. Comprehensive Application Example: Calculation and Reporting Flow for a C-Corporation

The following example illustrates the calculation of the credit basis, the application of utilization constraints, and the subsequent tracking on Form 720 via Schedule QR and Schedule TCS.

5.1. Scenario Definition: Advanced Materials R&D Corp.

Entity: Advanced Materials R&D Corp. (C-Corporation, filing Form 720).

Project Summary: Construction and equipping of a new qualified research laboratory in Jefferson County, Kentucky, completed and placed in service on January 1, 2024.2

Qualified Costs:

• New Research Lab Construction (Tangible, Depreciable): $\$1,500,000$
• Specialized Testing Equipment (Tangible, Depreciable): $\$500,000$
• Land Purchase (Non-Depreciable/Excluded): $\$200,000$
• Total Qualified Basis: $\$2,000,000$ (Land is excluded as non-depreciable property).3
  Initial Credit Calculation (5%): $\$2,000,000 \times 0.05 = \$100,000$ Total Qualified Credit.1

5.2. Year 1 Reporting and Initial Utilization (Tax Year 2024 Filing)

Step 1: Credit Generation (Schedule QR)

Advanced Materials R&D Corp. files its 2024 return (Form 720) and attaches Schedule QR. Schedule QR records the $\$100,000$ credit generated on $1/1/2024$. The mandatory supporting schedule itemizes the construction and equipment costs, dates purchased, and the specific $1/1/2024$ placed-in-service date.3

Step 2: Liability Determination (Form 720, Pre-Credit)

The corporation calculates its tax liabilities prior to applying any credits:

• Kentucky Corporation Income Tax Liability (B): $\$65,000$
• Kentucky LLET Liability (C): $\$15,000$
• Total Pre-Credit Tax: $\$80,000$

Step 3: Application (Schedule TCS) and Statutory Ordering

The corporation uses Schedule TCS to apply the credit against its liabilities in the required statutory order.

• Application Against LLET: The credit is applied first. Given the LLET liability of $\$15,000$, the maximum credit utilization is limited by the $\$175$ minimum floor.1

• Maximum LLET Credit Allowed: $\$15,000 – \$175 = \$14,825$.
• LLET Utilized (Year 1): $\$14,825$.
• Remaining Credit Available for Income Tax: $\$100,000 – \$14,825 = \$85,175$.

• Application Against Income Tax: The remaining credit ($\$85,175$) is applied against the Income Tax liability ($\$65,000$).

• Income Tax Utilized (Year 1): $\$65,000$.
• Remaining Credit Available (Carryforward): $\$85,175 – \$65,000 = \$20,175$.

• Total Tax Paid (Year 1): $\$175$ (LLET) + $(\$65,000 – \$65,000)$ (Income Tax) = $\$175$.

5.3. Subsequent Year Tracking and Compliance

In Year 2 (Tax Year 2025) and subsequent years, the corporation uses the remaining credit balance of $\$20,175$. For every filing until 2034, the corporation must attach a copy of the original 2024 Schedule QR to its Form 720, documenting the initial calculation and tracking the utilization.3

Table 2: Qualified Research Facility Credit Utilization and Carryforward Tracking (Example)

The example demonstrates that even with a large initial credit, the $\$175$ LLET minimum floor must always be paid, and carryforward utilization is entirely dependent on sufficient Income Tax liability being generated within the 10-year carryforward window. In this scenario, the corporation successfully utilized the full credit by the 2026 tax year, well within the 2034 expiration deadline.

VI. Official DOR Guidance and Legal Context

The interpretation and application of the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit are subject to guidance issued by the Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR). However, the legal weight of this guidance is limited, demanding caution from sophisticated taxpayers.

6.1. Legal Status of DOR Guidance

The DOR provides administrative guidance through various publications, forms, and instructions available on its website.4 However, the DOR explicitly states that such guidance does not constitute a final ruling, order, or determination.10

Consequently, a taxpayer may not file a protest or appeal based solely on the issuance of DOR guidance.10 If a taxpayer disagrees with the DOR’s position as outlined in the guidance, the formal legal recourse requires the taxpayer to file a return contrary to the guidance and either seek a refund for any resulting overpayment or protest an assessment issued by the DOR, following the statutory procedure outlined in KRS 131.110.10

6.2. Implications for Basis Qualification

The initial qualification of the tangible basis—determining if an expenditure constitutes new construction/expansion versus non-qualifying replacement property 2—is the highest risk area for this credit. Given that general DOR guidance lacks legally binding authority, relying on form instructions alone for multimillion-dollar capital investments exposes the taxpayer to significant audit risk in later carryforward years.

A prudent approach for corporate taxpayers undertaking complex, multi-phase facility investments is to proactively seek a formal Private Letter Ruling (PLR) from the DOR prior to the placed-in-service date. A PLR provides a legally binding determination regarding the specific qualification of the proposed capital investment, thereby mitigating the risk of credit disallowance during the long 10-year carryforward period and circumventing the need to enter into a formal protest process under KRS 131.110 years after the investment was made.

Conclusions

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit is a powerful, yet administratively rigid, incentive designed to drive fixed capital investment in R&D infrastructure within the Commonwealth. Compliance for C-corporations relies entirely on the successful integration of Schedule QR, which determines the 5% credit on tangible, depreciable property, and Schedule TCS, which coordinates the application against the Form 720 liabilities (Income Tax and LLET).

The primary complexity for corporate filers stems from three interconnected factors:

1. Narrow Basis Definition: The stringent requirement that the credit apply only to new, tangible, depreciable property for research requires precise accounting separation between qualifying assets and non-qualifying land or replacement property.
2. Long-Term Documentation: The mandatory 10-year carryforward period necessitates the preservation and annual attachment of the original Schedule QR, imposing a significant perpetual compliance burden on the entity and its pass-through owners.
3. LLET Floor and IRC § 174 Conflict: The statutory LLET minimum payment of $\$175$ slows utilization, demanding optimized tax planning. Furthermore, the simultaneous requirement to capitalize operational R&E expenditures under Kentucky’s IRC $\S 174$ conformity creates unfavorable timing differences that partially negate the immediate tax benefit of the facility credit.

Taxpayers planning to utilize this credit must move beyond relying solely on general DOR guidance and ensure that high-value capital expenditures are formally verified through either rigorous internal documentation mapping directly to KRS definitions or, preferably, a formal Private Letter Ruling from the Department of Revenue to secure the long-term validity of the claimed credit.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/