Comprehensive Analysis of KRS Chapter 141 and the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit

I. Executive Summary: The Kentucky R&D Facility Credit Framework

1.1. Core Statutory Definition (Initial Meaning)

KRS Chapter 141 establishes the Kentucky income tax framework, against which the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395) provides a nonrefundable incentive for in-state capital investment in R&D infrastructure. This credit is equal to 5% of qualified facility construction and equipping costs, applicable against corporate, individual income tax, and the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET).

1.2. Purpose and Distinguishing Features (Detailed Analysis)

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit, codified under KRS 141.395, is a strategic incentive mechanism within the Kentucky tax code designed to promote fixed capital investment in the state’s technological infrastructure.1 The credit is calculated as five percent (5%) of the qualified costs incurred for the construction of research facilities.2

A defining feature of the Kentucky credit, which differentiates it significantly from the federal R&D tax credit (IRC § 41), is its strict focus on infrastructure. The incentive is exclusively limited to costs related to tangible, depreciable property used for constructing, remodeling, equipping, or expanding research facilities in Kentucky.2 This limitation clarifies the core policy objective: the credit is not intended to subsidize general operational R&D expenses, such as wages, supplies, contract research, or computer rentals, but rather to mandate and support the establishment of long-term physical assets and technological capacity within the Commonwealth.3

The credit is classified as nonrefundable, meaning it can only offset a pre-existing tax liability and cannot generate a direct cash payment or refund.3 Given that capital investments often result in large, non-recurring credits that exceed a single year’s liability, the statute permits any unused credit amount to be carried forward for a period of ten (10) years.1 This lengthy carryforward provision is essential for taxpayers maximizing the eventual realization of the credit amount.

II. Statutory Foundations: KRS Chapter 141 and Tax Liability

2.1. Tax Structure Overview and Credit Eligibility

KRS Chapter 141 establishes the general tax liabilities in Kentucky, providing the baseline against which the research facility credit is applied. The credit is permitted against multiple taxing provisions within this chapter 1:

1. Individual Income Tax (KRS 141.020): Applicable for individuals, including sole proprietors and recipients of pass-through income.1
2. Corporate Income Tax (KRS 141.040): The standard application for C-corporations.1
3. Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) (KRS 141.0401): Applicable against this entity-level tax, which is based on gross receipts or gross profits.1

For pass-through entities (PTEs) that are not subject to the corporate tax imposed by KRS 141.040, the tax benefit is distributed to the owners. The credit is passed through to members, partners, or shareholders via the Kentucky Schedule K-1, where it may be used against their individual or corporate income tax liabilities, as well as any LLET liability they may incur.1 Sole proprietors claiming business income on a federal Schedule C are also eligible to claim the credit for qualified construction costs.1

2.2. Applicability and Limitations within KRS Chapter 141

The comprehensive applicability across KRS 141.020, 141.040, and 141.0401 makes the incentive relevant for nearly all business structures operating in Kentucky.1

A critical element of tax efficiency is the credit’s applicability against the LLET. The LLET functions as a minimum tax on Kentucky business activity. Allowing the R&D facility credit to offset LLET provides a significant advantage for businesses that might have little or no taxable net income due to deductions or losses, but still owe the entity-level LLET. This provision demonstrates a prioritization of facility investment by the legislature, as the R&D facility credit can reduce the LLET liability.3 However, this offset is subject to a statutory floor: the credit cannot reduce the LLET liability below the $175 minimum required by law.3 The ability for the credit to reduce the LLET enhances the financial viability of large greenfield projects or expansions, allowing entities to realize immediate tax savings from capital investment even during early phases of operation when taxable income may be low or negative.

III. Credit Mechanics: KRS 141.395 and Qualified Costs

3.1. Calculation, Nonrefundability, and Carryforward

The core calculation of the credit is mandated by KRS 141.395(3), providing a rate equal to five percent (5%) of the qualified costs of construction of research facilities.2 The process of calculating the qualified costs for the Kentucky credit is simpler than the federal calculation, as there is no requirement for a base period or incremental expenditure calculation; the entire current year’s eligible facility investment qualifies for the 5% rate.3 The credit is generated and claimed in the year that the qualified property is placed in service in Kentucky.3

As a nonrefundable credit 3, utilization is strictly limited to the tax liability of the claiming taxpayer. Any unused portion of the credit may be carried forward for ten (10) years.1 This carryforward mechanism is essential for capitalizing on the incentive, particularly when large capital expenditures generate a credit amount significantly exceeding the current year’s tax liability.

3.2. Detailed Definition of Qualified Costs

KRS 141.395 is highly prescriptive regarding what constitutes qualified costs.2 The definition of “Construction of research facilities” includes:

• Constructing new facilities in Kentucky.
• Remodeling existing facilities for qualified research purposes.
• Equipping facilities, which includes the purchase and installation of depreciable equipment.3
• Expanding existing facilities in the state.1

The definition is explicitly limited to tangible, depreciable property.1 Costs related to tangible real property (buildings) and tangible personal property (equipment, machinery, testing gear) are included.3

Crucially, the statute contains specific exclusions. The most significant exclusion is for “any amounts paid or incurred for replacement property”.1 This provision necessitates careful technical evaluation during facility renovations. When improvements are made, taxpayers must establish that the costs are for true expansion, remodeling, or equipping for new R&D purposes, and not merely replacing existing functional assets. For example, upgrading an HVAC system to meet new, stringent conditions required for advanced research activities would typically qualify as remodeling or equipping integral to the expansion of qualified research capacity, whereas replacing a piece of laboratory equipment that is identical to the disposed asset might be categorized as ineligible replacement property. This distinction requires precise substantiation tied to the functional change or enhancement of the R&D activity.

3.3. Interfacing with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC § 41)

Although the Kentucky credit is focused strictly on facility costs, the definition of the underlying activity is governed entirely by federal law. KRS 141.395 mandates that “Qualified research” means qualified research as defined in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code.1

This obligatory linkage means that a project must still undergo the rigorous technical analysis required by federal law, including demonstrating that the activities conducted in the facility aim to resolve technological uncertainty through a process of experimentation. Therefore, while the costs claimed are capital expenditures tracked by the fixed asset accounting team, compliance also requires input from technical R&D teams to verify the eligible research activity itself.

IV. Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Compliance Protocol

4.1. Regulatory Hierarchy and Authority

The Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) manages compliance with KRS Chapter 141 through a structured regulatory framework.6 Legally binding rules are promulgated through regulations issued in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A.

In addition to formal regulations, the DOR provides general statements of position and administrative advice, such as Technical Advice Memorandums (TAMs), Revenue Procedures (RPs), Private Letter Rulings (PLRs), and General Information Letters (GILs), pursuant to KRS 131.130(8).6 These guidance documents are considered advisory and do not carry the force or effect of law. Taxpayers retain the ability to file a return that contradicts non-binding DOR guidance and may formally protest any resultant tax assessment through the process outlined in KRS 131.110.6 Historically, the DOR has actively worked to rescind policies and circulars that have become obsolete or conflict with current statutes, ensuring that administration aligns with KRS Chapter 141.7

4.2. Required Forms and Documentation

To claim and subsequently utilize the research facility tax credit, specific forms and documentation must be maintained and filed annually.1

The primary form is the Schedule QR, Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit.1 This schedule is used initially to determine the credit allowed for the completed construction of research facilities.1 If a taxpayer qualifies for a new project in a subsequent year, a separate Schedule QR must be completed for that new project.1

Utilization reporting requires the attachment of the Schedule QR to the tax return each year the credit is claimed.1 The amount of credit claimed against the income tax liability or LLET is then entered on either Schedule TCS (Tax Credit Summary) or Schedule ITC (Incentive Tax Credit), according to the instructions for those forms.1

For documentation, the statute and DOR instruction require a supporting schedule listing the details of the tangible, depreciable property. This schedule must include the date purchased, the date placed in service, a detailed description, and the cost of the property.1

The most demanding administrative requirement is the management of the credit over its 10-year lifespan. A copy of the Schedule QR must be submitted annually with the tax return claiming the credit until the full credit is utilized or the 10-year carryforward period expires.1 This continuous annual tracking mechanism serves to mitigate audit risk by forcing the taxpayer to integrate the credit utilization tracking with their fixed asset records. It provides the DOR with ongoing verification that the qualified assets generating the credit remain in service throughout the entire utilization period.

V. The Application of Credit Ordering (KRS 141.0205)

5.1. Statutory Mandate for Ordering

KRS 141.0205 provides the mandatory sequence for applying multiple tax credits against the liabilities imposed by KRS 141.020, 141.040, and 141.0401.1 This statute is critical because it dictates the order in which credits reduce the tax base.

The research facilities credit permitted by KRS 141.395 occupies a later position in this sequencing, specifically designated as item (j).8 This position means that numerous other economic development credits—such as those related to job creation, voluntary environmental remediation, or other major investment programs—must be applied and exhausted before the research facility credit is considered.8

5.2. Impact on Utilization and Strategic Planning

The sequencing established by KRS 141.0205 has profound implications for utilization. For high-incentive firms that benefit from earlier-listed credits, the pre-application of those higher-priority offsets often reduces the tax liability to zero or near-zero before the R&D facility credit is reached.

This compulsory ordering reinforces the importance of the 10-year carryforward provision.3 For many taxpayers, particularly those undergoing large-scale facility construction, immediate utilization is secondary to ensuring that the generated credit can be preserved and applied over the maximum allowed timeframe.

The statutory stacking order functions as a policy mechanism, prioritizing certain incentives (often those directly tied to job retention and creation) over investment in fixed capital assets. Tax professionals must carefully model the flow-through of all applicable credits under KRS 141.0205. Active management of the credit portfolio is essential, particularly when managing expiring credits. Although the R&D facility credit holds a fixed position in the ordering, strategic modeling can help ensure that the credit is not wasted due to the expiration of its 10-year window, requiring meticulous tracking of credit generation dates and expiration deadlines.

VI. Case Study: Calculation and Utilization Example

This case study illustrates the mechanics of the 5% calculation and the effects of the nonrefundable status and credit ordering on the realization of the benefit.

6.1. Methodology of Qualified Cost Identification

Assume a corporation completes the construction and equipping of a new aerospace components research facility in Kentucky in Tax Year 2024. The total project spending is $4,800,000. Based on the 5% calculation rate 2 and the strict definition of qualified costs 3, the costs are segregated:

Example Calculation: Segregation of Qualified Research Facility Costs

The total qualified cost (QREs) for the facility is $4,200,000, resulting in a total generated credit of $210,000 for Tax Year 2024.3

6.2. Credit Utilization Scenario: Applying KRS 141.0205 and Carryforward

The taxpayer has an initial liability of $300,000 against which the $210,000 credit must be applied.

Credit Utilization and Carryforward (Tax Year 2024)

In this scenario, the taxpayer utilizes $120,000 of the facility credit immediately, offsetting the remaining liability completely. The balance of $90,000 is carried forward for up to 10 years, requiring continuous annual tracking and filing of Schedule QR to maintain eligibility and manage the expiration timeline.1

VII. Legislative History and Future Compliance Outlook

7.1. Legislative Context: The Sunset Threat of HB 142 (2016)

The history of KRS 141.395 reflects ongoing policy debate regarding the efficacy of facility-based tax incentives. In 2016, House Bill 142 was proposed to amend KRS 141.395, explicitly seeking to sunset the existing Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit.10

HB 142 intended to replace the existing facility credit with a new, capped incentive (limited to $3 million annually) aimed at research expenses paid to Kentucky public universities, establishing a new direction focused on public-private R&D partnerships.10 The legislative analysis supporting this pivot noted that the existing facility credit was resulting in approximately $500,000 in forgone annual revenues, suggesting that the legislature perceived a benefit in shifting investment focus.10

7.2. Current Status and Policy Continuation

Despite the legislative effort to sunset the facility credit, the statute remains active. The current language of KRS 141.395 continues to define the credit 2, and the Department of Revenue continues to publish the necessary forms and guidance for claiming it.1 Furthermore, recent legislative discussions concerning KRS 141.0205 confirm the ongoing status of the research facilities credit.8

Taxpayers should proceed with the assumption that the credit remains a stable incentive for new capital investment. However, the legislative history serves as a necessary warning regarding policy stability. Since the credit is nonrefundable and carries forward for a decade, tax practitioners must acknowledge the inherent legislative risk. A future policy change could potentially rescind the credit, rendering any accumulated, unused carryforward worthless. This possibility requires taxpayers and their advisors to treat the long-term carryforward as a financial asset subject to legislative volatility.

7.3. Mandatory Reporting and Legislative Oversight

The legislative structure mandates substantial oversight to evaluate the credit’s impact. The Department of Revenue, alongside the public universities, is required to submit annual reports to the Legislative Research Commission (LRC) detailing the utilization of the credit and the related R&D activities.10

This oversight ensures transparency and provides lawmakers with the data necessary to evaluate if the program is effectively meeting its goal of increasing R&D activities and establishing knowledge-based companies. This mandate reinforces the administrative requirement for taxpayers to submit detailed documentation and the annual Schedule QR, as the accuracy of the taxpayer data is essential for the DOR’s required reporting to the LRC.

VIII. Concluding Legal and Compliance Review

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395) is a specialized and impactful tax incentive targeting fixed capital investment, distinguished by its narrow scope and high reliance on administrative compliance. Operative within the framework of KRS Chapter 141, the 5% nonrefundable credit is an effective tool for offsetting both income tax and LLET liabilities, promoting long-term infrastructural growth in Kentucky’s R&D sector.

Effective utilization of the credit requires proactive strategic management of three core areas:

1. Rigorous Cost Classification: Taxpayers must strictly limit claimed costs to tangible, depreciable property used for construction, remodeling, equipping, or expansion, while explicitly excluding operational expenses and replacement assets.
2. Credit Sequencing: The placement of the credit at position (j) in KRS 141.0205 necessitates careful modeling of credit application, often leading to reliance on the 10-year carryforward provision to fully realize the incentive.
3. Continuous Reporting: The mandate to file the Schedule QR annually throughout the entire utilization period requires integrated financial and asset management to ensure the credit does not expire unused and to mitigate audit exposure related to the underlying qualified assets.

By adhering to these stringent compliance requirements, businesses can successfully monetize this incentive, affirming Kentucky’s policy goal of securing tangible, long-term technological assets within the state.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/