Statutory Nexus and Compliance Protocol: The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395) within the KRS Chapter 154 Economic Development Framework
1. Executive Summary and Statutory Context
1.1 The Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit: A Two-Line Summary and Comprehensive Overview
The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit, governed by KRS 141.395, is a nonrefundable incentive offering a 5% credit on qualified capital expenditures for constructing or equipping R&D facilities within the state. This mechanism serves the Commonwealth’s broader mandate under KRS Chapter 154 to promote technology infrastructure investment and long-term economic revitalization.
The Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit provides a powerful, direct incentive for capital-intensive industries to anchor their research and development infrastructure within Kentucky.1 This credit is fiscally distinct from the federal R&D tax credit (IRC § 41) because the Kentucky incentive targets the facility cost—the capital expenditure—rather than operational R&D labor or supply expenses. Structured as a nonrefundable credit, it offsets liability against Kentucky Income Tax (KRS 141.020 or 141.040) and the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) (KRS 141.0401).2 A significant benefit of the credit is the allowance for any unused portion to be carried forward for a maximum period of ten (10) years.1
1.2 Alignment of Economic Policy (KRS 154) and Tax Incentive (KRS 141.395)
KRS Chapter 154, titled “Economic Development,” establishes the overarching legal framework and legislative intent for generating targeted capital investment and job growth in the Commonwealth. This chapter vests authority in the Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (KEDFA) to define and administer programs related to “Approved company” status and “Economic revitalization project” funding.4 KRS 154 supports the promotion of science and technology through specific legislative programs, such as the Angel Investor Program and formal processes governing research and development work.5
While KRS 154 often involves negotiated, contract-based incentives—such as job development assessment fees (e.g., KEOZ projects 7) and formal funding agreements overseen by the state’s science and technology organization 6—KRS 141.395 serves as a non-contractual, statutory tool to execute the underlying policy goals of KRS 154. It reduces the cost of R&D capital formation directly through the tax code, complementing broader, more complex economic initiatives.5
The legislative structure of the R&D facility credit represents a strategic decision by the Commonwealth to streamline incentives for R&D infrastructure. Unlike contract-based KRS 154 projects that necessitate lengthy approval processes with KEDFA, the KRS 141.395 credit is self-administered and claimed directly on the tax return.2 This self-administered structure provides immediate predictability and ease of access for companies investing in physical R&D assets, thereby promoting rapid and fixed capital investment within the state. By linking the credit specifically to tangible, depreciable property, Kentucky ensures that the investment is long-lasting and establishes a permanent research ecosystem, which serves as a foundation for attracting high-skill payrolls incentivized through other mechanisms.
2. Detailed Mechanics of KRS 141.395 (The Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit)
2.1 Credit Calculation and Monetary Value
The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit is a nonrefundable credit equal to five percent (5%) of the qualified costs associated with the construction of research facilities.1
A significant feature of the Kentucky credit calculation is its straightforward approach, distinguishing it from the federal R&D credit methodology. The 5% rate is applied directly to all eligible qualified costs incurred during the tax year, eliminating the need for a base amount calculation, historical averaging, or fixed-base percentage determination.1 This mechanism simplifies compliance and maximizes the initial credit generation in the year the property is placed in service. Because the credit is nonrefundable, its utilization is strictly limited to offsetting tax liability; it cannot result in a cash refund.1 Any unutilized credit may be carried forward for up to ten (10) years.1
2.2 Defining Qualified Investment Costs: “Construction of Research Facilities”
The term “Construction of research facilities” is narrowly defined in the statute. It means constructing, remodeling, expanding, and equipping facilities located within Kentucky for the specific purpose of qualified research.2
The costs eligible for the 5% credit are strictly confined to expenditures for tangible, depreciable property.2 This encompasses the costs of labor, materials, architectural and engineering services, and installation for the physical acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, and equipping of the project.4 Examples include specialized laboratory apparatus, clean room infrastructure, and the construction costs of the building shell dedicated to research.
A critical exclusion is costs paid or incurred for replacement property.2 This restriction reinforces the state’s objective of incentivizing new capital formation or major facility improvements that materially extend the life or increase the capacity of the research operation, rather than subsidizing routine maintenance or the swapping out of older equipment. Furthermore, the credit is generated only once the tangible, depreciable property is placed in service.2 This aligns the credit timing with the commencement of the asset’s depreciation period for tax purposes, requiring taxpayers to maintain meticulous records regarding the date the property becomes operational.
2.3 The Standard for Qualified Research: IRC § 41 Conformity
Kentucky defines “Qualified research” by directly adopting the definition provided in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC § 41).3 By conforming to the federal standard, Kentucky implicitly incorporates both the eligibility requirements and the specific exclusions defined within IRC § 41, linking the state credit’s validity to federal interpretation of qualified research activities.
The inherent limitations of IRC § 41 research mean the Kentucky credit is not permitted for facilities used for certain activities, including: research conducted after commercial production has begun; research related solely to the adaptation or duplication of existing business components for a specific customer; foreign research; research in the social sciences, arts, or humanities; or funded research.10 Taxpayers must ensure the assets claimed under KRS 141.395 support activities that satisfy the rigorous “resolving technical uncertainties” test mandated by the federal code.
The fact that the Kentucky credit targets capital expenses while the federal credit targets operational expenses (wages, supplies) creates a synergistic tax benefit.1 A corporate taxpayer can leverage the 5% Kentucky credit on the multi-million dollar construction of a lab (capital) and subsequently claim the federal credit (often 10% to 20% of incremental QREs) on the operational expenses generated by research conducted within that new lab. This ability to stack dual incentives enhances the state’s financial proposition for establishing major research centers.1
3. Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) Guidance and Compliance Protocol
3.1 Administrative Authority and Binding Precedent
Compliance with KRS 141.395 is overseen by the Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR). Taxpayers rely on DOR guidance for proper interpretation and filing procedures. It is important to recognize that guidance issued by the DOR, such as publications or instructions, does not constitute a final ruling, order, or determination.12 If a taxpayer disagrees with official DOR guidance, they are statutorily permitted to file a return contrary to that guidance and subsequently either seek a refund or protest any resulting assessment pursuant to KRS 131.110.12 This provision clarifies the non-binding nature of published administrative guidance relative to formal rulings or determinations.
3.2 Required Forms and Documentation
The foundation of the credit claim process is the Schedule QR, Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit.2 This schedule serves two primary functions: first, to calculate the initial credit amount generated when the property is placed in service; and second, to record the amount of the credit claimed each subsequent tax year, thereby tracking the remaining carryforward balance.2 A separate Schedule QR must be filed for each individual project that qualifies.2
A mandatory component of the filing process is the inclusion of a supporting schedule detailing the tangible, depreciable property claimed. This schedule must list the date purchased, date placed in service, description, and cost of the assets.2 This detailed requirement ensures that the DOR can verify the capital nature of the expenditure and the correct timing of the credit generation.
The final claim of the credit against liability is made on entity-specific summary schedules:
- Schedule TCS: Used by Corporations and Pass-Through Entities to apply the credit against Income Tax and LLET.2
- Schedule ITC: Used by Individual Filers.2
3.3 Application against Tax Liabilities and Credit Ordering
The nonrefundable credit may be applied against the three primary business tax liabilities: Individual Income Tax (KRS 141.020), Corporate Income Tax (KRS 141.040), and the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) (KRS 141.0401).2 When a taxpayer claims multiple credits, the utilization of the research facility credit must follow the statutory ordering clause specified in KRS 141.0205 among other business incentive credits.2
Mandatory Separate Tracking of LLET and Income Tax
The most significant compliance mandate relates to the utilization against the Corporate Income Tax and the LLET. The Kentucky Department of Revenue strictly requires that the amount of credit claimed and the resulting balance available must be calculated separately for the Income Tax and the LLET.8
The DOR explicitly prohibits the cross-utilization of balances: any available balance designated for Income Tax cannot be used as a credit against the LLET, nor can the LLET balance be used against the Income Tax liability.8 Furthermore, the LLET credit utilization is restricted, as the credit cannot reduce the LLET liability below the statutory $\$175$ minimum.1
This rigid segregation forces taxpayers into dual-track credit management. A company with high credit generation must accurately project its liabilities for both tax streams over the full 10-year carryforward period. If one tax stream has insufficient liability, the portion of the credit allocated to that stream may expire unused, even if the other stream had sufficient liability to absorb the full balance. This structural separation demands rigorous strategic tax planning to maximize eventual recovery.
| Tax Liability | Enacting Statute | Filing Schedule | Credit Application Limit | Tracking Requirement |
| Corporate Income Tax | KRS 141.040 | Schedule TCS | Tax Liability | Must be tracked separately for balance carryforward 8 |
| Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) | KRS 141.0401 | Schedule TCS | Cannot reduce LLET below the $175 minimum 1 | Must be tracked separately for balance carryforward 8 |
| Individual Income Tax | KRS 141.020 | Schedule ITC | Tax Liability | Subject to KRS 141.0205 ordering clause 2 |
3.4 Claiming Procedures by Entity Type
The credit mechanism accommodates various business structures:
- Corporations: Corporations directly apply the credit against their Corporate Income Tax and LLET liability on their Kentucky Corporation Income Tax and LLET Return, using Schedule QR and Schedule TCS.13
- Pass-Through Entities (PTEs): Entities such as partnerships, S-Corporations, and LLCs calculate the credit at the entity level but pass it through to their members, partners, or shareholders on a Kentucky Schedule K-1.2
- Individuals: Individuals, including sole proprietors reporting business income on Schedule C, may claim the credit directly against their individual income tax liability.2
4. Policy Implications, Competitiveness, and Strategic Tax Planning
4.1 Strategic Tax Planning with the 10-Year Carryforward
The 10-year carryforward provision provides substantial long-term certainty for cost recovery.1 This duration is particularly valuable for large capital projects, as facility investment often precedes the generation of substantial taxable income.
Strategic utilization of the credit requires proactive dual-track management of the Income Tax and LLET balances. Because the balances cannot be cross-utilized 8, tax strategists must model future tax liabilities for both streams over the decade, prioritizing allocation to ensure full utilization before the 10-year expiration deadline. If a company forecasts consistently low corporate income tax liability, the portion of the credit allocated to that stream faces a high risk of expiration. This necessitates continuous projection and strategic utilization planning.
4.2 Policy Effectiveness and Economic Review
The Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit contributes significantly to Kentucky’s overall goal of maintaining a pro-business tax environment.15 The state has pursued recent tax reforms, including lowering individual income taxes and broadening the sales tax base. Within this shifting fiscal environment, targeted capital incentives like KRS 141.395 become increasingly critical for attracting specialized investment, particularly from capital-intensive sectors such as manufacturing and technology.1 The incentive acts as a strong signal of the Commonwealth’s commitment to supporting the expansion of physical research assets.
The General Assembly monitors the economic efficacy of this credit. The Legislative Research Commission (LRC) requires regular reporting that tracks key metrics, including the number of taxpayers claiming the credit and the total amount of credit utilized.16 This data is incorporated into the state’s periodic Tax Expenditure Analysis, where the value of the credit is classified based on whether its cost is “Minimal” (below $\$1$ million) or “Substantial” (above $\$1$ million).18 This ongoing review process indicates that the long-term existence and scope of the credit are subject to legislative scrutiny based on demonstrated economic return. Taxpayers making long-term commitments relying on this credit must monitor tax expenditure reports to assess potential future modifications to the 5% rate or the carryforward period.
5. Illustrative Case Study and Utilization Example
This section provides a detailed financial illustration of the calculation and multi-year utilization of the credit, specifically highlighting the mandatory separate tracking of the Income Tax and LLET credit balances.
5.1 Calculation Methodology Summary
The credit is computed by applying the statutory five percent (5%) rate to the total qualified costs of construction of research facilities placed in service during the tax year.1
Formula:
$$\text{Annual Credit Generated} = \text{Qualified Costs} \times 5\%$$
For instance, if a company documents $\$1,000,000$ in qualified facility costs, the resulting credit is $\$50,000$.1
5.2 Example: The Multi-Year Research Facility Credit Utilization (ABC Corp.)
Scenario Setup: ABC Corporation (a corporate taxpayer subject to both Corporate Income Tax and LLET) completes construction of a new R&D facility in Year 1. The total cost of eligible tangible, depreciable property placed in service is $\$4,000,000$.
Credit Generation (Year 1):
$$\$4,000,000 \times 5\% = \$200,000 \text{ (Total Credit Generated)}$$
This $\$200,000$ credit is established by filing Schedule QR. It is conceptually split for utilization and tracking purposes, initially allocating $\$200,000$ to the Income Tax carryforward pool and $\$200,000$ to the LLET carryforward pool. The actual claim is limited by the current year’s liability for each tax.
The following table demonstrates the utilization and subsequent mandatory separate tracking of the carryforward balances over three initial years and the final expiration year.
Table 3: Multi-Year Utilization and Carryforward Tracking (ABC Corp.)
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 (Projection) | Year 10 (Expiration) |
| Total Credit Generated (Year 1) | $200,000 | – | – | – |
| Beginning Available Balance (IT/LLET) | $200,000/$200,000 | $160,000/$140,000 | $150,000/$65,000 | $110,000/$60,000 |
| Corporate Income Tax Liability (A) | $40,000 | $10,000 | $30,000 | $7,000 |
| LLET Liability (B) | $60,000 | $75,000 | $5,000 | $1,000 |
| Credit Claimed Against Income Tax | $40,000 | $10,000 | $30,000 | $7,000 |
| Credit Claimed Against LLET | $60,000 | $75,000 | $5,000 | $1,000 |
| Income Tax Credit Balance CF | $160,000 | $150,000 | $120,000 | $113,000 |
| LLET Credit Balance CF | $140,000 | $65,000 | $60,000 | $59,000 |
Analysis:
In Year 1, ABC Corp. claims $\$40,000$ against Income Tax and $\$60,000$ against LLET. Since the total credit generated was $\$200,000$, and assuming a pro-rata allocation for tracking, this reduces the conceptual Income Tax carryforward pool by $\$40,000$ (leaving $\$160,000$) and the LLET pool by $\$60,000$ (leaving $\$140,000$).
In Year 2, ABC Corp. experiences a spike in LLET liability to $\$75,000$ and low Income Tax liability of $\$10,000$. The company utilizes the available credit to offset both liabilities. The remaining LLET balance is reduced to $\$65,000$. The crucial step, dictated by DOR compliance 8, is that the remaining Income Tax balance of $\$150,000$ cannot be used to cover the excess LLET liability. This separate tracking ensures the Income Tax balance remains available for future income tax needs but exposes that balance to the risk of expiration after 10 years if sufficient income tax liability is not generated.
By Year 10, the company must proactively utilize the remaining balances ($\$113,000$ for Income Tax and $\$59,000$ for LLET). Any amount not claimed against the respective liability in Year 10 will expire without value, confirming the necessity of a detailed, decade-long utilization strategy.
6. Recommendations for Compliance and Audit Readiness
6.1 Documentation and Segregation of Costs
To ensure audit readiness, corporate taxpayers must implement internal accounting procedures that treat KRS 141.395 expenditures as a distinct compliance area. This involves establishing dedicated cost centers to track all construction, remodeling, expansion, and equipping costs related to the R&D facility, strictly segregating these capital expenditures from non-qualifying operational or replacement costs.2
Documentation must provide a clean audit trail verifying that all claimed costs pertain exclusively to tangible, depreciable property. This necessitates linking the costs to the mandatory supporting schedule, which confirms the description, purchase date, and, critically, the date placed in service.2
Furthermore, although the credit targets capital investment, the underlying activities must conform to IRC § 41. Taxpayers should retain internal R&D project documentation that substantiates the qualified nature of the research conducted within the facility, demonstrating that the activities avoid the federal exclusions regarding post-commercial production, adaptation, or funded research.
6.2 Due Diligence Checklist for Capital Projects
- Statutory Eligibility Review: Before commitment, confirm that the planned investment involves new construction, remodeling, or expansion, and is not merely replacement property. Ensure the assets are strictly tangible and depreciable, aligning with KRS 141.395 definitions.
- Credit Generation Timing: Establish precise project management protocols to track the date tangible property is officially placed in service, as this is the date the credit is generated and the 10-year clock begins.8
- DOR Dual-Track Setup: Immediately upon credit generation and the initial filing of Schedule QR, institute a mandatory dual-track accounting and reporting system to separately manage the carryforward balances for Corporate Income Tax and LLET, preventing inadvertent cross-utilization of the credit.8
- Annual Ordering Compliance: Review the credit ordering clause (KRS 141.0205) annually to ensure the R&D facility credit is applied correctly relative to any other business incentive credits the company may be claiming.
7. Conclusion
The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395) is a highly effective, yet structurally complex, mechanism for fulfilling Kentucky’s KRS Chapter 154 mandate to spur economic development through fixed capital investment in science and technology. The credit’s primary advantage lies in its direct, non-incremental 5% rate applied to facility costs, allowing companies to stack incentives against the federal R&D operational credit.
However, compliance complexity is introduced by the Kentucky Department of Revenue’s requirement for mandatory separate tracking of the credit balances against Corporate Income Tax and LLET. This rule necessitates sophisticated, multi-year financial modeling to ensure that sufficient liability exists in both tax streams to fully absorb the credit before its 10-year expiration. Taxpayers committed to large-scale facility construction must establish robust internal controls centered on precise in-service date documentation, cost segregation, and meticulous dual-track accounting management to navigate the state’s compliance requirements and fully realize the substantial economic value offered by this incentive.
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
