Expert Report: The Nonrefundable Constraint and Strategic Utilization of the Kentucky R&D Tax Credit (KRS 141.395)

A nonrefundable tax credit serves exclusively to reduce a taxpayer’s pre-existing tax liability down to zero. The core function of this credit type is strictly limited to the amount of tax otherwise owed, preventing any excess credit from being returned as a direct cash refund.1

This mechanism requires careful strategic planning for businesses investing in research facilities in Kentucky. The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit, governed by KRS 141.395, provides a powerful nonrefundable incentive calculated at 5% of qualified infrastructure costs.3 Although the credit cannot generate an immediate refund, any unused balance may be carried forward for ten years.3 Strategic utilization is further governed by stringent Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) compliance requirements, including mandatory credit ordering rules (KRS 141.0205) and critical limitations regarding the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET).3

II. Nonrefundable Credits: Principles, Limitations, and Mitigation

To realize the maximum benefit from the Kentucky R&D incentive, businesses must first understand the fundamental limitations inherent in nonrefundable credits and the mechanism provided by the state to overcome them.

A. Defining Nonrefundable vs. Refundable Credits

The classification of a tax credit is pivotal, as it dictates the manner and extent to which the financial benefit is realized, particularly when the credit amount is substantial.

The Zero-Tax Ceiling

Nonrefundable tax credits operate under a “zero-tax ceiling”.2 They can reduce the tax owed, but they cannot create or increase a tax refund if the credit amount exceeds the total liability.1 For instance, if a company is eligible for a $30,000 nonrefundable credit but has only a $20,000 tax liability, the credit reduces the liability to $0, and the remaining $10,000 is not refunded.1 Therefore, the savings generated by a nonrefundable credit are strictly limited to the amount of tax incurred in that period.1

Contrast with Refundable Credits

Refundable credits differ fundamentally, as they are treated as payments made toward the liability. If the total refundable credits exceed the tax liability, the excess amount is returned directly to the taxpayer, resulting in a cash refund.2 Because the benefit of the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit is entirely dependent on the taxpayer generating sufficient Kentucky taxable income, its immediate utility is conditional upon the profitability of the business within the state.

B. Strategic Mitigation: The Mechanism of Credit Carryforward

For large, nonrefundable credits tied to capital investments—such as the 5% Kentucky R&D facility credit—the General Assembly recognized that the benefit might exceed a single year’s tax obligation. To prevent the forfeiture of these credits, state law explicitly provides for a carryforward mechanism.3

Any portion of the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit that is unused due to the nonrefundable limitation may be carried forward for a period of ten (10) years.3 This provision transforms the inherent nonrefundable limitation from a permanent loss risk into a timing consideration. It allows businesses to defer the utilization of the credit until future periods when sufficient tax liability is generated. This extended carryforward period is necessary because major capital expenditures—such as constructing a new research lab—often generate a significant credit that requires multiple subsequent profitable tax years for full absorption.5

III. The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395)

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit is a state-level incentive codified under KRS 141.395, aimed at fostering investment in research infrastructure within the Commonwealth.5

A. Statutory Basis and Credit Calculation

The credit is nonrefundable and is calculated at a rate of 5% of the total qualified costs.3 Unlike some federal programs, the calculation for the Kentucky credit is straightforward, requiring no fixed-base percentage or prior-year averaging calculation.5

The credit may be applied against three distinct tax liabilities imposed by the state 3:

1. Individual Income Tax (KRS 141.020)
2. Corporation Income Tax (KRS 141.040)
3. Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) (KRS 141.0401)

B. Definition of Qualified Costs

The scope of the Kentucky credit is highly specific, focusing strictly on capital investments in facilities, which distinguishes it from the federal R&D credit that targets expenses.

Eligible Property and Activities

Qualified costs pertain to “constructing, remodeling, and equipping facilities in this state or expanding existing facilities in this state for qualified research”.3 Crucially, the costs must be for tangible, depreciable property.3 The credit is earned and becomes available for application once the tangible property is placed in service.4

The definition of “Qualified research” under KRS 141.395 aligns directly with Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).3 This alignment simplifies compliance for businesses already adhering to federal R&D standards, as the underlying activity requirements are consistent.

Exclusionary Rules and Stacking Benefits

The statute explicitly excludes amounts paid or incurred for replacement property.3 Furthermore, the credit is infrastructure-focused and does not include traditional R&D expenses such as wages, supplies, contract research, or computer rentals.5

This focus on infrastructure provides a valuable structural benefit for taxpayers. Because the Kentucky credit targets tangible infrastructure while the federal R&D credit targets qualified research expenses (labor, supplies), a business engaging in R&D infrastructure investment can claim the 5% Kentucky credit on the facility costs simultaneously with the federal R&D credit on related operational expenses.5 This layering of credits, often referred to as “stacking,” maximizes the overall return on research investment. The requirement that costs be limited to tangible, depreciable property dictates that the Department of Revenue’s compliance focus will be concentrated on verifying the taxpayer’s fixed asset ledger and corresponding depreciation schedules.4

IV. Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) Compliance and Guidance

The Kentucky Department of Revenue governs the administration and reporting of the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit, placing a high burden on taxpayers for detailed documentation and continuous annual reporting.

A. Required Forms and Documentation

The central form required to calculate and track the credit is the Schedule QR, Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit.3 This schedule must be filed with the income tax return to determine the credit against both the income tax liability and the LLET liability.4

Annual Tracking and Documentation

The Schedule QR acts as a running ledger for the credit. A copy must be submitted each tax year the credit is claimed or carried forward, continuing until the entire credit is utilized or the 10-year carryforward period expires.3 Furthermore, if a new project qualifies in a subsequent year, a separate Schedule QR must be completed for that new project.3

To substantiate the credit claim, the return must include a detailed supporting schedule listing all tangible, depreciable property included in the costs. This schedule must include the date purchased, the date placed in service, a description of the property, and its cost.3 The continuous annual filing requirement for Schedule QR confirms that the burden of proving the existence and continuity of the 10-year carryforward balance rests squarely on the taxpayer.

B. Claiming the Credit

Once the allowable credit is calculated using Schedule QR, the claim amount is transferred to the final tax return schedules. Corporations and pass-through entities (PTEs) utilize Schedule TCS, while individuals claim the credit on Schedule ITC.3

For pass-through entities, the approved credit is allocated to the partners, members, or shareholders pro rata based on their interest at the time of credit approval. This credit amount is then reported on the Kentucky Schedule K-1, allowing the owners to apply the credit against their respective individual or corporate income tax liabilities.4

It is important for taxpayers to understand that while the DOR issues various forms of guidance (such. as Technical Advice Memoranda or Private Letter Rulings) to clarify tax laws, this guidance does not constitute a final legal ruling.8 If a taxpayer disagrees with DOR guidance, they retain the right to file a return contrary to the guidance and subsequently protest any assessment issued by the DOR, pursuant to KRS 131.110.8

V. The Nuance of Application: Tax Base, Ordering, and LLET Constraints

The effective utilization of the nonrefundable R&D credit is heavily influenced by Kentucky’s statutory rules concerning credit application priority and the structure of the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET).

A. Mandatory Credit Ordering (KRS 141.0205)

Kentucky law mandates a strict order of priority for applying nonrefundable business incentive credits against income taxes (KRS 141.020 and 141.040) and LLET (KRS 141.0401).3 This sequential application is formalized under KRS 141.0205.9

The Research Facilities Credit permitted by KRS 141.395 is listed at position (j) among the nonrefundable business incentive credits.9 This relatively low placement means the R&D credit is subordinate to several other major credits, including:

• The Limited Liability Entity Tax credit (a)
• Various economic development credits (b) (e.g., those computed under KRS 141.381, 141.400)
• The Certified Rehabilitation Credit (d)

Credits higher on the list must be fully utilized first. If the tax liability is reduced to zero by a higher-priority credit, the nonrefundable R&D credit cannot be utilized in the current year and must be immediately pushed into the 10-year carryforward pool. This necessity requires tax managers to model the impact of all other nonrefundable incentives claimed to accurately forecast the residual tax liability available for the R&D credit.

B. Critical Constraint: LLET Separate Tracking and Minimum Floor

The most significant constraint on the R&D facility credit utilization involves the LLET.

Separate Credit Pools

The Kentucky Department of Revenue requires that the R&D credit balance generated must be calculated and tracked separately for the Income Tax pool and the LLET pool.4 The balances are non-fungible: an unused credit balance available for the Income Tax cannot be applied against the LLET, and vice versa.4

LLET Minimum Floor Limitation

In addition to the separate tracking mandate, the application of the R&D credit against the LLET is subject to a statutory minimum. The credit cannot reduce the LLET liability below the $175 minimum.4

This combination of separate tracking and the $175 LLET minimum creates a potential risk of “credit trapping.” If a company’s annual LLET liability is low, say $5,000, the maximum credit utilized annually against that base is only $4,825 ($5,000 – $175). Consequently, a large credit balance allocated to the LLET pool may be consumed very slowly, potentially expiring within the 10-year carryforward period, even if the company concurrently has substantial corporate income tax liability that could otherwise have absorbed the credit.4

VI. Practical Application Example: Nonrefundable Utilization and Carryforward

The following scenario, based on reported industry calculations, demonstrates the interaction between the nonrefundable constraint, the 5% calculation rate, and the mandated separate tracking of the Income Tax and LLET bases.

A. Scenario Setup: Apex R&D Corporation (Year 1)

Apex R&D Corporation invests in expanding its qualified research facility in Kentucky, incurring $2,000,000 in costs for tangible, depreciable property placed in service during Year 1.5

B. Year 1 Utilization and Credit Allocation

The $100,000 credit must be utilized separately against the two tax obligations.

1. Corporate Income Tax Application

The $20,000 excess credit is nonrefundable in Year 1 but is preserved for future income tax liabilities.

2. LLET Application and Minimum Floor Constraint

The credit applied to the LLET is derived from the same initial $100,000 pool but must be tracked separately and observe the minimum floor.

C. Analysis of Utilization

In Year 1, Apex R&D utilized a total of $84,825 of the $100,000 generated credit ($80,000 against Income Tax and $4,825 against LLET). The remaining $15,175 is the balance of the initial credit that has been permanently pushed into the carryforward pools, requiring continued utilization planning over the next decade.

The example highlights the severe impact of the LLET constraints. While the company quickly utilized 80% of the credit against the Income Tax, the large remaining LLET carryforward balance of $95,175 can only be reduced by a maximum of $4,825 per year, meaning it would take approximately 20 years to fully utilize this specific pool if the LLET liability remains constant, well exceeding the 10-year statutory limit. This necessitates strategic forecasting to avoid credit expiration.

VII. Conclusion: Strategic Imperatives for Kentucky R&D Investors

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395) is a robust incentive, offering a 5% credit on capital infrastructure costs, which effectively complements the federal R&D tax credit. Its nonrefundable nature, however, necessitates precise strategic planning for businesses to fully realize the intended benefit.

The analysis confirms that maximizing the utility of this credit requires adherence to several complex administrative and statutory rules:

1. Mandatory Long-Term Forecasting: Due to the nonrefundable nature and the 10-year carryforward limit, businesses must conduct accurate, long-range financial modeling to forecast Kentucky taxable income and LLET liabilities for the full decade. This advanced planning is essential to assess the potential absorption rate of the generated credit and to prevent any portion from expiring unutilized.5
2. Meticulous Compliance and Documentation: Compliance is procedural and continuous, requiring annual filing of the Schedule QR, even in years when no credit is claimed, to maintain the legal integrity of the carryforward balance. The taxpayer must also maintain precise, auditable records demonstrating that all claimed costs pertain only to tangible, depreciable property placed in service.3
3. Modeling Credit Priority and LLET Trapping: Tax planning cannot treat the R&D credit in isolation. It must first account for the hierarchy established by KRS 141.0205, which dictates that higher-priority credits may exhaust the available tax liability. Furthermore, businesses must strictly manage the separate, non-fungible credit pools for Income Tax and LLET. Given the LLET’s $175 minimum floor, a large credit balance allocated to the LLET pool faces a significant risk of delayed utilization, potentially leading to its forfeiture upon reaching the 10-year expiration date.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/