Comprehensive Analysis of Pass-Through Entity Dynamics within the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395)

Section 1: Introduction and Definitional Framework

1.1 Executive Summary: Defining the Pass-Through Entity (PTE) in Kentucky

A Pass-Through Entity (PTE) in Kentucky is generally defined as any business organization (such as a partnership, S-corporation, or Limited Liability Company) that flows its income, deductions, and tax obligations directly to its owners for federal income tax purposes. For the purpose of the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility (QRF) Tax Credit, the PTE is the entity that generates the nonrefundable credit, applying it first against its entity-level tax liability before passing the residual value through to its partners or members for utilization against their personal or corporate income tax obligations.

Detailed PTE Scope and Kentucky Tax Requirements

Kentucky law recognizes various structures as Pass-Through Entities, including partnerships, S-corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships, and other similar entities that are not taxed at the entity level for federal income tax purposes.1 Historically, these entities utilized Form 765, the Kentucky Partnership Income and LLET Return, but current practice uses Form PTE, the Kentucky Pass-Through Entity Income and LLET Return, which is complementary to federal Forms 1065 and 1120S.2

A key differentiator for Kentucky PTEs is the presence of the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET), imposed by Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 141.0401. This entity-level tax means that Kentucky PTEs engage in two distinct tax calculations: calculating LLET liability at the entity level and allocating income and credits to their owners. This requires the QRF credit generated by the PTE to be applied first against the LLET before any benefit can be distributed to the partners.4

Since tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, Kentucky has offered an elective entity-level income tax for PTEs.5 Under this election, the PTE can choose to pay income tax on behalf of its direct or indirect owners. Crucially, the owner can then claim a refundable credit for 100% of the income tax paid by the PTE to Kentucky.5 Although this election exists, the flow-through mechanics of nonrefundable, statutory credits like the QRF Credit remain fundamentally linked to the entity’s role as the generating agent and the requirement to pass the credit through via the Kentucky Schedule K-1 (Form PTE).4

1.2 The Nuance of Dual Tax Liability for Kentucky PTEs

Unlike federal partnerships, which primarily serve as informational reporting vehicles (Form 1065), Kentucky PTEs must navigate mandatory entity-level taxation through the LLET. This dual structure—where the entity is subject to LLET and the partners are subject to income tax—significantly increases the complexity of tax compliance and credit utilization planning within the Commonwealth.

Because a Kentucky PTE must calculate and potentially offset its LLET liability before allocating any remaining credits, tax strategy must treat the LLET offset as an initial, critical step. The strategic focus must prioritize the efficient allocation of the QRF credit to the individual or corporate partners, whose income tax liability (KRS 141.020 or KRS 141.040) is generally much higher than the entity’s LLET obligation. This structure dictates that the QRF credit functions not merely as an incentive for the business itself, but primarily as a mechanism to reduce the income tax burden of the entity’s owners.

Section 2: Foundation of the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395)

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (QRF Credit) is codified under KRS 141.395 and provides a statutory incentive for capital investment in research infrastructure located within the state.

2.1 Statutory Basis and Calculation Mechanics

The QRF credit is calculated as a nonrefundable, nontransferable credit equal to five percent (5%) of qualified costs.7

Qualified Cost Definition and Alignment

The credit is narrowly focused on the costs associated with the “construction of research facilities”.4 This phrase is statutorily defined to include constructing, remodeling, expanding, and equipping facilities physically located within Kentucky for the purpose of qualified research.4

The definition of “Qualified research” is aligned directly with Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC § 41).4 This link ensures that the underlying R&D activities receiving the facility investment must meet the four-part test established under federal law, primarily requiring the activities to be technological in nature and intended to eliminate technical uncertainty.

Crucially, the eligible costs for the Kentucky QRF credit are strictly limited to tangible, depreciable property.4 Furthermore, costs paid or incurred for replacement property are specifically excluded from qualification.4 This deliberate focus limits the incentive to net new or expansive capital investments in Kentucky’s research infrastructure.

The calculation method is relatively straightforward compared to the federal system. Kentucky allows the 5% credit rate to be applied to the full amount of qualified costs incurred during the tax year, as there is no requirement for a fixed-base percentage or prior-year averaging—a significant simplification compared to federal rules.7

2.2 Non-Refundability and Carryforward Provisions

The QRF credit is explicitly designated as nonrefundable, meaning it can only offset existing tax liability and cannot result in a cash refund to the taxpayer.7 The strategic value of this credit, particularly for large capital expenditures made by PTEs, lies in its longevity. Any portion of the credit that remains unused after offsetting the current year’s liability may be carried forward for a period of ten (10) years.8

Filing Requirements

To generate and claim the credit, the taxpayer (the PTE) must file Schedule QR, Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit, with its income tax return.4 This schedule is used not only to determine the initial credit amount but also to track the amount claimed each subsequent tax year until the full credit is utilized or the 10-year carryforward period expires.4 The filing must include a supporting schedule listing the tangible, depreciable property purchased, along with the date of purchase, date placed in service, description, and cost.4

2.3 Incentivizing Capital Investment over Operational R&D

The design of the Kentucky QRF credit clearly establishes a capital-investment threshold for eligibility. While the underlying R&D activities must align with the federal definition found in IRC § 41, the credit basis is restricted solely to the costs of constructing or equipping the facilities.4

This structural limitation implies that a PTE could incur substantial operational R&D expenses—such as wages for researchers or costs of supplies—that fully qualify under IRC § 41, yet generate zero QRF credit if the entity rents its facilities or makes no significant new investments in tangible, depreciable property. The credit is therefore not a general R&D expense offset but a targeted incentive to encourage property ownership and significant capital expansion within Kentucky. For PTEs, this necessitates strategic planning regarding the timing of capital outlays, as the credit is generated when the qualified property is placed into service within the state, triggering the start of the 10-year carryforward window.7

Table 1 details the core mechanics of this credit.

Table 1: Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit Key Features (KRS 141.395)

Section 3: Mechanics of Credit Generation and Application at the PTE Level

The PTE is responsible for generating the QRF credit through qualifying expenditures and then acting as a conduit to pass the credit benefit to its owners. This process involves a mandatory application hierarchy governed by state tax law and administrative guidance.

3.1 Initial Application Against Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET)

As a limited liability entity, the partnership or S-corporation is subject to the LLET, which is imposed by KRS 141.0401. The generated QRF credit is first applied against this LLET liability.4 The application of the credit is reported by entering the total nonrefundable tax credits from Schedule TCS (Part III) onto the entity’s Form PTE.11

A critical statutory constraint governs this process: the LLET cannot be reduced below the $175 statutory minimum.7 Kentucky law stipulates that nonrefundable business incentive credits, including the QRF credit, may offset LLET, but they must respect this minimum floor. For example, if a PTE’s calculated LLET liability is $\$15,000$, and it has $\$100,000$ in QRF credits, only $\$14,825$ of the credit can be used to reduce the LLET to the minimum $\$175$ required payment.

The fact that large capital projects generate substantial QRF credits, but the LLET is structured as a relatively low tax based on gross receipts or gross profits, ensures that the LLET liability is often far less than the credit generated.7 Therefore, the vast majority of the credit often becomes a residual credit available for flow-through, transforming the LLET offset into an incidental benefit rather than the primary goal of the credit strategy. The main focus remains on maximizing the allocation and utilization of the flow-through credit at the owner level.

3.2 Credit Flow-Through Timing and Allocation

Any residual QRF credit remaining after the LLET application is allocated and passed through to the partners, members, or shareholders.4

Kentucky law mandates that the flow-through allocation must be determined based on the owner’s proportionate share of the entity’s income, deductions, gains, losses, and credits.12 This proportionate allocation must align with the entity’s organizational documents and partnership agreement.

Furthermore, the Department of Revenue (DOR) specifies a timing constraint: the credit is passed only to those who were owners at the time of the application and subsequent approval of the credit.4 This timing provision is important for PTEs undergoing ownership changes after the qualified facility investment has been made and the credit has been claimed.

3.3 Compliance Risk and Reporting Mandates

The administrative requirement for credit flow-through carries a significant compliance risk for the PTE. Although specifically contained within the statute governing the Clean Coal Incentive Act (KRS 141.428(7)), the text underscores the seriousness of administrative reporting for all credits passed through an entity: the PTE must provide the DOR electronically with information detailing all partners, members, or shareholders who may claim the approved credit.13 Failure to provide this essential information in the manner prescribed by regulation may result in the forfeiture of the available credits to all associated partners, members, or shareholders.13

This compliance mandate signals that the DOR relies heavily on accurate and timely submission of owner information to track credit ownership and utilization. Therefore, rigorous preparation of the Kentucky Schedule K-1 (Form PTE) and any accompanying electronic submission is paramount to preserving the credit benefit for the owners.

Section 4: Reporting and Owner Utilization via Kentucky Schedule K-1

The successful realization of the QRF credit benefit depends entirely on the accuracy and timely distribution of the Kentucky Schedule K-1 (Form PTE).

4.1 Reporting Vehicle: Kentucky Schedule K-1 (Form PTE)

The Kentucky Schedule K-1 (Form PTE) serves as the mandated reporting vehicle, showing each owner’s pro rata share of the pass-through entity’s income, deductions, and, critically, tax credits.11

This schedule must include the calculated flow-through QRF credit amount.4 The completed Schedule K-1 must be issued to each owner, along with instructions, on or before the day Form PTE is filed with the Department of Revenue.11 This ensures that corporate owners (who file Form 720) and individual owners (who file Form 740 or Form 740-NP) receive the necessary documentation to claim their proportionate share of the credit against their respective tax liabilities.15

4.2 Owner Utilization Against Tax Liability

Upon receiving the Schedule K-1, the owner integrates the allocated QRF credit into their personal or corporate Kentucky tax return. The flow-through credit may be used to offset the owner’s income taxes imposed by KRS 141.020 (individual income tax) or KRS 141.040 (corporate income tax).4

The credit retains its nonrefundable status at the owner level. If the owner cannot use their allocated credit portion in the current year due to low tax liability or the constraint of priority ordering, they retain the benefit of the 10-year carryforward period, allowing them to utilize the credit against future Kentucky income tax liabilities.8

4.3 Utilization Flexibility of the QRF Credit

A key advantage of the QRF credit, once allocated to the owner, pertains to its application scope. Kentucky law is highly restrictive regarding the use of the LLET credit (which is also passed to the owner). Specifically, the credit for LLET paid by the entity can only be applied against the owner’s income tax assessed on their proportionate share of distributive income from the PTE.16

In contrast, the statutory guidance and DOR materials concerning the QRF credit do not impose this limitation. This absence of restriction implies that the QRF credit allocated via Schedule K-1 may be used to offset the owner’s total Kentucky income tax liability, regardless of whether that income originated from the PTE, other Kentucky-sourced investments, or other business activities. This flexibility significantly enhances the strategic value of the QRF credit for owners with diversified Kentucky income streams, distinguishing it favorably from the more constrained LLET credit.

Section 5: Priority of Application: Integrating QRF Credit into Kentucky’s Credit Hierarchy

When an owner (whether an individual or a corporation) receives a flow-through QRF credit, they must apply it in accordance with Kentucky’s rigorous, statutorily mandated credit ordering sequence established by KRS 141.0205.

5.1 Statutory Ordering (KRS 141.0205)

KRS 141.0205 dictates the precise priority of application and use if a taxpayer is entitled to more than one nonrefundable business incentive credit against the tax imposed by KRS 141.020, KRS 141.040, and KRS 141.0401.17 This sequence is crucial because credits applied earlier reduce the tax base available for credits applied later. The owner uses Schedule TCS or Schedule ITC to apply the credit in this specific order.4

The Research Facilities Credit (KRS 141.395) is positioned late in the hierarchy, specifically listed as priority item (1)(j).17 This means several higher-priority credits must be fully exhausted before the QRF credit can be used. Key credits that take precedence include:

• Priority (a): The Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) credit permitted by KRS 141.0401.17
• Priority (b): Various economic development credits computed under related statutes (e.g., KREDA, KIDA).17
• Priority (f): The tax paid to other states credit permitted by KRS 141.070.17

The placement of the QRF credit late in the list, after fundamental credits like the LLET credit and tax paid to other states, means that for taxpayers engaged in high-growth activities often incentivized by economic development credits (which hold priority (b)), the current-year QRF credit benefit is highly susceptible to being entirely crowded out.

Table 2 highlights the position of the QRF Credit within this statutory hierarchy.

Table 2: Excerpt from KRS 141.0205: Priority of Nonrefundable Business Incentive Credits (Against Income Tax)

5.2 Strategic Implications of the Deferred Benefit

The application sequence mandated by KRS 141.0205 dictates that the QRF credit will often function as a long-term benefit, with the immediate current-year use potentially minimized. Taxpayers who participate heavily in other Kentucky incentive programs, particularly economic development initiatives, will likely find their immediate income tax liability fully offset by the higher-priority credits.7

Therefore, the critical value of the QRF credit rests almost entirely on its 10-year carryforward provision. Tax planning for PTE owners must assume that the benefit will primarily be realized during the later years (Years 2 through 10) of the carryforward window. Comprehensive utilization modeling must forecast future income tax liabilities and account for the gradual expiration of higher-priority credits to accurately project when and how the QRF credit can be fully applied. This elevates the QRF credit from a simple current-year offset to a crucial tool for decade-long tax planning and long-term capital repatriation.

Section 6: Case Study: QRF Credit Calculation and Allocation for a Partnership

To illustrate the mechanics of credit generation, LLET offset, and flow-through, consider the following scenario involving a limited liability partnership (PTE) that invests in qualified research facilities.

6.1 Scenario Setup

KY Tech Ventures LLP is a Kentucky-based partnership (PTE) subject to LLET.

6.2 Step 1: Credit Generation at PTE Level

The PTE calculates the QRF credit based on the 5% statutory rate applied to the total qualified costs.7

$$\text{Total QRF Credit Generated} = \$2,000,000 \times 0.05 = \$100,000$$

6.3 Step 2: Entity-Level Application Against LLET

The PTE must first apply the generated QRF credit against its LLET liability, adhering to the mandatory $175$ minimum payment.7

6.4 Step 3: Allocation and K-1 Distribution

The residual credit of $\$85,175$ is allocated to the owners based on their proportionate ownership share.12 This allocated amount is reported on the Kentucky Schedule K-1 (Form PTE) issued to each partner.

Table 3: QRF Credit Allocation and Partner Flow-Through Summary

6.5 Step 4: Owner-Level Utilization (Post-K-1)

The individual partners then claim their portion of the credit on their respective tax returns, strictly following the credit ordering rules of KRS 141.0205.

Assume Partner X has a current-year corporate tax liability of $\$50,000$ and also has $\$8,000$ in Limited Liability Entity Tax Credit (priority (a)) allocated from other investments.

1. Apply LLET Credit (Priority (a)): $\$50,000$ Liability – $\$8,000$ LLET Credit = $\$42,000$ Remaining Liability.
2. Apply QRF Credit (Priority (j)): Partner X utilizes the QRF allocation of $\$51,105$ against the remaining $\$42,000$ liability.
3. Carryforward: Partner X offsets the full $\$42,000$ liability, paying zero current-year corporate income tax. The remaining balance of the QRF credit, $\$9,105$ ($\$51,105 – \$42,000$), is carried forward by Partner X for up to 10 years.8

This example demonstrates how the credit operates primarily to reduce the partner’s income tax liability, often resulting in a substantial carryforward balance that must be managed over the subsequent decade.

Section 7: Conclusion and Strategic Compliance Recommendations

7.1 Summary of Nuanced Tax Requirements for PTEs

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395) is a specialized tax incentive that offers a 5% nonrefundable credit for new capital investment in research infrastructure. For PTEs, the compliance process requires managing two distinct tax regimes: the entity-level LLET, which must be offset first (subject to the $175 minimum), and the subsequent flow-through allocation to owners via Schedule K-1 (Form PTE).

The primary complexity and risk areas identified involve administrative compliance and utilization timing. The potential for credit forfeiture exists if the PTE fails to accurately report all necessary partner information to the Department of Revenue.13 Furthermore, the QRF credit’s statutory position late in the credit application hierarchy (KRS 141.0205(1)(j)) means its realization is often deferred to the carryforward period, necessitating robust long-term forecasting.

7.2 Compliance Checklist and Best Practices

To maximize the benefit and ensure compliance, PTEs engaging in qualified research facility construction must implement specific administrative and accounting protocols:

1. Rigorous Cost Segregation: Accounting practices must be implemented to meticulously segregate and track qualified costs. Only investments in tangible, depreciable property used for facility construction, remodeling, expansion, or equipping qualify. Costs related to replacement property must be explicitly excluded.4
2. Mandatory Annual Filing and Documentation: The PTE must ensure that Schedule QR is filed annually with the Form PTE, along with the detailed supporting schedule listing all tangible assets, including purchase dates, service dates, description, and cost.4 This filing is mandatory every year the credit is claimed, even if only a carryforward balance is utilized.
3. Proactive Carryforward Modeling: Because the credit is consistently crowded out by higher-priority items (such as the LLET credit and economic development incentives) 7, PTE owners must adopt detailed, forward-looking models to project tax liability and credit expiration dates for the full 10-year carryforward window. This planning ensures that the allocated credit is not lost due to non-utilization before its expiration date.
4. Accurate Partner Reporting: The PTE must ensure that the Schedule K-1 (Form PTE) accurately reflects each partner’s proportionate share and that the required electronic owner information is submitted to the DOR to satisfy administrative demands and prevent potential credit forfeiture.12

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/