Bridging Federal Science and State Infrastructure: Understanding “Technological in Nature” for the Kentucky R&D Facility Tax Credit

The definition of “Technological in Nature” (TIN) requires that research activities be directed toward discovering information relying on the principles of physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science. For the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395), this criterion ensures that eligible capital investments only support research activities that meet the stringent scientific foundation established under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41.

This requirement acts as a critical gateway, validating that the underlying purpose of a business’s R&D expenditure—whether operational costs for the federal credit or facility costs for the Kentucky credit—is rooted in genuine scientific advancement or resolution of technical uncertainty. For Kentucky, the necessity to meet the IRC § 41 definition for “Qualified Research” means that facility investments, such as construction and specialized equipment, must be demonstrably essential for performing activities that satisfy the TIN standard, thereby justifying the nonrefundable 5% credit.

I. The Technological Gatekeeper: Deconstructing the “Technological in Nature” Standard (IRC § 41)

The foundation for claiming the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit begins with establishing the eligibility of the underlying activity according to federal law. Kentucky adheres strictly to the definition of “Qualified Research” as articulated in IRC § 41.1 The “Technological in Nature” test is one of four mandatory requirements within the federal framework, serving as a pillar of scientific rigor.

1.1 Statutory Authority and the Detailed Requirement Analysis

The concept of qualified research is outlined in IRC § 41(d).2 Specifically, “qualified research” must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information that is “technological in nature”.3 This requirement is often cited as the fourth part of the four-part test used by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to define eligible activities.2

The Intent of Discovery

The core focus of the TIN requirement is on the generation of new scientific knowledge or the resolution of technical unknowns, rather than the mere application of existing technology or processes. The statute requires that the activity be “undertaken for the purpose of discovering information”.3 This mandates a forward-looking approach where the outcome, method, or design is scientifically uncertain at the outset of the research.4 The activity must aim to eliminate uncertainties regarding the appropriate design or the capability or method of development of a new or improved business component.2

Nuanced Distinction from the Process of Experimentation (PoE)

While the Process of Experimentation (PoE) requirement—the systematic evaluation of alternatives—focuses on how the research is conducted, the TIN requirement focuses on what scientific principles underpin the research.4 These two elements are mutually dependent. The technological information discovered must be the direct result of a systematic methodology grounded in scientific disciplines.5 If a systematic process exists but does not rely on hard science (e.g., testing different marketing slogans), the activity fails the TIN test. If the underlying science is present but no systematic evaluation of alternatives occurs, the activity fails the PoE test. Both are essential for meeting the IRC § 41 standard.

1.2 The Hard Science Imperative: Physical, Biological, Engineering, and Computer Science

To satisfy the TIN test, the activity must rely fundamentally on principles of the hard sciences.4 The permissible scientific fields are clearly defined: physical sciences, biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.4

The standard requires the use of applied science; the technological uncertainty and the subsequent experimentation must be based on these recognized scientific disciplines, explicitly excluding methodologies based on market research, intuition, or unsystematic trial-and-error.5 For example, the development of new algorithms, the use of computer-aided design (CAD) software, or complex simulation tools can help establish a foundation in computer science or engineering that supports the TIN criterion.5

The Exclusionary Rule

IRC § 41 provides a clear negative definition for unqualified activities by explicitly excluding research in the social sciences, arts, or humanities.7 This exclusionary rule provides a bright-line boundary for compliance. For instance, a firm developing a new manufacturing process must ensure that the engineering research on material stress resistance qualifies (physical science/engineering), while any concurrent market analysis or ergonomic studies (social sciences) must be segregated and excluded from the qualified activity pool. This strict segregation is vital, as research failure to meet the TIN requirement for the underlying activity under IRC § 41 means that any associated Kentucky facility costs are automatically ineligible for the state credit.1

The necessity for meticulous documentation on the TIN test establishes a high bar for compliance. Documentation must clearly articulate the scientific hypothesis being tested and the specific physical or engineering principles being manipulated. A simple listing of engineering tasks performed is insufficient; the taxpayer must justify why specialized equipment or a dedicated facility is required by referencing the foundational scientific principles being tested or improved. If the activity merely applies existing, known scientific techniques without seeking to resolve technical uncertainty, the TIN standard is not met, irrespective of the complexity of the technology involved.

1.3 Contextualizing TIN within the Federal Four-Part Test

The TIN requirement is inherently intertwined with the other three parts of the IRC § 41 test. An activity qualifies only if all four conditions are met concurrently.

1. Permitted Purpose: The research must seek to develop or improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a business component, such as a product, process, software, formula, or invention.2 The technological information discovered through the TIN activity must directly contribute to achieving this permitted purpose.3 If the goal is purely aesthetic or stylistic, the activity does not qualify, even if highly technical design tools are used.5
2. Elimination of Uncertainty: This requires seeking information to eliminate technical uncertainties concerning the capability, design, or method of developing or improving the business component.2 Crucially, the uncertainty must be technological—a scientific or engineering challenge—that necessitates the application of hard science principles (TIN) for its resolution.
3. Process of Experimentation (PoE): Substantially all qualified activities must involve a systematic process designed to evaluate alternatives.2 The systematic methodology used in the PoE must fundamentally rely on the principles of hard science, thereby meeting the TIN criterion simultaneously.4

The critical role of TIN is demonstrated by its potential to act as the primary point of audit scrutiny. Tax authorities often challenge TIN because it requires a subjective interpretation of the underlying scientific intent. If the documentation fails to prove that the core activity relies on the specified hard sciences to resolve technical uncertainty, the entire R&D activity is disqualified under IRC § 41, rendering any associated Kentucky facility costs ineligible for the state tax credit.

II. Kentucky’s Strategic Interpretation: Linking Technological Activity to Capital Investment

Kentucky leverages the strict federal definition of qualified research activity (including the TIN standard) but focuses its incentive on capital investment in infrastructure, creating a unique compliance environment tailored toward encouraging long-term fixed assets in the Commonwealth.

2.1 The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395)

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit is a nonrefundable income tax credit established under KRS 141.395.9 The credit equals five percent (5%) of the qualified costs for the “construction of research facilities”.6

Mandatory Federal Conformity and Scope

The Kentucky statute mandates conformity by defining “Qualified research” as “qualified research as defined in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code”.1 This means that a business must first satisfy the rigorous four-part federal test—including the Technological in Nature requirement—before any associated facility costs can be claimed at the state level.

The credit is nonrefundable and can be applied against various tax liabilities, including individual income tax (KRS 141.020), corporation income tax (KRS 141.040), and the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET, KRS 141.0401).1 Unused credit balances may be carried forward for ten (10) years.6

2.2 The Critical Cost Distinction: Federal QREs vs. Kentucky Qualified Costs

The most substantial distinction between the federal R&D tax credit and the Kentucky credit lies in the definition of eligible expenses. While the federal credit primarily targets operational costs (wages, supplies, contract research), Kentucky strictly focuses on infrastructure investment.9

Definition of Kentucky Qualified Costs

Eligible costs are confined to those for the “construction of research facilities,” which encompasses:

1. Constructing facilities in Kentucky for qualified research.
2. Remodeling facilities in Kentucky for qualified research.
3. Expanding existing facilities in Kentucky for qualified research.
4. Equipping facilities in Kentucky for qualified research.1

The costs must be ascribed solely to tangible, depreciable property.6 This limits eligibility to capital investments (e.g., specialized lab machinery, testing gear, construction costs).9

Explicit Cost Exclusions

The Kentucky statute explicitly excludes amounts paid or incurred for replacement property.1 This specifically disqualifies raw materials, supplies consumed during testing, and other non-depreciable, consumable items that would typically qualify as Federal QREs.9 Furthermore, operational costs such as wages, contract research expenses, and computer rentals are excluded from Kentucky’s definition of qualified facility costs.9

This policy focus—excluding wages and supplies while including tangible property—demonstrates Kentucky’s legislative intent to incentivize permanent fixed asset investment within the state.6 The credit is a powerful economic development tool designed to encourage companies, particularly in high-tech manufacturing or engineering sectors, to establish long-term physical R&D residency in Kentucky.

The cost disparity is summarized below:

Table 1: Kentucky Qualified Costs vs. Federal Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)

2.3 Proving the Link: How TIN Justifies Facility Costs in Kentucky

To successfully claim the Kentucky credit, the taxpayer must demonstrate a robust causal link: the capital expenditure must be necessary to perform the scientific activity that meets the TIN standard.

The taxpayer is required to prove that the function of the capitalized asset (e.g., a new testing chamber, laboratory construction) is required to resolve the technological uncertainty through a systematic process relying on hard science principles. This establishes that the facility cost is not merely supportive of general business operations but is integral to the R&D process itself.

For example, if a civil engineering firm is conducting qualified research (TIN) into optimizing concrete formulas for specific seismic applications, they may need to construct a new stress-testing laboratory (facility cost). The specialized testing equipment installed within the lab is only eligible if its function is essential for measuring the physical properties of the new formula—activities that are fundamental to physical sciences and engineering principles.12 Without this necessity, the capital cost fails the link to IRC § 41 qualified research.

The timing of the credit generation is tied directly to federal depreciation schedules. The credit is available once the tangible, depreciable property is “placed in service”.13 For large-scale facility construction, this link to the service date is essential for maximizing the value of the nonrefundable credit, as the 10-year carryforward period commences from that point.1 Precise documentation of the service date for each asset is therefore critical to ensure the credit does not expire before utilization.

III. Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) Compliance and Filing Protocols

Claiming the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit requires adherence to specific administrative procedures set forth by the Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR). These protocols dictate how the credit is calculated, applied, and tracked.

3.1 Credit Mechanics and Carryforward

The credit is calculated simply as 5% of all qualified facility costs incurred during the tax year.6 Unlike the federal credit, Kentucky does not require the use of a fixed-base percentage or prior-year averaging; all eligible capital investments in the current year qualify for the 5% rate.9

The credit is nonrefundable and serves to offset tax liability.9 Any unused credit amount may be carried forward for a maximum of ten (10) years.1

3.2 Application and Credit Ordering Rules

The credit can be applied against the corporation income tax, the LLET, or the individual income tax.1 For corporate taxpayers, or pass-through entities whose credit flows through to partners/members (via Kentucky Schedule K-1), the application process introduces a crucial complexity: the credit must be calculated and tracked separately against the income tax liability and the LLET liability.1

For example, if a firm earns a $\$100,000$ credit, that credit is not treated as a single pool. If the firm fully utilizes its available income tax credit balance, any remaining credit balance available against the LLET liability cannot be subsequently transferred back to offset income tax, and vice versa.13 This necessitates careful annual planning to ensure maximum utilization before the 10-year carryforward period expires. The application of the credit must also follow the specific ordering clause established in KRS 141.0205.1

3.3 Required Documentation and Schedule Filing

The DOR requires comprehensive documentation to substantiate the qualified costs and the ongoing use of the credit.

Schedule QR Filing

The primary compliance form is Schedule QR, the Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit schedule.1 This schedule must be filed with the income tax return to determine the credit allowed for the completion of construction of research facilities.13

A separate Schedule QR must be completed and filed each year that a new project generating new costs qualifies.1 Furthermore, a copy of the Schedule QR must be submitted each year that the credit is claimed (even if only carrying forward an unused balance) until the full credit is utilized or the 10-year carryforward expires.1

Supporting Schedule of Property

To substantiate the capital costs, the return must include a mandatory supporting schedule that lists the tangible, depreciable property being claimed.1 This schedule must detail:

• The date purchased.
• The date placed in service (which generates the credit).1
• A description of the property.
• The cost of the property.1

This required specificity—linking the cost, the date in service, and the property description—provides the DOR with a direct audit trail. This detailed list allows an auditor to verify immediately if the asset’s function is truly required for the “Technological in Nature” research, or if the asset is general purpose and therefore ineligible. This level of required detail demands that taxpayers prepare robust documentation that clearly articulates the technical necessity (TIN) of every capitalized asset claimed.

To finalize the claim, the calculated credit amount is entered onto either Schedule TCS (for corporations and pass-through entities) or Schedule ITC (for individuals), depending on the filing entity.1 For pass-through entities, the credit is distributed to the partners or members via Kentucky Schedule K-1.1

IV. Integrated Case Study: Applying Technological in Nature to Facility Investment

To illustrate the necessary connection between technological activity and facility expenditure in Kentucky, consider the case of a specialized manufacturing firm.

4.1 Business Scenario: Advanced Automotive Component Engineering

Bluegrass Composites, LLC (BCC), a manufacturer based in Kentucky, focuses on developing lightweight composite materials for high-performance electric vehicle (EV) battery casings. BCC initiates a project aimed at improving the thermal resistance and structural integrity of the composite material, which must withstand extreme stress and temperature fluctuations.

The Underlying R&D Activity (IRC § 41 Compliance):

• Permitted Purpose: To improve the reliability and performance of the battery housing by enhancing its thermal stability and impact resistance.5
• Elimination of Uncertainty: BCC faces uncertainty regarding the optimal chemical composition and the precise curing methodologies needed to achieve the required strength and heat dissipation metrics without compromising weight. This represents a technical challenge concerning the method and capability of development.2
• Technological in Nature (TIN): The research relies fundamentally on principles of physical chemistry, materials science, and mechanical engineering. Experiments involve manipulating molecular binding agents and temperature-pressure cycles to understand material behavior—activities clearly within the scope of hard sciences.4
• Process of Experimentation (PoE): BCC employs a systematic series of tests, using computer models (computer science) to predict optimal formulas, followed by physical tests in a controlled environment to validate the model’s predictions and systematically evaluate various composition alternatives.15

4.2 Qualified Facility Cost Identification and Calculation

To execute this technologically complex research, BCC incurs significant capital costs in 2024 to construct and equip a new, dedicated research laboratory in Lexington, Kentucky.

• Credit Calculation:

• Total Qualified Costs: $\$3,000,000$
• Credit Rate: 5%
• Total State Credit Earned (2024): $\$150,000$

4.3 Credit Application and Tracking

The $\$150,000$ credit is generated when the facility and equipment are placed in service. BCC must file Schedule QR and attach the detailed supporting schedule of the $\$3,000,000$ in depreciable property, ensuring that documentation substantiates the necessity of these assets for the TIN activities.

Consider the application of the nonrefundable credit against BCC’s 2024 tax liabilities:

• Corporate Income Tax Liability: $\$100,000$
• LLET Liability: $\$70,000$

The analysis of utilization involves separately tracking the credit against each tax.

In this scenario, BCC utilizes $\$100,000$ against Income Tax and then applies the remaining $\$50,000$ of the credit balance against the LLET liability, fully offsetting it. A remaining $\$20,000$ of the LLET liability must be paid, and no credit carryforward is generated because the entire $\$150,000$ credit was utilized against the two tax types.

However, if BCC’s LLET liability was only $\$30,000$, the application would change:

1. Income Tax applied: $\$100,000$ (remaining credit: $\$50,000$).
2. LLET applied: $\$30,000$ (fully offsets LLET).
3. Unused Credit: $\$20,000$.

Under the Kentucky rule requiring separate calculation and tracking 13, the unused $\$20,000$ credit must be carried forward and can only be applied against future LLET or corporate income tax liability as permitted by the original apportionment, requiring precise tracking over the next 10 years.

Audit Strategy for Multi-Purpose Assets

In claiming the costs of specialized equipment, such as the thermal curing oven, the taxpayer must be prepared to defend the asset’s use. While such equipment might occasionally be used for production quality control—a non-qualifying activity—the taxpayer must demonstrate that the primary or sole purpose of the depreciable asset is to conduct the technological experimentation required by the TIN and PoE tests.9 Documentation, such as equipment usage logs, scheduling data, and project reports confirming that the asset is overwhelmingly utilized for resolving technical uncertainty, is crucial for surviving a DOR audit.

Furthermore, firms often strategically stack the Kentucky facility credit with the Federal R&D credit. Although the depreciable facility costs claimed in Kentucky are generally ineligible for the federal credit, the operational expenses incurred within that Kentucky facility (e.g., wages, supplies) are QREs for the federal claim.2 This creates a comprehensive benefit: Kentucky subsidizes the infrastructure (long-term asset), while the Federal credit subsidizes the operations (human capital and materials) utilizing that infrastructure. This maximized benefit structure is entirely contingent upon proving that the activities meet the fundamental IRC § 41 standards, particularly the Technological in Nature requirement.

Conclusion: Strategic Investment in Technological Infrastructure

The Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395) is a highly targeted incentive, meticulously designed to foster the growth of research infrastructure within the Commonwealth. By requiring mandatory conformity to the definition of “Qualified Research” under IRC § 41, the state effectively outsources the most rigorous technical determination—the “Technological in Nature” (TIN) test—to established federal standards.

The TIN test serves as the foundational scientific prerequisite, ensuring that the research activities supported by capital investment are based on principles of hard sciences (physical/biological science, engineering, or computer science). This requirement is crucial because Kentucky uniquely limits eligible costs to tangible, depreciable property used for constructing, remodeling, or equipping research facilities, thereby focusing the state subsidy entirely on long-term physical assets.

For businesses seeking to utilize the nonrefundable 5% credit, success hinges on meticulous compliance:

1. Technical Justification: Proving that the research activity meets the four-part test, with specific emphasis on how the technical uncertainty necessitates the application of hard science (TIN).
2. Asset Linkage: Establishing a clear, demonstrable link between the capital cost (the depreciable asset) and its necessary function within the qualified research activity.
3. DOR Protocol: Adhering to Kentucky DOR filing requirements, including the annual submission of Schedule QR and the detailed supporting schedule listing all tangible, depreciable property with associated dates placed in service and costs.1
4. Tax Tracking: Separately calculating and tracking the credit utilization against Income Tax and LLET liabilities to prevent unnecessary carryforward expiration over the 10-year period.13

By satisfying the stringent federal TIN criteria and meeting the state’s focused capital expenditure requirements, Kentucky businesses can effectively translate significant infrastructure investment into a reliable tax reduction, ultimately supporting both cutting-edge scientific development and the state’s economic objective of securing long-term R&D residency.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/