Managing the Unused Credit Carryforward for the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (KRS 141.395)

Executive Summary: Defining the Unused Credit

The Unused Credit represents the portion of the nonrefundable Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit generated in a given tax year that exceeds a taxpayer’s current year combined state tax liability. This excess amount is eligible to be carried forward for up to ten consecutive taxable years for application against future Kentucky tax obligations.1

The carryforward provision is a fundamental component of the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit (QRF credit). Because this incentive focuses on large, singular capital investments in research infrastructure, it generates a substantial, fixed credit (5% of qualified costs) upfront.2 This generated amount almost always exceeds the tax liability of the year the facility is placed in service. Since the credit is nonrefundable, any amount that cannot be applied in the current tax period—the Unused Credit—must be transferred forward.2 The ten-year carryforward period is therefore indispensable, ensuring that the initial economic benefit of the facility investment is fully realized by allowing the tax asset to be monetized against fluctuating annual state taxes over the long term, thus stabilizing the incentive’s value.2

I. The Statutory Foundation of Kentucky’s R&D Facility Credit

Understanding the mechanism of the Unused Credit requires a detailed review of the statute governing the generation of the credit itself, which is codified in Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 141.395.

1.1. Scope and Eligibility (KRS 141.395)

The Kentucky QRF credit is a highly specific incentive distinct from the broader federal R&D tax credit, focusing exclusively on capital expenditures. The nonrefundable tax credit is calculated at a rate of five percent (5%) of the qualified cost incurred for the “construction of research facilities”.2

The definition of eligible costs is narrow and strictly defined. “Construction of research facilities” means constructing, remodeling, equipping facilities in the Commonwealth, or expanding existing facilities in Kentucky for the purpose of qualified research.1 Furthermore, eligibility is limited solely to tangible, depreciable property.1 The statute explicitly excludes any amounts paid or incurred for replacement property.1 Crucially, the definition of “qualified research” utilized for this state credit aligns directly with the parameters established in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).1

1.2. Nonrefundable Status and Tax Liability Targets

The QRF credit’s designation as nonrefundable dictates the necessity of the carryforward mechanism. A nonrefundable credit may reduce a taxpayer’s liability to zero but cannot result in a cash payment or refund from the state.2 Consequently, when the generated credit amount exceeds the available tax liability, the excess automatically becomes the Unused Credit eligible for carryforward.

The QRF credit offers robust application potential as it can be applied against two primary state tax obligations 1:

1. The Kentucky Income Tax, imposed under KRS 141.020 (individual) or 141.040 (corporate).
2. The Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET), imposed under KRS 141.0401.

This dual application is significant because it provides a wider tax base against which the credit can be utilized, increasing the probability of full monetization over the carryforward period.1

1.3. Generating the Initial Credit and the Unused Balance

The credit is deemed available for utilization generally once the tangible, depreciable property that forms the basis of the facility is placed in service.4

The calculation of the initial Unused Credit is defined by a simple arithmetic relationship: the total QRF credit generated minus the maximum amount allowed for offset in the current tax year. The limiting factor in this calculation is the Net Available Tax Liability. This net liability is the remaining tax due after applying credits that hold a higher priority in the statutory ordering scheme (discussed in Section 2.2).

Unlike many state R&D tax credits which are tied to ongoing operational expenses such as wages and supplies, the Kentucky QRF credit is triggered by capital expenditures.2 This structure means the credit is generated as a large, lumpy sum tied to the completion and activation of major capital projects.2 Because the credit is substantial and generated immediately, typically representing 5% of a multi-million dollar construction cost, it is virtually certain that the initial credit amount will exceed a single year’s combined tax liability. This structural reality makes the 10-year carryforward period not merely a benefit, but a necessary statutory feature required to ensure the incentive provides meaningful, sustained economic value commensurate with the long-term infrastructure investment.

II. Mechanics of the Unused Credit Carryforward

The mechanics of carrying forward the Unused Credit are governed by precise statutory constraints, primarily concerning duration, credit ordering, and minimum tax requirements.

2.1. The Ten-Year Carryforward Duration and Expiration Risk

Kentucky law explicitly dictates the duration for which any unused portion of the QRF credit may be preserved. Any unused credit may be carried forward for ten (10) consecutive taxable years.1 This time frame commences in the year the credit is first available for use.

The utilization of this carryforward is constrained by an expiration clock. Taxpayers must continue claiming the credit each tax year “until the full credit is utilized or the 10-year carryforward period has expired, whichever occurs first”.1 This deadline necessitates meticulous tracking of the credit’s vintage—the specific tax year in which the credit was generated.

While not explicitly mandated by statute, standard tax accounting practice requires the application of the oldest available credits first, known as the First-In, First-Out (FIFO) methodology. This procedural necessity minimizes the risk of credit expiration. If a company generates credits in multiple years (multiple vintages), it must ensure that the oldest credit is applied against the available liability before moving on to newer credits, requiring a decade-long granular tracking system.

2.2. The Governing Rule of Credit Ordering (KRS 141.0205)

The most complex determinant in the annual calculation of the Unused Credit is the strict ordering rule mandated by KRS 141.0205.1 Since the QRF credit is nonrefundable, it must be applied in a specific order relative to other nonrefundable business incentive credits.5

The Research Facilities Credit (KRS 141.395) is positioned at sub-section (j) within the list of nonrefundable business credits.5 This means that dozens of other credits—including the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) credit (a), various comprehensive Economic Development Credits (EDC) such as KREDA, KIDA, and KJDA (b), and specialized credits like the health insurance credit (e) and tax paid to other states credit (f)—must be applied and exhaust their potential benefits before the QRF credit can be applied against the remaining Net Available Tax Liability.5

This strict priority hierarchy can create a stacked dependency where the effective monetization of the QRF credit is compromised by the prior use of other incentives. If a taxpayer has simultaneously entered into various economic development agreements that generate significant, higher-priority credits, these incentives may consume a substantial portion of the annual income tax and LLET liability. This leaves a diminished pool of available tax liability for the QRF credit, resulting in a larger portion of the QRF credit being deemed “unused” and added to the carryforward balance. While the long 10-year carryforward period offers security, analysts must strategically model scenarios where the QRF credit carryforward inflates rapidly dueing to prior credit usage, thus pushing utilization dangerously close to the statutory expiration deadline.

2.3. The LLET Minimum Tax Constraint

A key calculation constraint when applying the QRF credit against the Limited Liability Entity Tax (LLET) is the statutory minimum tax requirement. Kentucky law mandates that the QRF credit cannot reduce the LLET liability below the statutory floor of $175.6

This minimum tax floor directly impacts the annual utilization calculation. For instance, if a corporation’s LLET liability is $\$1,000$, only $\$825$ $(\$1,000 – \$175)$ can be offset by the QRF credit in that year. The remaining $\$175$ must be paid, and the amount of credit that could not be applied due to this floor is added to the Unused Credit carryforward pool. This constraint must be respected regardless of the QRF credit’s position in the KRS 141.0205 ordering queue.

III. Kentucky Revenue Office Guidance: Compliance and Reporting

The Kentucky Department of Revenue (DOR) requires specific forms to document the calculation, utilization, and carryforward tracking of the QRF credit, ensuring compliance with the 10-year expiration rule.

3.1. Schedule QR (Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit)

Schedule QR is the foundational compliance document for the QRF credit. It is used to compute the initial allowable tax credit based on qualified costs for construction and equipment.4 Taxpayers are required to include a supporting schedule listing the specific tangible, depreciable property included in the costs, detailing the date purchased, date placed in service, description, and cost.1

The critical element concerning the Unused Credit is the annual reporting obligation. Schedule QR must be attached to the tax return each year the credit is claimed.1 This continuous annual submission requirement serves as the formal audit trail, tracking the utilization of the credit and documenting the remaining balance subject to the 10-year carryforward period.1 If a new project qualifies in a subsequent year, a separate Schedule QR must be filed for that project, reinforcing the necessity of tracking multiple, staggered 10-year expiration clocks.1

The DOR’s enforcement emphasis is highly focused on substance and duration. The requirement to list specific depreciable property verifies that the initial credit calculation is based on qualifying tangible assets. Simultaneously, the demand for annual submission of Schedule QR demonstrates the DOR’s intent to police the 10-year statutory life of the credit. Taxpayers must maintain meticulous, decade-long records of the credit’s amortization, as lax documentation on the property placed in service and annual utilization tracking is a significant indicator for audit review concerning the validity of claimed carryforward balances.

3.2. Schedule TCS (Tax Credit Summary)

Schedule TCS, the Tax Credit Summary, is used by corporations and limited liability pass-through entities to summarize and reconcile all tax credits claimed against the Income Tax (KRS 141.040) and LLET (KRS 141.0401).8

Schedule TCS is central to enforcing the mandatory credit ordering required by KRS 141.0205.8 The lines are structured such that the correct amount of Net Available Tax Liability is determined before the QRF credit is applied. The amount of the QRF credit utilized in the current year (as determined on Schedule QR) is entered onto Schedule TCS, where the final calculation for the annual tax offset is made. Any amount exceeding the maximum utilization allowed after applying all ordering rules and the LLET minimum constraint is officially recorded as the Unused Credit carryforward.6

3.3. Pass-Through Entity Considerations

For pass-through entities, such as S corporations and partnerships, the QRF credit is subject to specific allocation rules. The credit is allocated pro rata to the partners, members, shareholders, or beneficiaries, who then claim the credit against their individual income tax liability via Schedule K-1.2 However, the credit may also be utilized to offset the LLET liability at the entity level before allocation to the owners.2

IV. Detailed Case Study: Multi-Year Carryforward Application

This scenario demonstrates the practical impact of the statutory constraints, particularly the credit ordering rules and the LLET minimum tax, on the annual calculation and management of the Unused Credit carryforward.

4.1. Scenario Setup

4.2. Year-by-Year Utilization and Carryforward Tracking

The following table tracks the utilization of the $\$500,000$ credit pool (Vintage 1) across four years.

Multi-Year Carryforward Calculation and Utilization (Source V1)

Year-by-Year Analysis

• Year 1: The total liability is $\$100,000$. Following KRS 141.0205, the higher-priority EDC credit is applied first, consuming $\$10,000$. This leaves $\$90,000$ available for the QRF credit. The remaining $\$410,000$ of the initial $\$500,000$ generated credit becomes the Unused Credit Carryforward.
• Year 2: A similar scenario, resulting in $\$70,000$ utilization against the available liability, reducing the carryforward balance to $\$340,000$.
• Year 3 (LLET Minimum Impact): The company experiences low profitability, resulting in a total tax liability of $\$20,000$, consisting entirely of LLET. The LLET minimum constraint applies here: the credit cannot reduce the tax below $\$175$.7 Therefore, only $\$19,825$ is utilized, even though the company had a large carryforward balance available. The remaining $\$320,175$ continues to be carried forward.
• Year 4: A substantial increase in profitability yields high tax liability. After the $\$10,000$ EDC is applied, the Net Liability Available is $\$390,000$. This allows the company to utilize the entire remaining V1 carryforward balance of $\$320,175$, fully monetizing the credit pool before the expiration date.

4.3. Expiration Tracking and Strategic Administration

If InnovateTech Corp. had failed to utilize the final $\$320,175$ by the end of Year 11, that tax asset would have expired under the statutory mandate.1 The 10-year limit is a fixed ceiling, and any portion unused after that time is permanently forfeited.

Furthermore, if the company generated a new QRF credit (Vintage 2) in Year 5, it would now be managing two distinct pools: the remaining V1 balance (if any) and the new V2 balance, each operating under its own 10-year clock.

The proper administration of unused credits is not a passive accounting exercise; it necessitates a decade-long administrative effort. This effort includes tracking multiple credit vintages, applying complex ordering rules, and ensuring the annual submission of Schedule QR documentation for continuous compliance.1 For enterprises engaged in continuous R&D infrastructure investment, they must manage several concurrent carryforward pools with staggered expiration dates. Mismanagement of this complex process can lead to the unrecoverable expiration of significant tax assets, demonstrating that the 10-year period, while generous, introduces substantial compliance risk if not meticulously managed.

V. Conclusion: Strategic Value and Compliance Imperatives

The Unused Credit carryforward is the most significant structural feature of the Kentucky Qualified Research Facility Tax Credit, enabling taxpayers to fully recover the value of the 5% incentive generated by large, non-recurring capital projects. The effective monetization of this tax asset requires a high degree of technical diligence in two primary areas: statutory application and continuous compliance.

First, strategic application must strictly adhere to the credit ordering rules established in KRS 141.0205. The utilization of the QRF credit is subordinated to numerous other high-priority business incentives, which dictates that analysts must model the tax base remaining after these prior offsets are calculated. Furthermore, in years with low income, the LLET minimum floor of $\$175$ serves as a non-reducible constraint, forcing a portion of the credit into carryforward even when LLET liability is present.

Second, the compliance burden is sustained over the entire life of the credit. Meticulous tracking of credit vintages is non-negotiable to minimize the risk of forfeiture under the 10-year expiration mandate. The annual requirement to file Schedule QR and attach detailed schedules of depreciable property serves as the primary mechanism by which the Kentucky Department of Revenue verifies both the initial legitimacy and the ongoing amortization of the unused credit.1

In conclusion, tax planning related to the Kentucky QRF credit must involve modeling the full 10-year utilization cycle for each generated credit pool. By prioritizing the application of older credits (FIFO) and accurately accounting for the layered statutory constraints, corporations can successfully transform a large, immediate capital incentive into a stable, decade-long reduction in state tax liability.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/