Strategic Analysis of Basic Research Payments within the Louisiana Research and Development Tax Credit Framework
Basic research payments constitute cash disbursements made by corporations to qualified organizations, such as universities or scientific non-profits, for fundamental research aimed at advancing scientific knowledge without specific commercial objectives. Within the Louisiana tax landscape, these expenditures qualify for a significant credit of up to 30%, provided the research activities are physically conducted within the state’s borders.1
Legislative Foundations and Federal Conformity
The architecture of the Louisiana Research and Development (R&D) tax credit is deeply rooted in the state’s desire to foster an environment conducive to high-tech innovation and scientific discovery. Central to this objective is the definition of “basic research payments,” a term that Louisiana law imports directly from the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) to maintain consistency for multi-state corporations and local startups alike. Under 26 U.S.C. § 41(e), a basic research payment is defined as any amount paid in cash during a taxable year by a corporation to a qualified organization for basic research, but only if such payment is pursuant to a written agreement between the corporation and the qualified organization.3
Louisiana Revised Statute (La. R.S.) 47:6015 serves as the primary statutory vehicle for this incentive. The statute specifies that for the purposes of determining the credit, “qualified research expenses” and “qualified research” carry the same meanings as those defined in 26 U.S.C. § 41, as amended.5 This conformity ensures that the rigorous standards established by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for what constitutes “fundamental” as opposed to “applied” research are upheld at the state level. However, Louisiana modifies this conformity through a strict geographic nexus: only research conducted within Louisiana qualifies for the state-level incentive.1
The distinction between basic research and standard qualified research is paramount. Basic research is defined under IRC § 41(e)(7)(A) as any original investigation for the advancement of scientific knowledge not having a specific commercial objective.4 This excludes research in the social sciences, arts, or humanities. By focusing on fundamental scientific inquiry, the law aims to support the earliest stages of the innovation pipeline—the theoretical and experimental work that typically takes place in academic laboratories and often precedes the development of specific business components or products.
Defining the Qualified Organization
The eligibility of a basic research payment is contingent upon the status of the recipient. The law restricts these payments to “qualified organizations,” a designation that includes several specific categories of entities dedicated to education and scientific advancement.7 The structural requirements for these organizations are intended to ensure that the tax subsidy supports non-profit, public-interest research rather than private, commercialized development conducted by third parties.
Educational Institutions
The most common recipients of basic research payments are institutions of higher education. Under IRC § 41(e)(6)(A), a qualified organization includes any educational organization which is an institution of higher education within the meaning of section 3304(f) and is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).7 These are typically accredited colleges and universities that maintain a regular faculty and curriculum and have a regularly enrolled body of students in attendance at the place where its educational activities are carried on. In Louisiana, this primarily encompasses major research universities such as Louisiana State University (LSU), Tulane University, and the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, which serve as the state’s intellectual infrastructure for innovation.9
Scientific Research Organizations
Beyond traditional universities, the law recognizes certain non-profit scientific organizations. To qualify, an entity must be described in section 501(c)(3) of the IRC, be exempt from taxation under section 501(a), and be organized and operated primarily to conduct scientific research.7 Crucially, the organization must not be a private foundation.7 This ensures that the research being funded is accessible to the broader scientific community and contributes to the public store of knowledge.
Research Consortia and Grant Organizations
The statutory framework also includes research consortia and certain organizations that promote research through grant-making. A qualified research consortium is a tax-exempt organization (under section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(6)) that is organized and operated primarily to conduct scientific research.7 Furthermore, organizations organized and operated primarily to promote scientific research by making grants to institutions of higher education under written agreements may also qualify, provided they meet specific non-profit and governance standards.7
| Organization Category | Statutory Basis | Primary Mission Requirement |
| Higher Education Institution | IRC § 3304(f) | Academic instruction and bachelor’s/higher degree programs. |
| Scientific Research Org | IRC § 501(c)(3) | Primary operation must be scientific research for public benefit. |
| Research Consortium | IRC § 41(b)(3)(C) | Collaborative scientific research; must be non-private foundation. |
| Grant-Making Organization | IRC § 41(e)(6)(D) | Promotion of scientific research via higher education grants. |
Financial Mechanics: Inclusion and Incentives
One of the most significant advantages of basic research payments within the Louisiana tax credit regime is the inclusion rate. While the state generally follows the federal logic for calculating qualified research expenses (QREs), it offers a tiered incentive that is particularly generous toward small businesses and university-linked research.
The 100% Inclusion Advantage
A critical distinction exists between “contract research” and “basic research payments.” Under both federal and state law, payments made to third parties for standard qualified research (contract research) are typically only 65% includable in the credit calculation.1 This 35% reduction is intended to strip away the overhead and profit margins built into commercial contracts, leaving only the “direct” research costs.
However, basic research payments to qualified organizations are often treated differently. Louisiana guidance indicates that while contract research is limited to 65%, basic research payments made to qualified organizations—such as Louisiana universities—for fundamental research can be included at 100% of the cash payment, provided the research is performed within the state.2 This provides a 35% increase in the “base” of the credit for companies that choose to partner with academic institutions for fundamental discovery rather than hiring commercial labs for applied development.
Louisiana’s Tiered Credit Structure
The actual tax benefit derived from these expenditures is determined by a tiered system based on the number of persons employed by the entity in Louisiana.2 This structure reflects a policy decision to prioritize small, innovative startups that may have higher relative R&D costs but less immediate tax liability.
| Entity Size (LA Employees) | Credit Rate on Excess QREs | Base Amount Percentage |
| Less than 50 employees | 30% | 50% of 3-year average |
| 50 to 99 employees | 10% | 80% of 3-year average |
| 100 or more employees | 5% | 80% of 3-year average |
For a small biotechnology firm with fewer than 50 employees, the 30% credit rate applied to basic research payments (at 100% inclusion) creates a powerful financial engine.2 When a company of this size spends $100,000 on a research agreement with a Louisiana university, and that expenditure exceeds its base amount, the resulting tax credit is $30,000. In contrast, a similar $100,000 payment to a commercial contractor would only yield a $19,500 credit ($100,000 x 65% inclusion x 30% rate).
The “Base Amount” Hurdles
The credit is “incremental,” meaning it is calculated on the amount by which current-year Louisiana QREs exceed a historical base.5 For companies with 50 or more employees, the base amount is 80% of the average annual qualified research expenses within Louisiana during the three preceding taxable years.5 For smaller entities (less than 50 employees), the threshold is lower, set at 50% of the three-year average.5 This lower threshold makes it significantly easier for small businesses to qualify for the credit, even with relatively modest increases in research spending.
Louisiana Department of Revenue and Economic Development Guidance
The administration of the R&D credit is a joint effort between the Louisiana Department of Revenue (LDR) and Louisiana Economic Development (LED). While the LDR manages the tax filings and refunds, the LED acts as the primary certifying body, reviewing applications and determining the eligibility of research activities.
Revenue Information Bulletin 09-020
One of the most foundational pieces of administrative guidance is Revenue Information Bulletin (RIB) 09-020. This bulletin was issued to clarify the transition of the R&D credit into a refundable format.14 Although subsequent legislation has modified the refundability for larger corporations, the bulletin established the department’s position on the “qualified research” definition, emphasizing that it must meet the four-part test derived from the federal code.1 It also underscored that basic research and qualified research must be conducted specifically in Louisiana to qualify for the state credit.1
Revenue Information Bulletin 15-019 and the 2015 Reform
The state underwent a significant fiscal adjustment in 2015, which impacted the R&D credit’s structure. RIB 15-019 addressed changes in the refundability and transferability of credits.12 For credits claimed on original returns filed after July 1, 2015, the incentive generally became non-refundable, with a five-year carryforward period for any unused portion.2 This remains the standard for most claimants today, although certain historical claims and amended returns may follow different rules.12
Act 11 and the 2025 Aggregate Cap
A major shift in state revenue office guidance occurred with the passage of Act 11 during the 2024 Third Extraordinary Session. RIB 25-012 clarifies that the Louisiana R&D tax credit will now be subject to an annual aggregate cap of $12 million.15 This cap applies to claims allowed on returns filed on or after July 1, 2025.2
The implementation of this cap introduces a “first-come, first-served” mechanism.2 Taxpayers whose claims are disallowed due to the cap being reached in a given fiscal year are given priority in the subsequent year.2 This change places a premium on early application and submission to the LED. Furthermore, Act 11 established a flat tax rate of 3% for individuals and pass-through entities electing to be taxed as corporations, which alters the underlying tax liability that these credits offset.15
The Four-Part Test in the Context of Basic Research
Even fundamental research must satisfy a specific set of criteria to be certified by the LED. While the “commercial objective” is absent in basic research, the activity must still be scientific in nature and rigorous in its methodology. The LED utilizes the standard federal four-part test to evaluate all R&D claims, including basic research payments.12
- Technological in Nature: The research must rely on the principles of physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.12 Basic research, by definition, is the “advancement of scientific knowledge,” naturally fitting this criterion.4
- Permitted Purpose: The research must be intended to discover information that is useful in the development of a new or improved business component.1 For basic research, this is interpreted broadly as discovering fundamental scientific principles that could eventually inform product or process development.4
- Elimination of Uncertainty: The activity must be intended to discover information that eliminates uncertainty concerning the development or design of a product or process.12 Basic research addresses “uncertainty” at the most fundamental level—the basic laws of science and nature.
- Process of Experimentation: At least 80% of the activities must involve a process of experimentation, such as evaluating alternatives, testing hypotheses, or modeling.1 This is the hallmark of university-based basic research.
For basic research payments, the LED review focuses heavily on the “Process of Experimentation” and “Technological in Nature” requirements. Documentation such as the written agreement with the university, project descriptions, and researcher credentials are vital to proving that the funds were spent on genuine scientific inquiry rather than routine data collection or market research.1
Comparative Analysis of Basic vs. Contract Research
To optimize the tax benefit, businesses must understand the nuances between different types of third-party research arrangements. The following table summarizes the key differences in how these expenditures are treated under Louisiana law.
| Feature | Basic Research Payment | Contract Research Expense | Qualified Research Consortium |
| Recipient | Qualified Organization (Univ/Non-profit) | Any third party (Commercial/Individual) | 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(6) Scientific Org |
| Objective | Advancement of knowledge (Fundamental) | Business component development (Applied) | Scientific research for public/member benefit |
| Inclusion Rate | 100% | 65% | 75% |
| Agreement | Written agreement required | Written agreement required | Written agreement required |
| LA Nexus | Must be performed in LA | Must be performed in LA | Must be performed in LA |
| Financial Risk | Taxpayer must bear risk of failure | Taxpayer must bear risk of failure | Taxpayer must bear risk of failure |
The financial risk requirement, mentioned in IRC Section 41 and federal regulations, is a critical component of state eligibility as well.2 For a payment to qualify, the taxpayer must bear the financial risk of the research. If the research is “funded”—meaning the taxpayer is paid regardless of the outcome or the third party guarantees a result—it may be disqualified.18 In basic research agreements with universities, the corporation usually funds the research with no guarantee of a specific commercial result, thereby fulfilling the risk requirement.18
Application Procedures and Administrative Rules
The pathway to securing the Louisiana R&D credit involves a multi-stage administrative process overseen by the LED’s Office of Business Development. Companies cannot simply claim the credit on their tax return without prior certification.1
The FastLane Application System
Louisiana utilizes an online portal called “FastLane” for business incentive programs.20 Taxpayers must submit a detailed application that includes:
- Federal Form 6765 for the current and three previous tax years.1
- A breakdown of Louisiana-only qualified research expenses, specifically identifying basic research payments.1
- The total number of persons employed in Louisiana and the subset directly engaged in R&D.5
- Documentation of wages (W-2s or K-1s) and third-party payments (1099s or invoices).1
Expenditure Verification Reports
For companies with fewer than 50 employees that have not filed for the federal credit (Form 6765), an “Expenditure Verification Report” is often required.5 This report must be prepared by an independent CPA or tax attorney selected by the LED.5 The maximum fee for this verification is $15,000 for applications with expenditures up to $1 million, and $25,000 for those exceeding $1 million.5 This rigorous audit-like process ensures that only legitimate, qualified expenses are certified for the 30% credit rate.
Processing Timelines and Fees
The certification process typically takes between three to six months.1 This timeline depends on the complexity of the application and whether it is selected for a detailed review, which is statutorily required for at least 10% of all applications.1 In addition to the verification report fees, all applicants must pay an application fee to the LED, which is 0.5% of the tax credit applied for, with a $500 minimum and $15,000 maximum.12
Example Scenario: University Partnership for Fundamental Materials Discovery
To ground these concepts in practice, consider a hypothetical Louisiana-based chemical company, “Cajun Chem-Tech,” which has 85 employees. Cajun Chem-Tech specializes in advanced polymers and decides to fund a three-year fundamental research project at LSU to discover the basic molecular properties of a new class of sustainable resins.
Project Parameters:
- Company Size: 85 employees (Tier: 10% credit rate).2
- Payment: $200,000 cash to LSU (Qualified Organization) for basic research.3
- Previous 3-Year Avg Louisiana QREs: $150,000.
- Other Louisiana QREs in current year: $0 (all research is through the LSU agreement).
Step 1: Determine Eligibility
LSU is a “qualified organization” under IRC § 41(6).7 The molecular property research is “fundamental” and lacks a specific commercial objective, qualifying as “basic research” under § 41(e)(7).4 A written agreement is established before the work begins.3
Step 2: Calculate the Base Amount
For an entity with 50-99 employees, the base amount is 80% of the three-year average.5
$$\text{Base Amount} = \$150,000 \times 0.80 = \$120,000$$
Step 3: Determine Current Year QREs
Because it is a basic research payment to a qualified organization, it is included at 100%.2
$$\text{Current Year QREs} = \$200,000$$
Step 4: Calculate the Tax Credit
The credit is the rate (10%) multiplied by the excess of current QREs over the base.5
$$\text{Excess QREs} = \$200,000 – \$120,000 = \$80,000$$
$$\text{Tax Credit} = \$80,000 \times 0.10 = \$8,000$$
In this scenario, Cajun Chem-Tech secures an $8,000 tax credit to offset its Louisiana income or franchise tax. If they had instead spent that $200,000 on a commercial development contract for a specific product, the inclusion rate would drop to 65% ($130,000), and the credit would plummet to $1,000.2 This illustrates the $7,000 premium the state provides for investing in basic research through university partnerships.
Statistics and Economic ROI Analysis
The Louisiana Department of Revenue and LED monitor the performance of the R&D credit through regular ROI reports. These statistics provide insight into which sectors are driving innovation and whether the state’s investment is yielding economic benefits.
Sectoral Distribution of Credits
In recent years, the chemical manufacturing sector has emerged as the dominant claimant of the R&D credit. In fiscal year 2023, chemical manufacturing accounted for 33.29% of all R&D credits received, a significant increase from 9.87% in fiscal 2022.21 Other sectors, such as petroleum and coal product manufacturing, saw their shares decrease.21
| Metric | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | Change |
| Total Incentives Received | $5.50 Million | $11.48 Million | +108.7% |
| Chemical Manufacturing Share | 9.87% | 33.29% | +23.42 pts |
| Economic ROI | 29.28% | -8.97% | -38.25 pts |
| Fiscal ROI | -96.75% | -92.67% | +4.08 pts |
ROI Trends and the 2025 Cap
The economic ROI for the R&D program showed a decline from 29.28% in 2022 to -8.97% in 2023.21 While this may seem concerning, it is often a result of the lag between research investment and economic output. The state’s decision to implement the $12 million annual cap starting in 2025 is a response to the rapidly growing volume of claims, ensuring that the incentive remains sustainable within the state’s broader fiscal budget.2
Louisiana ranks 41st nationally in the total number of SBIR/STTR awards received, trailing behind neighbors like Kentucky and Arkansas.10 To combat this, the state’s 30% credit on grant award amounts is specifically designed to leverage federal dollars.2 For basic research, this means that every dollar of federal funding a Louisiana company brings in via a university partnership can be amplified by state tax incentives.
SBIR and STTR: The “Cash Boost” for Basic Research
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) grants represent a specialized intersection of federal funding and state tax credits. Louisiana offers a distinct 30% credit on the Phase I or Phase II award amounts received from these programs.2
The STTR program, in particular, requires that the small business collaborate with a non-profit research institution (a qualified organization) for at least 30% of the work.10 This requirement aligns with the “basic research payment” definition. A Louisiana business receiving an STTR grant can effectively double-dip:
- Grant Credit: Receive a 30% Louisiana tax credit on the total award amount received.2
- R&D Credit: Include the portion of the grant (and any supplemental corporate funds) paid to the university partner as basic research payments in the standard R&D credit calculation.5
Furthermore, these SBIR/STTR-based credits are transferable and sellable to other Louisiana taxpayers via the state’s tax credit registry.2 This provides immediate liquidity for startups that may have the innovation but not yet the revenue to utilize non-refundable credits.
Compliance and Audit Preparedness
Given the high credit rates—particularly the 30% tier for small businesses—the LED and LDR maintain rigorous audit standards. Taxpayers must be prepared to defend their basic research claims through several layers of documentation.
The “Substantially All” Rule
For any research activity to qualify, “substantially all” (defined as 80% or more) of the activities must constitute a process of experimentation.1 If a university project includes a significant amount of routine testing, marketing, or administrative training, the LED may disqualify the entire expenditure or require a significant haircut to the claimed amount.1
Documentation Checklist for Basic Research
In the event of a detailed examination, the LED will typically request:
- The Written Agreement: Proof that the agreement was in place before the research commenced.1
- Narrative of Activities: A detailed technical description of the research, mapping it to the four-part test.1
- Breakdown of Costs: Invoices from the qualified organization and proof of payment (cancelled checks or bank statements).1
- Researcher Credentials: CVs or bios for the university professors and graduate students involved in the work.1
- Proof of Louisiana Nexus: Evidence that the research was performed in Louisiana-based labs (e.g., lab logs, location of equipment).1
Failure to provide these items can result in the revocation of certification and the recapture of any tax benefits already claimed.16 The LED also has the authority to audit at least 10% of applications pre-issuance, and the LDR can audit within the standard three-year statute of limitations for tax returns.1
Future Outlook: The Sunset and Beyond
The Louisiana Research and Development Tax Credit is currently scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2029.12 No credits may be earned for research expenditures incurred after this date unless the legislature acts to renew the program. In the interim, the program is undergoing a transition toward greater fiscal control through the $12 million aggregate cap.2
Businesses should also monitor the interplay between the Section 41 credit and Section 174 amortization. Following the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), R&D expenditures (Section 174) must now be capitalized and amortized over five years for domestic research and fifteen years for foreign research.17 This change has increased the taxable income for many innovative companies, making the Section 41 tax credit even more critical as a tool to offset the increased tax burden.17 Louisiana’s recent adoption of bonus amortization for research and experimental procedures (as mentioned in RIB 25-012) may provide additional state-level relief from these federal amortization requirements.15
Conclusion
The inclusion of basic research payments to qualified organizations within the Louisiana Research and Development tax credit represents a strategic alignment of tax policy and academic partnership. By providing a 100% inclusion rate and a credit of up to 30%, Louisiana incentivizes the private sector to anchor its most fundamental scientific discovery within the state’s university system. This not only provides a powerful financial offset for innovative companies but also strengthens the state’s intellectual infrastructure and talent pipeline.
However, the benefits of this incentive are balanced by rigorous administrative requirements. The necessity of a pre-certification from the LED, the adherence to the four-part test, and the strict geographic nexus mean that companies must prioritize compliance and documentation. As the state moves toward a capped fiscal model in 2025, the competition for these credits will intensify. For Louisiana businesses, the path forward involves early and proactive engagement with both their academic partners and the state’s economic development officials to ensure that their investments in basic research yield the maximum possible tax and economic return.
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state










