Navigating the Intersection: IRC Section 41 and the Louisiana R&D Tax Credit Compliance Guide

Executive Summary: The Dual Mandate of R&D Tax Incentives

The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 establishes the framework for the federal Research and Development (R&D) tax credit, defining criteria for qualified research expenses and activities.

Louisiana Revised Statute (R.S. 47:6015) adopts this federal structure but imposes critical modifications, including a mandatory in-state activity requirement and variable credit rates tied to employee size.

This report provides a detailed analysis of the statutory and administrative requirements governing the Louisiana Research and Development Tax Credit, focusing on the essential conformity to, and critical deviations from, the foundational rules established under IRC Section 41. It is designed to equip corporate tax directors and CFOs with the necessary technical understanding to ensure robust documentation, timely certification, and full compliance.

Section 1: The Federal Foundation – Understanding Internal Revenue Code Section 41

The federal R&D tax credit, governed by IRC Section 41, serves as the primary incentive mechanism for increasing research activities within the U.S. economy. This statute details the necessary qualifying criteria, credit calculation methodologies, documentation requirements, and specific exclusions required for a business owner to claim the credit.1 Qualification is not determined by the success or failure of the research, but by the nature of the activities themselves.

1.1 The Definition of Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs)

QREs are the core measure for calculating the credit, representing expenses incurred in the conduct of qualified research. These expenses must adhere to the rules established by IRC Section 41(b) and must also qualify as expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer in carrying on a trade or business.2 This “trade or business” standard aligns with the deduction rules specified under IRC Section 174.1

QREs generally comprise three main categories of expenditure:

1. Wages: Employee wages paid or incurred for qualified services. Qualified services include the direct performance, direct supervision, or direct support of qualified research.
2. Supplies: The cost of tangible property consumed or used in the conduct of qualified research.
3. Contract Research Expenses: This category accounts for 65 percent of any amount paid or incurred by the taxpayer to any person (other than an employee) for the performance of qualified research.3

1.2 The Crux of Qualification: The Four-Part Test

For any expenditure to be considered a QRE, the underlying activity must satisfy the statutory Four-Part Test defined in IRC Section 41(d)(1). The statute requires these tests to be applied separately to each “business component” developed or improved by the taxpayer.4

1.2.1 Test 1: Qualified Purpose (Business Component Test)

The research activity must be undertaken for the purpose of developing a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality of a business component. The focus is on the advancement of the component’s utility.4

1.2.2 Test 2: Elimination of Uncertainty

The activity must be aimed at eliminating technical uncertainty. This uncertainty must relate to the appropriate design, methodology, or capability needed to achieve the intended result of the business component.4

1.2.3 Test 3: Process of Experimentation

The taxpayer must demonstrate that the activities involved a systematic process of experimentation designed to resolve the technical uncertainty identified in Test 2. This process typically involves iterations of modeling, simulation, or trial-and-error methodologies.4

1.2.4 Test 4: Technological in Nature

The research must fundamentally rely upon the principles of physical sciences, biological sciences, computer science, or engineering, or their direct application.4

1.3 The Critical Role of Documentation

Although not explicitly listed in the statute as the fifth test, stringent documentation is the practical determinant of eligibility. The R&D credit is inherently activity-based, meaning qualification is established by examining the specific research actions undertaken by a company.4 As evidenced by recent case law, such as the Little Sandy Coal case, a taxpayer’s failure to maintain thorough and contemporaneous records demonstrating how each of the four statutory tests was met for every claimed expense can lead to the disallowance of the credit.4

This rigorous evidentiary requirement is directly imported into state claims. When a state like Louisiana adopts the IRC §41(d)(1) definition for its own qualified research 6, any deficiency in the underlying federal documentation automatically compromises the validity of the state claim. Therefore, the capacity to meticulously prove, through records, the systematic process of experimentation, the nature of the uncertainty addressed, and the technological principles applied is essential for substantiating both federal and state R&D tax credit claims.

Section 2: Louisiana’s R&D Tax Credit (R.S. 47:6015) – Conformity and Critical State Modifications

Louisiana Revised Statute 47:6015 establishes the state Research and Development Tax Credit, which is designed to encourage existing businesses with facilities in Louisiana to establish or continue R&D activities within the state.6 While the Louisiana statute largely conforms to the federal research credit as enacted under the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, it introduces significant modifications that taxpayers must adhere to.6

2.1 Mandatory Geographic and Federal Linkage Requirements

2.1.1 In-State Expenditure Requirement

Unlike the federal credit, which only requires research be conducted within the United States, Louisiana mandates that both “basic research” and “qualified research” must be conducted in Louisiana to qualify for the state credit.6 Taxpayers with multi-state operations must implement precise cost tracking systems to apportion QREs accurately to their Louisiana-based activities.

2.1.2 Federal Claim Requirement

The Louisiana statute generally requires that a taxpayer seeking the credit must also claim a federal income tax credit under 26 U.S.C. 41(a) for increasing research activities during the same taxable year.8 This connection is formalized through the application process, which requires the submission of the Federal Form 6765, Credit for Increasing Research Activities.5

2.2 Stricter Interpretation of the Process of Experimentation

Louisiana law specifically adopts the four requirements of IRC §41(d)(1) for defining “qualified research”.5 However, the state modifies the definition of the Process of Experimentation Test (Test 3) by imposing a rigid, quantitative floor.

The statute defines the “substantially all” requirement by stating that 80% or more of the research activities must involve a process of experimentation.5 This conversion of a qualitative federal standard into a mandatory quantitative threshold (80%) creates an elevated compliance burden for taxpayers in Louisiana. Taxpayers must implement granular activity tracking mechanisms—such as detailed time allocation records, activity logs, and project narratives—to quantitatively segment the time spent on core experimentation activities (designing, testing, validating) from supportive activities (administrative, routine quality control).

The state’s focus on enforcing this 80% minimum is evident in the documentation requirements for detailed examinations, which often request a breakdown of costs by expenditure category and by specific activity (business component).6 Taxpayers must be prepared to defend the 80% allocation based on contemporaneous records during an audit.

2.3 Statutory Exclusions

In addition to the exclusions found in IRC Section 41 (such as funded research or research conducted outside the United States) 4, Louisiana implements specific exclusions targeting certain types of contract work:

• Custom Manufacturing and Fabricating: Businesses primarily engaged in custom manufacturing and custom fabricating are statutorily excluded from claiming the credit.6
• The Patent Exception: The only means for a custom manufacturing or fabricating business to overcome this exclusion is by possessing a pending or issued United States patent related to the qualified research expenditures being claimed.6 This condition ensures that the state incentive is reserved for activities demonstrating technological novelty and advancement, rather than routine, job-specific engineering or fabrication tasks.

Section 3: State Administrative Guidance and Calculation Mechanics

The Louisiana R&D tax credit is an incremental credit administered through a multi-step process involving the Louisiana Economic Development (LED) and the Louisiana Department of Revenue (LDR). The structure of the credit is deliberately designed to favor smaller businesses.

3.1 Administrative Oversight and Application Requirements

3.1.1 Roles of LED and LDR

The certification process is managed by LED, which receives the application (Form R-1017) and supporting documentation.8 Credits cannot be claimed on a taxpayer’s return until LED has officially certified them.6 LDR is responsible for the utilization and carryforward management of the certified credits.10

3.1.2 Application and Verification

Each taxpayer seeking the credit must apply to LED.8 The application must include:

• A deposit of the expenditure verification report fee: $7,500 for applications claiming QREs up to $1 million, and $15,000 for applications claiming QREs over $1 million.9
• The federal income tax return and supporting documentation showing the federal research credit amount for the same taxable year, specifically attaching Federal Form 6765.5
• A detailed breakdown of total QREs versus Louisiana-only QREs.8
• Employment data, including the total number of Louisiana employees, the number engaged in R&D, and the average wages for both research and non-research personnel.8

Processing typically takes 3 to 6 months, but a detailed examination, statutorily required for at least 10% of applications, can prolong the total application time.6

3.2 Taxpayer Classification and Base Calculation Methodology

The calculation of the Louisiana R&D credit is incremental, meaning the credit is only applied to the amount of current year LA QREs that exceed a predetermined “base amount.” Both the calculation of the base amount and the subsequent credit rate are dependent on the taxpayer’s employee count, determined as of the last quarter of the tax year.5

For the purpose of calculating the base amount, the taxpayer must calculate the average of its Louisiana Qualified Research Expenditures incurred during the three preceding taxable years.7

The disparity in the required base amount (50% versus 80%) and the credit rate (30% versus 5% or 10%) reveals a deliberate structure designed to maximize the incentive for small businesses. By setting a low base amount (50%), the state makes it significantly easier for small businesses to demonstrate an “increase” in R&D spending over their historical average. This easier threshold is coupled with a credit rate that is six times higher than the rate for the largest corporations (30% vs. 5%), ensuring that new, incremental research investment by smaller firms yields a substantially greater proportional tax benefit.7

3.3 Program Limitations, Carryforward, and Transferability

3.3.1 The Fiscal Cap and Strategic Timing

A crucial limitation on the program is the statutory aggregate cap. Beginning July 1, 2025 (FY2026), the total amount of R&D tax credit allowed across all taxpayers in each fiscal year is limited to $12 million.7

The imposition of this fiscal cap fundamentally changes the dynamics of claiming the credit, transforming it from a mere statutory entitlement based on compliance into a competitive financial resource. Claims are processed on a first-come, first-served basis.7 Consequently, achieving statutory compliance is insufficient; timely application submission to LED becomes paramount. Taxpayers must prioritize submitting their certification application (Form R-1017) immediately following the close of the tax year to secure their place against the cap. Taxpayers whose claims are disallowed due to the cap receive priority in the following fiscal year, further emphasizing the risks associated with filing delays.7

3.3.2 Credit Utilization and Carryforward

The credit is utilized against tax liability. Note that statutory changes effective January 1, 2026 (Acts 2024, 3rd Ex. Sess., No. 6), stipulate that the credit will be applied only against income tax due, removing the application against the corporation franchise tax for all taxpayers.8 Unused credit amounts may be carried forward for a period not exceeding five years.7

3.3.3 Transferability

The primary R&D tax credits calculated based on incremental QREs are not transferable.7 However, credits derived from federal Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) or Small Business Technology Transfer (SBTT) grants are calculated separately (30% of the award received during the tax year).7 These specific SBIR/SBTT-related credits, beginning with the 2018 tax year, may be transferred or sold to another Louisiana taxpayer, offering enhanced liquidity for small technology firms.7 The LDR manages the tracking of these transferable credits through the Tax Registry and requires notification of transfer via Form R-6135.10

Section 4: Practical Example and Compliance Requirements

4.1 Example of the Louisiana Incremental Credit Calculation

The following calculation illustrates the credit determination for a small taxpayer, leveraging the preferential base percentage and high credit rate.

Scenario: Tech Development Co.

Tech Development Co. is a software development firm with 30 employees operating solely in Louisiana. The company’s Louisiana QREs for the current tax year are $250,000.

Calculation Steps

1. Determine Classification and Rates: Tech Development Co. employs 30 persons, classifying it as a small taxpayer (less than 50 employees). The applicable base rate is 50%, and the credit percentage is 30%.7
2. Calculate Average Prior QREs:
   
   $$\text{Average QREs} = \frac{(\$50,000 + \$100,000 + \$150,000)}{3} = \$100,000$$
3. Calculate the Base Amount:
   
   $$\text{Base Amount} = \$100,000 \times 50\% = \$50,000$$
4. Calculate the Incremental Increase:
   
   $$\text{Incremental QREs} = \text{Current Year QREs} – \text{Base Amount} = \$250,000 – \$50,000 = \$200,000$$
5. Calculate the Final Tax Credit:
   
   $$\text{LA R\&D Credit} = \$200,000 \times 30\% = \$60,000$$

Tech Development Co. is eligible for a certified Louisiana R&D tax credit of $60,000.

4.2 Compliance for Non-Federal Filers

Louisiana requires confirmation that the activities claimed meet the IRC 41 standards regardless of whether the federal credit is claimed.

The Agreed Upon Procedures (AUP) Report

For small taxpayers (less than 50 employees) who have not filed for the federal R&D tax credit on IRS Form 6765, the state mandates the submission of an Expenditure Verification Report prepared under Agreed Upon Procedures (AUP).8 This report, prepared by a third party, serves as the critical substitute verification that the claimed QREs adhere to the definitional requirements of IRC 41(d).5 Certification of the R&D credit by LED is contingent upon the receipt and approval of this verification report.8

Audit Preparedness and Detailed Documentation

Since Louisiana is required to select at least 10% of applications for detailed examination 6, taxpayers must be perpetually prepared for a comprehensive audit. If an application is selected, LED will require an extensive level of detail to ensure compliance with the 80% experimentation rule and the accurate apportionment of Louisiana QREs.6

Key documentation requested during a detailed examination includes, but is not limited to 5:

• A complete breakdown of costs segmented by expenditure category (wages, supplies, contract research) and by each qualified research activity or business component.
• W-2s, K-1s, 1099s, invoices, and receipts supporting all claimed expenditures.
• Financial statements and completed filed tax returns for the relevant tax years.
• Organizational charts detailing employee names, titles, and comprehensive descriptions of the R&D work performed by each individual.
• Technical contracts related to the research and a narrative justification explaining how the Four-Part Test was met for each activity, including evidence of the required 80% experimentation threshold.

Conclusion

The Louisiana R&D tax credit is a powerful, yet intricate, mechanism that requires expert navigation through state and federal law. The statutory framework offers substantial benefits, particularly the uncapped 30% credit for small businesses, which is a highly competitive rate nationally.6

However, the program imposes unique compliance challenges that demand strategic forethought:

1. Rigorous Federal Compliance: Eligibility starts and ends with the strict satisfaction of the IRC Section 41 Four-Part Test, requiring meticulous, project-level documentation to substantiate technical uncertainty and experimentation.
2. The 80% Quantification Burden: Louisiana’s defining modification is the 80% threshold for experimentation. Businesses must deploy precise tracking systems to quantitatively prove that the substantial majority of time and expense allocated to a project was dedicated to resolving technical uncertainties through a systematic process of experimentation.
3. Risk Management of the Fiscal Cap: The impending $12 million fiscal cap effective mid-2025 transforms the credit realization process. Taxpayers, especially those with large claims, must treat the application submission to LED as a high-priority, time-sensitive event to ensure certification before the annual limit is exhausted.

Successful utilization of the Louisiana R&D tax credit hinges on integrating federal definition standards with the state’s stringent quantitative and geographic requirements, underpinned by continuous, contemporaneous documentation practices.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/