Navigating the Dual Compliance Path: IRC Section 41(d) and the Louisiana Research and Development Tax Credit

The federal definition of Qualified Research (QR) under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41(d) establishes a crucial four-part test for determining eligible research expenditures. This framework is adopted by Louisiana but is significantly tightened by state statutes, mandating that research activities be conducted locally and meet an elevated threshold for the process of experimentation.

I. Executive Summary: The Definition of Qualified Research (IRC §41(d))

Qualified research under IRC Section 41(d) defines activities eligible for the federal R&D tax credit, generally requiring expenses to resolve technical uncertainties through a process of experimentation toward a new or improved business component. When applied in Louisiana (LRS 47:6015), this definition is made substantially more rigorous by mandating that 80% or more of the activities constitute the process of experimentation.

The federal definition establishes a mandatory four-part test that must be applied to each separate “business component” to determine eligibility.1 Louisiana’s tax law, codified primarily in Louisiana Revised Statute (LRS) 47:6015, explicitly incorporates the federal definition but introduces critical, restrictive modifications concerning the degree of experimentation required and the eligibility of certain service-based industries.3 Understanding these modifications is essential for compliance and maximization of the state credit.

II. The Foundation: Understanding IRC Section 41(d)—The Four-Part Test

IRC Section 41(d)(1) mandates that research activities must satisfy four fundamental requirements concurrently to be classified as “Qualified Research” (QR).1 These requirements ensure that the expenditure represents genuine scientific or technological innovation rather than routine development or commercial engineering.

2.1. Legislative Intent and Scope

The overarching purpose of IRC §41 is to stimulate economic growth by rewarding companies that incur costs in the pursuit of technological advancement and the resolution of technical uncertainty.1 The definition focuses on fundamental research steps rather than routine engineering, production, or marketing activities. The four tests must be applied separately to each “business component,” a term defined broadly as any product, process, computer software, technique, formula, or invention which is to be held for sale, lease, or used by the taxpayer in a trade or business.1

2.2. The Four Mandatory Requirements (The Shrink-Wrap Test)

2.2.1. Test 1: Section 174 Requirement (Deductible Expenses)

The first requirement is foundational: the expenditure must be of a type that can be treated as an expense under IRC Section 174.1 This connection ensures that the costs claimed are related to R&D in the “experimental or laboratory sense” and generally excludes costs such as indirect overhead, debt service, or costs associated with land or certain buildings. This test serves as a preliminary filter, requiring the costs to align with the accepted federal definition of exploratory research costs.

2.2.2. Test 2: Technological in Nature (Discovering Information)

The research must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information that is technological in nature.1 This means the underlying principles being explored or relied upon must be derived from physical sciences, such as physics, chemistry, engineering, or computer science.2 The uncertainty being addressed must relate to technological capacity, design methodology, or functional limitations, rather than merely market viability or consumer preference. This test separates technological advancement from simple business strategy.

2.2.3. Test 3: Business Component Improvement (Qualified Purpose)

The third test requires that the application of the technological information discovered must be intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved business component of the taxpayer.1 This establishes the necessary connection between the abstract scientific inquiry (Test 2) and a concrete, commercially useful result, thereby justifying the economic incentive. Research is conducted for a “qualified purpose” if it relates to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality of the component.1 Importantly, research related to style, taste, cosmetic, or seasonal design factors is explicitly excluded.2

2.2.4. Test 4: Process of Experimentation (Defining Uncertainty)

The fourth test requires that substantially all of the activities constitute elements of a process of experimentation for a qualified purpose.1 This process is systematic, involving identifying technical uncertainty (what is the capability or optimal design?), evaluating alternatives, and conducting trials and testing to resolve that uncertainty.2 The successful application of this test confirms that the taxpayer followed a rigorous, verifiable methodology to overcome technical challenges, rather than relying on standard engineering or established production knowledge.

2.3. Mandatory Exclusions under IRC §41(d)(4)

IRC Section 41(d)(4) mandates the exclusion of certain activities, regardless of whether they might otherwise satisfy the four-part test.2 These exclusions prevent the credit from subsidizing non-innovative or geographically unsuitable activities. Key exclusions include:

• Research conducted after the beginning of commercial production.
• Activities related to the adaptation or duplication of existing business components.
• Surveys, studies, or research related to management functions.
• Research conducted outside the United States (foreign research).
• Research in the social sciences, arts, or humanities.
• Research that is funded by another party, where the taxpayer retains no financial risk.2

III. Louisiana’s Adoption and Strict Modification of Federal Law (LRS 47:6015)

Louisiana R.S. 47:6015 incorporates the federal definition of qualified research but enforces several critical restrictions that elevate the compliance burden, making the Louisiana credit harder to attain than the federal credit itself.

3.1. General Conformance and Statutory Basis

Louisiana law explicitly links its R&D credit provisions to the federal statute. LRS 47:6015 defines “Qualified research expenses” and “qualified research” by reference to 26 U.S.C. 41, as amended.4 Furthermore, the credit is exclusively available to research activity that must be conducted in Louisiana.3 This geographic nexus is an absolute requirement for all claimed Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs).

3.2. Louisiana’s Critical Modification: The 80% Experimentation Threshold

The most significant distinction between the federal and Louisiana credits lies in the interpretation of the “process of experimentation” test. While federal regulations generally use “substantially all” without a fixed numerical minimum, Louisiana law establishes an unambiguous numerical standard: “Substantially all” means 80% or more of the research activities involve a process of experimentation.3

This 80% threshold represents a crucial shift from a facts-and-circumstances approach to a strict bright-line rule. By setting this high minimum, Louisiana effectively prevents claiming the credit for projects where a significant portion (more than 20%) of the time is spent on non-experimental activities, such as routine testing, detailed production planning, or integrated administrative overhead. Taxpayers are compelled to implement granular, contemporaneous time-tracking systems capable of isolating qualified activities with high precision to meet this elevated documentation standard, thereby mitigating the compliance risk associated with state audits.

3.3. Calculating the Louisiana Credit: Rate Tiers and Structure

The Louisiana R&D tax credit is tiered based on employee count and is designed to especially favor small businesses and encourage incremental increases in research activities.5

Table 1: Louisiana R&D Tax Credit Rate Tiers and Structure

For businesses with less than 50 employees, the calculation uses an incremental method where the credit is applied to the QREs exceeding a calculated base amount. This base amount is fifty percent of the average annual qualified research expenses within Louisiana during the three preceding taxable years.4 For example, if a small business’s current QREs were $210,000 and their calculated base was $62,500, the incremental increase of $147,500 would yield a 30% credit of $44,250.8

IV. Administrative Guidance and State-Specific Exclusions

Compliance in Louisiana requires navigating a unique administrative structure where the credit is certified by an economic development agency before it can be applied through the tax collecting agency.

4.1. The Role of Louisiana Economic Development (LED) and LDR

The Louisiana R&D Credit is primarily administered by the Department of Economic Development (LED). Taxpayers must apply to LED for the credits and submit an application fee.9 Crucially, credits cannot be claimed on the taxpayer’s Louisiana income tax return until they have been certified by LED.3 LRS 47:6015 also requires the assignment of an authorized CPA or tax attorney to prepare and submit an expenditure verification report based on procedures developed by the department.9

The role of the Louisiana Department of Revenue (LDR) is primarily that of tax collection and general administration. While LDR issues Revenue Information Bulletins (RIBs), which serve as informal informational statements 10, recent RIBs have focused on interest rates and specific non-R&D credits (like the Local Inventory Tax Credit) rather than detailed interpretive guidance specific to the IRC §41(d) definition or the 80% rule.10 Because the definition of “Qualified Research” is a prerequisite for certification by LED, LED’s administrative rules, found in the Louisiana Administrative Code Part I, Chapter 29, function as the primary and authoritative compliance framework.

4.2. Ineligible Businesses: The Mandatory Patent Requirement

Louisiana strategically limits the eligibility of certain sectors to ensure that state incentives are directed toward innovation that results in verifiable, proprietary intellectual property (IP). The following two categories of businesses are ineligible unless they meet a strict patent exception 3:

1. Professional services firms.
2. Businesses primarily engaged in custom manufacturing and custom fabricating.

To restore eligibility, the firm must possess a pending or issued United States patent that is directly related to the qualified research expenditures claimed.3 Furthermore, only those expenditures directly related to the business component covered by that pending or issued patent will be eligible for credits.12 This regulation functions as a significant policy driver, ensuring R&D incentives benefit activities that produce protectable, scalable assets, rather than client-specific, non-proprietary custom work typically found in many consulting or fabrication firms.

4.3. Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs): Functional Wage Analysis

QREs consist of wages, supplies, and contract research expenses, following federal standards. The classification of wages is a frequent area of review. Qualified wages include those for individuals engaging in the direct performance, direct supervision, or direct support of qualified research.3

The interpretation of supervision is strictly functional. “Direct supervision” is defined as the immediate supervision (first-line management) of qualified research. It explicitly excludes supervision by a higher-level manager to whom the first-line managers report, even if that higher-level manager is a qualified scientist.3 For instance, the wages of a Vice President of Operations, even if they spend substantial time on the project, would likely be disqualified if their role is determined to be corporate overhead or higher-level administrative oversight rather than first-line technical management. This detailed distinction underscores the necessity for granular, functional, and contemporaneous documentation of employee activities, rather than relying on job title alone, to satisfy LED’s scrutiny.3

V. Practical Application and Case Study Example

The application of the Louisiana R&D credit requires satisfying both the federal four-part test and the specialized 80% experimentation threshold.

5.1. Case Study: Optimization Research in the Petroleum Industry

Consider PetroStream Solutions (PSS), a large oil and gas logistics company operating in Louisiana that employs 150 people. PSS undertakes a project to develop an improved, proprietary software system for real-time sensor data integration to stabilize pressure variations in its pipeline network. This type of activity is common in sectors like Railroad Transportation, which is a major user of the Louisiana credit.6

Federal IRC §41(d) Four-Part Test Assessment:

1. Section 174 Test: PSS expenditures (software engineer wages, computer leasing time, and prototype materials) qualify as experimental R&D costs. (Pass)
2. Technological Test: The project seeks to resolve technical uncertainty regarding the optimal algorithm and integration methodology required to process large volumes of high-frequency sensor data, relying on computer science and engineering principles. (Pass)
3. Business Component Test: The resulting proprietary software system constitutes an improved process used internally by PSS to enhance the reliability and quality of its existing infrastructure. (Pass)
4. Process of Experimentation Test (Louisiana Hurdle): PSS’s documentation confirms that 85% of the software engineering team’s time was dedicated to designing, coding, testing, and debugging algorithms to resolve technical uncertainty. The remaining 15% was spent on routine maintenance, general internal communication, and administrative tasks.

Louisiana Compliance Check: Since 85% of the activity involves the process of experimentation, this figure is greater than the stringent 80% minimum required by Louisiana law (LRS 47:6015), allowing the activity to be considered “Qualified Research” in Louisiana.3

5.2. QRE Calculation and Credit Determination

Since PSS employs 150 people, it falls into the highest employee tier, qualifying for the 5% credit rate.5

Assume the relevant financial data for the current tax year is:

• Current Year Louisiana QREs: $1,200,000.
• Calculated Base Amount (determined by the prior three years’ average QREs): $1,050,000.

The incremental increase in QREs is:

$$\text{Incremental QREs} = \text{Current QREs} – \text{Base Amount}$$

$$\text{Incremental QREs} = \$1,200,000 – \$1,050,000 = \$150,000$$

The Louisiana R&D Credit is calculated as:

$$\text{LA Credit} = \text{Incremental QREs} \times \text{Credit Rate}$$

$$\text{LA Credit} = \$150,000 \times 5\% = \$7,500$$

Prior to claiming the $7,500 credit on their LDR tax return, PSS must submit the detailed technical narrative and supporting documentation (including the time tracking demonstrating 85% experimentation) to LED for mandatory certification.3

VI. Economic Impact and Utilization Statistics

The Louisiana R&D tax credit (LRS 47:6015) is an important tool for economic development, successfully generating substantial value-added to the state’s economy, even though the immediate fiscal return is negative.

6.1. Economic Return on Investment (ROI) Data

In Fiscal Year (FY) 2022, the total value of tax incentives received under the R&D credit program was $5.5 million.6 Despite this outlay, the expected annual value added (GDP growth) generated by these incentives reached $7.1 million.6 This relationship yielded a positive Economic Return on Investment (ROI) of 29.28% for FY 2022.6

This positive Economic ROI, representing a significant variance of $+55.95\%$ from the prior fiscal year 6, strongly indicates that the R&D incentives are effectively stimulating broader economic activity beyond the immediate tax subsidy. This demonstrates that the state’s investment translates into sustained economic growth, job creation, and productivity gains.

However, the Fiscal Return on Investment for the same period was $-91.68\%$.6 This negative fiscal return is common for R&D credits and indicates that while the program drives significant long-term economic benefits (Economic ROI), the immediate state tax revenues generated by the incentive-fueled activity do not fully recoup the cost of the tax credit within the same fiscal cycle. This demonstrates the state’s policy decision to prioritize long-term technological competitiveness over immediate revenue generation.

Table 2: Louisiana R&D Tax Credit Economic Impact Summary (FY 2022)

6.2. Industry Concentration

Program utilization data for FY 2022 shows that the credit benefits are highly concentrated in specific industry sectors 6:

• Railroad Transportation (NAICS 482): 33.20%
• Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (NAICS 54): 20.34%
• Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing (NAICS 324): 12.42%

The dominant utilization by the Railroad Transportation sector suggests substantial R&D activity related to infrastructure, logistics, and heavy engineering process improvements, validating the application of IRC §41(d) to capital-intensive industrial environments. Despite the challenging patent exclusion, the high utilization rate for Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services suggests that many firms in this category are either performing non-excluded fundamental research or successfully complying with the patent requirement in LRS 47:6015.12

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Louisiana R&D Tax Credit is a powerful economic incentive, offering rates up to 30%, which are highly competitive nationwide. However, the program’s benefit is contingent upon strict adherence to its modified Qualified Research definition, particularly the unique Louisiana 80% experimentation threshold and the stringent patent requirements for specific service and fabrication sectors.

7.1. Strategic Recommendations for Compliance

1. Mandatory Documentation Precision: Taxpayers must recognize that the Louisiana 80% rule for the process of experimentation is a non-negotiable compliance hurdle. Federal documentation standards are insufficient for the state claim. Companies must implement functional time-tracking systems that precisely allocate time to qualified experimental tasks, ensuring the 80% threshold is met for each business component.
2. IP Strategy Integration: Professional services firms and custom manufacturers must treat the R&D credit as an IP incentive program. The cost and effort of obtaining a pending or issued U.S. patent must be integrated into the R&D budget, as only expenditures directly linked to that proprietary IP will be eligible for credit claims.12
3. Proactive Administrative Planning: Given the prerequisite nature of LED certification, taxpayers should begin the application process and expenditure verification report preparation well in advance of filing the LDR tax return. Compliance efforts must prioritize LED’s standards and the required functional analysis of wages, which strictly limits compensation for higher-level management roles.3

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/