The Dual Meaning of the $15,000 Fee Cap in the Louisiana R&D Tax Credit Program (L.R.S. 47:6015)

The Louisiana Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit program requires applicants to submit an administrative application fee capped at $15,000, calculated based on the anticipated value of the tax incentive. This identical $15,000 figure also serves as the mandatory deposit for the Expenditure Verification Report required for applications claiming over $\$1$ million in Qualified Research Expenditures (QREs).

This report provides a detailed analysis of the two distinct financial obligations associated with the $\$15,000$ limit, differentiating the administrative fee governed by the Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) from the expenditure verification deposit mandated by the Louisiana Revised Statutes (L.R.S.). Taxpayers must meticulously separate and budget for both fees, as they represent mandatory, non-refundable cash expenditures due at the time of application submission to the Louisiana Department of Economic Development (LED).

Statutory and Administrative Framework

The structure of the Louisiana R&D Tax Credit program is defined by the legislature under L.R.S. Title 47, § 6015, which authorizes the credit itself.1 The administrative fees and procedural rules are further codified in the Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC), specifically LAC 13:I.2715, establishing the calculation and maximum for the administrative application fee.2 Compliance with the program fundamentally requires the taxpayer to demonstrate that its activities meet the definition of qualified research as provided in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 41(d)), underscoring the necessity of robust documentation.3

Jurisdictional Division: LED vs. DOR

The administration and verification process for the R&D tax credit is split between two primary state entities, the Louisiana Department of Economic Development (LED) and the Louisiana Department of Revenue (DOR).

The Louisiana Economic Development (LED) acts as the gatekeeper for the incentive. LED receives all applications, determines preliminary eligibility, calculates and collects the requisite fees, manages the expenditure verification process, and ultimately issues the necessary certification letter that allows the taxpayer to claim the credit.2 All fees, including the administrative fee and the verification deposit, are made payable directly to the Louisiana Department of Economic Development.2

The Louisiana Department of Revenue (DOR) retains final jurisdiction over the claim. Even after LED certification, the DOR examines claims upon filing of the state income or franchise tax return.4 The DOR maintains the authority to disallow any credits that are not sufficiently substantiated by supporting documentation, including necessary Internal Revenue Service documents.3 This division of labor confirms that the upfront fees fund the LED’s administrative and verification process, while the credit’s eventual utility remains subject to DOR compliance review.

Credit Calculation Fundamentals (Determining the Anticipated Incentive)

The basis for the administrative application fee is the “Total Anticipated Tax Incentive”.2 Accurately calculating this amount requires a preliminary determination of QREs (Qualified Research Expenses) and applying the state’s tiered rate structure and base calculation methodology.

Louisiana uses a tiered credit rate based on the number of employees 6:

• Businesses with 0–49 employees receive a 30% credit rate.6
• Businesses with 50–99 employees receive a 10% credit rate.6
• Businesses with 100 or more employees receive a 5% credit rate.6

Crucially, the credit is generally applied only to the portion of QREs that exceed a “base amount” calculated using the average QREs from the preceding three taxable years.8 For entities employing less than fifty persons, the base amount is set at 50% of the average annual QREs.6 For entities employing fifty or more persons, the base amount is 80% of the average annual QREs.6

Since the Application Fee is mathematically dependent upon the calculated credit amount, any miscalculation in the QRE base determination—particularly concerning the $50\%$ or $80\%$ historical baseline—will result in an incorrect Application Fee submission.8 Such errors can potentially lead to application rejection by the LED staff responsible for reviewing the application and fee calculation sheet.6 This linkage confirms the requirement for precision in the foundational credit calculation before fee remittance.

Comprehensive Analysis of the Maximum Administrative Application Fee ($15,000)

The first application of the $\$15,000$ limit relates to the administrative fee required by LAC 13:I.2715. This fee is essential for funding the operational costs of the LED certification program.

Calculation Basis and the Statutory Cap

The application fee is mandatory and must be submitted with the initial application package.2 The regulatory formula dictates that the fee amount shall be equal to $0.5$ percent ($0.005$) multiplied by the total anticipated tax incentive.2 The regulations establish a minimum application fee of $\$500$.2

The critical constraint is the statutory maximum: the application fee cannot, under any circumstances, exceed $15,000.2

This administrative cap establishes a fixed cost for the largest claims within the program. The threshold at which this maximum fee is reached is when the anticipated R&D Tax Credit benefit totals or exceeds $3,000,000. This figure is derived by dividing the maximum fee by the applicable rate ($ $15,000 \div 0.005 = $3,000,000$). Any corporation claiming an anticipated tax credit benefit of $\$3$ million or higher will pay a flat, non-refundable administrative fee of $\$15,000$.

Implications of Tiered Rates on Fee Efficiency

A detailed examination of the relationship between the credit rate and the maximum fee reveals a disparity in administrative cost efficiency based on the applicant’s size. Because the administrative fee is calculated against the credit benefit rather than the expenditure amount, smaller businesses (those eligible for the $30\%$ rate) achieve the $\$15,000$ cap with significantly lower QREs than larger firms (eligible for the $5\%$ rate).

For instance, a small business (under 50 employees) must document $\$10$ million in creditable QREs to generate a $\$3$ million credit ($\$10,000,000 \times 30\% = \$3,000,000$). This triggers the $\$15,000$ maximum administrative fee. Conversely, a large business (100+ employees) requires $\$60$ million in creditable QREs to generate the same $\$3$ million credit ($\$60,000,000 \times 5\% = \$3,000,000$). Both firms pay the same $\$15,000$ administrative fee.

This structure implies that, relative to their total qualified spending, smaller firms bear a proportionally higher administrative cost burden to reach the fee cap. The design ensures that for the highest credit claims, the administrative cost stabilizes at $\$15,000$, implicitly favoring the largest R&D expenditures by capping their administrative processing cost regardless of the claimed credit magnitude beyond the $\$3$ million threshold.

Table 1: Louisiana R&D Tax Credit Administrative Application Fee Structure (LAC 13:I.2715)

Disambiguation: The $15,000 Threshold in Expenditure Verification Fees

The second application of the $\$15,000$ figure is distinct and relates to the mandatory Expenditure Verification Report required for certain applications, as detailed in L.R.S. 47:6015. This is a payment intended to cover the cost of a third-party audit of the QREs.

Statutory Requirement and Required Deposit

The statutory framework requires an expenditure verification report for specific applicants, primarily small businesses (employing less than fifty persons) who are applying for the credit without having filed for the corresponding federal R&D tax credit on IRS Form 6765 or who are not applicants for the Small Business Technology Transfer Program or Small Business Innovation Research Program.1 The report must be prepared by a certified public accountant or tax attorney selected by the department.3

L.R.S. 47:6015 mandates that the taxpayer submit a deposit for the verification report fee at the time of application.1 The required deposit amount is directly tied to the volume of claimed QREs:

1. For applications with claimed QREs of up to $\$1,000,000$, the required deposit is $7,500.1
2. For applications with claimed QREs in excess of $\$1,000,000$, the required deposit is $15,000.1

It is imperative to note that this $15,000 amount is explicitly defined as a deposit for the verification report.1 This payment serves as working capital for the subsequent mandatory audit process.

The Maximum Cost Liability and Hidden Exposure

While the deposit sets the initial cash outlay, the taxpayer is statutorily assessed the actual cost incurred for the expenditure verification report.1 The deposit is merely a prepayment, and the taxpayer remains liable for the full actual cost, up to a statutory maximum.

The maximum actual cost assessed to the taxpayer also follows a tiered structure related to QRE volume 1:

• For verification of an application with claimed QREs of up to $\$1,000,000$, the maximum fee for the report is capped at $15,000.1
• For verification of an application with claimed QREs in excess of $\$1,000,000$, the maximum fee for the report is capped at $25,000.1

The potential difference between the required deposit and the maximum cost creates a financial exposure that must be accounted for in compliance planning. For large claims (over $\$1$ million in QREs), the $\$15,000$ deposit is not the cost ceiling. The applicant is exposed to a maximum total cost of $\$25,000$ for the audit, meaning a potential back-bill liability of up to $\$10,000$ exists depending on the actual time and complexity required by the third-party auditor.1 This $\$25,000$ cap is crucial for risk assessment and demonstrates that the initial $\$15,000$ deposit only partially mitigates the potential audit expense for significant claims.

This distinction highlights that the two statutory $\$15,000$ figures are fundamentally different: one is a guaranteed administrative maximum, and the other is a mandatory prepayment against a potentially higher liability.

Table 2: Expenditure Verification Report Deposit and Cost Tiers (L.R.S. 47:6015(B)(3)(i))

Local State Revenue Office Guidance and Compliance Requirements

Application Submission and Payment Protocol

Applicants must complete the R&D Application and calculate the fee using the R&D Fee Calculation Sheet.6 The application, required documentation, and the necessary fees must be submitted either online or by mail.4 All fee payments must be remitted by check, made payable to the Louisiana Department of Economic Development.2

The timing of the application is critical: the taxpayer must submit the application within one year after December 31 of the year in which the qualified research expenditure was incurred.4 The application package must also include documentation relevant to the specific claim type, such as Federal Form 6765 for taxpayers with 50 or more employees, or a request for a verification report for eligible small businesses who are not filing the federal form.4

DOR’s Enforcement and Substantiation Standards

The review by LED and the subsequent payment of all administrative and verification fees do not conclude the compliance process. The Louisiana Department of Revenue (DOR) retains the power to examine the filed state tax return and disallow credits. The burden of proving that the activities meet the federal definition of qualified research (26 U.S.C. 41(d)) rests solely with the applicant.3

For applicants subject to the expenditure verification process, the taxpayer is statutorily required to make all records related to the tax credit application available to the certified public accountant or tax attorney selected by the department for the verification report.3 The comprehensive nature of the record-keeping required—including Internal Revenue Service documents—is essential, as unsubstantiated claims will be disallowed upon examination by the DOR, irrespective of the prior LED certification.3

The high upfront administrative and audit costs, coupled with the retained disallowance power by the DOR, emphasize that the investment in the R&D credit program necessitates a high degree of confidence in the underlying technical and financial documentation prior to application submission.

Total Maximum Upfront Cash Commitment

For the largest R&D claims—those where the anticipated credit exceeds $\$3$ million and the QREs exceed $\$1$ million—the taxpayer must calculate the cumulative initial cash outlay. This is calculated by simultaneously triggering the maximum Administrative Application Fee and the maximum Expenditure Verification Deposit.

This leads to a mandatory minimum cash outlay required at the time of application submission of $30,000 ( $\$15,000$ Administrative Fee Maximum $+\$15,000$ Verification Deposit).1

Comprehensive Numerical Case Study: Maximum Fee Exposure

This example illustrates a scenario designed to trigger both major $\$15,000$ fee thresholds, defining the complete upfront financial commitment necessary for a large, eligible claim.

Scenario Setup: MegaTech Research Inc.

MegaTech Research Inc. is a Louisiana-based company engaged in qualified research.

• Employee Count: 45 employees (Qualifies for the 30% credit rate and the 50% base calculation).6
• Prior History: MegaTech is a new filer and had no QREs in the preceding three years. Therefore, the base amount for the calculation is $\$0$.8
• Current Claimed QREs: $10,000,000.
• Compliance Status: MegaTech is a small entity not filing Federal Form 6765, making the expenditure verification report mandatory.1

Step 1: Calculate Anticipated Tax Incentive (Basis for 0.5% Administrative Fee)

The first step determines the value of the credit, which dictates the administrative fee.

1. Creditable QREs: Since the base amount is $\$0$, all current QREs are creditable: $\$10,000,000$ (Current QREs) $-\$0$ (Base Amount) = $\$10,000,000$.
2. Anticipated Tax Incentive: Applying the $30\%$ rate: $\$10,000,000 \times 30\% = \$3,000,000$.

Step 2: Calculate Administrative Application Fee (Maximum Cap Triggered)

1. Fee Calculation (0.5%): $0.005 \times \$3,000,000 = \$15,000$.
2. Application Fee Result: The calculated fee is $\$15,000$. As this equals the statutory maximum, the Application Fee payable to LED is $15,000.2

Step 3: Determine Expenditure Verification Fees (Deposit Triggered)

1. QRE Threshold Test: Claimed QREs of $\$10,000,000$ exceed the statutory $\$1,000,000$ threshold.1
2. Required Deposit (Due at Application): The deposit for applications exceeding $\$1$ million in QREs is $15,000.1
3. Maximum Potential Report Cost: Since QREs exceed $\$1$ million, the maximum liability for the actual cost of the report is capped at $25,000.1

Total Upfront Cash Outlay and Risk Summary

For MegaTech Research Inc., the administrative and verification costs combine to necessitate a significant initial cash commitment to LED.

Table 3: MegaTech Research Inc. Total Fee Exposure

This case demonstrates that for applications maximizing the incentive, the two distinct $\$15,000$ figures are triggered concurrently, resulting in a mandatory $\$30,000$ payment at the time of submission, with a total risk exposure of $\$40,000$ due to the maximum audit cost liability. The cost of compliance in this scenario represents $1.33\%$ of the anticipated $\$3$ million credit benefit.

Conclusion and Key Compliance Recommendations

The analysis confirms that the $\$15,000$ value within the Louisiana R&D Tax Credit structure serves two separate and critical financial functions: it is the definitive cap for the Administrative Application Fee (based on $0.5\%$ of the anticipated credit benefit), and it is the necessary Expenditure Verification Report Deposit for large claims (QREs over $\$1$ million). The mandatory upfront payment for high-value applications can reach $\$30,000$, with a total potential liability for fees and verification costs extending up to $\$40,000$.

Successful engagement with this incentive program requires a tax strategy that accounts for these significant, non-refundable cash outlays and the potential exposure to additional verification costs.

Compliance Recommendations

1. Precision in Credit Calculation is Essential: Given that the Application Fee is a function of the anticipated credit amount, applicants must ensure meticulous accuracy in determining their Louisiana QREs and the corresponding base calculation (50% or 80% of the prior three-year average).6 Errors in the underlying calculation will lead to incorrect fee amounts and potentially result in application delays or rejection.
2. Comprehensive Provisioning for Audit Costs: For all claims requiring expenditure verification, especially those exceeding $\$1$ million in QREs, financial planning must budget for the full $25,000 maximum cost liability, not just the initial $\$15,000$ deposit.1 This strategy safeguards against unforeseen demands for additional payment following the completion of the mandatory third-party audit.
3. Strategic Filing of Federal Form 6765: Small businesses (under 50 employees) intending to claim substantial QREs (over $\$1$ million) should be advised that filing Federal Form 6765 may exempt them from the mandatory expenditure verification report requirement.1 Eliminating this requirement removes the $\$15,000$ deposit and the $\$25,000$ maximum cost exposure, significantly simplifying compliance and improving cash flow.
4. Prioritization of Application Timing: Taxpayers should be cognizant of legislative changes, specifically the forthcoming statewide aggregate limit of $12 million on R&D tax credits allowed each state fiscal year, effective July 1, 2025, to be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis.8 Under a capped system, timely submission of a compliant, fully funded application (including the administrative and deposit fees) becomes paramount to securing the certified credit amount before the annual cap is exhausted.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/