Wages for Qualified Services (WQS) in the Louisiana R&D Tax Credit (R.S. 47:6015): A Comprehensive Compliance Analysis

Wages for Qualified Services (WQS) are defined under Louisiana R.S. 47:6015 as taxable compensation paid to employees for labor performed in the direct performance, direct supervision, or direct support of certified research and development activities conducted within Louisiana. This category represents a critical component of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) utilized by businesses to claim the substantial tax credit offered by the state.

The Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit program is authorized by the Louisiana Legislature to encourage new and sustained R&D activity, recognizing that the health, safety, and welfare of the state depend upon the growth and expansion of the private sector.1 The incentive offers eligible companies up to a 30% tax credit on QREs incurred within the state, featuring no minimum spending requirement.2 The credit may be applied against income and corporation franchise taxes and, while non-refundable, can be carried forward for five years.2 Since WQS typically accounts for the majority of claimable R&D expenses 4, rigorous compliance with the state’s detailed definition of “qualified services” is essential for maximizing and defending the credit claim.

Statutory and Jurisdictional Foundation: The Federal Nexus

The Louisiana R&D tax credit framework is structurally dependent upon federal tax law, specifically the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41. This reliance imposes a foundational requirement that all Louisiana claims meet the stringent technical and substantiation standards established by the federal government.

Louisiana R.S. 47:6015 Requirements and State Scope

Louisiana Revised Statute 47:6015 establishes the eligibility criteria and defines the expenditure categories that qualify for the state credit. A fundamental requirement is the geographic constraint: only research and development activities, and consequently, only wages and expenditures, conducted and incurred physically within the state of Louisiana qualify for the credit.2 Furthermore, eligibility for the credit is calculated based on the taxpayer’s aggregate employee count, including all affiliated companies, which determines the applicable calculation tier and credit rate.6

Specific business types are ineligible unless they demonstrate a commitment to patentable innovation. Professional services firms and businesses primarily engaged in custom manufacturing or custom fabricating are ineligible to participate unless they have a pending or issued United States patent related to the qualified research expenditures claimed.2 This legislative restriction reinforces the incentive’s focus on fostering proprietary technological advancement rather than subsidizing routine service provision.

Conformance to Federal Law (IRC §41)

The technical definition of qualified research in Louisiana mandates alignment with the criteria set forth in 26 U.S.C. 41(d).6 This linkage signifies that the technical merit of a Louisiana R&D project is governed by federal case law and regulation. Any project must satisfy the rigorous Four-Part Test outlined in IRC $\S41(\text{d})(1)$:

1. IRC $\S174$ Requirement: The expenditures must be eligible for deduction or capitalization under IRC $\S174$.2
2. Technological Nature: The research activity must be undertaken to discover information that is technological in nature, requiring reliance on principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.2
3. Functional Improvement: The discovery must be intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved business component of the taxpayer.4
4. Process of Experimentation: Substantially all of the activities must involve a process of experimentation. Louisiana explicitly adopts the federal definition that “substantially all” means 80% or more of the research activities must involve a process of experimentation.2

The critical dependence on the federal framework, combined with the state’s requirement for providing federal forms such as IRS Form 6765, 8821, and 4506 in the application process, means that Louisiana’s WQS compliance standards are effectively enforced through the lens of IRS scrutiny.6 State auditors are equipped to apply federal interpretations, emphasizing the necessity for taxpayers to maintain an audit file commensurate with the rigorous standards of the IRS Audit Techniques Guide.10

Failure to meet the “Substantially All” threshold for the process of experimentation constitutes the single greatest technical risk for wage disallowance at the project level. If a project is deemed to incorporate too much routine production, testing of existing items, or general administrative tasks, the 80% experimentation requirement is violated. This violation can lead to the disallowance of 100% of the QREs, including all claimed WQS, associated with that project. Therefore, the technical narrative accompanying the application must rigorously demonstrate that the employee labor was focused overwhelmingly on resolving technological uncertainties through iteration and experimentation.2

Defining Wages for Qualified Services (WQS): The Three Pillars

Wages qualify as a component of QREs only if they are paid or incurred by the taxpayer and are for services that directly relate to the qualified research activities.5 The Louisiana administrative guidance, consistent with federal law, separates eligible labor into three distinct categories: Direct Performance, Direct Supervision, and Direct Support.5

Qualified Services: The Three Categories of Eligible Labor

1. Direct Performance

This category covers the wages of individuals who are actively and physically engaged in the qualified research activities themselves.12 The scope includes the core hands-on tasks necessary for innovation, such as the technical design and requirement definitions, prototyping, coding, technical specification development, testing, and redesign.13 For example, a software engineer writing experimental code or a scientist executing a lab trial falls under direct performance.12

2. Direct Supervision

Direct Supervision encompasses the wages paid to immediate, first-line managers responsible for overseeing qualified research. This role is strictly defined as the immediate supervision of employees conducting qualified research.5

The application of this definition carries a significant caveat: the credit explicitly excludes supervision by higher-level management. Wages paid to high-ranking executives, Vice Presidents, or any manager to whom a first-line supervisor reports are not eligible, even if the individual holds the title of a “qualified research scientist”.2 This rigid structure ensures that the credit subsidizes labor directly controlling the experimental process, rather than managerial or corporate overhead functions such as financial forecasting or strategic resource allocation. The requirement for detailed organizational charts submitted during the application process is specifically designed to allow regulators to immediately identify and eliminate claims associated with improperly classified upper management wages.2

3. Direct Support

Direct Support includes the wages of non-research staff whose activities are integral and essential to the performance of the qualified research. These services must directly facilitate the R&D process but do not constitute the actual performance or supervision of the experimentation.5

Examples of eligible direct support activities include:

• A machinist modifying or maintaining experimental equipment or machining a part for a prototype used in qualified research.14
• A technical support employee compiling, organizing, or typing reports that describe the results and findings of laboratory trials or experimentation.12
• Quality Assurance (QA) testers who document results during a specific phase of experimental testing, provided the testing meets the four-part test criteria.12

The fact that the labor required for documenting and communicating research outcomes (e.g., typing reports of laboratory results) is included as qualified labor means the state recognizes the crucial role that accurate and auditable record-keeping plays in the R&D process.

Exclusions: Non-Qualifying Indirect and Administrative Costs

Any wages related to general or administrative services are considered non-qualifying indirect costs and must be strictly excluded from QRE calculations.2 These exclusions apply even to employees who primarily work within the R&D department but spend a portion of their time on non-research related tasks.

Specific examples of excluded wages include time spent on general overhead, departmental budgeting, routine clerical duties, personnel management, corporate accounting, sales, and marketing.14 Furthermore, an allocated portion of wages belonging to departments such as purchasing or receiving, whose primary function is logistics and is only incidental to the research activity, is explicitly excluded from the credit calculation.2 Accurate time tracking is therefore necessary to isolate and claim only the qualified percentage of an employee’s wages.

State Revenue Office Guidance and Administrative Rules

The administration of the Louisiana R&D Tax Credit involves two primary state bodies: the Louisiana Economic Development (LED) and the Louisiana Department of Revenue (LDR). Compliance requires satisfying both the LED’s certification requirements and the LDR’s audit standards, which are governed by the Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC), specifically LAC 61:I.Chapter 29.2

LED Administrative Guidance and Certification

The Louisiana statute mandates that taxpayers apply to the LED for certification of the credits.1 The credit cannot be legally claimed on a tax return until this certification is secured.2 LED’s role involves verifying that the taxpayer and the claimed activities meet the technical eligibility requirements and the necessary expenditure benchmarks.

The application submitted to LED must include substantial detail regarding WQS, including documentation of the total number of persons employed in Louisiana, the number directly engaged in R&D, and the average wages of both R&D and non-R&D personnel.1 This requirement for detailed workforce statistics is used to assess the employment impact of the R&D program.

LDR Audit Standards and Burden of Proof

While LED certifies the technical eligibility, the LDR retains full authority for auditing the financial substantiation of the claim and enforcing compliance. LDR’s audit standards are defined by the need to verify that the claimed expenditures are supported by documentation.6

The statute places the legal burden squarely on the taxpayer to prove that the claimed activities meet the technical definition of qualified research as provided in 26 U.S.C. 41(d).6 The LDR is explicit: upon examination, the department will disallow any credits that are not substantiated by supporting documentation, including necessary Internal Revenue Service documents.6

The LDR’s authority extends to requesting confidential federal tax information related to the credit, specifically citing IRS Forms 8821 and 4506.6 This underscores the state’s intent to verify consistency between the state claim and the federal position, even if a federal credit was not ultimately claimed. Any material discrepancy in the QRE base calculation or the methodology used for wage allocation will be subject to intense scrutiny, establishing that maintaining a federal-level audit file is a prerequisite for robust state compliance.

The dual regulatory structure means that a successful LED certification, while necessary, does not guarantee protection against an LDR audit challenge. The LDR focuses on the financial records, whereas LED focuses on the technical submission. This requires businesses to prioritize rigorous internal financial controls and audit readiness, rather than merely targeting application approval.

Compliance and Documentation Requirements for WQS

Defending WQS claims under R.S. 47:6015 requires a meticulous approach to record-keeping, focused on establishing a direct and verifiable nexus between the wages paid and the qualified activities performed in Louisiana.

The Necessity of Contemporaneous Record-Keeping

Compliance is fundamentally rooted in adherence to the federal rule of record retention (IRC $\S6001$), which mandates that taxpayers “retain records in a sufficiently usable form and detail” to substantiate the claimed expenditures.10

For WQS, the most critical and frequently challenged element is the allocation of wages, particularly for employees who split their time between qualified and non-qualified activities. The allocation methodology must be defensible and based on verifiable, contemporaneous data. The Service explicitly states that it is not obligated to accept estimates of qualified research expenses if documentation exists to verify actual amounts.10 This preference for factual, contemporaneously created records means that taxpayers relying on retroactive estimation or generalized quarterly allocation based on interviews face significantly higher audit risk.16 The optimal defense involves digital time capture systems where the creation and saving dates (metadata) demonstrate that the records were generated concurrently with the performance of the work.16

Required Documentation Checklist for WQS

A comprehensive audit file for WQS must integrate data from technical, human resources, and financial departments to support the claim.

Table 1: Essential WQS Documentation and Audit Purpose

The requirement for organizational charts and detailed job descriptions in the application package ensures that the state can verify compliance with the Direct Supervision rule.2 Claiming WQS is not purely an accounting function; it requires operational alignment across organizational functions. For instance, an outdated job description classifying an engineer’s time as general administration, even if their time sheet correctly shows R&D work, creates significant friction during an audit and can lead to disallowance because the organizational documentation contradicts the claim.

Calculation Methodology and Practical Example

Wages for Qualified Services form the labor portion of the total Qualified Research Expenses (QREs). The final credit amount is calculated based on the increase in QREs above a historical base amount, utilizing a tiered structure based on the taxpayer’s size.

WQS Allocation and QWE Calculation

The calculation of the Qualified Wage Expenditure (QWE) component follows three sequential steps:

1. Identify Total Taxable Wages: Determine the total W-2 wages, including compensation for services performed in Louisiana, paid to each employee during the tax year.
2. Determine Qualified Percentage: Use contemporaneous time tracking records to calculate the precise percentage of time each employee spent on Direct Performance, Direct Supervision, or Direct Support activities within Louisiana.
3. Calculate Qualified Wage Expenditure (QWE): Multiply the employee’s total taxable wages by the qualified percentage.

Calculating the Incremental Credit

Louisiana R.S. 47:6015 utilizes different base period calculation rules and credit rates based on the aggregate employee count of the taxpayer and all affiliates. This differential treatment reveals a clear policy goal: offering a disproportionately higher incentive to small businesses to stimulate new R&D investment.

Table 2: Louisiana R&D Tax Credit Calculation Tiers (R.S. 47:6015)

For taxpayers with fewer than three prior tax years of QREs, the base amount is calculated using the available years.17 If there are no prior years of QREs, the base amount is zero, allowing the credit to be calculated on 100% of the current year’s QREs.17

For small businesses (LQRE), the use of a 50% base calculation rate combined with the highest credit rate (30%) provides a strong financial incentive, as incremental research activities yield a higher return. In contrast, larger enterprises must generate significantly higher QRE growth over their historical average (80% base) to achieve their lower credit rate (5% or 10%).

It is also important to note the specific state policy preference inherent in the components of QREs. While WQS (employee wages) are generally claimable at 100% of the qualified allocation, contract research costs (amounts paid to outside consultants) are limited to 65% of the Louisiana expense.4 This intentional discounting of external services strategically incentivizes taxpayers to hire Louisiana employees to perform the qualified services, maximizing local job creation and the subsequent economic value-added within the state.18

Case Study: Allocation and Calculation Example (LQRE)

Consider BioTech LA, LLC, a Louisiana-based firm with 40 aggregate employees, qualifying it for the LQRE (Small Business) tier. The company is calculating its R&D credit for the 2025 tax year.

The company incurred $400,000 in Qualified Wage Expenses (QWE) in 2025, supported by rigorous time tracking data. Its prior Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) were: 2024: $300,000; 2023: $200,000; 2022: $100,000.

Step 1: Wage Allocation (WQS Component of QRE)

Below is a summary of the allocation that substantiates the $400,000 QWE claim for three key personnel:

Table 3: Qualified Wage Allocation Sample

Step 2: Base Amount Calculation

1. Calculate 3-Year Average Prior QREs:
   The average of the three preceding years is calculated:
   
   $$\frac{\$300,000 + \$200,000 + \$100,000}{3} = \$200,000$$
2. Calculate Base Amount (50% for LQRE Tier):
   The base period amount is 50% of the average prior QREs 8:
   
   $$\$200,000 \times 50\% = \$100,000$$

Step 3: Incremental Credit Calculation

1. Calculate Incremental Increase (Excess QREs):
   The current year’s QRE must exceed the calculated base amount:
   
   $$\$400,000 \text{ (CY QRE)} – \$100,000 \text{ (Base Amount)} = \$300,000$$
2. Apply Credit Rate (30% for LQRE Tier):
   The credit is calculated on the incremental increase:
   
   $$\$300,000 \times 30\% = \$90,000$$

The resulting Louisiana R&D Tax Credit for 2025 is $90,000. This calculation demonstrates the significant benefit of the 30% rate and the lower 50% base for small businesses that actively manage their research expenditures.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The ability to successfully claim and defend the Wages for Qualified Services (WQS) component of the Louisiana R&D Tax Credit (R.S. 47:6015) hinges on reconciling two distinct requirements: the technical adherence to the federal Four-Part Test and the meticulous substantiation of labor expenditures demanded by the Louisiana Department of Revenue (LDR).

The nuanced definitions surrounding WQS—specifically the categories of direct performance, direct supervision (limited to first-line management), and direct support—are designed to target the subsidy towards labor directly involved in technological experimentation, while excluding general and administrative overhead. The explicit exclusion of indirect costs, such as purchasing or executive-level supervision, requires internal controls that can accurately parse and document the time dedicated to non-qualified activities.

Since the LDR explicitly relies on the taxpayer maintaining supporting documentation consistent with federal standards (IRC $\S6001$ and related IRS guidance), the standard of compliance required for the state credit is equivalent to that of the federal R&D tax credit. The state’s ability to request federal forms and its statutory mandate to disallow unsubstantiated credits reinforce the taxpayer’s burden of proof.

Strategic Recommendations for Audit Defense

To mitigate the inherent audit risk associated with WQS claims, taxpayers should adopt the following strategic operational and documentation protocols:

1. Formalize Compliance Protocols: Establish written internal policies that explicitly define the scope of R&D projects and the methodology used to classify and track employee time, ensuring consistency between the definitions used by technical staff, human resources, and the tax department.
2. Mandate Contemporaneous Time Tracking: Transition away from retrospective estimation methodologies for wage allocation. Invest in and enforce the use of digital time capture systems that record qualified and non-qualified hours daily or weekly. Contemporaneous records, particularly those with metadata demonstrating creation at the time of the activity, provide the most robust defense against LDR challenges, as auditors are not required to accept generalized estimates.
3. Ensure Documentation Consistency: Verify that all documentation submitted, including the mandatory organizational charts and job descriptions 2, accurately reflects the reporting structure necessary to claim “Direct Supervision” wages. The organizational hierarchy must validate that claimed supervisors are indeed first-line managers.
4. Maintain a Unified Audit File: Integrate all required records—payroll data, time logs, technical project narratives, and necessary federal forms (if applicable)—into a single, easily accessible audit file. This preservation must extend beyond the tax year in question to cover the full statutory carryforward period (five years) plus the applicable audit statute of limitations, recognizing the LDR’s mandate to disallow any non-substantiated expenditures.2
5. Prioritize Economic Substance: The inclusion of only 65% of contract research expenses in QRE calculations suggests that state policy favors WQS. Taxpayers should strategically prioritize using Louisiana employees for qualified services over engaging external non-employee contractors to maximize the economic incentive available through the 30% credit tier.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/