Comprehensive Analysis of the Carryover to Succeeding Years for the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit

Carryover to succeeding years represents the legal mechanism where unused Maine Research Expense Tax Credits are preserved for future application over a fifteen-year period. This provision protects the financial value of innovation investments during years when a business lacks sufficient tax liability or exceeds statutory utilization caps.1

The existence of a carryover provision is a fundamental recognition by the Maine Legislature that research and development cycles do not always align with fiscal profitability. In the high-stakes environment of technological innovation, significant expenditures are often front-loaded, occurring years before a product reaches the market and generates taxable income. Without the ability to “carry over” these credits, the Research Expense Tax Credit (RETC) would be functionally useless for the very startups and expanding enterprises it is intended to incentivize.3 Under Maine Revised Statutes, Title 36, § 5219-K, the carryover mechanism ensures that the 5% incremental credit and the 7.5% basic research credit are not “wasted” in years of net operating losses or low tax liability.1 This detailed analysis explores the statutory foundations, the administrative guidance provided by Maine Revenue Services (MRS), and the practical implications for corporate and individual taxpayers navigating this fifteen-year window of opportunity.1

Statutory Foundation of the Research Expense Tax Credit Carryover

The primary statutory authority for the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is found in 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K. This section establishes the credit as a nonrefundable incentive, meaning it can reduce a taxpayer’s liability to zero but cannot result in a refund check from the state.2 The specific mechanics of the carryover are articulated in subsection 5, which provides a dual-track preservation for unused credits.1

The Two Prongs of Carryover Eligibility

The law identifies two distinct scenarios that trigger the carryover of an unused credit. First, any portion of the credit that exceeds the actual tax due for the taxable year is eligible for carryover.1 This is the most common trigger, typically affecting startups in the pre-revenue or early-revenue stages. Second, the statute provides for the carryover of credits that are “not allowed by subsection 3”.1 Subsection 3 contains the restrictive corporate utilization cap, which limits the amount of credit a corporation can use in a single year even if it has a high tax liability.1

By providing for carryover in both instances—insufficient tax liability and statutory utilization caps—the Maine tax code ensures that the credit remains a deferred tax asset rather than a permanent loss.7 The fifteen-year duration is particularly generous compared to other state-level incentives, such as the new Dirigo Business Incentives Program, which allows only a four-year carryover.8

The Calculation Framework: Setting the Stage for Unused Credits

To determine the amount of credit that will eventually enter the carryover pool, a taxpayer must first calculate the current-year credit. Maine utilizes an incremental model that rewards spending in excess of a historical baseline.3

The “base amount” is the critical variable in this equation. For a taxpayer with no prior R&D history in Maine, the base amount is effectively zero, allowing the full 5% credit to apply to all qualified spending in the first year.2 This often results in a massive “unused credit” that begins its fifteen-year carryover journey immediately.2

Corporate Limitations and the Generation of Unused Credit

While individuals and pass-through entity owners are generally limited only by their total tax liability, corporations face a more complex bottleneck.9 Under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K(3), a corporation’s ability to use the Research Expense Tax Credit in any single year is capped by a tiered percentage of its tax due.1

The Utilization Cap Formula

The credit for corporations is limited to the sum of:

1. 100% of the corporation’s first $25,000 of tax due (determined before credits).
2. 75% of the corporation’s tax due in excess of $25,000.1

This statutory restriction creates a “forced carryover” scenario. For example, if a corporation has a tax liability of $100,000 and has generated $100,000 in R&D credits, it cannot wipe out its entire tax bill. Instead, it can only use $81,250 ($25,000 + 75% of the remaining $75,000).2 The remaining $18,750 is classified as an “unused credit” and must be carried over to the subsequent year, despite the corporation having theoretically enough tax to “pay” for the credit in the current year.1

Rationale for the Corporate Cap

The Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) notes that these limitations were designed to ensure that even the most innovative corporations still pay a minimum level of tax to support state infrastructure and services.3 However, the 15-year carryover acts as the necessary pressure valve for this restriction. By allowing the unused 25% of the tax liability to be carried forward, the state preserves the incentive’s total value while smoothing out its fiscal impact on the General Fund.3

Administrative Guidance from Maine Revenue Services (MRS)

Maine Revenue Services provides detailed guidance on the practical application of carryovers through its annual worksheets and instructions. The central document for this process is the Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet (RETCW), revised annually.9

Managing the Carryover Pool: Line 7 of the RETCW

In the administrative workflow, Line 7 of the RETCW is the designated entry point for historical credits.9 Taxpayers are instructed to enter the “unused credit amounts from prior years” on this line. This requires a rigorous internal ledger that tracks credits by their year of origin.9

A common administrative pitfall is the failure to properly sequence the credits. MRS guidance implies a first-in, first-out (FIFO) approach, where credits nearing their 15-year expiration are utilized before current-year credits.2 This sequencing is vital for maximizing the “unexpired” portion of the carryover pool. If a taxpayer has a credit from 2010 and a new credit from 2024, the 2010 credit must be exhausted first, as it will expire after the 2025 tax year.1

Documentation and Verification Requirements

MRS requires that a copy of the federal Form 6765 (“Credit for Increasing Research Activities”) be attached to any Maine return claiming the credit or a carryforward.2 Furthermore, if the taxpayer is a member of a pass-through entity, the entity’s federal Form 6765 must also be provided.12

The state assessor has the authority to audit not just the current year’s return, but the underlying validity of the carryover balance.1 This means that a business using a carryover in 2024 that originated in 2015 must be prepared to provide documentation for 2015 expenses, including:

• Detailed project records and lab notes.13
• Payroll records linking specific employee time to Maine-based research.2
• Proof that the activities met the IRS “Four-Part Test” (Technological in nature, Permitted purpose, Elimination of uncertainty, and Process of experimentation).14

Combined Returns and Unitary Group Dynamics

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit includes specific rules for corporations filing combined returns as part of a unitary business group. These rules, found in 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K(4), complicate the carryover landscape by introducing “sharing” mechanics.1

Inter-Company Credit Sharing

When corporations file a combined return, the credit is initially “generated” by the individual member corporation that performed the research.1 That individual corporation must first apply the credit against its own portion of the group’s total tax liability. If the individual member has an “excess” (unused) credit, it can “share” that credit with another group member.1

However, the “sharing” is limited. The other member corporation can only use the shared credit to the extent that it has remaining capacity under the subsection 3 corporate limitations ($25k/75% cap).1 If the entire group still has unused credits after this inter-company sharing, the unused and unexpired credits must be carried over by the individual corporation that originally generated them.1

Administrative Complexity in Unitary Groups

This “individual retention” of carryovers is a significant administrative burden. If a unitary group undergoes a reorganization or if a subsidiary is sold, the carryover credits stay with the specific legal entity that generated them.1 Tax directors must maintain an entity-by-entity carryover schedule to ensure that these valuable tax assets are not lost during corporate restructuring or when navigating the 15-year expiration timeline.1

Pass-Through Entities and the Owner’s Carryover

For S-corporations, Partnerships, and LLCs, the Research Expense Tax Credit is not used at the entity level. Instead, the credit and any associated carryover follow the ownership interest.2

The Schedule K-1 Conduit

The pass-through entity calculates the Maine-qualified research expenses and allocates them to its owners on a pro rata basis.9 The owners then claim the credit on their individual Maine tax returns (Form 1040ME).2

• Individual Utilization: An individual owner uses their share of the credit to offset their personal Maine income tax.2
• Individual Carryover: If the individual’s credit share exceeds their personal tax due, the unused portion belongs to that individual, not the entity.9
• 15-Year Clock: The carryover period for the individual starts from the tax year in which the credit was generated by the entity.1

Because individuals are not subject to the $25,000 + 75% corporate cap, they often find it easier to utilize credits more quickly than C-corporations, provided they have sufficient taxable income.2

The Legacy of the Super Credit (§ 5219-L) Carryovers

Although the “Super Credit for Substantially Increased Research and Development” was repealed for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, its carryover provisions remain active and highly relevant for current filers.3

Differing Carryover Standards

The Super Credit carryover rules are more restrictive than the standard R&D credit, creating a stratified pool of unused credits for long-standing Maine innovators.16

The Super Credit’s “prior year liability” floor is a particularly harsh restriction. It prevents a taxpayer from using the carryover to reduce their current tax bill to an amount lower than what they paid in the previous year.13 This means that even if a company is highly profitable, its Super Credit carryover might be “trapped” if its tax liability has decreased relative to the prior year.10 In contrast, the standard R&D credit (§ 5219-K) has no such year-over-year floor, allowing for more flexible utilization.1

Expiration Watch: 2023 and 2024

Because the Super Credit was last generated in 2013, the ten-year carryover period is reaching its end for most taxpayers.18 The 2023 Super Credit Carryforward Worksheet (Line 1) is the final or near-final opportunity for many firms to draw down these balances.18 Any Super Credit carryover not used by the tenth year following its generation is permanently lost, as Maine law does not allow for the conversion of expired Super Credits into standard R&D credits.17

Quantitative Analysis: Statistics and State Impact

The fiscal impact of the Research Expense Tax Credit, including its carryover obligations, is monitored by the Maine Revenue Services Office of Tax Policy and reviewed by OPEGA.11

Fiscal Expenditure and Participation

According to state tax expenditure reports, the Research Expense Tax Credit costs the Maine General Fund approximately $2.2 million to $4 million annually in lost revenue.2 However, this figure only represents credits actually used in a given year. The total amount of “unused” credits sitting on corporate balance sheets as carryovers is likely much higher, though specific aggregate data on the total carryover pool is not readily available.3

The OPEGA report highlights a significant contradiction: while Maine has offered a generous 15-year carryover since 1995, the state continues to rank poorly on national R&D measures.3 This has led to recommendations for a re-evaluation of the credit’s goals and the data collected from participants, particularly regarding the utilization of carryover balances.3

Comparative Analysis: The Dirigo Business Incentives Transition

In 2023, the Maine Legislature enacted the Dirigo Business Incentives Program (36 M.R.S. § 5219-AAA), which begins for tax years starting on or after January 1, 2025.8 This program provides a modern contrast to the RETC carryover rules and signals a shift in state policy toward more immediate, but shorter-lived, incentives.22

Refundability vs. Long Carryover

The Dirigo program introduces a hybrid model of refundability and carryover that differs sharply from the 15-year RETC window.21

• RETC (§ 5219-K): Nonrefundable; 15-year carryover; No annual dollar cap on generation; $25k/75% cap on utilization.1
• Dirigo (§ 5219-AAA): Refundable up to $500,000 per year; 4-year carryover; $2,000,000 annual cap on total credit (including carryovers).8

For businesses in the R&D services, manufacturing, or software publishing sectors, the Dirigo program may be more attractive for capital investments because of the $500,000 refundability feature.21 However, the 15-year carryover of the RETC remains the superior tool for high-risk, long-cycle research where a four-year window is insufficient to reach profitability.2

Credit Ordering and Strategy

As businesses move into 2025 and beyond, they must adopt a sophisticated “credit stacking” strategy. Because Dirigo credits have a much shorter 4-year life, they should generally be used before RETC carryovers.8 If a firm has a Dirigo credit expiring in 4 years and an R&D credit expiring in 12 years, the tax software or preparer must ensure the Dirigo credit is applied first to maximize the longevity of the total tax asset pool.7

Practical Example: Multi-Year Carryover and Utilization

To illustrate the interplay between the incremental credit generation, the corporate cap, and the 15-year carryover, we examine the case of “Acadia Bio-Tech, Inc.”

Scenario Assumptions

• Year 1-3 Average QRE (Base Amount): $1,000,000.
• Year 4 Maine QRE: $2,000,000.
• Year 5 Maine QRE: $2,000,000.
• Tax Liability (Year 4): $20,000 (Low profit).
• Tax Liability (Year 5): $200,000 (High profit).

Year 4: The Generation of Unused Credit

1. Incremental QRE: $2,000,000 – $1,000,000 = $1,000,000.
2. Current Year Credit: $1,000,000 \times 5\% = \$50,000$.
3. Tax Due (Before Credits): $20,000.
4. Utilization (Subsection 2): The credit cannot reduce tax below zero. Acadia Bio-Tech uses $20,000 of the credit to eliminate its tax bill.1
5. Unused Credit to Carryover: $50,000 – $20,000 = \$30,000$. This amount is eligible for carryover until Year 19.1

Year 5: The Impact of Corporate Limitations

1. New Base Amount: $(1,000,000 + 1,000,000 + 2,000,000) / 3 = \$1,333,333$.2
2. Incremental QRE: $2,000,000 – $1,333,333 = \$666,667$.
3. Year 5 Credit Generation: $666,667 \times 5\% = \$33,333$.
4. Total Available Credit: $33,333 (Current) + $30,000 (Carryover) = \$63,333$.
5. Tax Due (Before Credits): $200,000.
6. Corporate Limitation (Subsection 3):

• 100% of first $25,000 = $25,000.
• 75% of remaining $175,000 = $131,250.
• Max Allowable Credit: $25,000 + $131,250 = \$156,250$.1

1. Final Utilization: Since the total available credit ($63,333) is less than the max allowable ($156,250), the company uses the entire $63,333.2
2. Net Tax Paid: $200,000 – $63,333 = \$136,667$.
3. Carryover Balance: $0.

This example highlights how the “unused” credit from a lean Year 4 provided a vital shield for the high-profit Year 5. It also demonstrates how the incremental base amount calculation “catches up” to a taxpayer, making it harder to generate massive new credits once a high spending level is established.2

Risk Management: The Audit and Documentation Trail

Because carryover credits can stay on the books for 15 years, they present a unique audit risk. Maine Revenue Services has the right to verify the origin of a carryover even if the original year is beyond the normal three-year statute of limitations for assessing new taxes.1

Preservation of Contemporaneous Records

The burden of proof remains on the taxpayer to justify every dollar of a carryover credit.2 For a 15-year carryover, this means maintaining:

• Detailed Time Tracking: Records should distinguish between qualified research and routine production or administrative work.13
• Project Lists: A comprehensive list of all Maine-based projects for which the credit was claimed, including descriptions of the technical uncertainties addressed.13
• Supplier Invoices: Proof of purchase for supplies used exclusively in the research process in Maine.13
• Contracts: Copies of agreements with qualified Maine organizations (like the University of Maine) for “Basic Research” payments that qualify for the higher 7.5% rate.1

Ownership Changes and Transfers

Taxpayers must be aware that Research Expense Tax Credit carryovers are generally not transferable between unrelated parties in a simple sale of assets.13 In the context of C-corporations, the use of carryover credits after an “ownership change” (defined as a more than 50 percentage point change in ownership over three years) is strictly limited by the rules of IRC Section 383, which Maine adopts.1 These rules prevent the “trafficking” of unused credits, where a profitable company buys a failing startup solely to use its accumulated R&D carryovers to wipe out its own tax liability.15

Conclusion: Strategic Implications for Maine Businesses

The “Carryover to Succeeding Years” provision of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is more than a technicality; it is the cornerstone of the state’s innovation strategy. By providing a 15-year lifecycle for unused credits, the law acknowledges the long-term, non-linear nature of scientific discovery and technological development.1

For the business owner or tax director, the unused credit represents a significant deferred tax asset that must be managed with precision. This includes navigating the restrictive corporate utilization caps, understanding the complexities of combined reporting for unitary groups, and maintaining a documentation trail that can withstand a decade or more of scrutiny.1 While the state’s poor ranking in overall R&D performance has led to questions about the credit’s efficacy, the existence of a robust carryover mechanism ensures that Maine remains a competitive location for firms that view innovation as a multi-decade endeavor.3 As the state introduces newer, refundable programs like Dirigo, the 15-year carryover of § 5219-K will continue to serve as the bedrock incentive for capital-intensive research in the Pine Tree State.21

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/