Statutory Analysis of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit and the $25,000 Tiered Limitation

The “Credit Limitation: First $25,000 in Tax Due (100%)” is a statutory provision that allows Maine corporations to use the Research Expense Tax Credit to offset their entire income tax liability up to the first $25,000. For any tax liability exceeding this initial threshold, the credit is capped at offsetting 75% of the remaining balance, ensuring a mandatory minimum tax contribution on higher levels of corporate income.1

This tiered limitation structure serves as a critical fiscal gatekeeper within the Maine Revised Statutes, specifically under Title 36, Section 5219-K. While the state aims to aggressively incentivize innovation and high-tech manufacturing, it balances this objective against the necessity of maintaining a stable and predictable revenue stream from its largest corporate entities.3 By permitting a full 100% offset on the first $25,000, Maine provides a significant cash-flow advantage to small and mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) and early-stage startups whose total state tax burden may not exceed this amount.5 For these organizations, the credit can effectively eliminate their state income tax liability, allowing for the immediate reinvestment of those funds into further research, development, and personnel.5 Conversely, for larger corporations with substantial Maine-source income, the 75% limitation on the excess ensures that even the most prolific R&D investors remain contributors to the state’s general fund.2 This mechanism mirrors the federal philosophy found in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 38(c), which similarly restricts the utilization of the General Business Credit against net regular tax liability.1 Understanding the interplay between this limitation, the non-refundability of the credit, and the 15-year carryforward provision is essential for any business entity engaged in qualifying research activities within the state of Maine.1

The Statutory Origin and Framework of 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit was established to foster a competitive environment for technological and experimental research within the state borders. Since its application began for tax years on or after January 1, 1996, the statute has undergone various refinements, most recently being updated by Public Law 2023, c. 360, which clarified the authority of the State Tax Assessor to adopt rules similar to federal standards.1

Definition of Taxpayer and Qualifying Activities

The credit is not restricted to C-corporations alone; it is accessible to a wide array of taxpayers including individuals, estates, and trusts, as well as partners and shareholders of pass-through entities like S-corporations and LLCs.5 However, the specific $25,000 tiered limitation described in subsection 3 of the statute is explicitly applied to corporations.1 For individuals and pass-through owners, the credit is generally limited to the amount of tax otherwise due, essentially a 100% offset of their specific liability, with any unused portion subject to carryforward.2

To qualify for the credit, the activities must be conducted within the state of Maine and must meet the federal definitions of “qualified research” and “qualified research expenses” as outlined in IRC Section 41.1 This alignment with federal standards ensures that businesses do not have to navigate two disparate sets of technical criteria, but the state-level restriction to “in-state expenditures” remains a firm boundary.5 The credit comprises two distinct mathematical components:

1. Incremental Research Expense Credit: 5% of the amount by which qualified research expenses (QREs) for the taxable year exceed the “base amount”.1
2. Basic Research Credit: 7.5% of basic research payments as determined under IRC Section 41(e)(1)(A), which typically involves payments to qualified organizations such as universities or scientific research institutes.1

Calculation of the Maine Base Amount

The “base amount” in the Maine context is strictly defined as the average amount spent per year on qualified research expenses in Maine over the previous three taxable years.1 This is a significant departure from the federal “Regular Credit” method, which utilizes a complex fixed-base percentage and gross receipts.5 Maine’s reliance on a three-year average simplifies the calculation for taxpayers but creates a high sensitivity to year-over-year spending fluctuations.5 For new businesses or those with no prior research history in Maine, the base amount is effectively zero, allowing for a 5% credit on the entirety of their initial R&D investments.5

Mechanics of the $25,000 and 75% Limitations

The limitation provided in 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K(3) is the primary constraint on credit utilization for corporate entities. It is a mandatory calculation that must be performed after the total credit earned (including current year generation and prior year carryforwards) has been determined.2

The Tiered Offset Logic

The statute creates two distinct “buckets” of tax liability. The first bucket, containing the first $25,000 of tax due, is fully eligible for offset.1 The second bucket, containing all tax due in excess of $25,000, is only 75% eligible for offset.1 The “tax due” for this purpose is specifically defined as the amount determined before the allowance of any other credits.1 This ensures that the R&D credit is applied against the grossest version of the liability, maximizing the potential utilization of the $25,000 tier.2

The mathematical limit ($L$) for the allowable credit in a single tax year can be expressed as:

$$L = \min(\text{Total Credit Available}, 25,000 + 0.75 \times (\text{Gross Tax} – 25,000))$$

For a corporation with a tax liability of $200,000, the maximum credit it could utilize is $25,000 plus 75% of $175,000, which totals $156,250.2 Even if the corporation had $300,000 in R&D credits, it would still be required to pay at least $43,750 in cash tax for that year (25% of the $175,000 excess).1

Comparison of Corporate vs. Individual Application

Maine Revenue Services guidance distinguishes between the corporate application of the tier and the application for other types of taxpayers. While corporations are subject to the 75% haircut on the excess, individuals and certain other entities are generally capped only by their total tax liability.2

This distinction suggests that the Maine legislature viewed the R&D credit as a tool that should be “fully available” to smaller personal businesses and individual innovators, while acting as a “significant but limited” subsidy for larger industrial and technology corporations.3

Maine Revenue Services Guidance and Reporting Requirements

The Bureau of Revenue Services, commonly known as Maine Revenue Services (MRS), provides the administrative infrastructure for claiming the credit through annual worksheets and instruction booklets.2 The “Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet” is a mandatory attachment for any taxpayer claiming the credit on Form 1120ME (for corporations), Form 1040ME (for individuals), or other relevant returns.6

Line-by-Line Application on the MRS Worksheet

The worksheet instructions for Line 8 specifically operationalize the tiered limitation.2 Taxpayers are instructed that if their tax liability exceeds $25,000, they must enter the lesser of their total available credits (Current Year + Carryforward) or the total of $25,000 plus 75% of the tax liability exceeding $25,000.2

1. Line 2: Calculation of the 5% incremental credit.2
2. Line 6: Calculation of the 7.5% basic research credit.2
3. Line 7: Addition of unused credit amounts from prior years (Carryforward).2
4. Line 8: Application of the $25,000 / 75% limitation.6

Required Documentation for Compliance

MRS guidance emphasizes that a taxpayer must attach a copy of their federal Form 6765 (Credit for Increasing Research Activities) to support their state claim.2 For members of pass-through entities, a copy of the entity’s federal Form 6765 must be provided to ensure the underlying research expenses were properly qualified at the source.2 Furthermore, businesses are encouraged to maintain project records, lab notes, and photographs of various testing stages to defend the “technological in nature” and “experimental” requirements during a potential audit.11

Aggregation Rules for Controlled Groups and Unitary Businesses

The application of the $25,000 tier is not as simple as filing a separate return for every subsidiary to capture multiple $25,000 full-offset buckets. Maine law contains strict aggregation provisions to prevent such maneuvers.1

Aggregation of Controlled Group Activities

Under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K(1), the State Tax Assessor has the authority to aggregate the activities of all corporations that are members of a controlled group, as defined by IRC Section 41(f)(1)(A).1 This means that for the purpose of calculating the $25,000 limitation, the group is often treated as a single entity, and the $25,000 “full offset” bucket must be apportioned among the various members.1 Public Law 2023, c. 360 recently updated subsection 3 to mandate that the assessor adopt rules similar to those under IRC Section 38(c)(5)(B) for the purposes of this apportionment.1

Combined Returns and Credit Sharing

In the case of corporations filing a combined return in Maine, the statute provides a specific hierarchy for how credits are utilized across the group 1:

• Entity-First Rule: A credit generated by an individual member corporation must first be applied against the tax due attributable to that specific company.1
• Excess Credit Application: A member corporation with an excess research and development credit (i.e., more credit than it can use under its own limitation) may apply that excess against the tax due of another group member.1
• Constraint on Sharing: This inter-group sharing is only permitted to the extent that the “receiving” member corporation can use additional credits under the standard $25,000 and 75% limitations of subsection 3.1

This “water’s edge” combined reporting methodology ensures that while the state allows flexibility for corporate groups, it strictly maintains the integrity of the 75% offset limit on large-scale operations.12

Historical Context and Recent Legislative Developments

The $25,000 threshold and the 5% credit rate have been subjects of intense debate in the Maine Legislature, particularly between 2021 and 2024. While the statute remains currently at the $25,000/75% level, multiple attempts have been made to expand these incentives.4

Failed Reform Efforts (LD 643 and LD 926)

In the 131st Legislature, several bills were introduced with the intent of significantly boosting the R&D credit to compete with other New England states.15 LD 643 and LD 926 both proposed a dramatic overhaul of Section 5219-K.15

These bills sought to double the effective value of the credit for most taxpayers while simultaneously raising the threshold where the 75% limitation begins.4 However, the legislation ultimately failed, with LD 643 being reported as “Ought Not to Pass” (ONTP) in early 2024.16 Maine Revenue Services expressed concerns regarding the fiscal impact, estimating that such changes would nearly double the annual revenue loss to the state, which is currently around $4 million.4

OPEGA Evaluation Findings

The Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) conducted a full evaluation of the Research Expense Tax Credit in 2022.3 The review highlighted a critical tension: while the credit is widely claimed by Maine’s innovation sectors (biotechnology, manufacturing, technology), there was a perceived lack of “transparency” regarding which specific businesses receive the bulk of the benefits.4 OPEGA noted that R&D credits tend to be most lucrative for large pharmaceutical and high-tech companies, which often find themselves restricted by the 75% limitation on the excess of $25,000.4 The evaluation suggested that while the credit is a “standard” part of state economic development toolkits, there was inadequate data to definitively prove it was the primary driver for attracting new R&D into the state.4

Detailed Mathematical Example and Scenario Analysis

To provide practical insight into how the $25,000 limitation applies in real-world tax scenarios, we will examine “Penobscot Manufacturing LLC,” a mid-sized corporation with significant R&D activities in Maine.

Step 1: Generation of the Credit

Penobscot Manufacturing has consistently increased its Maine research spending. For the current tax year, its Maine QREs are $800,000. Its spending for the previous three years was:

• Year -1: $600,000
• Year -2: $550,000
• Year -3: $500,000

Calculate the Base Amount:

$$\text{Base Amount} = \frac{600,000 + 550,000 + 500,000}{3} = \$550,000$$

5

Calculate the Earned Credit:

$$\text{Incremental Credit} = 0.05 \times (800,000 – 550,000) = \$12,500$$

1

Assuming no basic research payments or carryforwards for this example.

Step 2: Application of the Limitation (Low Tax Scenario)

If Penobscot Manufacturing has a Maine tax liability of $20,000:

• Available Credit: $12,500.
• Limitation: 100% of first $25,000 = $25,000.
• Credit Allowed: $12,500 (Full utilization).2
• Tax Due After Credit: $7,500.

Step 3: Application of the Limitation (High Tax Scenario)

Suppose Penobscot Manufacturing has a much higher tax liability of $100,000, and they also have $100,000 in unused R&D credits from previous years (Carryforward).

• Total Available Credit: $12,500 (Current) + $100,000 (Carryforward) = $112,500.
• Calculate the Tiered Limit:

• 100% of first $25,000 = $25,000.
• 75% of the excess ($100,000 – $25,000 = $75,000) = $56,250.2
• Total Limit: $25,000 + $56,250 = $81,250.

• Credit Allowed: Lesser of $112,500 (Available) or $81,250 (Limit) = $81,250.2
• Tax Due After Credit: $100,000 – $81,250 = $18,750.
• Carryforward to Next Year: $112,500 – $81,250 = $31,250.1

This scenario demonstrates the “minimum tax” effect of the 75% cap. Despite having more than enough credits to wipe out their entire $100,000 liability, the corporation is forced to pay at least 25% of the liability exceeding $25,000, which in this case is $18,750.1

Interaction with Federal Tax Changes (IRC Section 174)

A nuance often overlooked in Maine tax planning is the indirect impact of federal amortization rules under IRC Section 174 on the state-level $25,000 limitation.5

The Amortization Crisis

Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, businesses can no longer immediately deduct R&D expenses.5 Instead, they must capitalize and amortize them over five years.5 Because Maine tax liability is based on federal taxable income (with modifications), this change has two primary effects:

1. Inflated Maine Tax Liability: Companies are seeing their taxable income spike because they can only deduct 10% (first-year half-year convention) of their research costs instead of 100%.5
2. Increased Exposure to the 75% Limit: Many companies that previously stayed under the $25,000 “full offset” threshold are now being pushed above it due to higher taxable income.5

For a Maine manufacturer with $1,000,000 in domestic R&D costs, the deduction drop from $1,000,000 to $100,000 adds $900,000 to their federal (and likely Maine) taxable income.5 This could easily translate into an additional $60,000 to $80,000 in Maine state tax liability, firmly moving them into the 75%-offset tier where their R&D credit utilization is restricted.2

Economic Statistics and Revenue Analysis

The Research Expense Tax Credit represents a significant portion of Maine’s corporate tax expenditure budget. Analyzing the data from the 2022-2024 Tax Expenditure Reports provides insight into the scale of this incentive.3

Analysis of the Trends

The data shows a significant projected increase in the fiscal cost of the credit between 2022 and 2025.3 This growth is not necessarily driven by a massive influx of new taxpayers—the number of claimants remains relatively steady at around 175—but rather by an increase in the value of the credits being generated and utilized.3 This suggests that existing Maine companies are scaling their R&D investments or that the amortization changes in Section 174 are forcing a higher utilization of the credit carryforwards as tax liabilities rise.4

Interestingly, the average credit per taxpayer ($22,571 to $23,485) is hovering very close to the $25,000 full-offset threshold.3 This implies that a substantial percentage of Maine claimants are able to offset their entire state tax liability, while only a small group of large-scale innovators are hitting the 75% limitation cap on the excess.2

Relationship with Other Maine Business Incentives

The Maine R&D credit does not exist in a vacuum. Its effectiveness is often tied to how it interacts with other nonrefundable credits, such as the Maine Capital Investment Credit (MCIC) and the Pine Tree Development Zone (PTDZ) credit.21

Ordering of Credits

Maine Revenue Services provides an implicit ordering of credits through the structure of Form 1120ME, Schedule C.23 The Research Expense Tax Credit is generally applied alongside other investment credits.23 A crucial strategic point for corporations is the “tax due before credits” rule.1 If a company has multiple credits, the $25,000 / 75% limitation for the R&D credit is always calculated based on the gross tax, regardless of whether other credits have already wiped out a portion of that tax.2

For businesses in a Pine Tree Development Zone, the PTDZ credit often reduces the effective tax liability to zero for the first several years, rendering the R&D credit $25,000 tier unusable for immediate offset.23 In such cases, the 15-year carryforward becomes the primary value driver, allowing the company to accumulate R&D credits while in the “tax-free” zone and utilize them once the PTDZ benefits sunset.1

Compliance Best Practices and Audit Risks

Maine Revenue Services (MRS) maintains a sophisticated audit unit that pays close attention to high-value tax expenditures.24 The Research Expense Tax Credit, given its technical complexity, is a frequent subject of review.4

Avoiding the “Aggregation” Audit Trap

A common error for corporate groups is the failure to properly aggregate Maine-based research activities across a unitary business.1 If MRS determines that two subsidiaries are part of a unitary group, they may consolidate the tax liability for the purpose of the $25,000 limit.1 This could lead to a retroactive assessment where the group is only allowed a single $25,000 “full-offset” bucket instead of two, resulting in a mandatory 25% cash tax on the previously sheltered income.2

Substantiating the “Maine Only” Requirement

Perhaps the most common reason for credit disallowance in Maine is the inclusion of out-of-state expenses.5 While the federal credit allows for expenses incurred anywhere in the United States, the Maine credit is strictly “in-state”.5 MRS auditors will typically request a breakdown of wages by work location and a list of contractor sites.11 If a Maine-based company hires a consulting firm in Boston to perform software testing, those expenses must be backed out of the Maine credit calculation, even if they qualify for the federal credit.5

Strategic Implications for Tax Planning

The $25,000 limitation structure dictates three primary strategies for Maine-based R&D companies:

1. The SME “Full Shield” Strategy: Small and mid-sized entities should aim to keep their Maine-source income at a level where their tax liability remains below $25,000.2 At this level, the R&D credit provides its maximum relative value by acting as a dollar-for-dollar tax eliminator.5
2. The Carryforward “Banking” Strategy: For high-growth startups that are currently pre-revenue or in a loss position, the 15-year carryforward is a massive asset.5 These companies should meticulously document their R&D spending today—even though they have no tax to offset—to build a “bank” of credits that can be used once they become profitable.3
3. The Unitary Group Allocation Strategy: Multi-state and multi-entity corporate groups must work with tax professionals to ensure they are apportioning the $25,000 tier correctly among their Maine-taxable members.1 Strategic allocation of expenses can sometimes help “level out” the tax liability across entities to stay within the 100%-offset tiers as much as possible.1

Final Synthesis and Policy Outlook

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, with its $25,000 tiered limitation, represents a nuanced approach to state-level industrial policy. It is a permanent, nonrefundable incentive that provides a robust bridge for innovators while maintaining a floor for the state’s fiscal health.1

Summary of Key Statutory Components

• Authority: 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K.1
• Core Limit: 100% of the first $25,000 of tax, 75% of the excess.1
• Calculation: 5% of excess over 3-year average + 7.5% of basic research.1
• Duration: Permanent, with a 15-year carryforward for unused amounts.3
• Aggregation: Mandatory for controlled groups and unitary businesses.1

Conclusion

The “first $25,000” limitation is more than just a calculation rule; it is a defining characteristic of the Maine business landscape. For the vast majority of Maine’s 175-odd R&D tax claimants, it provides total or near-total relief from state income taxes.3 For the larger drivers of the state’s economy, it serves as a necessary check, requiring them to contribute to the state’s revenue while still rewarding their localized innovation efforts with a 75% offset on their most substantial liabilities.2 As federal laws like Section 174 continue to evolve and place higher tax burdens on innovation, the role of the Maine R&D credit—and the intelligent management of its limitation tiers—will only grow in importance for the state’s high-tech, biotechnology, and manufacturing sectors.4 Businesses must remain vigilant in their documentation and proactive in their multi-year tax modeling to ensure that this 15-year carryforward window is utilized to its maximum potential, securing the capital needed for Maine’s next generation of technological breakthroughs.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/