Comprehensive Analysis of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit and the Mechanics of the 75% Excess Liability Limitation

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit allows corporations to fully offset the first $25,000 of their income tax liability, while limiting the credit application to 75% for any tax due exceeding that amount. This tiered limitation ensures that while innovation is incentivized, the state maintains a consistent minimum revenue stream from its largest corporate taxpayers.1

The statutory framework governing this incentive, primarily codified under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K, represents a sophisticated balancing act between aggressive economic development and fiscal pragmatism. By decoupling the credit from a simple dollar-for-dollar offset once a specific liability threshold is reached, the Maine Legislature has created a sliding scale of utility that distinguishes between small-scale innovators and large-scale industrial or technological entities. For a small business with a total Maine tax liability of $25,000 or less, the credit functions as a traditional non-refundable incentive capable of eliminating the entire tax burden for a given year.3 However, for larger organizations, the 75% limitation on the excess serves as a structural “quasi-minimum tax” mechanism. This prevents even the most research-intensive organizations from zeroing out their state tax obligations in a single period, regardless of the volume of their qualifying expenditures within the state.1 This limitation is not merely a calculation hurdle but a fundamental aspect of Maine’s broader fiscal policy, ensuring that the cost of tax expenditures is distributed across a longer time horizon via a 15-year carryforward provision.1 To understand the specific application of the “Tax in Excess of $25,000 (75%)” rule, one must examine the interplay between federal definitions of research activity, the geographic constraints of Maine’s tax code, and the administrative directives issued by Maine Revenue Services (MRS).

Legislative Intent and the Evolution of Section 5219-K

The Research Expense Tax Credit was enacted in 1995 as a permanent fixture of the Maine tax code, reflecting a strategic shift toward a knowledge-based economy.5 Unlike many state programs that sunset after several years, § 5219-K was designed to provide long-term certainty for businesses investing in high-risk technological experimentation.6 The core of the credit is its incremental structure, which rewards taxpayers for increasing their research activities relative to a rolling three-year average.3

Historically, Maine has utilized tiered limitations to prevent large, sudden drops in corporate tax collections. The 75% limitation on tax liability exceeding $25,000 mirrors certain aspects of the federal General Business Credit under IRC § 38(c), which also limits credit usage against a portion of the tax liability.1 By adopting a similar structure, Maine Revenue Services aligns its administrative logic with federal standards while maintaining local control over the specific percentage of the offset.3 This alignment is critical for businesses that operate in multiple jurisdictions and must reconcile different state-level limitations on the same underlying research expenditures.

The fiscal impact of the credit is closely monitored by the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) and the Department of Administrative and Financial Services (DAFS).5 Statistical data from the 2024 Tax Expenditure Report indicates that the credit is a significant tool for roughly 241 taxpayers, including 112 corporations and 129 individuals often filing through pass-through entities.5 The projected revenue loss to the state’s General Fund is estimated at approximately $7.85 million per year for the 2024-2025 biennium, a figure that underscores the state’s significant investment in fostering local R&D.5

Defining Qualified Research and Base Amount Calculations

Before the 75% limitation can be applied, a taxpayer must first determine the “available credit.” Maine law leans heavily on federal definitions but imposes strict geographic boundaries. The credit is calculated as the sum of two distinct components: the incremental research expense credit and the basic research payment credit.1

The “base amount” is defined as the average amount per year spent on qualified research expenses over the previous three taxable years.1 This “rolling base” ensures that the credit is truly incremental. If a company spends $1 million on R&D for four consecutive years, its incremental credit would effectively drop to zero after the fourth year, as the current year’s spending would no longer exceed the three-year average.3 This design encourages continuous growth in investment rather than rewarding a static level of research activity.

Qualified research activities must satisfy the “Four-Part Test” outlined in IRC § 41, which includes requirements that the research be technological in nature, relate to a new or improved business component, involve a process of experimentation, and be intended to eliminate technical uncertainty.4 For Maine purposes, these activities must occur within the state. If a firm utilizes a contract research organization (CRO) located in Massachusetts, those expenses are excluded from the Maine credit calculation, even if the contracting firm is headquartered in Portland, Maine.3

Detailed Mechanics of the $25,000 and 75% Limitation

The most critical calculation for large corporations is found in subsection 3 of § 5219-K. This provision dictates the maximum amount of generated and carried-forward credit that can be used to offset the current year’s tax liability.1

The Tiered Offset Logic

The limitation follows a two-tiered mathematical logic. The first $25,000 of tax due, as determined before the allowance of any credits, is eligible for a 100% offset by the R&D credit.1 Any tax liability exceeding this $25,000 threshold is only eligible for a 75% offset. This means that for every dollar of tax liability over $25,000, the taxpayer must still pay at least 25 cents in tax, even if they have an unlimited pool of R&D credits.2

This mechanism creates a progressive “floor” of taxation. While a business with a $20,000 liability can reduce their tax to zero, a business with a $1,025,000 liability faces a much more complex calculation. The first $25,000 of their liability is eliminated, but of the remaining $1,000,000, only $750,000 can be offset.1 Consequently, the large firm must pay a minimum of $250,000 to the state. This ensure that major industrial players contribute to the state’s infrastructure and services regardless of the scale of their R&D investments.5

Integration with Other Non-refundable Credits

The application of the R&D credit does not happen in a vacuum. Corporations often utilize multiple incentives, such as the Investment Tax Credit or the Pine Tree Development Zone (PTDZ) credit.11 Maine Revenue Services provides specific ordering rules for these credits on Schedule C of Form 1120ME.13 Generally, non-refundable credits are applied in an order that maximizes the taxpayer’s benefit, though the R&D credit is specifically restricted by its own internal 75% rule.2

The “tax due” against which the credit is applied is the liability after certain modifications but before most other credits.2 It is essential for tax practitioners to distinguish between credits that reduce the “tax due” before the R&D credit is calculated and those that are applied after. Failure to sequence these correctly can lead to an overstatement of the allowable R&D credit and subsequent audit adjustments.3

Maine Revenue Services (MRS) Guidance and Compliance Standards

Maine Revenue Services provides extensive administrative guidance through its “Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet” and the instructions for Form 1120ME.2 These documents serve as the primary resource for interpreting how the state revenue office applies the statutory limitation.

The Worksheet Approach

The MRS Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet is the definitive tool for performing the limitation calculation. Line 8 of the worksheet specifically addresses the $25,000/75% threshold.2

The instructions clarify that the “tax liability” used for this calculation is the amount determined before other credits.2 This is a crucial distinction. If the law allowed the credit to be applied after other credits had already reduced the liability, the 75% limit would be much more restrictive, as the “excess” would be smaller.2 By applying it to the pre-credit liability, the state allows the taxpayer to utilize more of their R&D credit while still maintaining the 25% minimum on the remainder.1

Unitary Businesses and Combined Reporting

For corporations that are part of a unitary business and file a combined return (Form CR), additional rules apply to how the $25,000 threshold is handled.1 The law states that the State Tax Assessor shall adopt rules similar to those under IRC § 38(c)(6)(B) for apportioning the $25,000 among members of a controlled group.1

In a combined filing, the credit generated by an individual member corporation must first be applied against the tax due attributable to that specific company.1 If that company has an “excess” credit—either because the credit generated exceeds their specific liability or because the 75% limitation was triggered—they may apply that excess against the tax due of another member of the group.1 However, the receiving member can only use the credit to the extent that it stays within its own 75% limitation.1 This prevents groups from shifting credits to a single member to bypass the tiered limitation.1

Comprehensive Tax Case Study: InnovateMaine LLC

To illustrate the practical application of the § 5219-K limitation, we will examine the hypothetical case of InnovateMaine LLC, a mid-sized aerospace manufacturer that transitioned from a traditional machine shop to a high-tech materials research facility.

Step 1: Credit Generation

In the current tax year, InnovateMaine LLC conducted extensive research into carbon-fiber wing structures. All activities took place in their Saco, Maine, facility.

• Current Year Maine QREs: $2,000,000
• Three-Year Average (Base Amount): $1,200,000
• Qualified Basic Research Payments: $50,000 (Paid to the University of Maine)
• Unused Carryforward from Prior Years: $150,000

The available credit is calculated as follows:

1. Incremental Credit: 5% of ($2,000,000 – $1,200,000) = $40,000.1
2. Basic Research Credit: 7.5% of $50,000 = $3,750.1
3. Total Generated: $43,750.
4. Total Available Pool: $43,750 + $150,000 (Carryforward) = $193,750.2

Step 2: Applying the Limitation

InnovateMaine LLC calculates its Maine corporate income tax liability (before credits) to be $200,000. We now apply the $25,000 and 75% rule found in Line 8 of the MRS worksheet.2

1. Calculate the Tiered Cap:

• First $25,000 @ 100% = $25,000
• Amount in Excess of $25,000 = $175,000 ($200,000 – $25,000)
• 75% of Excess = $131,250 ($175,000 × 0.75)
• Maximum Allowable Credit: $25,000 + $131,250 = $156,250.1

Step 3: Final Tax Result and Carryforward

Despite having $193,750 in total available credits, InnovateMaine LLC is capped at using $156,250 in the current year.1

• Tax Due After Credit: $200,000 – $156,250 = $43,750.
• Remaining Carryforward: $193,750 – $156,250 = $37,500.

This $37,500 will be carried forward to the next tax year, subject to the 15-year expiration window from its year of origin.1 The 75% limitation effectively forced the company to pay $43,750 in tax this year, preserving the state’s revenue while allowing the company to retain the credit’s value for the future.2

Economic Statistics and Fiscal Outlook of the R&D Credit

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is one of the state’s most impactful corporate tax expenditures. Data from various state reports provide a clear picture of its reach and the significant commitment the state makes to research-intensive industries.3

Summary of Credit Performance and Projections

The growth in the projected revenue loss from $1.65 million in 2022 to nearly $4 million annually in the 2024-25 biennium suggests that Maine businesses are becoming more adept at claiming the credit and that the state’s efforts to market the program are succeeding.5 However, OPEGA reports have highlighted a “lack of readily available data” on the specific economic outcomes (e.g., specific job counts directly tied to R&D).6 This lack of data often leads to legislative debate over whether the 75% limitation should be loosened to attract more out-of-state firms or tightened to protect the General Fund.6

Comparison with Historic Incentives: The Super Credit

The current § 5219-K should be distinguished from the repealed “Super Credit for Substantially Increased Research and Development” under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-L.4 The Super Credit provided an additional 50% credit for expenses that exceeded 150% of the taxpayer’s average R&D spending from the 1994-1996 period.4

The Super Credit was significantly more restrictive than the standard R&D credit, as it was limited to 50% of the taxpayer’s liability after all other credits and could not reduce the liability below the amount paid in the prior year.4 The repeal of the Super Credit in 2014 simplified the Maine tax code, leaving the § 5219-K credit as the primary mechanism for research-based tax relief.7 The transition from the Super Credit to the current tiered 75% limit represents a modernization of the state’s incentive philosophy, moving away from rigid 1990s-era benchmarks toward a more flexible incremental system.6

Compliance Requirements and Audit Vulnerabilities

Maintaining compliance with the § 5219-K credit requires meticulous record-keeping. Maine Revenue Services has the authority to audit these claims, and the 75% limitation is a frequent area of focus during corporate tax examinations.3

Essential Documentation for Taxpayers

To survive an MRS audit, a corporation must be prepared to provide documentation that bridges the gap between their financial statements and the tax credit worksheet.4

• Employee-Level Detail: Records must show the percentage of time each employee spent on “qualified” vs. “non-qualified” tasks.4 If an employee spent 40% of their time on new product development and 60% on routine quality control (which is excluded), only 40% of their wages can be included in the QRE pool.3
• Geographic Verification: Documentation must prove that the research occurred at a Maine-based location.2 This is particularly challenging for software companies with remote developers.13
• Federal Consistency: Because the Maine credit is built on the federal credit, any adjustment made by the IRS to the federal Form 6765 must be reported to Maine Revenue Services within 180 days.7 A federal disallowance of research activities will almost certainly lead to a corresponding state disallowance.7

Common Pitfalls in the 75% Calculation

Taxpayers often make errors in the “Line 8” limitation calculation by failing to properly define “tax liability”.2 If a corporation has already applied a refundable credit (which reduces the net tax owed to the state but not the statutory “tax due before credits”), they might incorrectly lower the threshold for the 75% calculation.10

Another common error involves unitary groups. In a combined return, the $25,000 threshold is not available to every member of the group.1 It must be apportioned among the group members.1 A group that claims $25,000 of “100% offset” for four different subsidiaries ($100,000 total) is in violation of the statute and will face significant assessments during an audit.1

Interplay with Maine Apportionment and Nexus Rules

The value of the R&D credit is inextricably linked to how much of a corporation’s income is actually taxed by Maine. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, Maine has established clear thresholds for “Nexus,” which is the level of connection a business must have with the state to be subject to its taxes.13

Maine uses a “single-sales factor” apportionment formula.13 This is generally advantageous for manufacturing firms that produce goods in Maine (generating high R&D credits) but sell them to a global market.5 Since only the sales made into Maine are used to determine the portion of profit taxed by the state, these firms often have a relatively low Maine tax liability compared to their massive research investment.5

While this “low liability” sounds like a benefit, it often leads to the accumulation of unused R&D credits.2 If a company’s Maine tax liability is only $50,000 due to single-sales factor apportionment, they can only use $43,750 of credit per year ($25,000 + 75% of $25,000).1 If that same company generates $200,000 in credits annually, they will build a massive carryforward balance that may never be fully realized before the 15-year expiration.1 This structural reality makes Maine’s R&D credit particularly valuable for companies that are expanding their sales within the Maine market.

Strategic Outlook: The Dirigo Business Incentives and Beyond

The Maine tax landscape is currently undergoing a significant transformation with the introduction of the “Dirigo Business Incentives Credit Program,” scheduled to begin for tax years on or after January 1, 2025.20 This program will offer a 5% to 10% capital investment credit and will be refundable, a major departure from the non-refundable nature of the § 5219-K Research Expense Tax Credit.20

For businesses engaged in research and development, the transition to 2025 requires a dual-track strategy. The existing R&D credit will likely remain a core component for offsetting operational research costs (wages and supplies), while the Dirigo credit will take the lead on incentivizing the construction of new research facilities and the purchase of high-end lab equipment.6

The presence of the 75% limitation on the R&D credit makes the new, refundable Dirigo incentives even more attractive for large-scale investors. Because the Dirigo credit is refundable, it is not capped by the taxpayer’s liability in the same way as the R&D credit.4 Large corporations that are currently “trapped” by the 75% limitation on their R&D credits may find that shifting their investment focus toward Dirigo-qualified capital assets allows them to receive immediate cash benefits from the state, effectively bypassing the liability-based bottlenecks of the older credit system.6

Conclusion: Synthesizing the 75% Rule in Maine’s Tax Ecosystem

The “Credit Limitation: Tax in Excess of $25,000 (75%)” is more than a simple calculation; it is a fundamental regulator of Maine’s corporate tax revenue. By providing a 100% offset for the first $25,000 of tax, the state ensures that small and emerging high-tech startups can reinvest their entire state tax savings back into their innovation pipelines. For mid-sized and large corporations, the 75% limitation acts as a fiscal safeguard, preventing the state’s largest taxpayers from eliminating their societal contribution through concentrated R&D spikes.

The complexity of the Maine R&D tax credit—ranging from its reliance on federal Section 41 definitions to its strict geographic boundaries and tiered offset limits—requires a high level of administrative diligence. Taxpayers must navigate the MRS worksheet logic, the nuances of combined reporting, and the long-term management of 15-year carryforward balances. As Maine enters a new era of business incentives with the Dirigo program in 2025, the Research Expense Tax Credit will continue to serve as the bedrock of the state’s innovation economy, provided that businesses and their advisors remain vigilant in managing the specific limitations that govern its application. The 75% rule stands as a testament to Maine’s commitment to innovation, tempered by a necessary devotion to long-term fiscal sustainability.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/