The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit: Technical Uncertainty and the Four-Part Test

The elimination of uncertainty requirement dictates that a taxpayer must intend to discover information that resolves technical unknowns regarding the capability, method, or appropriate design of a business component. In the context of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, this means a project only qualifies if the information available at the outset does not establish—through standard professional practice—how to achieve the desired technical result.1

This fundamental concept serves as the gateway to one of the state’s most significant corporate and individual tax incentives. The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, codified under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K, is designed to stimulate innovation by lowering the financial risk of research and development activities conducted within the state.4 By aligning state tax policy with the rigorous standards of the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, Maine provides a mechanism for businesses to recoup a portion of their investment in high-stakes technological advancement.6 However, the eligibility for this credit is not determined by the volume of work performed or the novelty of a product in the consumer market; rather, it is determined by the presence of technical uncertainty and the systematic effort to eliminate it.3 This analysis provides a deep exploration of how the “Elimination of Uncertainty” prong of the Four-Part Test functions within Maine’s regulatory environment, the specific guidance provided by Maine Revenue Services, and the practical application of these rules in the state’s primary industrial sectors.

The Statutory Architecture of 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is an incremental, nonrefundable credit available to a wide range of taxpayers, including C-corporations, S-corporations, partnerships, and individual filers.4 To understand the context of uncertainty, one must first grasp the legal structure that supports the credit’s calculation and limitation.

The credit is fundamentally composed of two distinct calculations. First, the incremental component allows for a credit equal to 5% of the excess of qualified research expenses (QREs) for the taxable year over a “base amount”.4 The base amount is defined as the average annual amount spent on QREs in Maine over the previous three taxable years.4 Second, a credit of 7.5% is allowed for “basic research payments,” which are payments made to qualified organizations—typically universities or scientific research institutes—for the pursuit of fundamental scientific knowledge.4

Credit Mechanics and Jurisdictional Limitations

A defining characteristic of the Maine credit is its strict “Maine-only” requirement. While the state adopts the federal definitions of qualified research found in IRC § 41, it limits the application of the credit solely to expenditures for research conducted within the geographic boundaries of Maine.10 This ensures that the tax benefit remains tied to the state’s local workforce and infrastructure.

The credit is nonrefundable, meaning it can reduce a taxpayer’s liability to zero but cannot result in a payment from the state if the credit exceeds the tax due.6 For corporations, the credit is limited to 100% of the first $25,000 of tax due plus 75% of the tax due in excess of $25,000.4 For individuals and smaller corporations, the credit is capped at the total tax liability for the year.7 Any unused credit may be carried forward for 15 years, providing a long-term incentive for capital-intensive industries such as biotechnology or maritime engineering.7

The Qualitative Pillar: The Four-Part Test

The determination of whether an activity qualifies for the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit rests upon the “Four-Part Test” derived from federal IRC § 41(d).1 This test is designed to differentiate between routine business improvements and genuine technological innovation. Each activity must be evaluated on a “business component” basis, meaning the test applies separately to each product, process, or software platform under development.1

The Permitted Purpose Prong

The research must be undertaken for a “qualified purpose,” which involves creating a new or improving an existing “business component”.1 The goal of the research must be to improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of that component.11 Activities that focus solely on the aesthetic or cosmetic aspects of a product do not qualify.1

The Technological in Nature Prong

The process of experimentation must fundamentally rely on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.1 This is often referred to as the “hard sciences” requirement.3 Research that depends on social sciences, economics, or humanities—such as market research or management studies—is explicitly excluded.2

The Process of Experimentation Prong

To meet this prong, the taxpayer must engage in a systematic process designed to evaluate one or more alternatives to achieve a result where the capability, method, or design is uncertain at the beginning of the research.1 This process typically involves formulating a hypothesis, testing it through modeling, simulation, or trial-and-error, and then refining or discarding that hypothesis based on results.3

The Elimination of Uncertainty Prong

The activity must be intended to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a business component.1 This prong is the specific focus of this analysis and serves as the primary technical hurdle in most audits.3

Deep Dive: The Meaning of Elimination of Uncertainty

The concept of “Elimination of Uncertainty” is the foundational element of what the law considers “research and development in the experimental or laboratory sense”.2 According to Treasury Regulation § 1.174-2(a)(1), which Maine follows, uncertainty exists if the information available to the taxpayer at the start of the project does not establish the capability, the method, or the appropriate design of the business component.2

Capability Uncertainty: The “Can It Be Done?” Question

Capability uncertainty is the highest level of technical risk. It occurs when the taxpayer is unsure if the desired outcome is even possible within the laws of physics or the current state of the art.3 This is common in “moonshot” projects. For instance, a Maine startup attempting to develop a new type of zero-emission marine engine that operates on a theoretical chemical reaction would face capability uncertainty—the core question is whether the engine can function at all.3

Method Uncertainty: The “How Do We Do It?” Question

Method uncertainty exists when the taxpayer knows that a result is possible but does not know the specific procedure or technique required to achieve it.3 A manufacturer in Maine’s forest products sector might know that it is possible to create a biodegradable plastic from wood cellulose, but the exact chemical “recipe” or mechanical process to extrude that plastic into a stable film remains uncertain.21

Design Uncertainty: The “What Is the Optimal Configuration?” Question

Design uncertainty is the most common form of uncertainty claimed by businesses. It occurs when the taxpayer knows a goal is achievable and knows the method to use, but the precise, optimal design of the final product is unknown.2 In the shipbuilding industry, a company may have the capability and the method to build a 50-foot hull, but the specific geometric configuration required to achieve a 15% improvement in fuel efficiency represents design uncertainty.20

The Distinction Between Technical and Business Risk

A critical distinction for Maine taxpayers is that the uncertainty must be technical in nature, not commercial.24 Business uncertainties—such as whether a product will be popular, whether consumers will pay a certain price, or whether the project will be profitable—are explicitly excluded from the credit.26 The elimination of uncertainty must be achieved through the application of the hard sciences.1

Maine Revenue Services: Guidance and Administrative Interpretation

Maine Revenue Services (MRS) provides the administrative framework for applying these rules through instructional materials and specific tax rules. The primary guidance is found in the “Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet” and MRS Rule 806.10

MRS Rule 806 and the Definition of Research

MRS Rule 806 (“Nonresident Individual Income Tax”) provides the formal definition of “research and development” for Maine tax purposes. It states that research and development activities are performed in the experimental or laboratory sense if they are intended to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a product, formula, invention, process, technique, or patent.19

Furthermore, Rule 806 and federal standards adopted by Maine explicitly exclude several types of activities that businesses often mistake for R&D:

• Quality Control: Routine testing and inspection for the purpose of ensuring consistency in production.19
• Market Research: Studies regarding consumer preference, advertising, or promotions.7
• Aesthetic Improvements: Changes that only affect the appearance of a product rather than its function or performance.1
• Routine Software Debugging: Fixing standard errors in existing software that do not require a process of experimentation to resolve.2

The 2024 Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet

The MRS 2024 worksheet acts as the primary filing document. It requires taxpayers to pull specific data from federal Form 6765 and isolate the Maine-specific portion.10

• Line 1 (Basic Research Payments): This line captures payments made to Maine-based universities or research organizations. Taxpayers must ensure these payments are in excess of a federal base amount calculated specifically for their Maine activities.10
• Line 3 (Qualified Research Expenses): This is the total of wages, supplies, and contract research costs incurred for activities performed within Maine.10
• Line 4 (Base Amount): The three-year average of prior Maine QREs. MRS provides strict instructions on prorating these amounts if a taxpayer had a short tax year in the preceding three-year window.10

This calculation demonstrates how the incremental nature of the credit works: the credit is awarded not on the total spend, but on the increase in spending compared to the historical average.4

Industry Application: Marine and Shipbuilding Innovation

Maine’s maritime sector provides a rich context for the application of the elimination of uncertainty test. The state is home to significant naval architecture and shipbuilding expertise, where the challenges of operating in harsh ocean environments create constant technical unknowns.20

Qualified Research in the Shipyard

A shipyard or marine engineering firm in Maine may claim the credit for activities such as:

• Advanced Hull Design: Developing new hull geometries to reduce drag and improve stability. The uncertainty here relates to how the hull will interact with water at varying speeds and sea states, requiring complex hydro-dynamic modeling and scale testing.20
• Propulsion Systems: Integrating hybrid diesel-electric or hydrogen fuel cell systems into existing vessel designs. The uncertainty involves the power management logic and the thermal stability of the fuel cells in a saltwater environment.20
• Materials Science: Testing new composite alloys or coatings designed to resist biofouling and corrosion. The uncertainty concerns the long-term durability and fatigue resistance of these materials under constant immersion.20

Unqualified Routine Activities

Conversely, the following activities in a shipyard would generally not qualify because they lack the requisite technical uncertainty:

• Routine Vessel Maintenance: Repairing or painting an existing ship using established methods.20
• Building to Standard Prints: Constructing a vessel based on a proven design without any modification or experimentation.20
• Aesthetic Modifications: Changing the interior cabin layout or upholstery for a customer’s preference.1

Industry Application: Forest Bioproducts and Advanced Manufacturing

Maine’s forest products industry is currently undergoing a revolutionary shift from traditional paper production to advanced “bioproducts.” This transition is driven by R&D that is heavily focused on overcoming the technical uncertainties of using wood cellulose in new applications.21

Innovation in Wood-Derived Materials

Key R&D activities in this sector include:

• Nanocellulose Development: Researching “nanocellulose,” nature’s super-polymer, to create reinforced building materials or biodegradable food packaging. The uncertainty often centers on how to isolate the cellulose fibers without damaging their structural integrity at an industrial scale.21
• Wood Fiber Insulation: Developing bio-based insulation that meets strict fire safety standards. The uncertainty lies in the chemical treatment of the wood fibers to ensure they are both fire-resistant and structurally stable over time.21
• Renewable Chemicals: Extracting high-value chemicals from forest residuals. The uncertainty involves the chemical catalysts and temperature gradients required to achieve the necessary purity for commercial use.21

In each of these cases, the company must document that they did not know the “appropriateness of the design” or the “capability of the method” at the start of the project.2

Industry Application: Biotechnology and Life Sciences

The biotechnology sector in Maine, anchored by institutions like the University of Maine and private firms, is a primary driver of high-skilled job growth.31 This sector is almost entirely defined by technical uncertainty.

Qualified Biotech Research

Activities that qualify in the biotech sector include:

• Drug Formulation: Developing new drug delivery systems that ensure a medicine reaches its target in the human body without degrading. The uncertainty involves the biochemical interactions between the drug and the delivery vehicle.3
• Medical Device Engineering: Creating precision instruments for robotic surgery. The uncertainty relates to the mechanical tolerances and the software feedback loops required to ensure patient safety.11
• Sustainable Aquaculture: Researching new fish feeds that use plant-based proteins instead of fishmeal. The uncertainty involves the nutritional absorption rates and the impact on fish growth cycles.32

The biotechnology sector frequently uses “Basic Research Payments” (Line 1 of the MRS worksheet) for collaborations with universities, allowing them to claim a 7.5% credit on these high-risk exploratory projects.4

Economic Impact and Statistical Overview

The Research Expense Tax Credit is a vital tool for Maine’s economic development, even as the state continues to face challenges in its national innovation ranking. According to OPEGA and state tax expenditure reports, the credit serves a targeted group of high-investment firms.5

Fiscal Performance of the Credit

The revenue loss to the state (which represents the tax savings to Maine businesses) has fluctuated but generally remains between $2 million and $4 million per year.6

While these numbers may seem modest compared to larger states, the impact on Maine’s R&D sector is significant. Jobs in the R&D sector pay an average of 1.4 times more than other sectors in the state, and the sector saw a 38% growth in employment between 2016 and 2022—far exceeding the 4% growth in the broader economy.31

Maine’s Competitive Standing

Despite these gains, Maine ranks 47th in the nation for total R&D performed and 31st for the percentage of science, engineering, and health doctoral degree holders in the workforce.34 This disparity suggests that while the Research Expense Tax Credit is effective for those who use it, many eligible Maine businesses may not be aware of the credit or may find the complex documentation requirements to be a barrier to entry.5

The Audit Lifecycle: Documenting Uncertainty and Experimentation

The primary reason R&D tax credit claims are denied in an audit is a lack of contemporaneous documentation.8 Maine Revenue Services and the IRS expect a taxpayer to be able to “tell the story” of their innovation through evidence created at the time the work was done.18

The “Contemporaneous” Standard

Documentation must be dated and prove that the work occurred within the fiscal year being claimed.18 Reconstructing records several years after a project has been completed is generally unacceptable to tax authorities.17

Essential Document Checklist

A robust R&D claim should be supported by:

• Project Narrative: A document outlining the technical goals and the specific technical uncertainties (Capability, Method, or Design) identified at the project’s inception.8
• Trial Logs and Lab Notes: Records of experiments, including those that failed. Failures are powerful evidence that the outcome was not “immediately clear” at the start.8
• Prototype Records: Photographs, videos, or CAD drawings of the various stages of build and assembly.8
• Testing Protocols and Results: Data from simulations, field trials, or pressure tests used to evaluate the alternatives.8
• Payroll and Expense Records: Specific tracking that links employee time and supply purchases to the qualified project.8

The 80% Rule (Substantially All)

To qualify a business component, “substantially all” (80% or more) of the activities associated with its development must constitute elements of a process of experimentation.2 This means if a project involves significant non-technical work (such as marketing, legal, or standard production), the entire project may be disqualified.2 Companies should use time-tracking software to ensure that at least 80% of an engineer’s or scientist’s time is spent on direct research, supervision, or support.1

Recent Legislative Developments and Federal Conformity

The future of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is currently shaped by significant changes in federal tax law and ongoing state-level legislative discussions.

The Impact of IRC Section 174 Amortization

A major shift occurred with the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which required businesses to amortize R&D expenses over five years (domestic) or 15 years (foreign) starting in 2022, rather than deducting them immediately.15 Because Maine’s tax law is tied to the IRC, this change effectively increased the tax burden for Maine companies in the short term.36

However, the federal “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) enacted in July 2025 has introduced new flexibility, allowing some taxpayers to elect immediate expensing for domestic research for tax years beginning after 2024.20

Maine’s Current Conformity Status

Maine Revenue Services has issued guidance indicating that Maine does not automatically conform to all federal changes.37 For the 2025 tax season:

• Maine generally nonconforms to the accelerated expensing of R&D expenses incurred after 2021.37
• The state allows certain small businesses that file amended federal returns for 2022, 2023, or 2024 to claim a deduction for those years.37
• Taxpayers must carefully monitor future legislative activity, as the Maine Legislature must enact specific conformity legislation to align with the OBBBA’s taxpayer-friendly provisions.37

Proposed State Reforms

Legislative proposals such as LD 308 and LD 1665 have sought to significantly expand the Maine credit.6 These proposals include:

• Increasing the credit rate from 5% to 10%.39
• Doubling the maximum credit that can be claimed before the 75% limitation kicks in (from $25,000 to $50,000).6
• Halving the base amount to 50% of the three-year average, which would drastically increase the credit amount for companies with steady or slightly increasing R&D budgets.39

While these changes are still under debate, they reflect a bipartisan recognition that Maine must remain competitive with other states (such as Massachusetts or Rhode Island) that offer more aggressive R&D incentives.34

Comprehensive Example: Designing an Ocean-Based Carbon Sequestration Buoy

To ground these theoretical concepts, consider a detailed example of a Maine-based environmental technology firm, “Coastal Carbon Solutions.”

Background and Technical Challenge

The company aims to develop a “Passive Substrate Sequestration Buoy” (PSSB). The goal is to create a device that floats at the ocean surface, collects carbon dioxide through a specialized membrane, and then transitions to a “negatively buoyant” state to sink and store the carbon in the deep ocean.12

Identifying Technical Uncertainties

The firm identifies three primary uncertainties at the project’s outset:

1. Capability Uncertainty: Will the specialized membrane be able to absorb CO2 at a rate sufficient to justify the cost of the buoy?.3
2. Method Uncertainty: How can the buoy transition from “positively buoyant” to “negatively buoyant” without using an external power source that would negate the carbon savings?.8
3. Design Uncertainty: What is the optimal shape of the substrate to ensure it sinks straight down rather than being carried away by lateral ocean currents?.2

The Process of Experimentation

The firm employs the following systematic process:

• Phase 1 (Modeling): Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to simulate 50 different buoy shapes.18
• Phase 2 (Prototyping): Building three distinct mechanical triggers that use water pressure at specific depths to change the buoy’s buoyancy.12
• Phase 3 (Testing): Deploying 10 small-scale prototypes in the Gulf of Maine and tracking their descent using acoustic sensors.20

Financial Data and Credit Calculation

• 2024 Maine QREs (Wages + Supplies): $600,000
• Prior 3-Year Average (Base Amount): $400,000
• Maine Corporate Income Tax Liability: $100,000

Step 1: Calculate the Incremental Credit

$$Excess QREs = 600,000 – 400,000 = 200,000$$

$$Incremental Credit = 5\% \times 200,000 = 10,000$$

7

Step 2: Apply the Statutory Limitation

For a corporation with $100,000 in tax due, the credit is limited to:

• 100% of the first $25,000 = $25,000
• 75% of the remaining $75,000 = $56,250
• Total Allowable Credit Capacity = $81,250 4

Since the calculated credit ($10,000) is well within the $81,250 capacity, Coastal Carbon Solutions can apply the full $10,000 against their tax liability, reducing their payment to the state from $100,000 to $90,000.

Conclusion

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is a powerful, though technically demanding, incentive that rewards businesses for embracing the risks of innovation. At its core, the elimination of uncertainty requirement serves as a qualitative filter, ensuring that the credit is reserved for activities that push the boundaries of current knowledge in the hard sciences.1 Whether a company is designing the next generation of deep-sea hull geometries, developing life-saving medical devices, or transforming forest residuals into high-value chemicals, the success of their tax claim hinges on their ability to prove that they faced technical unknowns and engaged in a systematic process to resolve them.20

As Maine’s innovation economy grows, the importance of this credit will only increase. By understanding the nuances of the Four-Part Test, staying abreast of federal conformity changes, and maintaining rigorous contemporaneous documentation, Maine businesses can successfully navigate the complexities of state revenue guidance.17 Ultimately, the credit provides the financial breathing room necessary for Maine’s researchers and engineers to continue their work, ensuring that the state remains a viable and attractive hub for 21st-century technological leadership.14

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/