Comprehensive Analysis of In-House Research Expenses and the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit Framework

In the regulatory landscape of the State of Maine, in-house research expenses refer to the direct costs of wages, supplies, and computer leasing incurred during the conduct of qualified technological experimentation within state borders. These expenses serve as the primary components of the Research Expense Tax Credit, a non-refundable fiscal incentive aimed at reducing the financial risk associated with innovation performed by Maine-based personnel.1

The Statutory Architecture of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, codified under Title 36, Section 5219-K of the Maine Revised Statutes, represents a strategic alignment of state fiscal policy with the federal standards for innovation established by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).3 Since its enactment in 1995, the credit has functioned as a “piggyback” mechanism, meaning it utilizes the definitions and foundational requirements of the federal Credit for Increasing Research Activities under IRC Section 41, yet it imposes a strict jurisdictional limitation: only research conducted within the State of Maine qualifies for the state-level benefit.4 This structural choice simplifies compliance for multi-state corporations while ensuring that the tax expenditure directly supports the local economy and the creation of high-skilled jobs within Maine.1

The legislative intent behind 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K is fundamentally incremental.1 Rather than acting as a broad subsidy for all research spending, the credit is designed to reward taxpayers who increase their investment in research and development (R&D) over time.2 This is achieved by calculating the credit based on the excess of current-year qualified research expenses (QREs) over a base amount, which is defined as the average annual R&D spend during the three preceding taxable years.3 By focusing on growth, the State of Maine attempts to stimulate new innovative activity rather than simply lowering the tax burden on established, static research programs.1

Conceptualizing In-House Research Expenses

Under the Maine framework, in-house research expenses are a subset of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) that represent the internal resources a taxpayer dedicates to technological advancement.15 The law distinguishes these from “contract research expenses,” which involve payments to third parties to perform research on the taxpayer’s behalf.8 Because in-house expenses reflect the direct employment of Maine residents and the direct purchase of materials within the state, they are often scrutinized more closely by Maine Revenue Services (MRS) to ensure they meet the strict “in-state” requirement.4

Qualified Wages and the Human Capital Element

Wages paid to employees performing “qualified services” are typically the most significant component of in-house research expenses, historically representing nearly 70% of total R&D credit spending nationwide.16 In Maine, the term “wages” adopts the definition found in IRC Section 3401(a), which includes all taxable compensation reported on an employee’s Form W-2, such as base salary, bonuses, and certain stock-based compensation.15 However, it is essential to note that fringe benefits, such as employer-paid health insurance premiums and 401(k) contributions, are generally excluded from the calculation as they do not constitute “wages” for the purposes of the credit.16

To be eligible for inclusion in the credit calculation, these wages must be paid for the performance of qualified services, which fall into three distinct categories:

1. Direct Conduct of Research: This encompasses the actual “bench work” or engineering activities, such as a biologist in a Portland lab performing CRISPR gene-editing experiments or a software developer in Bangor coding a proprietary machine-learning algorithm to solve a technical challenge.15
2. Direct Supervision: This involves the immediate management of individuals performing the direct research. A project manager who reviews technical specifications, sets experimental protocols, and directs the day-to-day activities of researchers is providing a qualified service.15 General upper-level management, such as a CEO who merely approves a budget, does not qualify.18
3. Direct Support: This includes activities that are essential to the research process but do not constitute the research itself. Examples include a technician in an Auburn facility cleaning specialized lab equipment used for a qualified experiment or a machinist in Lewiston fabricating a one-of-a-kind prototype part for a new engine design.15

Maine follows the “substantially all” rule (the 80% rule) from federal regulations.16 If at least 80% of an employee’s services during the taxable year are qualified services, then 100% of the wages paid to that employee may be treated as qualified research expenses.16 If the percentage is less than 80%, the taxpayer may only include the portion of the wages that directly corresponds to the time spent on qualified activities.15

Qualified Supplies and Consumables

The second category of in-house research expenses consists of qualified supplies.8 These are defined as any tangible property, other than land or improvements to land, that is not of a character subject to the allowance for depreciation.16 This creates a sharp distinction between capital investments and research supplies: while a $500,000 mass spectrometer is a depreciable capital asset (and thus not a supply), the $50,000 worth of specialized chemicals, reagents, and disposable glass used within that spectrometer during an experiment are qualified supplies.15

For an expense to be qualified as a supply in Maine, it must be consumed or transformed during the research process.15 This includes:

• Materials used to construct a prototype that has no future commercial value.5
• Energy and utilities, such as electricity or water, if they are “extraordinary” and used directly in the conduct of research rather than for general facility lighting or heating.16
• Raw materials used in a pilot manufacturing run where the primary goal is to test the feasibility of a new process.15

General administrative expenses, such as office paper, pens, and cleaning supplies for the non-research areas of a company, are strictly ineligible.15

Computer Leasing and Processing Costs

In the digital age, many Maine-based innovators rely on high-performance computing to conduct research.8 The Maine credit allows for the inclusion of payments made to another person for the right to use a computer in the conduct of qualified research.16 In the contemporary context, this frequently applies to cloud computing fees (e.g., AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) or “Software as a Service” (SaaS) costs, provided the computing power is utilized for tasks like complex simulations, data modeling, or hosting development environments for software innovation.8 This category is technically “in-house” because the taxpayer’s own employees are the ones interacting with and directing the leased computing resource.16

The Four-Part Test: The Gateway to Qualified Research Activities

Merely spending money on wages or supplies does not guarantee a tax credit. For an in-house expense to be “qualified,” it must be linked to a project that satisfies the “Four-Part Test” mandated by IRC Section 41 and adopted by Maine Revenue Services.6 This test ensures that the credit is only applied to technological innovation rather than routine business improvements or aesthetic changes.4

1. Permitted Purpose (The Business Component Test)

The research must be intended to develop or improve a “business component” of the taxpayer.14 A business component can be any product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention that is held for sale, lease, or license, or used in the taxpayer’s own trade or business.14 The improvement sought must relate to the performance, functionality, reliability, or quality of that component.14 For instance, a Maine brewery developing a new filtration technique to improve the shelf life of its beer is seeking a permitted purpose.17

2. Elimination of Uncertainty

At the start of the project, the taxpayer must face technical uncertainty.5 This exists if the information available to the taxpayer does not establish either (a) the capability of developing the component, (b) the method for achieving the goal, or (c) the appropriate final design of the component.5 If a Maine aerospace company knows exactly how to build a part but is simply looking to optimize the manufacturing schedule, there is no technical uncertainty, and thus no credit.5

3. Process of Experimentation

The taxpayer must engage in a systematic process to evaluate one or more alternatives to eliminate the technical uncertainty.5 This process usually involves modeling, simulation, systematic trial and error, or the development and testing of multiple prototypes.5 Simple “look and feel” testing or consumer surveys do not constitute a process of experimentation.4

4. Technological in Nature

The research must fundamentally rely on the “hard sciences”.14 This means the process of experimentation must utilize principles from engineering, physics, chemistry, biology, or computer science.14 Activities based on the social sciences, management studies, or economics—such as market research or efficiency studies—are explicitly excluded from the Maine R&D tax credit.4

Maine Revenue Services (MRS) Local Guidance and Filing Procedures

Maine Revenue Services (MRS) serves as the primary administrative and enforcement body for the R&D credit.2 Taxpayers claiming the credit must follow specific local procedures that diverge in critical ways from the federal filing process, particularly regarding the jurisdictional isolation of expenses.4

The Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet

To claim the credit, taxpayers must complete the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet (Worksheet 5219-K).5 This worksheet serves as the mechanism for calculating the Maine-specific credit amount and must be attached to the Maine income tax return (e.g., Form 1120ME for corporations or Form 1040ME for individuals).5

The worksheet requires taxpayers to isolate Maine-specific QREs from their national R&D spend. Because the Maine credit is 5% of the excess over a three-year average base amount, the taxpayer must also identify and report their Maine-only QREs for the three prior taxable years.4

Required Supporting Documentation

MRS guidance is explicit: taxpayers must provide a copy of their federal Form 6765, Credit for Increasing Research Activities, along with their Maine return.9 For owners of pass-through entities (PTEs) such as partnerships, LLCs, and S-corporations, the individual partner or shareholder must include a copy of the PTE’s federal Form 6765 and the federal Schedule K-1 they received.9

MRS reserves the right to request “additional information supporting the credit” before processing the claim.19 In the event of an audit, the state tax assessor may request contemporaneous records that verify both the nature of the research activity and the physical location where it was performed.3

Jurisdictional Allocation of Expenses

The most common error in Maine R&D claims is the failure to properly subtract non-Maine expenses.4 If a company has a research center in Saco and another in Boston, only the wages paid to employees working at the Saco facility—and the supplies physically consumed there—can be included.4 If an employee splits their time between locations, their wages must be prorated based on the hours physically spent in Maine.9 Similarly, for contract research, the 65% rule applies only to the portion of the contract performed within Maine borders.9

Corporate Limitations and Carryforward Mechanics

While the calculation of the Maine R&D credit is incremental, the ability of a corporation to use that credit in any given year is capped by statutory limitations that are more restrictive than the federal standard.3

The Corporate Offset Limit

For corporations, the credit is limited to 100% of the first $25,000 in income tax liability (calculated before other credits), plus 75% of the tax amount in excess of $25,000.3 This means a corporation with a $100,000 tax bill can only use $81,250 of R&D credits in that year ($25,000 + 75% of $75,000).3 For individuals and corporations with less than $25,000 in tax liability, the credit is limited to the tax liability itself, as the credit is non-refundable.3

The 15-Year Carryforward

Any portion of the credit that cannot be used in the current year—either because it exceeds the tax due or because of the corporate 75% limitation—may be carried forward for 15 taxable years.3 This longevity is a critical feature for Maine’s biotechnology and manufacturing startups, which often incur massive R&D costs during a pre-revenue phase and need a long window to monetize those credits once they become profitable.4

Maine specifically prohibits the “carryback” of R&D credits to prior taxable years.4 This is a major departure from federal law, which allows for a one-year carryback to recover taxes paid in a prior period.23

Combined Reporting for Unitary Businesses

In the case of corporations filing a Maine combined return as part of a unitary business group, special rules apply.3 The credit generated by an individual member corporation must first be applied against the tax due attributable to that specific company.3 If that company has excess credit, it may be used by another member of the group, provided the other member has capacity under the $25,000/75% limitation.3 This “sharing” of credits allows large enterprises with multiple Maine subsidiaries to optimize their tax position.3

Comprehensive Example: The TechMaine Manufacturing Scenario

To understand how in-house research expenses translate into a tax benefit, consider TechMaine, a fictional high-performance materials manufacturer located in South Portland. For the 2024 tax year, TechMaine underwent a major project to develop a new composite material for offshore wind turbines.

Step 1: Identifying Maine-Specific QREs for 2024

TechMaine identified the following expenditures:

• Wages: Four engineers spent 100% of their time on the project. Total W-2 wages: $400,000.
• Wages: A lead scientist spent 50% of her time in South Portland and 50% at a partner lab in Massachusetts. Total W-2 wages: $200,000 (only $100,000 is Maine-eligible).
• Supplies: Composite resins and test carbon fiber consumed in South Portland: $75,000.
• Computer Leasing: High-performance modeling fees for turbine simulation: $25,000.
• Contract Research: TechMaine paid a local Maine firm $100,000 to perform structural stress testing. (65% of this is a QRE).

Total 2024 Maine QREs = $\$400,000 + \$100,000 + \$75,000 + \$25,000 + (\$100,000 \times 0.65) = \$665,000$.4

Step 2: Calculating the 3-Year Base Amount

To determine the incremental credit, TechMaine averages its Maine-only QREs from 2021, 2022, and 2023.

• 2023 QREs: $550,000
• 2022 QREs: $500,000
• 2021 QREs: $450,000

Base Amount = $(\$550,000 + \$500,000 + \$450,000) / 3 = \$500,000$.4

Step 3: Computing the Credit

1. Incremental Credit Component: 5% of the excess over the base.

• Excess = $\$665,000 – \$500,000 = \$165,000$.
• Credit = $\$165,000 \times 0.05 = \$8,250$.1

1. Basic Research Credit Component: Assume TechMaine made no separate basic research payments to universities.

• Credit = $0.

Total Tentative Maine Credit for 2024 = $8,250.

Step 4: Applying Limitations

TechMaine has a 2024 Maine corporate income tax liability of $20,000.

• Because the liability is less than $25,000, the limitation is simply 100% of the tax liability.3
• TechMaine can use the full $8,250 credit to reduce its tax due to $11,750.4

If TechMaine had a tax liability of $200,000, the calculation would be:

• Limit = $(\$25,000 \times 1.00) + ((\$200,000 – \$25,000) \times 0.75) = \$25,000 + \$131,250 = \$156,250$.3
• In this case, the $8,250 credit is well under the limit and can be used in its entirety.3

The Evolution of R&D Policy in Maine: From Super Credits to Strategic Evaluations

The landscape of Maine’s innovation incentives has shifted significantly over the past decade, moving from aggressive expansion credits toward a more measured, data-driven approach to evaluation.2

The Rise and Fall of the “Super Credit” (§ 5219-L)

Until 2014, Maine offered the “Super Credit for Substantially Increased Research and Development” under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-L.5 This credit was even more lucrative than the standard R&D credit, providing a benefit for qualified research expenses that exceeded a “super credit base amount” (which was anchored to historical 1997 spending).21 While the Super Credit expired for new expenditures on January 1, 2014, its 10-year carryforward provisions have impacted Maine tax returns for a decade.6

As of the 2024-2025 tax years, the generation of new Super Credits is no longer possible, and most existing carryforwards have likely reached their statutory limit.24 Recent legislative efforts, such as LD 977 and LD 1665, have attempted to “Restore the Super Credit” or increase the standard credit rate to 10%, but these bills have generally stalled due to fiscal concerns.25

The 2022 OPEGA Evaluation and National Benchmarking

In March 2022, the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) released a landmark report evaluating the Research Expense Tax Credit.2 This evaluation provided a sober look at the credit’s performance in the context of the national innovation economy.

OPEGA recommended that the Legislature clarify the specific goals of the credit—such as job creation or investment stimulation—and consider whether the incremental design of the credit excludes some of Maine’s most consistent innovators.1 These recommendations continue to inform ongoing legislative debate regarding the modernization of Maine’s tax code.6

Operational Challenges: The Impact of Federal Section 174 Amortization

One of the most pressing issues for Maine businesses engaged in R&D is the recent change in federal tax law regarding the amortization of research and experimental (R&E) expenditures.29 Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), beginning in 2022, businesses are no longer allowed to immediately deduct their R&D costs under IRC Section 174.29 Instead, these costs must be capitalized and amortized over five years for domestic research and fifteen years for foreign research.29

The “Book-Tax” Difference in Maine

Because Maine’s income tax is based on federal adjusted gross income, the state automatically conforms to this federal amortization requirement.31 This has created a significant “book-tax” difference for many companies: while a firm may spend $1 million on in-house research wages in a year, it can only deduct $100,000 of those wages for tax purposes in Year 1 (due to the mid-year convention of the five-year amortization schedule).29

This change has several consequences for the Maine R&D tax credit:

1. Increased Tax Liability: The inability to immediately deduct R&D costs increases the taxable income for innovative firms, potentially making the R&D tax credit even more valuable as an offset to this higher tax burden.29
2. Tracking Complexity: Taxpayers must now meticulously track their “Section 174 expenses” separately from their “Section 41 QREs”.29 While there is significant overlap, the amortization rules are broader and include indirect costs that do not qualify for the 5% Maine R&D credit.16
3. State Conformity Risks: While Maine currently conforms to the TCJA amortization rules, other states (like California) have decoupled, allowing for immediate state-level expensing.30 Maine taxpayers must remain vigilant for any future legislative changes that might decouple Maine from Section 174.33

Complementary Incentives: Maximizing the Innovation Footprint

To fully optimize their financial position, Maine businesses should not view the Research Expense Tax Credit in isolation. Several other state programs offer synergies that can further reduce the cost of technical activities.12

Sales and Use Tax Exemptions for R&D Equipment

Maine Revenue Services provides an immediate sales tax exemption for machinery and equipment used “directly and exclusively” in research and development.12 While the R&D income tax credit excludes depreciable equipment (focusing on wages and supplies), the sales tax exemption specifically targets that equipment.22

A biotechnology firm in Portland can buy $200,000 worth of lab equipment and pay $0 in sales tax at the time of purchase by providing the vendor with an Industrial Users Blanket Sales Tax Certificate of Exemption.22 This provides instant cash flow relief that complements the end-of-year income tax benefit of the R&D credit.4

The Dirigo Business Incentives Program (Starting 2025)

For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, Maine is launching the Dirigo Business Incentives Program, which is expected to replace or supplement several existing programs.35 The Dirigo program will offer a capital investment tax credit—either 5% or 10% depending on the county—that will be refundable.35 This is a major policy shift, as the Research Expense Tax Credit remains non-refundable.4 Businesses planning major research expansions in 2025 and beyond should evaluate how to stack the 5% incremental R&D credit for their labor costs with the 10% refundable Dirigo credit for their new research facilities and equipment.35

Pine Tree Development Zones (PTDZ)

The PTDZ program continues to provide benefits for businesses in sectors like biotechnology, manufacturing, and IT.22 For companies certified as PTDZ businesses, the income tax credit is calculated based on the tax liability attributable to “qualified business activity”.36 In years where a company is eligible for both PTDZ and R&D credits, the PTDZ credit must be used first.36 Because PTDZ credits do not have a carryforward provision, this ordering rule is designed to prevent taxpayers from losing the value of their PTDZ benefits while their R&D credits safely wait in the 15-year carryforward pool.36

Best Practices for Audit Readiness and Documentation

Maine Revenue Services maintains a high standard for documentation, particularly regarding the contemporaneous nature of the evidence provided.5 Taxpayers should move beyond retrospective estimates and adopt a robust documentation strategy.18

Contemporaneous Record Keeping

The “gold standard” for defending an R&D credit claim in Maine is contemporaneous documentation—records created at the time the research was performed.5 This includes:

• Project Timelines: Records showing when the uncertainty was identified, when experiments were run, and when the project concluded.5
• Technical Proof: Lab notes, engineering specifications, CAD drawings, and prototype photographs that prove a process of experimentation occurred.5
• Labor Allocation: Time-tracking logs that show exactly which hours were dedicated to “qualified services” versus general administration or routine production.5

The Risk of Routine Activities

Auditors often target “routine” activities that taxpayers have mistakenly included in their in-house research expenses.4 Businesses must be careful to exclude:

• Quality Control: Testing for consistency in an existing product line.5
• Market Research: Surveys to determine if customers like a new color or price point.4
• Aesthetic Design: Efforts to make a product “look better” without improving its technical performance.17
• Management Surveys: Internal studies to improve corporate efficiency rather than a business component’s technical quality.4

Conclusion: Strategic Value for the Maine Innovation Sector

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit remains a cornerstone of the state’s efforts to foster a high-tech economy and support businesses that embrace the risks of innovation.2 By understanding the specific meaning of in-house research expenses—and the strict requirement that they be incurred for work performed within the state—Maine businesses can effectively lower their cost of capital and reinvest those savings into further growth.1

While the credit faces challenges—including a complex incremental calculation, corporate offset limits, and the impact of federal amortization rules—the 15-year carryforward period provides a powerful long-term asset for companies committed to the Maine landscape.4 As the state moves toward the 2025 implementation of the Dirigo Business Incentives, the opportunity for taxpayers to integrate the R&D credit with refundable capital incentives suggests a future where Maine remains a competitive, if nuanced, harbor for technological advancement.19 Success for the Maine innovator lies in the rigorous documentation of their process of experimentation and a meticulous approach to the jurisdictional allocation of their human and physical capital.5

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/