The Individual Corporation and Entity-Specific Carryover in Maine’s Research Expense Tax Credit

In the context of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, the principle of “Individual Corporation (Carryover by Entity)” refers to the statutory requirement that tax credits generated by a specific member of a combined unitary group remain legally tethered to that individual corporation. Consequently, any unused portion of the credit must be tracked and carried forward solely by the corporation that incurred the research expenses, even if it was temporarily shared to offset the tax liability of another group member in a prior year.

The Statutory Foundation of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, codified under Title 36, Section 5219-K of the Maine Revised Statutes, represents a critical intersection of state economic policy and federal tax alignment. The primary objective of this credit is to incentivize businesses to conduct and increase their scientific and technological research activities within the State of Maine.1 To understand the specific nuances of the “Individual Corporation” carryover rules, one must first master the general calculation and limitation framework established by the statute.

Under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K(1), a taxpayer is permitted a credit against their Maine income tax equal to the sum of two distinct components. The first component is 5% of the excess of the qualified research expenses (QREs) for the taxable year over the “base amount.” The second component is 7.5% of basic research payments as defined by Section 41(e)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).1 The “base amount” is calculated as the average annual QREs incurred by the taxpayer over the preceding three taxable years.1 This incremental design ensures that the credit rewards growth in research investment rather than merely subsidizing existing, stagnant levels of activity.4

A fundamental aspect of the Maine credit is its reliance on federal definitions. The terms “qualified research expenses,” “basic research,” and “qualified organization” are interpreted according to the standards set forth in IRC Section 41.1 However, Maine law imposes a strict geographic limitation: the credit applies only to expenditures for research conducted specifically within the state.1 This territorial restriction distinguishes the state credit from its federal counterpart and necessitates rigorous accounting to isolate Maine-based activities from a corporation’s broader national or international research efforts.6

The Corporate Limitation Framework

For corporate taxpayers, the credit is not unlimited. Section 5219-K(3) establishes a tiered limitation based on the corporation’s tax liability. The credit allowed for any given year is capped at 100% of the first $25,000 of tax due, plus 75% of the tax due that exceeds $25,000.1 This formulaic approach ensures that even large credit-generating entities contribute some level of revenue to the state’s General Fund, while still providing significant relief for high-tech investments.

The mathematical representation of the maximum allowable credit for a corporation with a tax liability exceeding $25,000 is expressed as:

$$MaxCredit = 25,000 + 0.75 \times (TotalTaxDue – 25,000)$$

For corporations with a tax liability of $25,000 or less, the credit is simply limited to the total tax liability, as the credit is nonrefundable and cannot reduce the tax due to less than zero.1 If a taxpayer’s generated credit exceeds these annual limitations, the excess becomes a carryover.1

The Concept of the Unitary Business and Combined Reporting

To understand the “Individual Corporation” carryover, one must analyze the environment in which it most frequently applies: the unitary business group. Maine Revenue Services (MRS) requires an affiliated group of corporations engaged in a “unitary business” to file a combined report if at least one member of that group has nexus with Maine.9 A unitary business is characterized by functional integration, centralization of management, and economies of scale between the entities.9

Maine utilizes a “water’s edge” methodology for combined reporting.9 This means that the income subject to apportionment is the income reported on the federal income tax return, modified by Maine-specific additions and subtractions.9 While the combined report aggregates the income of all unitary members to determine the total group income, the tax liability is ultimately attributed to the members that have a physical or economic presence (nexus) in the state.11

In this unitary context, a distinction arises between the group as a single economic unit and the individual corporations as distinct legal entities. This distinction is the core of the “Carryover by Entity” rule. While income is combined for measurement purposes, credits are viewed through a separate-entity lens to ensure that the tax benefit remains aligned with the legal entity that performed the underlying research and incurred the expenses.13

.1

Individual Member Corporations in Combined Returns: Subsection 4

The specific regulatory mechanism governing the “Individual Corporation” rule is found in 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K(4). This subsection dictates how credits are applied and tracked within a combined filing environment. The law establishes a three-step priority for the utilization of R&D credits:

1. Primary Application: A credit generated by an individual member corporation must first be applied against the Maine income tax liability attributable to that specific company.1
2. Secondary Sharing (The “Shift”): If the generating corporation has “excess” credits—meaning credits remaining after it has reduced its own attributable liability to zero—those credits may be applied against the tax due of another member of the same unitary group.1
3. Sharing Limitations: The amount of excess credit that can be shifted to another member is limited to the extent that the recipient member can use the credit under the general § 5219-K(3) limitations ($25,000 + 75% rule).1

The “Carryover by Entity” requirement comes into play after these steps are exhausted. Any portion of the credit that remains unused after being applied to the owner’s liability and shared (if possible) with other group members is carried over. Crucially, the statute specifies that “unused, unexpired credits generated by a member corporation may be carried over from year to year by the individual corporation that generated the credit”.1

This means the carryover does not become a general “group carryover.” It is not an asset of the parent company or the unitary group at large. Instead, it is a specific attribute of the subsidiary that performed the research. If that subsidiary were to leave the unitary group in a future tax year, the carryover would depart with it, and the remaining group members would lose access to that specific tax attribute.9

Maine Revenue Services Guidance: Rule 810 and Administrative Procedures

Maine Revenue Services provides further clarity on this principle through Rule 810, which governs unitary business taxable income and combined reports. Section.07 of Rule 810 reinforces the separate-entity nature of tax credits. It explicitly states that a tax credit generated by a taxable corporation may be applied only against the Maine income tax liability of that specific corporation, unless a specific provision of law permits otherwise.9

Because § 5219-K(4) provides that specific “otherwise” permission, sharing is allowed. However, MRS guidance emphasizes that when a credit is permitted to be shared among group members, it must be apportioned among those members using their separate apportionment factors.9 This ensures that the credit is distributed in a manner consistent with the economic activity of each member in Maine.

Carryover Tracking and Reporting

The administrative burden of “Carryover by Entity” falls on the taxpayer to maintain granular records. MRS does not maintain a central ledger for every corporation’s credit carryovers; instead, the taxpayer must substantiate these amounts on their annual filings using the “Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet”.7

The worksheet requires the taxpayer to list the unused credit amounts from prior years (Line 7).7 In a combined return, this line represents the sum of the individual carryovers owned by the nexus members. However, internal documentation must be capable of breaking this sum down by entity. If the Maine Revenue Services performs an audit, they will verify that each dollar of carryover can be traced back to the specific corporation that originally generated it and that the 15-year expiration period has not lapsed.1

The 15-year carryover period is governed by Section 5219-K(5). A taxpayer may carry over unused credits to any one or more of the “next succeeding 15 taxable years”.1 As these credits are used over time, they must be applied in chronological order—a First-In, First-Out (FIFO) methodology—to ensure that the oldest credits are exhausted before they expire.9

Interaction with the “Super Credit”

Historically, Maine offered a “Super Credit for Substantially Increased Research and Development” under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-L. While this credit was repealed for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, its carryover rules provide a useful comparison.5 The Super Credit allowed for a five-year carryforward, much shorter than the 15 years provided for the standard R&D credit.8

The Super Credit was built directly upon the foundation of the § 5219-K credit, often sharing the same base amount definitions.4 For businesses still managing legacy carryovers from the Super Credit era, the “Individual Corporation” rule remains equally relevant: those credits are also tethered to the generating entity and cannot be freely moved between group members outside the specific sharing permissions of the law.4

Detailed Example: Multi-Entity Unitary Group

To illustrate the practical application of these rules, consider a unitary business group comprising three distinct corporations: Alpha Corp, Beta Inc, and Gamma Ltd. All three have nexus in Maine and are part of a combined return.

Year 1: Generation and Shifting

In Year 1, Alpha Corp conducts significant research and generates $100,000 in R&D credits. Beta Inc and Gamma Ltd do not conduct research and generate $0 in credits.

The Maine income tax liability (after apportionment) for each entity is as follows:

• Alpha Corp: $10,000
• Beta Inc: $50,000
• Gamma Ltd: $5,000

Step 1: Primary Application

Alpha Corp must first apply its $100,000 credit against its own $10,000 liability.

Alpha’s liability is now $0. Alpha has $90,000 in “excess” credits.

Step 2: Secondary Sharing (Shift to Beta)

Beta Inc has a liability of $50,000. Alpha shifts its excess to Beta.

However, Beta’s use of Alpha’s credit is limited by the § 5219-K(3) rule:

Beta can use 100% of its first $25,000 + 75% of ($50,000 – $25,000).

$25,000 + $18,750 = $43,750.

Alpha shifts $43,750 to Beta. Beta’s remaining liability is $6,250.

Alpha’s remaining excess is $90,000 – $43,750 = $46,250.

Step 3: Secondary Sharing (Shift to Gamma)

Gamma Ltd has a liability of $5,000. Alpha shifts its remaining excess to Gamma.

Since Gamma’s liability is below $25,000, it can use the credit up to 100% of its tax due.

Alpha shifts $5,000 to Gamma. Gamma’s liability is now $0.

Alpha’s final unused credit is $46,250 – $5,000 = $41,250.

Result of Year 1:

Alpha Corp carries forward $41,250. This is an individual carryover owned by Alpha.

Year 2: Departure from the Group

In Year 2, the unitary group sells Alpha Corp to an unrelated third party. Alpha Corp is no longer part of the unitary group containing Beta and Gamma.

Step 4: Carryover Following the Entity

When Alpha Corp leaves the group, it takes its $41,250 carryover with it.

Beta Inc and Gamma Ltd have no carryover available to them in Year 2, despite the fact that they “used” Alpha’s credits in Year 1. The carryover is an attribute of the corporation that generated it, not the group that utilized it.1

Economic Context and Performance Statistics

The Research Expense Tax Credit is a significant component of Maine’s tax expenditure budget. Its design and the “Carryover by Entity” rule reflect the state’s attempt to balance aggressive business incentives with stable revenue collection.4

The Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) conducted a comprehensive review of the credit in 2022. Their findings highlighted the fiscal impact and the profile of businesses utilizing the credit.2

Revenue Loss and Taxpayer Participation

According to the Maine State Tax Expenditure Report, the credit results in a multi-million dollar annual reduction in state income tax revenue. While the number of taxpayers is relatively small, the impact per entity can be substantial, particularly for those in the manufacturing and biotechnology sectors.4

.4

The steady increase in projected revenue loss suggests either an expansion of research activities in the state or a growing awareness and utilization of the credit by eligible firms. However, OPEGA’s evaluation also pointed out that Maine’s overall R&D performance continues to rank in the bottom tier nationally—specifically 47th in total R&D performed—indicating that the tax credit is only one factor in a broader economic ecosystem.5

Efficacy and Policy Evaluation

The “Carryover by Entity” rule itself is a subject of policy debate. Critics argue that for a truly integrated unitary business, the restriction on carryover sharing creates unnecessary complexity and may penalize groups that undergo restructuring.16 Proponents, including Maine Revenue Services, maintain that the rule prevents “credit shopping”—where a group might acquire a failing research-heavy firm solely to use its carryovers to offset the profits of an unrelated profitable subsidiary.9

OPEGA’s 2022 report recommended that the Legislature review and memorialize the specific goals of the R&D credit to determine if the current design, including its limitations and carryover structures, effectively serves those goals.2 Legislative attempts to amend the credit, such as LD 308 (which proposed doubling the credit rates and increasing the $25,000 threshold), show a continued interest in strengthening the incentive, though such changes have often been met with fiscal caution.4

Compliance and Documentation Standards

Given the entity-specific nature of the carryover, Maine Revenue Services maintains high standards for documentation and audit trails. To defend a carryover on an individual corporation basis, a taxpayer must be prepared to provide evidence that transcends simple summary totals.15

The Four-Part Test and Maine Specificity

Maine follows the federal “four-part test” under IRC § 41 to determine if an activity qualifies for the credit. However, the documentation must specifically prove the Maine-based nature of each component 3:

1. Technological in Nature: The research must fundamentally rely on the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.3
2. Permitted Purpose: The research must be intended to improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a new or existing business component.3
3. Elimination of Uncertainty: The taxpayer must intend to discover information that would eliminate technical uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a product or process.3
4. Process of Experimentation: The taxpayer must engage in a systematic process designed to evaluate alternatives, such as modeling, simulation, or trial-and-error testing.3

For a unitary group, these tests must be documented at the entity level. If Alpha Corp generates the credit, the lab notes, payroll records, and supply invoices must show that the research was performed by Alpha Corp’s employees using Alpha Corp’s assets at a location in Maine.7

Audit-Proofing the Carryover

Because carryovers can last for up to 15 years, businesses often face the “statute of limitations” paradox. While the state may be barred from assessing tax for a year from 12 years ago, they can still adjust the amount of a carryover originating from that year if it is being used to offset tax in a current, open year.9

.5

Interactions with Corporate Reorganizations

The “Individual Corporation” principle is most tested during mergers and acquisitions. When corporations change their legal structure, the survival of the R&D carryover depends on the nature of the transaction.

Mergers (Type A Reorganizations)

In a statutory merger where Corporation A merges into Corporation B, Corporation B generally succeeds to the tax attributes of Corporation A, including R&D credit carryovers, under rules similar to IRC § 381. However, Maine Revenue Services may apply “continuity of business” principles. If the research activity that generated the credit is discontinued immediately after the merger, the carryover may be challenged.9

Asset Sales

In a pure asset sale, where Corporation A sells its business assets to Corporation B but Corporation A remains in existence as a legal shell, the R&D carryovers remain with Corporation A. They do not transfer to the buyer. This often results in “stranded” credits if the seller has no remaining Maine income to offset.9

Unitary Group Changes

As demonstrated in the earlier example, when an entity leaves a unitary group, the carryover follows the entity. This is a critical consideration for Private Equity firms or parent companies that frequently buy and sell subsidiaries. The “tax basis” and “deferred tax assets” (DTAs) recorded on the financial statements must reflect the fact that these credits are entity-locked.9

Special Rules for Pass-Through Entities

While the primary focus of “Individual Corporation” carryovers is on C-corporations in combined returns, the principle has parallels for pass-through entities (PTEs) such as Partnerships and S-corporations.

Under Maine law, PTEs do not pay income tax at the entity level; instead, the credit is calculated by the PTE and then distributed to its owners based on their ownership percentage.7 The owners then claim the credit on their individual returns (Form 1040ME) or corporate returns (Form 1120ME).7

If the owner is a corporation, and that corporation is part of a unitary group, the credit it receives from a PTE is treated as if the corporation generated the credit itself. It must first offset that corporation’s liability, then can be shifted to other group members, and any remainder is carried over by that corporation.7

.7

Future Outlook and Legislative Trends

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is in a state of evolution. Recent legislative sessions have seen a push to modernize the credit to better compete with states like Massachusetts or jurisdictions with more aggressive “Alternative Simplified Credit” (ASC) models.6

Potential Shifts to Refundability

One major trend in state R&D credits is the move toward “refundability,” particularly for small businesses or startups that have significant research expenses but no current tax liability. While Maine’s R&D credit remains strictly nonrefundable, other new incentives like the “Dirigo Business Incentives Tax Credit” (Rule 816) have introduced refundable components for certain capital investments.20 If the R&D credit were ever made refundable, the “Individual Corporation” carryover rule would become moot for many, as the credit would be paid out in the year it was generated.

Data Transparency and Oversight

The 131st and 132nd Legislatures have increased the focus on tax expenditure oversight. OPEGA’s ongoing evaluations are likely to lead to stricter data collection requirements.22 Future versions of the Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet may require more explicit entity-level reporting of carryover balances to facilitate better state-wide tracking of these deferred tax assets.7

Conclusion

The principle of “Individual Corporation (Carryover by Entity)” is a cornerstone of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit’s administrative integrity. It serves as a vital safeguard that ensures tax benefits remain connected to the legal entities responsible for the underlying economic activity. For corporations operating within a unitary group, this rule necessitates a sophisticated approach to tax compliance—one that balances the immediate benefits of credit shifting with the long-term necessity of entity-specific carryover tracking.

As Maine continues to refine its position as a hub for technological innovation, the 15-year carryover period provided by 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K will remain a powerful tool for businesses. However, the value of that tool is entirely dependent on meticulous record-keeping and a deep understanding of the separate-entity rules. Companies that fail to track their credits at the subsidiary level risk losing these valuable assets during audits or corporate restructurings. Conversely, those that master the mechanics of entity-specific carryovers can effectively turn their research investments into a long-term, stable offset against their Maine tax liabilities, supporting sustained growth and innovation in the Pine Tree State.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/