Strategic Analysis of IRS Form 6765 and the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit Framework
IRS Form 6765 is the primary federal documentation required to calculate and claim the Credit for Increasing Research Activities, serving as the essential evidentiary link for taxpayers seeking the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit. Under Maine Revised Statutes Title 36, §5219-K, this federal form provides the structural definitions for qualified expenditures, which are then isolated to include only those research activities performed geographically within the State of Maine.
The integration of federal tax documentation into state-level incentive programs represents a cornerstone of Maine’s strategy to foster a high-technology economy. While the federal research and development (R&D) tax credit provides a significant reduction in federal liability, Maine’s state-specific credit leverages these federal rigorous standards to provide a localized incentive. For businesses operating within the state, understanding the interplay between Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 and Maine’s Title 36 is critical for maximizing fiscal benefits while maintaining strict compliance with Maine Revenue Services (MRS) guidance.1
The Federal Catalyst: Comprehensive Meaning of IRS Form 6765
IRS Form 6765, titled “Credit for Increasing Research Activities,” is used by U.S. businesses to figure and claim the federal R&D tax credit, elect a reduced credit under Section 280C, or elect a payroll tax credit for qualified small businesses.4 At its core, the form quantifies the dollar-for-dollar reduction in income tax liability available to companies that invest in domestic innovation.1 The federal credit is designed to lower the financial risk inherent in the “trial and error” process of developing new business components, which the IRS defines as products, processes, computer software, techniques, formulas, or inventions.6
Structural Evolution of Form 6765
The form has undergone significant revisions, particularly leading into the 2024 and 2025 tax years, to increase the transparency of R&D claims. Historically, the form was focused on the numerical calculation of qualified research expenses (QREs), but it now requires extensive qualitative disclosure to assist the IRS in identifying high-risk or fraudulent claims.4
| Section | Primary Function | Regulatory Focus |
| Section A | Regular Credit Method | Calculates credit based on a historical “fixed-base percentage” and incremental QREs over a base amount. 4 |
| Section B | Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) | Calculates credit at a 14% rate on expenses exceeding 50% of the average QREs for the three preceding tax years. 1 |
| Section C | Aggregate Credit Summary | Combines credits from partnerships, S-corporations, and other entities into a total current year credit. 4 |
| Section D | Payroll Tax Credit Election | Enables qualified small businesses (gross receipts <$5M) to apply up to $500,000 of the credit against social security taxes. 4 |
| Section E | Qualitative Information | Requires details on major acquisitions, dispositions, and new categories of QREs not previously claimed. 4 |
| Section F | QRE Itemization | Provides a summary of QREs across wages, supplies, and contract research costs for the taxable year. 4 |
| Section G | Business Component Detail | Requires project-level information for components representing the top 80% of total QREs, up to 50 components. 7 |
The transition from a simple calculation tool to a detailed reporting document reflects a broader shift in federal tax administration toward data-driven audit selection. Section G, for instance, requires the name of the business component, the type of software (if applicable), and a breakdown of qualified wages by service category (direct research, direct supervision, or direct support).7 For Maine taxpayers, this federal granular detail is indispensable, as MRS requires the same level of substantiation to prove that the activities claimed for the state credit were indeed conducted within Maine’s borders.9
The Qualified Small Business Exception
One of the most impactful provisions of Form 6765 is the ability for “qualified small businesses” (QSBs) to monetize the credit even if they lack income tax liability. A QSB is generally defined as a corporation or partnership with less than $5 million in gross receipts for the taxable year and no gross receipts for any year prior to the five-year period ending with the taxable year.4 These entities can elect to use up to $500,000 of their R&D credit to offset the employer portion of social security taxes.4 This provision is particularly relevant for startups in Maine’s growing biotech and software sectors, providing immediate cash flow to support ongoing research.3
Maine’s Regulatory Framework: The Research Expense Tax Credit
The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, codified under 36 M.R.S. §5219-K, is the state’s primary mechanism for incentivizing private-sector R&D. While it mirrors many federal concepts, it is characterized by specific state-level limitations and geographic restrictions that distinguish it from the broader federal credit.2
Statutory Authority and Legal Definitions
The Maine statute adopts the federal definitions for “qualified research” and “qualified research expenses” as set forth in IRC Section 41.2 However, the law limits the credit strictly to expenditures for research conducted within the State of Maine.3 This geographic nexus is the most critical factor for Maine Revenue Services when reviewing claims.
The Maine credit is comprised of two distinct components:
- Incremental Research Credit: Equal to 5% of the excess of the current year’s Maine-based QREs over the “base amount”.2
- Basic Research Credit: Equal to 7.5% of basic research payments spent for research conducted in Maine, typically involving payments to universities or scientific research organizations.2
In Maine, the “base amount” is defined as the average amount per year spent on qualified research expenses over the previous three taxable years by the taxpayer.2 This differs from the federal “Regular Method” which uses a historical 1980s base period, or the federal “ASC Method” which uses a 50% threshold.3 Maine’s use of a simple three-year rolling average provides a more straightforward calculation but requires consistent year-over-year growth in R&D spending to generate significant credits.3
Corporate Limitations and Carryforward Provisions
Maine’s law includes specific guardrails to ensure that the credit does not entirely eliminate corporate tax revenue. These limitations are applied before any other credits and are structured to ensure larger corporations still contribute a minimum amount to the state treasury.2
| Liability Threshold | Maine Credit Limitation |
| First $25,000 of Tax Due | 100% of the tax due may be offset by the credit. 2 |
| Tax Due in Excess of $25,000 | Only 75% of the excess tax due may be offset. 2 |
| Overall Net Tax Liability | The credit cannot reduce the tax due to less than zero. 2 |
Any portion of the credit that remains unused because of these limitations, or because the credit exceeds the taxpayer’s total liability, can be carried forward for up to 15 years.2 This 15-year carryforward period is vital for Maine industries that experience long development cycles, such as life sciences or advanced manufacturing, as it allows them to bank credits during high-investment years and apply them once products reach commercial profitability.9
Maine Revenue Services (MRS) Administrative Guidance
MRS provides detailed instructions and worksheets to help taxpayers bridge the gap between their federal Form 6765 and their Maine income tax return. The primary document used for this purpose is the “Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet”.9
Worksheet Mechanics and Line-by-Line Application
The MRS worksheet requires taxpayers to extract specific figures from their federal Form 6765, but they must manually calculate the “Maine portion” of those numbers.9 This process involves a meticulous review of internal accounting records to isolate Maine-only wages, supplies, and contract costs.
- Worksheet Line 1 (Basic Research): Taxpayers enter basic research payments in excess of the federal base that were spent in Maine. These figures are typically found on federal Form 6765, Section A, line 4 or Section B, line 17.9
- Worksheet Line 3 (Total Maine QREs): This line represents the total QREs applied to research conducted in Maine during the current taxable year. This corresponds to the total wages, supplies, and computer rental costs reported on federal Form 6765, Section A, line 5 or Section B, line 20, but restricted to Maine activities.9
- Worksheet Line 4 (Base Amount Calculation): Taxpayers must list the qualified research expenses applied to research conducted in Maine for the three prior tax years. If any of these years were “short years” (less than 12 months), the expenses must be prorated according to federal regulations.9
Pass-Through Entity and Combined Return Guidance
In the case of pass-through entities (PTEs) such as partnerships, LLCs, and S-corporations, the entity itself does not claim the credit against its own tax. Instead, the credit is allocated to its partners, members, or shareholders in proportion to their respective interests.9 MRS requires each owner to provide the name, EIN, and their specific ownership percentage of the PTE generating the credit.9 Crucially, a copy of the PTE’s federal Form 6765 must be attached to the owner’s individual or corporate return to support the claim.9
For corporations filing a combined return, additional rules apply. The credit generated by an individual member corporation must first be applied against the tax due attributable to that specific company.2 However, if that member has an excess credit, it may be applied against the tax due of another group member to the extent that member can use additional credits under the $25,000 plus 75% limitation.2
The Four-Part Test: Federal Standards in the Maine Context
Because Maine adopts the federal definition of “qualified research” under IRC §41(d), all activities claimed for the Maine credit must satisfy the “Four-Part Test”.6 This test ensures that the credit is directed toward true scientific and technological advancement rather than routine business activities.
1. Technological in Nature
The activity must fundamentally rely on the principles of the hard sciences, such as physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.6 In Maine’s economy, this often applies to the development of new marine-based pharmaceutical compounds, advanced composite materials for boat building, or sophisticated software for wood products logistics.11
2. Permitted Purpose
The research must be intended for the discovery of information to develop a new or improved “business component”.6 This includes improvements in functionality, performance, reliability, or quality.6
3. Elimination of Uncertainty
Taxpayers must demonstrate that they faced technical uncertainty at the beginning of the project.6 This uncertainty must relate to the capability or method of achieving the desired result, or the appropriate design of the business component.6 If a project is merely “routine” and the solution is known at the outset, it does not qualify.8
4. Process of Experimentation
Substantially all of the research activities must constitute a process of experimentation.6 This requires a systematic trial-and-error methodology where the company evaluates one or more alternatives, tests hypotheses, and analyzes data to choose the most viable path.6
Excluded Activities and Documentation Risk
Both federal and Maine guidelines exclude specific activities from the credit. Research conducted after the beginning of commercial production, the adaptation of an existing product for a specific customer, or the duplication of an existing product are all ineligible.6 Furthermore, research conducted outside the United States is excluded at the federal level, and research conducted outside Maine is excluded at the state level.6
The primary risk for Maine taxpayers during an audit is the failure to maintain contemporaneous documentation. MRS guidance suggests that lab notes, project records, prototypes, and testing protocols are essential to prove the project satisfied the Four-Part Test.10 Even if a project fails, the expenses may still qualify, as the law incentivizes the effort of research rather than only the successful outcomes.10
Quantitative Example: Integrated Federal and State R&D Credit Calculation
To understand the practical application of Form 6765 in a Maine context, we examine a hypothetical C-corporation, “Acadia Bio-Solutions,” which operates a research facility in Bar Harbor, Maine.
Acadia Bio-Solutions: Year 4 Fiscal Data
The company has been active for four years and has the following qualified research expense (QRE) profile. All expenses were incurred for research conducted in Maine.
- Year 1 QREs: $1,000,000
- Year 2 QREs: $1,200,000
- Year 3 QREs: $1,400,000
- Current Year (Year 4) QREs: $2,000,000
- Current Year Basic Research Payments: $100,000 (to the University of Maine).
- Maine Corporate Income Tax Due (Before Credits): $150,000.
Step 1: Calculate the Maine Base Amount
The Maine base amount is the average of the prior three years of QREs.
$$Base = \frac{1,000,000 + 1,200,000 + 1,400,000}{3} = 1,200,000$$
Step 2: Calculate the Maine Incremental Credit
The credit is 5% of the excess QREs over the base amount.
$$Incremental Credit = 0.05 \times (2,000,000 – 1,200,000) = 40,000$$
Step 3: Calculate the Maine Basic Research Credit
The credit is 7.5% of eligible basic research payments.
$$Basic Research Credit = 0.075 \times 100,000 = 7,500$$
Step 4: Aggregate and Apply Maine Tax Limitations
The total generated credit is $40,000 + $7,500 = $47,500. Next, we must apply the corporate tax limitations based on the $150,000 tax liability.
| Tier | Calculation | Limit |
| Tier 1 | 100% of first $25,000 | $25,000 |
| Tier 2 | 75% of tax exceeding $25,000 ($125,000 × 0.75) | $93,750 |
| Total Allowable Limit | $25,000 + $93,750 | $118,750 |
In this case, the total generated credit of $47,500 is well within the $118,750 allowable limit. Acadia Bio-Solutions can use the entire $47,500 to reduce its Maine income tax from $150,000 to $102,500. If the credit had exceeded $118,750, the excess would be carried forward to Year 5.2
Step 5: Contrast with Federal Calculation (ASC Method)
On IRS Form 6765 Section B, the company would calculate its credit as 14% of the excess of current QREs over 50% of the three-year average.
$$Federal ASC = 0.14 \times (2,000,000 – (1,200,000 \times 0.50)) = 196,000$$
This comparison illustrates that while the Maine credit uses a similar “rolling average” concept, the lower 5% rate and the lack of a 50% “floor” on the base amount make the Maine credit significantly different from the federal calculation. Maine’s method is strictly incremental relative to the full prior-year average.3
Historical Performance and Economic Evaluation
The effectiveness of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit has been a subject of significant legislative scrutiny. The Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) released a comprehensive evaluation in 2022 that highlighted the credit’s performance over the preceding decade.18
Statistical Profile of Credit Utilization (2010–2019)
OPEGA’s findings suggest that while the credit is a permanent fixture of Maine’s tax code, its impact on the state’s national R&D ranking remains limited.18
| Measure | Statistic / Ranking | Implications |
| National Ranking (Total R&D Performed) | 47th in the Nation 18 | Maine continues to lag behind peer states in total R&D investment. |
| R&D as Percentage of State GDP | Lower 10th Percentile 18 | Innovation is a relatively small portion of the state’s overall economic output. |
| Workforce Education (SEH Doctorates) | 31st in the Nation 18 | Maine ranks moderately in high-skill STEM talent relative to its workforce. |
| Annual Credit Claims (Aggregate) | Peak of $4.5 Million in 2015-16 18 | The fiscal cost to the state is relatively low compared to other economic incentives. |
| Estimated Taxpayers Affected | Approximately 175 Taxpayers 13 | The credit is utilized by a small, concentrated group of highly innovative firms. |
OPEGA’s overall conclusion was that the specific impact of the credit on the state economy is “unknown” because Maine Revenue Services does not currently collect data on the specific R&D investment dollars or job counts directly associated with the credit claims.18 The report recommended that the Legislature memorialize clearer goals for the credit and consider design changes—such as moving away from a strictly incremental structure—to expand participation among smaller businesses that may have flat or fluctuating R&D budgets.18
The Legacy of the “Super Credit”
The 2022 OPEGA evaluation also touched on the “Super Credit for Substantially Increased Research and Development” (36 M.R.S. §5219-L).20 This credit was even more aggressive than the current §5219-K credit, offering an additional benefit for expenses that exceeded 150% of a historical base amount.11 Although it was repealed for tax years beginning after 2013, it remains relevant because of its 10-year carryforward period.12 Companies that generated massive Super Credits in the early 2010s may still be applying those carryforwards to their 2023 and 2024 Maine returns.12
Future Outlook: The 2025 Dirigo Business Incentives and Conformity
The landscape of Maine research incentives is shifting with the introduction of the “Dirigo Business Incentives” program (36 M.R.S. §5219-AAA), which took effect on January 1, 2025.22 This program represents a move toward more “refundable” and “capital-intensive” incentives that complement the existing Research Expense Tax Credit.
Interaction Between R&D and Dirigo Credits
The Dirigo program is available to many of the same sectors that claim R&D credits, including manufacturing, software publishing, and scientific R&D services.17 However, whereas the R&D credit is focused on operating expenses (wages and supplies), the Dirigo credit is focused on capital investments (machinery and equipment) and employee training.23
- Dirigo Benefit: 10% capital investment tax credit (5% in Cumberland, York, and Sagadahoc counties) and $2,000 per employee for qualified training programs.23
- Refundability: The Dirigo credit is refundable up to $500,000 per tax year, making it far more attractive for cash-strapped startups than the nonrefundable R&D credit.23
- Strategic Stacking: A Maine tech company could potentially claim the 5% R&D credit on its developer wages (supported by Form 6765) and simultaneously claim a 10% Dirigo credit on the servers and laboratory equipment used by those developers.14
Federal Conformity and the Section 174 Issue
A major area of concern for Maine tax planners is “conformity” with federal tax law changes. As of 2025, Maine has updated its reference to the IRC to include amendments through December 31, 2024.27
A critical conflict exists regarding IRC Section 174, which now requires taxpayers to amortize research expenses over five years (fifteen years for foreign research) instead of expensing them immediately.28 While the federal “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) of 2025 attempted to provide relief for these rules, Maine has signaled nonconformity with some of these accelerated expensing provisions.28 Taxpayers must ensure they are not “double-dipping” by claiming a state credit on expenses that the state requires to be “added back” to income because of nonconformity with federal expensing rules.28
Conclusion: Strategic Recommendations for Maine Taxpayers
The integration of IRS Form 6765 and the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit provides a powerful, albeit complex, incentive for innovation. To successfully navigate this environment, businesses must view tax compliance not as an annual filing task, but as a continuous data-collection process.
- Project-Level Accounting is Essential: With the introduction of the federal Section G requirements, companies must track expenses by “business component”.7 This project-level accounting is the only way to accurately isolate “Maine-only” expenses for the state worksheet.9
- Maximize Basic Research Collaborations: The 7.5% credit for basic research payments is significantly higher than the 5% incremental credit.2 Establishing formal research partnerships with the University of Maine or other Maine-based scientific nonprofits can yield a higher return on investment.
- Monitor the Dirigo Transition: As the Dirigo program fully launches in 2025, companies should evaluate whether their R&D-related equipment purchases qualify for the 10% capital investment credit, which offers the rare benefit of refundability in the Maine tax code.23
- Prepare for “Nexus” Audits: Maine Revenue Services is particularly focused on whether research was “conducted in Maine”.11 For companies with remote employees or multistate operations, maintaining residency affidavits and time-tracking logs that prove work was performed within Maine is the best defense against credit disallowance.9
In summary, while Maine’s R&D credit requires a rigorous adherence to federal IRC Section 41 standards, it offers a stable, 15-year carryforward window that can significantly reduce the long-term cost of innovation for Maine’s most forward-thinking enterprises.9 By utilizing the granular data generated for IRS Form 6765, Maine businesses can substantiate their contributions to the state’s technological growth and optimize their overall tax position.
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state










