Analysis of Nonrefundable Tax Credit Mechanisms within the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit Framework

A nonrefundable tax credit in Maine is a statutory incentive that reduces a taxpayer’s liability to zero but cannot generate a cash refund for any amount exceeding that liability. In the context of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, this structure offsets income taxes owed on qualified in-state innovation activities while allowing excess amounts to be carried forward for future use.

The functional definition of nonrefundability is central to the fiscal architecture of Maine’s taxation system, particularly under Title 36, Section 5219-K. Unlike refundable credits—which the state treats as a tax overpayment and returns to the taxpayer as a check—nonrefundable credits are contingent upon the existence of a positive tax liability. For many high-growth technology firms and manufacturers in Maine, this means the credit acts as a latent asset that reduces the effective tax rate only when the company reaches a stage of profitability or positive tax appetite. The legislature’s decision to make the Research Expense Tax Credit nonrefundable is a strategic policy choice designed to mitigate the state’s immediate revenue risk while still providing a robust long-term incentive for businesses to anchor their research operations within Maine’s borders.1 To compensate for the inability to receive an immediate cash payout, the state provides a generous 15-year carryforward period, ensuring that the economic value of R&D investments is preserved as these companies mature from research-heavy phases into revenue-generating entities.1

Statutory Foundations and the Research Expense Tax Credit

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is codified under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K and applies to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1996.1 The law is fundamentally designed to reward incremental increases in research spending rather than baseline expenditures. This “incremental” philosophy is a hallmark of both Maine and federal R&D tax policy, intended to incentivize additional investment that would not have occurred but for the tax benefit.2

The Two-Tiered Credit Calculation

The credit is comprised of two distinct components, each with its own rate and calculation methodology. These rates are applied to expenditures that meet federal definitions but are geographically restricted to the State of Maine.1

The first component, the 5% incremental credit, targets the “excess” qualified research expenses. The “base amount” for this calculation is defined as the average annual amount spent on qualified research expenses by the taxpayer over the three taxable years immediately preceding the year in which the credit is claimed.1 This moving average ensures that the credit is responsive to the taxpayer’s recent history of innovation. For a new business in Maine, the base amount for the first year of operation is effectively zero, allowing for a 5% credit on the entire first year of qualified expenditures.3

The second component, the 7.5% basic research credit, is specifically intended to foster collaboration between the private sector and academic institutions. Basic research, as defined by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41(e)(1)(A), refers to original investigations for the advancement of scientific knowledge that do not have a specific commercial objective.1 By providing a higher percentage for these payments, Maine incentivizes firms to leverage the state’s higher education infrastructure, such as the University of Maine System, for foundational scientific work.

Definitions and Federal Alignment

Maine law relies heavily on “conformity” with federal tax definitions. Terms such as “qualified research expenses,” “qualified organization,” and “basic research” carry the same meanings as they do under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code.1 This alignment is a significant administrative convenience for taxpayers, as it allows for the use of federal data to populate state tax forms. However, the most critical distinction is the “Maine-only” requirement. While the federal credit applies to research conducted anywhere in the United States, the Maine credit is strictly limited to expenditures for research conducted within the State of Maine.6

Mechanics of Nonrefundability and the Carryforward Provision

The nonrefundable nature of the credit is explicitly stated in 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K(2), which mandates that the credit “may not reduce the tax due to less than zero”.1 This creates a “tax appetite” requirement: if a company has no Maine income tax liability for a given year—perhaps due to heavy initial losses or other deductions—the credit generated in that year cannot be used immediately.3

The 15-Year Carryforward Window

To address the needs of pre-revenue or cyclical businesses, the statute provides a 15-year carryforward period.1 Any portion of the credit that exceeds the tax due for a taxable year may be carried over and applied to the tax due for any one or more of the next 15 succeeding taxable years.1 This is notably longer than many other state-level credits and reflects the long-duration nature of R&D cycles, where an initial discovery may not lead to a profitable product for a decade or more.4

Corporate Tax Liability Restrictions: The 25/75 Rule

For corporate taxpayers, Maine imposes a secondary limitation on the amount of credit that can be applied in any single tax year. This limitation is codified in § 5219-K(3) and applies before the nonrefundability check.1

This “tiered” limitation means that even a highly innovative company with a large stockpile of R&D credits must still pay at least 25% of its tax liability on income exceeding $25,000 in cash.1 This ensures that the state’s General Fund receives a minimum contribution from profitable corporations even in years of high R&D activity. Any credit amount that is disallowed due to this 75% limitation is also eligible for the 15-year carryforward.1

Local State Revenue Office Guidance and Compliance

Maine Revenue Services (MRS) is the primary administrative body responsible for overseeing the Research Expense Tax Credit. The agency provides annual worksheets and instructions that translate the statutory language into actionable filing steps.6

The Annual Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet

Taxpayers must complete and enclose the Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet with their Maine income tax return (Form 1040ME, 1120ME, etc.).6 The worksheet requires taxpayers to break down their federal Form 6765 data to isolate Maine-specific costs.

If a taxpayer conducts research in multiple states, they must perform a specific “Maine portion” calculation. This involves subtracting the non-Maine portion of the federal base period amounts from the Maine portion of the current-year expenditures.6 This prevents companies from benefiting from Maine’s credit based on investments made in other jurisdictions. MRS emphasizes that amounts entered on the worksheet must be supported by the taxpayer’s federal filings and internal accounting records.6

Pass-Through Entities and Flow-Through Credits

For businesses structured as pass-through entities—such as partnerships, LLCs, S-corporations, and trusts—the credit is generated at the entity level but claimed by the individual owners.6 The credit is allocated in proportion to each owner’s respective interest in the entity. MRS guidance requires that the name and federal employer identification number (EIN) of the generating entity be included on the owner’s individual worksheet.6 Owners must also provide a copy of the entity’s federal Form 6765 to substantiate the credit claim.6

Controlled Groups and Combined Returns

Maine law provides specific rules for corporations that are members of a controlled group or that file a combined Maine return.1

• Controlled Groups: The State Tax Assessor has the authority to aggregate the activities of all corporations that are members of a controlled group (as defined by IRC § 41(f)(1)(A)) to determine the credit amount.1
• Combined Returns: A credit generated by an individual member of a combined group must first be applied against the tax liability attributable to that specific company. If an excess exists, it may be applied against the tax liability of another member of the group, provided the other member has not reached the statutory limitations (§ 5219-K(3)).1
• Carryforward Ownership: Unused and unexpired credits are generally carried forward by the individual corporation that originally generated the credit, rather than by the combined group as a whole.1

Qualitative Substantiation: The Four-Part Test

Because Maine adopts the federal IRC Section 41 standards, the “meaning” of the credit is inextricably tied to the federal “Four-Part Test.” MRS and the state courts look to federal regulations and case law to determine if an activity qualifies for the credit.7

The Four Pillars of Qualified Research

1. The Technological in Nature Test: The research must fundamentally rely on the principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.7 This excludes social sciences, market research, or aesthetic design.
2. The Permitted Purpose Test: The activity must be intended to develop a new or improved “business component,” such as a product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention.7 The goal must be to improve functionality, performance, reliability, or quality.
3. The Elimination of Uncertainty Test: At the outset of the research, there must be a genuine technical uncertainty regarding the capability or method of achieving the desired result, or the appropriate design of that result.7
4. The Process of Experimentation Test: The taxpayer must undergo a systematic process designed to evaluate one or more alternatives to achieve the result. This can include modeling, simulation, or systematic trial-and-error.7

Documentation Requirements for Audit Defense

MRS guidance stresses the importance of contemporaneous documentation to support these four pillars. In the event of a state audit, a taxpayer must be able to provide evidence that the research took place as claimed.8

Quantitative Example: A Corporate Credit Scenario

To illustrate the application of § 5219-K, consider a Maine-based aerospace component manufacturer, “Katahdin Aerospace,” for the 2024 tax year.

Step 1: Establishing the Base Amount

Katahdin Aerospace spent the following on qualified research in Maine over the past three years:

• 2023: $1,200,000
• 2022: $1,000,000
• 2021: $800,000

The base amount is the average of these three years 1:

$$Base = \frac{\$1,200,000 + \$1,000,000 + \$800,000}{3} = \$1,000,000$$

Step 2: Calculating Current Year Credit Generation

In 2024, Katahdin Aerospace had $1,500,000 in Maine QREs and made a $50,000 basic research payment to the University of Maine.

1. Incremental Credit (5%):

$$Excess = \$1,500,000 – \$1,000,000 = \$500,000$$

$$Credit A = \$500,000 \times 0.05 = \$25,000$$

7. Basic Research Credit (7.5%):

$$Credit B = \$50,000 \times 0.075 = \$3,750$$

Total Credit Generated in 2024 = $28,750.1

Step 3: Determining the Allowable Credit for the Year

Assume Katahdin Aerospace has a total Maine income tax liability of $100,000 (before any credits).1

1. Applying the 25/75 Corporate Limit:

• Tier 1: 100% of the first $25,000 = $25,000
• Tier 2: 75% of the remaining tax due ($75,000) = $56,250
• Maximum allowable credit application = $81,250.1

1. Final Application:

Since the credit generated ($28,750) is less than the maximum allowable ($81,250), the company can use the entire $28,750 to offset its tax liability.

Final Tax Due: $100,000 – $28,750 = $71,250.1

If Katahdin had generated $150,000 in credits, it would only be allowed to use $81,250 in 2024. The remaining $68,750 would be carried forward to 2025.1

The “Super Credit” for Substantially Increased R&D (§ 5219-L)

Any discussion of the Maine R&D tax environment must account for the “Super Credit,” a historically significant but currently limited incentive codified under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-L.4

Historical Context and Sunset

The Super Credit was designed to provide a much larger incentive for companies that expanded their R&D footprint significantly beyond their 1990s levels. It was equal to the excess of current QREs over a “super credit base amount,” which was defined as the average of expenses from the three years prior to 1997, increased by 50%.8

However, the ability to generate new Super Credits expired. According to the statute, the credit applies only to tax years beginning before January 1, 2014.10 While there have been several legislative attempts to restore this credit—most notably LD 977 and LD 498 in recent sessions—it remains inactive for current tax years as of the 2024/2025 MRS guidance.15

Carryovers of the Super Credit

Although new credits cannot be generated, many Maine companies still hold significant Super Credit carryforwards from the pre-2014 era. These carryforwards are subject to stricter rules than the standard R&D credit 10:

• Carryover Period: 10 years (though some legislation proposed reducing this to 5 years).10
• Annual Application Cap: The credit applied in any single year cannot exceed 25% of the taxpayer’s tax due (after other credits).10
• Previous Year Liability Floor: The credit cannot reduce the tax liability below the amount of tax due in the preceding taxable year.8 This prevents a company from using a massive legacy credit to suddenly drop its tax payment to near zero.

Economic Evaluation and Statistical Insights

The Maine State Legislature’s Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) conducted a comprehensive review of the Research Expense Tax Credit in 2022. This report provides a window into the fiscal impact and economic effectiveness of the incentive.2

Fiscal Impact and Utilization

The Research Expense Tax Credit is a relatively focused incentive with a stable base of participants.

OPEGA’s findings highlight that while the credit is a common feature in 70% of U.S. states, Maine’s specific ranking in R&D performance remains low (47th nationally).2 This suggests that while the credit is a necessary defensive tool to remain competitive with other states, it may not be sufficient on its own to drive Maine to the forefront of the national innovation economy without complementary investments in workforce and infrastructure.2

The Impact of Incremental Design

A key insight from the OPEGA report is that the incremental nature of the credit—rewarding only growth—can sometimes penalize companies with steady, high-level research budgets. In years where a company’s research spending is flat, they may generate no new credits even if their total investment in Maine remains substantial.4 This has led to recommendations that the state reconsider the credit’s design to potentially expand participation and provide more certainty for long-term R&D planning.2

Implementation Strategy for Corporate Filers

For a business navigating the Maine R&D tax landscape, the nonrefundable nature of the credit requires a strategic approach to tax planning and financial modeling.

Integrating the Credit into Financial Modeling

Because the credit is nonrefundable and subject to a 15-year carryforward, its value must be assessed using a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) approach. A credit generated today by a loss-making startup might not be utilized for five or more years. Therefore, tax managers must estimate the company’s future profitability to determine the “Net Present Value” of current R&D activities in Maine.3

Interaction with Sales Tax Exemptions

Companies should also consider how the income tax credit interacts with Maine’s sales tax exemptions. Maine offers 100% sales tax exemptions for machinery and equipment used “directly and exclusively” in research and development.5 For capital-intensive R&D, such as laboratory build-outs or pilot manufacturing plants, the sales tax exemption provides an immediate cash benefit that is not subject to the nonrefundability limitations of the income tax credit.5

Audit Risk and the “State Tax Assessor” Authority

The State Tax Assessor has broad authority under § 5219-K(6) to adopt rules necessary to implement the credit.1 This includes rules similar to the federal “General Business Credit” limitations under IRC § 38(c)(6)(B).1 Taxpayers should be aware that MRS has the power to aggregate activities of related entities, which can significantly impact the “base amount” calculation and, consequently, the size of the allowable credit.1

Legislative Landscape and the Future of Innovation Incentives

The Maine Legislature continues to debate the efficacy and structure of the Research Expense Tax Credit. In the 130th and 131st Legislatures, various bills (such as LD 308) proposed doubling the credit percentages and increasing the corporate caps to make the state more competitive with neighbors like Massachusetts.4

The Drive for Data and Transparency

Recent legislative updates (such as those effective in late 2024 and 2025) have focused on transparency and conformity. Maine has updated its references to the Internal Revenue Code to reflect amendments through December 31, 2024, ensuring that state law remains in sync with federal shifts.20 Additionally, there is an increasing move toward requiring more detailed reporting from credit recipients, including data on job creation and capital investment, to assist OPEGA and the Taxation Committee in evaluating the state’s return on investment.2

The Fate of the Super Credit

While the Super Credit (§ 5219-L) remains sunsetted for new generation, the persistent introduction of “restoration” bills (like LD 977) indicates a recurring legislative interest in aggressive innovation incentives.15 However, as of the 2024 tax year, businesses should proceed with the understanding that only the standard 5%/7.5% credit under § 5219-K is available for new R&D spending.17

Conclusion

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit represents a sophisticated intersection of tax law, economic policy, and corporate strategy. Its nonrefundable nature is the defining characteristic that shapes its utility for businesses: it is not a direct subsidy or a grant, but rather a targeted reduction in the cost of success. By requiring a tax liability to “unlock” the credit’s value, the state ensures that it is primarily rewarding companies that eventually contribute to Maine’s economic base through profitable operations.1

For the professional tax manager or business owner, success in leveraging this credit requires a dual focus on rigorous technical substantiation and long-term financial forecasting. As Maine continues to refine its innovation policy in the wake of the OPEGA evaluations, the Research Expense Tax Credit will remain a vital, if complex, tool for any business seeking to anchor high-value research and engineering operations in the Pine Tree State.2

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/