Regulatory Analysis of the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” in the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit Framework

Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits represents the gross tax liability calculated from a taxpayer’s Maine net income after apportionment but prior to the subtraction of any non-refundable incentive credits. In the context of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, this figure acts as the statutory baseline for the “75% limitation” which determines the maximum amount of credit a corporation can utilize in a single tax period to offset its state obligations.

The importance of this specific tax metric cannot be overstated for corporate financial planning and state tax compliance. While many taxpayers focus on the accumulation of qualified research expenses (QREs), the actual economic utility of these credits is governed by the taxpayer’s current-year tax capacity. The “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” serves as the denominator for several critical calculations under Maine Revised Statutes (M.R.S.) Title 36. It represents the state’s theoretical claim on a business’s profits before the government allows that business to “pay itself back” for investments in innovation. Because the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit (RETC) is designed to be non-refundable, this gross tax figure creates a definitive “ceiling” on immediate tax relief. This ceiling is further restricted for larger corporations by a tiered limitation formula that ensures every profitable entity pays a minimum contribution to the state’s General Fund. Understanding this baseline requires a deep dive into the sequence of Maine’s tax calculation, the nuances of the state’s apportionment rules, and the specific administrative guidance provided by Maine Revenue Services (MRS).

The Statutory Architecture of the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit

The Research Expense Tax Credit, codified under 36 M.R.S. §5219-K, is Maine’s primary mechanism for incentivizing private sector research and development (R&D). It is fundamentally an incremental credit, meaning it rewards businesses not just for spending on research, but for increasing their investment over time relative to a historical baseline.1 The credit applies to corporations, individuals, estates, and trusts, and it is largely modeled after the federal Credit for Increasing Research Activities found in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41.3

Components of the Credit Calculation

The total RETC earned in any given year is the sum of two distinct calculations. Each of these components relies on Maine-specific expenditures, necessitating a careful isolation of costs from any activities occurring outside the state’s borders.1

The “base amount” for the incremental portion is defined as the average research expense for the three taxable years immediately preceding the credit year.3 For new businesses or those with no prior R&D activity in Maine, this base amount is zero, allowing the full 5% credit to apply to initial investments.1

The Role of IRC §41 and Maine Modifications

While Maine adopts the federal definitions for “qualified research” and “qualified research expenses,” it departs from federal law in several key areas. For instance, Maine does not utilize the “Alternative Simplified Credit” (ASC) method or the “Startup Fixed-Base” elections available at the federal level.1 Instead, Maine adheres strictly to the three-year moving average. Furthermore, the expenditures must be “conducted in Maine,” which excludes research performed by Maine-headquartered companies if the actual lab work or engineering occurs in other jurisdictions.3 This geographic restriction requires taxpayers to maintain detailed payroll and project logs to substantiate the “in-state” requirement during MRS audits.5

Analyzing “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits”

To understand where “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” fits into the tax lifecycle, one must examine the linear progression of a Maine corporate tax return (Form 1120ME). The journey begins with the taxpayer’s federal taxable income, which is then adjusted by Maine-specific “addition” and “subtraction” modifications.7

From Federal Income to Maine Gross Tax

The process of arriving at the tax amount before credits is a multi-step calculation that filters federal data through state-specific mandates:

1. Federal Taxable Income: The starting point on Form 1120ME, Line 1.8
2. Maine Modifications: Additions (Schedule 1A) such as state and local taxes, and subtractions (Schedule 1S) such as interest on U.S. government obligations or federal Net Operating Loss (NOL) recapture.9
3. Apportionable Income: The modified income that is subject to the state’s apportionment formula.8
4. Apportionment (Rule 801): Applying the Maine apportionment factor (typically based on sales/receipts) to determine the portion of income attributable to Maine operations.11
5. Maine Net Income: The resulting figure after apportionment.8
6. Gross Tax (Line 5/Line 6a): The tax rate schedule (ranging from 3.5% to 8.93% for corporations) is applied to Maine Net Income. This resulting figure is the Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits.7

This figure represents the taxpayer’s total obligation to the state before the “incentive layer” is applied. By placing the credit calculation after the tax rate is applied to apportioned income, the law ensures that the value of the credit is directly proportional to the business’s Maine-sourced profitability.

Why “Before Credits” is the Critical Baseline

The designation “before credits” is a intentional policy choice. If the limitation were calculated based on the tax due after other credits, it would create a prioritized hierarchy that could inadvertently nullify the value of the RETC.14 For example, if a company utilized a Jobs and Investment Tax Credit first, reducing its tax balance, a “net tax” limitation on the RETC would find very little remaining capacity to offset. By using the gross tax as the baseline, the state allows the taxpayer to calculate their RETC “room” based on their full tax presence in the state, regardless of other incentives they might also be utilizing.1

The Tiered Limitation Formula for Corporations

The most practical application of “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” occurs in the calculation of the corporate limitation cap. Under 36 M.R.S. §5219-K, the amount of RETC a corporation can actually use to reduce its current-year check to the state is capped based on the size of its tax bill.1

The $25,000 Threshold

The limitation formula splits the tax liability into two segments. This protects small businesses while ensuring large taxpayers maintain a minimum cash payment.

• Segment 1: 100% of the first $25,000 of tax due before credits.1
• Segment 2: 75% of the tax due before credits that exceeds $25,000.1

This means that for a corporation with a $100,000 tax bill (before credits), the maximum RETC it can claim is not $100,000, but rather:

$$\text{Max Credit} = \$25,000 + (0.75 \times (\$100,000 – \$25,000)) = \$25,000 + \$56,250 = \$81,250$$

In this scenario, even if the company has $200,000 in earned R&D credits, it must still pay at least $18,750 in cash for the current tax year ($100,000 total tax minus the $81,250 credit cap). The remaining $118,750 in unused credits is carried forward for up to 15 years.1

Limitations for Individuals and Pass-Through Owners

For individual taxpayers—such as partners in a research firm or shareholders in an S-Corp—the limitation is more straightforward but still anchored to the “before credits” baseline.1

• For individuals and for taxable corporations with a tax liability of no more than $25,000, the credit is limited to the full amount of the tax liability.3
• The credit cannot reduce the tax liability below zero (it is non-refundable), but it can reduce it to zero.1

This ensures that smaller entities and individual innovators are not subject to the 25% “minimum tax” that applies to larger corporations. However, like corporations, any credit amount exceeding their tax liability is pushed into the 15-year carryforward period.3

Maine Revenue Services (MRS) Guidance and Form Compliance

The primary source of guidance for calculating the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” is the instruction set for Form 1120ME and the “Worksheet for Research Expense Tax Credit.” MRS provides specific directions on how to translate statutory law into line-item entries.3

Form 1120ME: Line-by-Line Breakdown

On the 2024 Form 1120ME, the sequence of the tax calculation highlights where the “before credits” figure is captured.

1. Line 5 (Gross Tax): The initial calculation of tax based on the Maine Net Income.7
2. Line 6a (Maine Corporate Income Tax): This is the tax after apportionment, representing the actual tax attributable to Maine-sourced activity.7
3. Schedule C (Tax Credits): This is the section where all credits, including the RETC, are totaled. The instructions for Schedule C emphasize that these credits are subtracted from Line 6a.10

The RETC Worksheet: Line 8 Mechanics

Taxpayers claiming the credit must complete a dedicated worksheet. Line 8 of this worksheet is where the 75% limitation is applied. The MRS guidance for Line 8 explicitly states: “If a taxable corporation’s tax liability exceeds $25,000 (before other credits), the corporation must enter… the total of $25,000 plus 75% of the tax liability (before other credits) exceeding $25,000”.3

This instruction is critical because it clarifies that “before other credits” means the taxpayer should not reduce the tax liability by other non-refundable credits (like the Maine Capital Investment Credit or Seed Capital Credit) before applying the RETC limitation formula.3 This allows the RETC to be measured against the largest possible tax base, maximizing the amount that can be claimed in the current year.

Rule 801: Apportionment and Its Impact on Tax Baseline

Because the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” is derived after apportionment, any changes to a taxpayer’s apportionment factor directly impact their credit capacity. MRS Rule 801 provides the comprehensive framework for how businesses must source their receipts.11

For companies with significant R&D spend but fluctuating Maine sales, the “before credits” tax figure can be highly volatile. A company that moves its primary market from Maine to international customers might find its Maine gross tax dropping significantly. Even if its R&D lab in Portland remains fully staffed, its ability to use those R&D credits locally will diminish because the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” (the baseline for the cap) has shrunk.8

Practical Example: Multi-State Technology Corporation

To illustrate the interplay between “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” and the 75% limitation, consider a hypothetical manufacturer of specialized biomedical sensors located in Bangor, Maine.

Data Points for Year X

• Total Federal Taxable Income: $10,000,000
• Maine Apportionment Factor (Rule 801): 40%
• Maine Net Income: $4,000,000
• Current Maine Corporate Tax Rate: 8.93% (top bracket)
• Current Year Maine QREs: $1,500,000
• Prior 3-Year Average Maine QREs (Base Amount): $1,000,000
• Prior Year RETC Carryforwards: $100,000

Step 1: Calculate the Earned Credit

The corporation first determines how much credit it has earned for the current period, plus its historical surplus.

1. Incremental Credit Earned: $5\% \times (\$1,500,000 – \$1,000,000) = \$25,000$.1
2. Basic Research Credit: (Assume $0 for this example).
3. Total Credit Available: $\$25,000 \text{ (Current)} + \$100,000 \text{ (Carryforward)} = \$125,000$.

Step 2: Establish “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits”

This is the baseline used for the limitation formula.

• Gross Tax Liability: $\$4,000,000 \times 8.93\% = \$357,200$.7
• Baseline (T): $357,200.

Step 3: Apply the 75% Limitation Formula

Since the tax liability ($357,200) is greater than $25,000, the corporation must apply the corporate cap:

1. First Tier (100%): $25,000.
2. Second Tier (75% of excess): $0.75 \times (\$357,200 – \$25,000) = 0.75 \times \$332,200 = \$249,150$.
3. Maximum Allowable Credit ($Credit_{limit}$): $\$25,000 + \$249,150 = \$274,150$.1

Step 4: Final Tax Determination

The corporation compares its total available credits ($125,000) to its limitation cap ($274,150).

• Actual Credit Claimed: Since $125,000 is less than $274,150, the corporation can claim the full $125,000 this year.1
• Final Tax Due: $\$357,200 – \$125,000 = \$232,200$.
• Carryforward to next year: $0.

In this scenario, the corporation’s profitability and Maine apportionment were high enough that the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” provided more than enough “room” to utilize all current and prior credits. If the apportionment factor had been only 5%, the gross tax would have been much lower, potentially forcing credits into further carryforward years.

Historical Trends and Economic Impact Statistics

The Research Expense Tax Credit is one of the more significant “tax expenditures” in the state of Maine. A tax expenditure is any provision that results in a reduction of revenue through credits, exemptions, or deductions.15

General Fund Revenue Loss

The Maine State Tax Expenditure Report provides biennial estimates of how much revenue the state “forgoes” by allowing businesses to claim the RETC. These figures illustrate the scale of the incentive and the level of corporate participation.16

Source: Maine State Tax Expenditure Reports.16

The relatively stable number of taxpayers (around 175-185) suggests that the RETC is utilized by a consistent core of Maine-based innovators. The increasing dollar value of the revenue loss indicates either an increase in the intensity of R&D spending per company or an increase in the profitability of those companies, which raises their “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” and allows them to utilize more of their earned credits.1

OPEGA Findings on the RETC

The Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) recently evaluated the credit to determine its efficacy.2 Key findings include:

• Alignment: Maine’s credit structure is standard compared to other states, 70% of which offer a similar federal-conformity-based R&D credit.2
• Performance: Maine has historically performed poorly on national R&D rankings despite the credit being available since 1995.2
• Barriers: The “incremental” requirement (spending more than the 3-year average) and the 75% limitation can act as barriers for some businesses, particularly those with fluctuating budgets or those that are in a “maintenance” phase of R&D rather than a growth phase.2

OPEGA’s findings suggest that for some firms, the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” limitation is a secondary concern to the difficulty of meeting the 5% incremental threshold in the first place. However, for those that do qualify, the limitation remains the final hurdle in monetization.

Comparative Analysis: Standard Credit vs. Super Credit

Maine offers two separate research-related credits, and the meaning of “tax due” differs slightly between them. Taxpayers must be careful not to conflate the 75% limitation of the standard credit (§5219-K) with the limitations of the “Super Credit” (§5219-L).5

The Super Credit for Substantially Increased R&D

The Super Credit is intended for companies that have significantly increased their R&D spending over 1997-level baselines.5

The Super Credit’s limitation is much more restrictive because it is calculated after the allowance of any other credits, including the standard RETC.5 This means if the standard credit already reduced the tax bill, the “room” for the Super Credit is cut in half from an already smaller number. Furthermore, the Super Credit prohibits a company from using the incentive to pay less tax than it did the previous year, effectively creating a “ratchet” that limits the credit’s use during high-growth periods.5

Compliance Procedures and Audit Substantiation

Because the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” relies on several layers of calculation—modifications, apportionment, and tax rate application—it is a frequent target for Maine Revenue Services audits.2

Common Audit Triggers

1. Apportionment Inconsistency: If the sales factor used to determine “Tax Due” on the Maine return differs from the sales factors reported to other states, MRS may challenge the “Tax Due Before Credits” figure.12 Rule 801 requires consistency in reporting across all jurisdictions where the taxpayer is taxable.11
2. Sourcing of QREs: MRS often investigates whether the research was truly “conducted in Maine.” If a company includes wages for remote employees living in New Hampshire or Massachusetts, the QRE base is incorrectly inflated.3
3. Credit Sequence Errors: Applying the 75% limitation after other non-refundable credits is a common error that usually results in an under-claimed credit. Conversely, failing to apply the 75% limitation at all leads to an over-claimed credit and subsequent penalties.14

Required Documentation

Taxpayers must maintain a robust audit trail to support the “before credits” baseline and the underlying expenses:

• Federal Form 6765: A copy of the federal R&D claim must be attached to the Maine return.3
• Payroll Apportionment: Worksheets showing the percentage of time each “qualified” employee spent on R&D tasks specifically within Maine.1
• Base Period Data: Proof of Maine R&D spending for the three prior years to validate the base amount.3
• Unitary Business Proof: For companies filing a combined report (Form CR), documentation showing that the group constitutes a “unitary business” under Rule 801, allowing for the sharing of credits and tax liability.1

The Impact of Federal Tax Conformity (IRC §174)

A significant emerging issue for Maine R&D filers is the state’s conformity to federal changes regarding research expenditures. Historically, companies could “expense” R&D costs immediately. However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) now requires companies to amortize these costs over five years (15 years for foreign research) under IRC §174.5

Indirect Impact on the RETC Cap

While §174 amortization is a deduction issue rather than a credit issue, it has a direct second-order effect on the Research Expense Tax Credit. By requiring companies to amortize expenses rather than deduct them all at once, “Federal Taxable Income” increases in the short term.5

• Higher Federal Taxable Income $\rightarrow$ Higher Maine Net Income.
• Higher Maine Net Income $\rightarrow$ Higher Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits.
• Higher Tax Due $\rightarrow$ A higher 75% limitation cap.

Ironically, the federal change that makes R&D more “expensive” from a deduction standpoint may actually help companies with large RETC carryforwards monetize those credits faster, as the higher “gross tax” baseline provides more room under the 75% rule.1

Conclusion: Navigating the Intersection of Innovation and Tax Policy

The Research Expense Tax Credit remains a cornerstone of Maine’s business incentive portfolio, offering a 15-year window for companies to realize the value of their in-state investments.1 However, the actual value of that incentive is strictly modulated by the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits.” This figure is the gatekeeper that determines whether a business can offset its current obligations or must defer that benefit to a future period.

For the corporate taxpayer, the “Tax Due Before Allowance of Any Credits” is not just a line on a form; it is a reflection of their Maine-sourced success. By utilizing a gross tax baseline for the 75% limitation, Maine law acknowledges the value of innovation while maintaining a stable revenue floor for the state. As businesses navigate the complexities of Rule 801 apportionment and federal §174 conformity, they must keep this baseline in clear focus. In the final analysis, the Maine R&D tax credit is a partnership between the state and the private sector—a partnership where the state shares the risk of innovation, but only to the extent that the innovation contributes to a profitable Maine presence.2

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/