The Regulatory and Economic Landscape of Wages for Qualified Services within the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit

Wages for qualified services represent the specific portion of an employee’s compensation attributable to performing, supervising, or supporting technological research and development activities conducted physically within the State of Maine. These wages constitute the core eligible expenditure for the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, calculated as a percentage of investments that exceed a taxpayer’s historical three-year average.

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit, codified under Title 36, Section 5219-K of the Maine Revised Statutes, serves as a cornerstone of the state’s economic strategy to foster innovation and high-wage job creation. By incentivizing private-sector investment in research and development, the state seeks to mitigate the inherent financial risks associated with technological experimentation. This non-refundable credit is explicitly structured to reward incremental growth, meaning it targets businesses that expand their research footprint rather than those maintaining a static level of investment.1 The legislative intent, as observed by the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA), is to stimulate investment that might otherwise be deferred or conducted in more tax-favorable jurisdictions, thereby anchoring high-quality jobs within the state’s borders.3 Because Maine’s tax code “piggybacks” on the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, the definition of what constitutes a “qualified service” and the “wages” paid for such services is fundamentally tied to federal standards, yet constrained by strict Maine-specific territorial limitations.3

The Statutory Foundation: 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K

The authority for the Maine Research Expense Tax Credit is derived from 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K, which allows a taxpayer a credit against the tax due equal to the sum of 5% of the excess of qualified research expenses (QREs) for the taxable year over the base amount, plus 7.5% of basic research payments.1 The statute defines “base amount” as the average amount per year spent on qualified research expenses over the three prior taxable years.1 This rolling average creates a dynamic threshold that taxpayers must exceed to unlock the 5% credit. For new businesses or those initiating research in Maine for the first time, the base amount effectively begins at zero, providing an immediate incentive for initial investments.5

A critical element of § 5219-K is its adoption of federal definitions. The statute mandates that terms such as “qualified research expenses” and “basic research” carry the same meanings as they do under IRC Section 41.1 However, the law limits these definitions to expenditures for research conducted exclusively in Maine. This creates a dual-layer compliance requirement: an activity must first satisfy the federal criteria for qualified research and then meet the state’s requirement for Maine-based execution.5

Defining Qualified Services and Wages

Within the context of the Maine credit, “wages for qualified services” represent the most substantial portion of QREs, often exceeding 75% of a typical claimant’s total qualified expenditure.4 Under federal and state guidance, qualified services are categorized into three distinct roles performed by employees.4

The definition of “wages” for these services is generally restricted to compensation reported in Box 1 of Form W-2.4 This includes base salaries, bonuses, and certain stock-based compensation. Notably, the Maine State Tax Assessor and Maine Revenue Services (MRS) follow federal precedents such as Apple Computer Inc. v. Commissioner, which clarified that the spreads from stock options are considered wages for R&D credit purposes.13 However, it is essential to note that employer-paid fringe benefits—such as 401(k) matches, health insurance premiums, and life insurance—are strictly excluded from the QRE calculation, as they do not constitute “wages” under the statutory definition.4

The Federal Connection: The Four-Part Test

Since Maine law adopts the definitions of IRC Section 41, every “qualified service” for which wages are claimed must pertain to an activity that passes the federal “Four-Part Test.” During an audit, Maine Revenue Services evaluates the underlying activities against these criteria to determine if the associated wages were truly for “qualified research”.16

The first component is the Permitted Purpose test. The activity must relate to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality of a “business component,” which can be a product, process, formula, technique, or software.5 The second is the Elimination of Uncertainty test, which requires that the researcher intended to discover information that would eliminate technical uncertainty regarding the capability, methodology, or appropriate design of the business component.9 The third requirement is a Process of Experimentation, meaning the employee’s work must involve a systematic evaluation of alternatives, such as modeling, simulation, or trial-and-error, to achieve the desired result.16 Finally, the research must be Technological in Nature, fundamentally relying on the principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.9

Wages paid for routine data collection, market research, quality control testing of existing products, or aesthetic modifications are ineligible for the credit, as these activities fail to meet the “Elimination of Uncertainty” and “Process of Experimentation” prongs of the test.5

Maine Revenue Services (MRS) Guidance and Administrative Procedures

Maine Revenue Services provides specific administrative frameworks through instructional bulletins and the annual Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet.8 These materials serve as the primary “local guidance” for taxpayers navigating the complexities of § 5219-K.

The Maine Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet

The worksheet, revised annually (with the latest revision dated December 2024), guides taxpayers through the calculation of Maine-specific QREs.8 Line 3 of the worksheet requires the entry of “total qualified research expenses applied to research conducted in Maine during the taxable year”.8 This necessitates a rigorous internal accounting process where companies must isolate Maine-based wages from their total national or global payroll.

For corporations filing a combined return, MRS allows the aggregation of activities among members of a controlled group.1 However, the credit must first be applied against the tax liability of the specific entity that generated the credit before any excess can be used to offset the tax of other group members.1

The “Substantially All” Rule (The 80% Rule)

A critical administrative simplification adopted from federal guidance is the “Substantially All” rule, commonly known as the 80% rule.14 If an employee spends at least 80% of their working time engaged in qualified services (direct conduct, supervision, or support), then 100% of their W-2 Box 1 wages can be included in the Maine QRE calculation.12 This serves as a significant administrative relief for businesses, allowing them to avoid the minute-by-minute tracking of time for dedicated research personnel.

Conversely, if an employee spends less than 80% of their time on research—for instance, a production manager who spends 40% of their time overseeing a new manufacturing process development—only the actual percentage (40%) of their wages may be claimed as a QRE.14 In all cases, these services must be physically performed in Maine to qualify for the Maine credit, even if they qualify for the federal credit.5

Statistical Insights and Economic Evaluation

In 2021 and 2022, the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) conducted a comprehensive review of the Research Expense Tax Credit to determine its effectiveness.2 The report provided several data points that illuminate the scale and impact of the credit in Maine.

OPEGA noted that while the credit is a common feature of state tax systems (offered by roughly 70% of states), Maine has historically underperformed in R&D metrics such as patent filings and venture capital attraction.2 This has led to legislative discussions regarding the need to enhance the credit’s potency. For instance, LD 308 (later reintroduced in various forms) proposed doubling the incremental credit rate from 5% to 10% to better compete with other jurisdictions.3

Practical Application: A Corporate Case Study

To understand how the law and MRS guidance apply in a business context, consider the case of “Portland Precision Engineering” (PPE), a Maine-based C corporation specialized in advanced composite materials.

Phase 1: Identifying Qualified Research Activities (QRAs)

In 2024, PPE undertook a project to develop a new, lightweight alloy for aerospace applications. The project required engineering expertise, laboratory testing, and the construction of high-stress prototypes.

PPE’s total Maine QREs for 2024, including $20,000 in laboratory supplies and $50,000 in payments to a Maine-based contract lab, totaled $550,000 ($480k wages + $70k other).

Phase 2: Calculating the Base Amount

PPE must now determine its “base amount” by averaging its Maine QREs from 2021, 2022, and 2023.1

• 2023 Maine QREs: $500,000
• 2022 Maine QREs: $450,000
• 2021 Maine QREs: $400,000
• Three-Year Average (Base Amount): ($500k + $450k + $400k) / 3 = $450,000.5

Phase 3: Final Credit Computation

Following the MRS Worksheet instructions:

1. Excess QREs: $550,000 (2024 QREs) – $450,000 (Base Amount) = $100,000.5
2. Incremental Credit (5%): 5% of $100,000 = $5,000.1
3. Basic Research Credit: PPE paid $10,000 to the University of Maine for basic research. 7.5% of $10,000 = $750.1
4. Total 2024 Credit Earned: $5,000 + $750 = $5,750.5

Phase 4: Applying Limitations

Assuming PPE has a 2024 Maine tax liability of $30,000 (before credits). Under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K(3), the credit is limited to 100% of the first $25,000 plus 75% of the liability over $25,000.1

• 100% of $25,000 = $25,000
• 75% of ($30,000 – $25,000) = $3,750
• Maximum Allowable Credit in 2024: $28,750.1

Since the $5,750 credit earned is well below the $28,750 cap, the entire credit is usable in 2024, reducing PPE’s final tax liability to $24,250.1

Compliance and Audit Preparedness

Given that Maine Revenue Services has the authority to aggregate the activities of controlled groups and verify the “nexus” of research activities, documentation is paramount.1 Taxpayers must be prepared to demonstrate that the wages claimed were for services rendered within Maine and that the activities met the federal four-part test.

Nexus and Territorial Sourcing

A corporation is deemed to have nexus with Maine if its Maine payroll exceeds $250,000 or if 25% of its total payroll is in Maine.23 For companies with remote workers or split facilities, MRS requires contemporaneous records (such as timesheets) that clearly delineate work performed at Maine sites versus out-of-state locations.5 If an employee performs research both in and out of Maine, only the portion of their wages attributable to Maine-based work can be entered on Line 3 of the Research Expense Tax Credit Worksheet.8

Substantiation Documents

MRS instructions state that taxpayers “must provide a copy of your individual federal Form 6765 and any other documentation supporting the claim for this credit”.8 Key documents that should be maintained in the “R&D Tax Credit Defense File” include:

• Project Lists: A comprehensive list of all projects for which wages were claimed, mapped against the four-part test.16
• Wage Logs: Box 1 W-2 reports reconciled against project time allocations.4
• Technical Evidence: Lab notes, CAD drawings, prototypes, and testing results that substantiate the “process of experimentation”.16
• Contract Agreements: For contract research, documentation proving the research was conducted in Maine and that the taxpayer retained the “substantial rights” to the research results.3

Future Outlook: Legislative Adjustments and Federal Conformity

The landscape of the Maine R&D tax credit is currently in a state of flux due to both state-level policy debates and federal tax law volatility. The 131st and 132nd Maine Legislatures have seen multiple proposals to expand the credit to better serve small businesses and high-growth startups.3

The Move Toward Higher Incentive Rates

The OPEGA evaluation highlighted that Maine’s 5% incremental rate is on the lower end compared to some peer states.2 This has spurred interest in LD 308 and LD 643, which proposed doubling the credit rates.3 While these specific bills faced fiscal challenges, the underlying momentum suggests a long-term shift toward more aggressive R&D incentives to reverse Maine’s lackluster innovation performance.2

Federal Conformity and the OBBBA

On July 4, 2025, the federal government enacted the OBBBA, which introduced changes affecting the 2025 tax year.25 Maine Revenue Services issued a report on conformity, determining that the State Tax Assessor would temporarily adjust the administration of Maine’s tax laws to align with federal intent for the 2025 filing season.25 This provides critical stability for businesses, ensuring that “qualified research” defined in 2024 remains consistent as they plan their 2025 innovation budgets.25

Conclusion

The Research Expense Tax Credit, as established under 36 M.R.S. § 5219-K, remains a vital tool for Maine-based enterprises seeking to leverage technological innovation for growth. At the heart of this credit are “wages for qualified services”—a labor-centric incentive that subsidizes the high cost of engineering, scientific, and technical expertise within the state. While the 5% incremental credit requires consistent growth in R&D spending to be fully utilized, its close alignment with federal IRC Section 41 standards provides a familiar and reliable framework for tax practitioners.

For businesses, the primary challenge lies in the dual burden of proving both the technical validity of their research and its strict geographic nexus to Maine. However, with robust documentation and a clear understanding of Maine Revenue Services’ administrative guidelines—including the 80% rule and the 15-year carryforward provisions—taxpayers can significantly reduce their effective tax rate while contributing to the state’s economic resilience. As the Maine Legislature continues to weigh the fiscal cost of the credit against its long-term benefits for job creation, the Research Expense Tax Credit stands as a testament to the state’s commitment to anchoring the high-wage, high-skill industries of the future.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/