Assessing the Technological in Nature Standard within the Maryland Research and Development Tax Credit Framework
The technological in nature standard requires that research activities fundamentally rely on the principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science. Under Maryland law, this criterion serves as the essential technical gateway that distinguishes qualifying scientific innovation from routine business activities or aesthetic design.
The Theoretical Underpinnings of the Technological in Nature Requirement
The concept of being technological in nature is one of the four pillars of the “Four-Part Test” used to determine eligibility for the Research and Development (R&D) tax credit. Maryland has explicitly adopted the federal definitions of qualified research and qualified research expenses as articulated in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).1 This alignment ensures that the state’s fiscal incentives are targeted toward the same high-standard scientific endeavors recognized at the national level. To be considered technological in nature, the information sought to be discovered must be grounded in the “hard sciences”.3 This excludes research in the social sciences, such as economics, psychology, or management, as well as aesthetic design or market-driven product modifications.5
The Maryland Department of Commerce and the Comptroller of Maryland apply this test to ensure that the credit fosters genuine technical advancement within the state.7 The requirement is not merely that a company uses technology, but that the process used to solve a problem is itself scientific. For instance, using a complex software program to manage payroll is not R&D, but developing a new algorithm to enhance the encryption or processing speed of that software is technological in nature because it relies on computer science.5 This distinction is critical for businesses operating in Maryland’s diverse economy, which includes significant clusters in biotechnology, aerospace, and information technology.10
The standard focuses on the “process” rather than the “outcome.” A project does not need to be successful to qualify for the credit; the intent is to incentivize the attempt to overcome technical barriers.3 This “effort-based” approach recognizes that scientific discovery is inherently uncertain and that the risks associated with such uncertainty should be mitigated through tax policy.13 Furthermore, the taxpayer may rely on existing scientific principles to achieve a new result; there is no requirement that the researcher discovers a new law of physics, only that they apply existing laws to resolve a design or method uncertainty.12
The Four-Part Test: A Multi-Dimensional Framework
The technological in nature test does not exist in a vacuum but is part of a holistic four-part evaluation. Each part must be satisfied for an activity to be deemed “Qualified Research” under Maryland Tax-General § 10-721.2
The Permitted Purpose Test
The first part of the framework, often called the Business Component Test, requires that the research be undertaken to develop a new or improved business component.3 A business component can be a product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention that is held for sale, lease, or license, or used by the taxpayer in their trade or business.5 The purpose of the activity must be to improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of that component.5 If the goal is merely to change the appearance of a product or to conduct a market survey, it fails this initial test.5
The Elimination of Uncertainty Test
For an activity to qualify, the taxpayer must face a technical uncertainty at the outset of the project.13 This uncertainty exists if the information available to the taxpayer does not establish the capability or method for developing or improving the business component, or the appropriate design of the component.5 It is important to distinguish technical uncertainty from business uncertainty; not knowing if a product will sell is a business risk, whereas not knowing if a material can withstand a certain temperature is a technical uncertainty.13
The Process of Experimentation Test
The third requirement is that substantially all of the activities must constitute a process of experimentation.8 This involves a systematic evaluation of one or more alternatives to achieve a result where the capability, method, or design is uncertain.8 This process typically involves a cycle of hypothesis formulation, testing, and refinement, which may include modeling, simulation, or trial-and-error methodologies.5
The Technological in Nature Test
Finally, the process of experimentation must fundamentally rely on the hard sciences.8 This is the core requirement that anchors the research in the physical world of engineering, biology, or computer science.5 The following table outlines how different scientific disciplines satisfy this requirement in practical Maryland industries.
| Discipline | Underlying Scientific Principles | Industry Application |
| Engineering | Statics, dynamics, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics. | Designing high-tolerance aerospace alloys or custom tooling.5 |
| Biological Sciences | Molecular biology, genetics, biochemistry, pharmacology. | Gene therapy research or developing new drug delivery methods.5 |
| Computer Science | Algorithm design, data structures, network architecture. | Developing AI-driven cybersecurity or enhancing database processing.5 |
| Physical Sciences | Material science, organic chemistry, physics. | Formulating resorbable polymers for medical implants.8 |
Maryland Statutory Context and Administrative Guidance
The Maryland Research and Development Tax Credit program is administered primarily by the Maryland Department of Commerce, in close consultation with the Comptroller of Maryland.1 The program was enacted in 2000 to foster a vibrant innovation economy.7 Under Tax-General § 10-721, Maryland offers two types of credits: the “Basic” credit and the “Growth” credit.8
Basic and Growth Credit Mechanics
The Basic R&D Tax Credit is calculated at 3% of eligible R&D expenses that do not exceed the Maryland Base Amount.8 The Maryland Base Amount is typically the average of the firm’s R&D expenses over the preceding four years.1 The Growth R&D Tax Credit is calculated at 10% of eligible expenses that exceed this base amount.1
| Credit Type | Statutory Rate | Threshold |
| Basic Credit | 3% | Expenses $\leq$ Maryland Base Amount.8 |
| Growth Credit | 10% | Expenses $>$ Maryland Base Amount.8 |
One of the most critical aspects of the Maryland program is the statutory annual cap.1 Currently, the total amount of credits approved for all businesses in the state may not exceed $12 million per year.1 If the total applications exceed this limit—which occurs nearly every year—the Department of Commerce is required to prorate the credits.1
Proration and Effective Rates
The proration of the Maryland credit can significantly reduce the actual benefit received by a company. For example, in 2019, the basic credit was 8.78 times oversubscribed, reducing the effective rate from 3% to 0.26%.7 The growth credit was 11.85 times oversubscribed, dropping the effective rate from 10% to 1.18%.7 This oversubscription means that even if a business satisfies the technological in nature test and other requirements, the fiscal impact may be lower than anticipated.7
Revenue Office Guidance on Small Businesses
Maryland provides special benefits for small businesses, which are defined as entities with net book value assets totaling less than $5 million at the beginning or end of the tax year.1 For these entities, the R&D credit is refundable.1 This means that if the certified credit exceeds the firm’s state income tax liability, the business can claim a refund for the excess.10
The Department of Commerce requires small businesses to submit documentation, such as a balance sheet, to prove their asset levels.1 The term “net book value assets” includes all assets, including intangibles, minus depreciation and amortization, but without subtracting liabilities.2 This specific definition is crucial for compliance; many startups may be cash-poor but have high asset values due to intellectual property or capitalization, potentially pushing them out of the “small business” category.10
Local Application of Guidance and Regulatory Requirements
The Comptroller of Maryland provides several Administrative Releases and Tax Tips that refine how the R&D credit intersects with other tax obligations. For instance, Administrative Release 34 provides guidance for tax-exempt organizations to claim business credits against employer withholding taxes.25 This is particularly relevant for research-heavy nonprofits or university-affiliated labs that may conduct qualified research.26
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions (Tax Tip #9)
A significant but often overlooked piece of state guidance is Business Tax Tip #9, which discusses sales and use tax exemptions for production activities.6 While this is a separate tax from the income tax-based R&D credit, the definition of “Research and Development” in this context is remarkably similar.6 The Tip defines R&D as “basic and applied research in the sciences and engineering, and the design, development, and governmentally mandated pre-market testing of prototypes, products, and processes”.6 This guidance confirms that Maryland’s revenue office views “technological” as inherently tied to “sciences and engineering,” explicitly excluding non-technical activities like market research or routine product testing.6
The Role of Pass-Through Entities (Administrative Release #6)
Administrative Release #6 provides the framework for how pass-through entities (PTEs)—such as LLCs and S-Corps—claim the credit.28 PTEs must complete Form 500CR and submit it with their Form 510 or 511 returns.25 The credit is then passed through to the individual members or partners based on their distributive share of ownership.10 This mechanism is vital for many Maryland startups and professional engineering firms that are structured as PTEs.8
Case Study: Analyzing the Technological Standard in Practice
To illustrate the application of the technological in nature test, we can examine a successful software development example versus an unsuccessful engineering case.
Example 1: Successful Software Innovation (IVO Tech)
IVO Tech is a software company that developed innovative features to improve processing speeds and storage efficiency.8 Their activities included:
- Experimenting with possible code fixes to resolve storage exposure.8
- Executing systematic test cases to eliminate uncertainty before customer release.8
- Developing new algorithms to meet changing consumer performance preferences.8
These activities satisfy the technological in nature test because the process of experimentation fundamentally relied on the principles of computer science.8 The firm maintained a robust “Innovation Log” and detailed labor time sheets to document the nexus between their costs and the technical experimentation.8
Example 2: The Failure of Routine Engineering (Phoenix Design Group)
In contrast, the U.S. Tax Court case Phoenix Design Group, Inc. v. Commissioner (2024) provides a cautionary tale.18 An engineering firm sought credits for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEPF) design work for hospitals.18 The court denied the credits because:
- The activities were considered routine engineering or code compliance, rather than innovative research.18
- The firm failed to show “objective technical uncertainty,” relying instead on standard calculations and historical data.18
- The firm’s “six-stage design process” was not considered a systematic process of experimentation because the activity logs did not align with the experimental intent.18
This case demonstrates that merely being an engineering firm does not satisfy the technological in nature requirement. One must prove that the work involved applying engineering principles to solve a specific, non-routine technical uncertainty.18
Documentation and Compliance: The “Nexus” Requirement
The most common reason for credit disallowance in Maryland is a lack of documentation.10 The state revenue office requires a “nexus” between the qualified research expenses (QREs) and the qualifying activities.13
Necessary Technical Documentation
Taxpayers should maintain records that prove the technological nature of their research contemporaneously. This means documenting the work as it happens, rather than recreating it years later during an audit.10
| Document Type | Purpose | Key Details to Include |
| Project Plans | Define scope and uncertainty. | Specific technical objectives and initial design constraints.3 |
| Laboratory Notebooks | Record experimentation. | Hypotheses tested, trial results, and analysis of failures.3 |
| Design Specs/Schematics | Prove engineering reliance. | Calculations, drawings, and revisions based on testing.8 |
| Innovation Logs | Trace the timeline. | Daily or weekly notes on technical hurdles encountered.8 |
Financial and Payroll Nexus
Because wages represent the largest portion of most R&D claims, payroll records must be linked to specific projects.12 Maryland follows federal guidelines that allow for the inclusion of wages for those performing, directly supervising, or directly supporting qualified research.3 However, if an executive’s time is claimed, there must be proof of their direct involvement in the technical experimentation.33
Recent Findings and the Future of the Credit
The 2024 evaluation of the R&D tax credit by the Department of Legislative Services (DLS) has introduced significant debate regarding the program’s effectiveness.22
Criticisms of the Current System
The DLS report highlighted that the program provides “modest benefit to most participants” due to proration.22 It noted that the credit often acts as a “windfall” for activities that would have occurred anyway, particularly for large pharmaceutical manufacturers who remain the primary beneficiaries.22 Furthermore, the DLS found that the participation rate has declined, and many small businesses are underutilizing the refundable portion of the credit.22
The OBBBA and Section 174 Capitalization
Recent federal changes under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and the subsequent “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) have altered the landscape for R&D.13 For tax years starting after 2021, firms were required to capitalize and amortize R&D expenses over five years rather than deducting them immediately.13 The OBBBA has sought to restore full expensing for domestic R&D, which would provide immediate tax relief and encourage more Maryland-based research.13
Industry Perspectives: The Manufacturing 4.0 Push
The Maryland Manufacturing Advisory Board (MMAB) has advocated for stronger state-specific R&D incentives.38 They argue that the capitalization requirements have reduced the immediate value of the credit, making it harder for small and mid-size manufacturers to modernize.38 They recommend increasing state grants and credits to foster “Manufacturing 4.0″—the adoption of new technologies like AI and robotics in production.38
Conclusion: Strategic Implications for Maryland Innovators
The technological in nature standard remains the defining boundary of the Maryland Research and Development Tax Credit. For businesses to successfully claim this incentive, they must navigate a complex regulatory environment that demands rigorous scientific rigor and meticulous record-keeping. While the program’s future is subject to legislative debate—with some calling for its termination and others for its expansion—it remains a vital tool for Maryland’s high-tech and life science sectors.
Ultimately, the credit is a reward for technical risk-taking. By grounding their activities in the hard sciences and clearly documenting the path from uncertainty to discovery, Maryland companies can secure essential capital to fuel their next generation of innovation. Successful applicants will be those who treat the Four-Part Test not as a compliance hurdle, but as a roadmap for engineering and scientific excellence. Whether a firm is developing resorbable medical devices or AI-driven software, the core of the claim must remain steadfastly technological in nature. This focus ensures that Maryland continues to be a destination for the world’s most challenging and potentially transformative research and development efforts.
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
Choose your state
