The Integration of S-Corporation Tax Structures with the New Hampshire Research and Development Tax Credit: A Comprehensive Analysis of Entity-Level Innovation Incentives

The New Hampshire Research and Development Tax Credit is a nonrefundable incentive allowing business organizations to offset up to ten percent of qualified manufacturing wages against state business taxes. For entities structured as S-Corporations, this credit is applied strictly at the entity level to reduce Business Profits Tax and Business Enterprise Tax liabilities rather than passing through to individual shareholders.

The Foundation of New Hampshire Business Taxation and the Role of the S-Corporation

The landscape of business taxation in New Hampshire is characterized by a unique dual-tax framework that distinguishes the state from its federal counterparts and neighboring New England jurisdictions. This system is composed of the Business Profits Tax (BPT), established under RSA 77-A, and the Business Enterprise Tax (BET), established under RSA 77-E.1 To understand how the Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit applies to an S-Corporation, one must first recognize that New Hampshire does not conform to the federal treatment of S-Corporations as pass-through entities for the purpose of business income taxation.3 In the federal system, an S-Corporation election under Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code allows profits, losses, and credits to flow through to shareholders, who then report these items on their individual income tax returns.5 However, the New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration (DRA) treats S-Corporations as separate taxable business organizations, meaning the entity itself is responsible for filing returns and paying taxes on its apportioned business profits and enterprise value base.3

The Business Profits Tax is assessed on the income generated from conducting business activity within the state, currently at a rate of 7.5% for taxable periods ending on or after December 31, 2023.2 For an S-Corporation, the starting point for determining taxable business profits is the “Gross Business Profits” calculation, which incorporates flow-through items from Federal Schedule K as if the entity were a C-Corporation.4 This ensures that all components of the S-Corporation’s economic activity are captured at the corporate level before being subjected to the state’s apportionment formulas. Concurrently, the Business Enterprise Tax is imposed at a rate of 0.55% on the enterprise value tax base, which includes the sum of all compensation, interest, and dividends paid or accrued by the business.2 The interplay between these two taxes is governed by a credit mechanism where the BET paid is allowed as a credit against the BPT liability.2 Within this complex environment, the R&D Tax Credit serves as a critical fiscal tool, specifically designed to incentivize the manufacturing sector by providing a dollar-for-dollar reduction in these entity-level taxes.7

Statutory Origins and the Evolution of RSA 77-A:5, XIII

The New Hampshire Research and Development Tax Credit was formally established in 2007 through the enactment of Senate Bill 134, which added paragraph XIII to RSA 77-A:5.10 The legislative intent was to create a permanent incentive that would bolster the state’s manufacturing base and encourage high-wage employment within technological sectors.10 From its inception, the credit was designed to be restrictive in scope but powerful in its targeted impact, focusing exclusively on qualified manufacturing research and development expenditures.1 The statute defines these expenditures as wages paid or incurred for services rendered within the state, provided those services are undertaken to discover information that constitutes research and development for a new or improved manufacturing process or business component.1

Over the nearly two decades since its introduction, the program has undergone significant expansions in its funding capacity. Initially, the legislature capped the total aggregate of tax credits issued to all taxpayers at $1,000,000 per fiscal year.10 As the program gained popularity among small and mid-sized manufacturers, the demand consistently outpaced available funds, leading to successive legislative increases. In 2013, Senate Bill 1 raised the annual limit to $2,000,000, and more recently, in 2017, House Bill 2 increased the cap to its current level of $7,000,000.10 Despite these increases, the program remains oversubscribed, a trend that underscores the importance of the proration mechanism defined in the law. This mechanism ensures that if the total credits applied for in a given year exceed the $7,000,000 pool, every taxpayer’s awarded credit is reduced proportionally, maintaining the fiscal integrity of the state’s budget while still providing widespread support to the innovation community.7

The Meaning of S-Corporation in the Context of Innovation Credits

For an S-Corporation operating in New Hampshire, the designation “S-Corp” is essentially a federal tax election that the state chooses to disregard in favor of its own entity-level taxation.3 This distinction is the most critical factor in determining how the R&D credit is realized. While many states allow the R&D credit to pass through to the personal income tax returns of the S-Corporation’s owners, New Hampshire mandates that the credit must be used to offset the entity’s BPT and BET liabilities.7 Consequently, an S-Corporation shareholder will not see an “R&D Credit” line item on their New Hampshire personal tax return, nor will they receive a personal tax refund based on the company’s research activities.6 Instead, the benefit is realized within the corporation’s own financial statements, where a reduced state tax liability increases the net income available for reinvestment or distribution to shareholders.3

The DRA provides specific administrative guidance for S-Corporations to ensure that their research activities are properly captured for tax purposes. S-Corporations are required to file Form DP-120, “Computation of S-Corporation Gross Business Profits,” which serves as the bridge between federal reporting and state tax liability.16 This form ensures that the entity’s profits are correctly stated before the R&D credit is applied. Furthermore, the S-Corporation must file Form DP-9, the “Small Business Corporations (S-Corp) Information Report,” which provides the DRA with a comprehensive overview of the entity’s structure and ownership.16 In the context of the R&D credit, these forms work in tandem with Form DP-165, the credit application, and Form DP-160, the schedule of credits, to create a transparent audit trail of innovation-related expenditures.10

Qualified Manufacturing Research and Development: The Wage Requirement

A defining characteristic of the New Hampshire R&D Tax Credit, as specified in RSA 77-A:5, XIII(b), is its strict limitation to wages.1 While the federal R&D credit under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code allows taxpayers to include the costs of supplies, prototype materials, computer rental costs for cloud computing, and a portion of contract research expenses, New Hampshire explicitly excludes these categories.1 The state’s focus is narrowly tailored to support the creation and retention of high-value manufacturing jobs within the Granite State.7 Therefore, for an S-Corporation to claim the credit, it must demonstrate that the expenditures were “wages paid or incurred to an employee of the business organization for services rendered by such employee within this state”.1

The services rendered must meet a triple-pronged criteria to be considered “qualified manufacturing research and development expenditures.” First, the wages must be treated as qualified research expenses under Section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code.1 Second, the research must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information that constitutes research and development of a new or improved manufacturing process or business component.1 Finally, the wages must be reported in the enterprise value tax base under RSA 77-E, meaning they were subject to the Business Enterprise Tax.1 This link between the BET and the R&D credit is fundamental; it ensures that the state only provides a credit for labor that has already contributed to the state’s tax base through the compensation element of the BET.1

The Determination of the Base Amount and the 50% Floor Exclusion

The calculation of the R&D Tax Credit in New Hampshire follows a specific mathematical model: the credit is equal to 10% of the “excess” of qualified manufacturing research and development expenses over a “base amount”.1 While New Hampshire adopts the federal definition of the base amount, it provides a critical and highly beneficial exception for state-level taxpayers. Under federal rules, the base amount is subject to a “minimum” or a “floor,” which states that the base amount can never be less than 50% of the current year’s qualified research expenses.7 This federal floor effectively limits the credit to only half of the current year’s spending, even for companies that are significantly increasing their R&D investments.

New Hampshire, however, explicitly permits the base amount to be as low as zero.7 By removing the 50% floor, the state allows businesses—particularly startups or those establishing new manufacturing lines—to claim a credit on their entire wage expenditure in years where they have little to no historical R&D spending.7 For an S-Corporation that has recently transitioned into a new technological manufacturing field, this can result in a state credit that is significantly more robust relative to the current year’s spending than the federal equivalent.7 The base amount calculation typically utilizes the taxpayer’s historical ratio of qualified research expenses to gross receipts, and New Hampshire permits the use of total taxpayer gross receipts without requiring state-specific adjustments for the denominator of the fixed-base percentage.7

Detailed Analysis of the Application and Award Process

The administration of the R&D Tax Credit by the Department of Revenue Administration is governed by a strict calendar that all S-Corporations must observe. The process begins with the filing of Form DP-165, the “Research & Development Tax Credit Application”.10 This application must be postmarked or submitted via the Granite Tax Connect (GTC) portal no later than June 30 following the taxable period in which the expenditures were made.7 A common point of administrative failure for S-Corporations occurs when they rely on their tax filing extensions; while the S-Corporation’s tax return (Form 1120-S) might not be due until September 15, the application for the R&D credit remains firmly anchored to the June 30 deadline.11

The DRA requires that a copy of Federal Form 6765, “Credit for Increasing Research Activities,” be attached to the DP-165.11 In instances where the federal return has not yet been finalized due to an extension, the taxpayer must submit a pro-forma or draft copy of Form 6765.11 Failure to include this documentation will result in the rejection of the application as incomplete.11 Once the June 30 deadline passes, the DRA enters a three-month evaluation period. By July 31, the Department sends acknowledgment letters to all applicants, and by September 30, it issues formal Award Letters specifying the exact credit amount granted to each business.1

The Mechanics of the $50,000 Per-Taxpayer Cap and Proportional Reduction

While the 10% calculation provides a theoretical maximum for the credit, the state imposes a “hard cap” of $50,000 per fiscal year for any individual business organization.7 This cap ensures that the program’s benefits are distributed across a broad base of manufacturers rather than being consumed by a few large-scale enterprises.7 For an S-Corporation, this cap applies to the entity as a whole. In cases of “unitary businesses”—groups of related entities with integrated operations and common ownership—the entire group is treated as a “single taxpayer,” and the $50,000 limit applies to the aggregate of the group’s manufacturing activities.1

The second major constraint is the $7,000,000 aggregate pool.7 Because the R&D credit is one of the state’s most popular incentives, the total amount of credits requested by all New Hampshire businesses often exceeds this statutory limit.7 To manage this, the Commissioner of the DRA is empowered to perform a proportional reduction of all awards.7 For example, if the state receives valid applications totaling $14,000,000 in credits, each individual award would be reduced by 50%, meaning an S-Corporation that qualified for the full $50,000 would only receive an award of $25,000.7 This proration is a critical variable in corporate budgeting, as the final value of the credit remains unknown to the taxpayer until the September 30 notification.7

Illustrative Example: Precision Machining S-Corporation (Nashua, NH)

To clarify the practical interaction of these rules, consider an S-Corporation named “Granite Aero-Components, Inc.,” located in Nashua. The company specializes in high-precision components for the aerospace industry and maintains a dedicated R&D lab for improving its multi-axis milling processes.

Phase 1: Expenditure Analysis

During the 2024 fiscal year, Granite Aero-Components incurs the following costs:

• Wages for 4 NH-based research engineers: $450,000.
• Materials for experimental prototypes: $75,000.
• Contract testing with a laboratory in Massachusetts: $50,000.
• Total Federal QREs: $575,000.

Under New Hampshire’s strict wage-only rule, the company’s “qualified manufacturing research and development expenditures” are limited to the $450,000 in NH-based wages.1

Phase 2: Base Amount Calculation

The company has been in business for 10 years and has an average gross receipts figure of $4,000,000 over the prior four years. Its fixed-base percentage is determined to be 5%.

• NH Base Amount: $4,000,000 \times 0.05 = $200,000.
• Unlike the federal calculation, no 50% floor of $225,000 ($450,000 \times 0.50$) is applied.7

Phase 3: Tentative Credit Determination

• Excess Expenditures: $450,000 – $200,000 = $250,000.
• Tentative Credit: $250,000 \times 0.10 = $25,000.
• Because $25,000 is less than the $50,000 taxpayer cap, the company applies for $25,000 on Form DP-165.1

Phase 4: Proration and Final Award

In September, the DRA announces that due to high demand, all credits will be prorated by 80%.

• Final Awarded Credit: $25,000 \times 0.80 = $20,000.

The company receives its Award Letter and will use this $20,000 to offset its BPT and BET liabilities on its next state tax return.9

The Priority of Credit Application and the Concept of Non-Cascading Credits

Once an S-Corporation receives its Award Letter, the utilization of the credit follows a specific hierarchical order mandated by the DRA. The credit must first be applied against the Business Profits Tax liability.7 If the BPT liability is completely eliminated and a portion of the credit remains, that balance can then be applied against the Business Enterprise Tax liability.7 This priority ensures that the state’s primary income tax is addressed before the value-added enterprise tax.

Furthermore, it is essential for S-Corporations to understand that the R&D Tax Credit is “non-cascading”.22 In New Hampshire, a “cascading” credit is one where the amount of credit used to offset the BET is also considered “BET paid” for the purposes of the credit allowed against the BPT under RSA 77-A:5, X.22 For example, the Community Development Finance Authority (CDFA) credit is cascading; if an S-Corp uses it to pay its BET, the state still views that BET as “paid” and allows it to be used as a credit against the BPT.22 The R&D credit does not share this status. Any portion of the R&D credit used to offset the BET does not count as “BET paid” and cannot be recycled to reduce the BPT.22 This prevents a “double-dipping” effect where a single innovation credit would effectively offset two different tax streams twice over.

Carryforward Provisions and Strategic Long-Term Planning

The R&D Tax Credit is nonrefundable, meaning that if an S-Corporation’s total tax liability is less than the credit awarded, the state will not issue a refund check for the difference.7 However, the law provides a generous carryforward provision. Any unused portion of the credit may be carried forward and used to offset the taxpayer’s tax liability within the subsequent five tax years following the taxable period in which the expenditures occurred.1 This carryforward mechanism is particularly valuable for S-Corporations that may experience cyclical profitability or are in a “loss position” during years of heavy R&D investment.

Strategic long-term planning for an S-Corporation involves projecting future BPT and BET liabilities to ensure that the R&D credits do not expire unused. For instance, if an S-Corporation expects a significant increase in its enterprise value tax base (due to rising interest payments or dividends) in year three, it can strategically accumulate R&D credits from years one and two to shield that future liability.2 It is also worth noting that the carryforward remains at the entity level; if the S-Corporation is sold or undergoes a structural change, the availability of these carryforwards will be subject to the DRA’s rules on the succession of tax attributes.3

Local Revenue Office Guidance: The Role of Technical Information Releases (TIRs)

The New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration communicates its official policy positions and interpretations of the law through Technical Information Releases (TIRs).13 These documents are essential reading for any S-Corporation seeking to maintain compliance with the R&D credit program.

TIR 2007-007 provided the foundational guidance upon the program’s enactment, detailing the definition of “qualified manufacturing research and development” and clarifying the attribution of wages to New Hampshire.13 It established the precedent that wages must make up lines 5, 24, or 49 of the federal Form 6765 to be eligible.13 Subsequent releases, such as TIR 2013-001 and TIR 2015-005, documented the legislative increases to the funding cap and provided updated instructions on the proration process.10 The DRA’s guidance emphasizes that the R&D credit is a privilege, not a right, and that strict adherence to documentation and filing requirements is the only way to secure an award.7

For an S-Corporation, the “Local Revenue Office Guidance” also includes the instructions for the “Schedule of Credits” (Form DP-160). This schedule acts as the final accounting for all credits used during the tax period and requires the S-Corporation to break down the application of the R&D credit between its BPT and BET returns.16 The DRA explicitly instructs that Form DP-160 should only be used if the business has credits available in addition to the standard BET credit, reinforcing the R&D credit’s role as a secondary, specialized incentive.19

The Impact of Unitary Business Rules and Combined Reporting

New Hampshire requires organizations operating a “unitary business” to use combined reporting for their business tax returns.2 A unitary business is characterized by a group of related entities that exhibit a unity of ownership, operation, and use.4 For S-Corporations that are part of such a group, the R&D Tax Credit takes on a more complex dimension. The group is considered a single taxpayer for the purposes of the credit, meaning that R&D activities conducted by an S-Corp subsidiary in Portsmouth can be used to offset the tax liability generated by a sales-focused LLC member in Concord, provided they are part of the same unitary group.1

The DRA requires combined filers to use Form DP-160-WE (Schedule of BPT Credits for Combined Groups).29 This form necessitates a detailed calculation to determine the individual member’s portion of the total tax liability based on their activity inside New Hampshire.29 A significant insight for combined filers is that the $50,000 cap applies to the entire group, not each individual entity.1 This prevents businesses from splintering into multiple smaller S-Corporations to bypass the taxpayer limit.7

Statistical Insights: Program Utilization and Industry Trends (2020-2024)

The DRA’s annual Tax Expenditure and Potential Liability Reports offer a wealth of data regarding the effectiveness and popularity of the R&D Tax Credit. These statistics reveal a robust and growing demand for the program, particularly within the manufacturing and life sciences sectors.21

The jump in the number of taxpayers from 214 in FY 2023 to 271 in FY 2024 represents a 26.6% increase in participation.22 This surge suggests that more S-Corporations and small businesses are successfully navigating the complex application process and identifying qualified NH-based wages. However, the total award amount remains below the $7,000,000 cap in some years not because of a lack of demand, but often due to the rigorous auditing and rejection of ineligible non-wage or non-manufacturing expenditures by the DRA.7

The life sciences sector has emerged as a primary driver of R&D activity in the state. According to industry reports, life sciences contribute roughly $2.8 billion to New Hampshire’s GDP and employ over 11,000 people in high-paying roles.21 Many of these firms are structured as S-Corporations to provide founders with flexibility and to avoid the double-taxation associated with C-Corporations at the federal level.5 For these entities, the New Hampshire R&D credit is often the most significant state-level tax planning tool at their disposal.21

Future Outlook: The Legislative Trajectory of SB 276

The future of the R&D Tax Credit in New Hampshire is currently at a legislative crossroads. Senate Bill 276 (2025) was introduced with the express purpose of modernizing the credit to keep pace with inflation and regional competition.14 The bill proposed two major changes: increasing the aggregate statewide cap from $7,000,000 to $10,000,000, and doubling the individual taxpayer cap from $50,000 to $100,000.14

Proponents of the bill, including the industry group NH Life Sciences, argued that the current $50,000 limit is “too low to be competitive” and that the frequent proration of awards—sometimes by as much as $4,000,000—discourages companies from fully investing in new NH-based facilities.21 The DRA’s fiscal note on the bill projected that the expansion would decrease state business tax revenue by approximately $3,000,000 per year but noted that the administrative costs for updating the forms and systems would be minimal and could be absorbed into the existing budget.14

However, the bill was ultimately Tabled in the Senate in early 2025 and subsequently marked as “Inexpedient to Legislate”.33 This legislative stall indicates a cautious approach by the state government regarding revenue decreases, especially as other taxes like the Interest and Dividends tax continue to be phased out.6 For S-Corporations, this means that for the foreseeable future, tax planning must remain centered on the existing $50,000 and $7,000,000 limits.15

Conclusion: Strategic Recommendations for S-Corporation Stakeholders

The New Hampshire Research and Development Tax Credit represents a powerful, albeit narrow, incentive for the state’s manufacturing core. For S-Corporations, the key to success lies in acknowledging the state’s entity-level tax philosophy and meticulously aligning their internal payroll tracking with the requirements of RSA 77-A:5, XIII. The “meaning” of the S-Corporation in this context is that of a primary taxpayer; the entity must stand on its own to prove the innovation occurred, the wages were paid in New Hampshire, and the manufacturing nexus is solid.

To maximize the benefit of this credit, S-Corporation executives should implement a robust compliance framework. This includes ensuring that Form DP-165 is filed by the June 30 deadline regardless of income tax extensions, maintaining contemporaneous documentation of research projects to satisfy potential DRA audits, and coordinating the R&D credit with other incentives like the ERZTC to avoid prohibited wage duplication. By viewing the R&D credit as a long-term strategic asset that can be carried forward through periods of growth, New Hampshire S-Corporations can significantly lower their effective tax rate and reinvest those savings into the next generation of manufacturing excellence within the Granite State.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/